Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If one dose not play one
can not win. Go for it C H!!!!!!!!!
<P align=center><B>VOTING SHARES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF </B></P> <P align=justify>The Corporation is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares without par value, of which 200,531,855 are issued and outstanding on May 18, 2012 (the record date). The Corporation is also authorized to issue an unlimited number of Class A preferred shares without par value, of which none have been issued. The Board of Directors has fixed May 18, 2012 as the record date for Shareholders of the Corporation who are listed on its Register of Shareholders to be entitled to receive notice of and to attend and vote at the Meeting or any adjournment of the Meeting. The holders of common shares entitled to vote at the Meeting are entitled to one vote for each common share held as at the record date. </P> <P align=justify>The following table sets forth the ownership of the Corporations shares by those parties which, to the knowledge of management, owned ten percent (10%) or more of the outstanding common shares of the Corporation as at May 18, 2012:</P>
align=justify>The Corporations principal objective for 2011/2012 is to bring the Corporations Copperstone Mine into profitable commercial production. The compensation program for the CEO was re-structured in March, 2011 to reward him for achieving that goal. The following milestones were set for the CEO for 2011/2012: </P>
P align=justify>$100,000 bonus was granted and be payable on the date of receipt of the remaining major Copperstone operating permit (the ADEQ Aquifer Protection Permit). This milestone was achieved and the bonus was paid in April, 2011 to the CEO.</P></TD></TR>
P align=justify>$100,000 bonus will be granted at the beginning of profitable commercial production at Copperstone.</P></TD></TR></TABLE> <P align=justify><U>Equity Participation</U> </P> <P align=justify>The Corporation believes that encouraging its executives and employees to become shareholders is the best way of aligning their interests with those of its Shareholders.
OK I seen this happen befor
It was RMTD that did a 15
and we sharholder got ZIP
The CO. took all the assets
and gave them to another co.
And we got ZIP
Just bring up RMTD stock and you will see what
is coming. I can not beleve how they can
keep doing this to people thak all there money
and leve theme hanging.
Ho got the $$$
when scottrade sold me my shares!!!!
M G did have something
going in New Guinean and I think it was big.
So this may open the door for M G to do some thing.
so he may of had a good up and coming CO. in the works.
I would like to thank CarltonH for
the hard work he is doing.
And for M G keeping up the good fight to.
One thing people just do not under stand
a true Brit when it comes to sticking up
for one self when they are right.
Brit,s have staying power and a lot of grit
As some are finding out. So keep up the
good fight M G and make who ever did this
to you M Gs and us Shareholders pay and
do the right thing.
GO BCIT
The way I look at this
Is like I paid for a car and took it home.
And they let me drive it for a little bit and then said O we think
there may be some thing wrong with the car. So put in you garage
and we will put a lock on it so you can not drive it..
And then after 4 or 5 years come back and say we are coming to get
the car because we can’t find out what went wrong whit the car.
O you can’t have you money back it’s been to long and you did get to drive it
But I would like to sell the car I did
pay for, and get my
Money back and maybe a little more.
And how come you would the car back
Is it good for parts I think so.
I will just keep the car thanks.
OK so the DTCC has a temporary lock
that would mean no one can take BCTI symbol
or revoke the stock like a brocker. right.
If not why.
When the shareholder we sued by MG and I gave him my names
And responded to that suit. He must have my name. And the broker I use. Right
Thank you thank you!!!
Yes thats is it and only it thats
all I meed to no. Thank you
Hope so Thank you so much!!
I see i you post 136361
You say
When the shareholder meeting occured years ago inwhich I attended, Megas and companies whereabouts in PNG was mentioned in conversations following the meeting.
No fine details were talked about, but work was going on at that time.
Yes there was a shareholder metting but here is the twist
shareholders were told to come to the meeting but when sharholders got there
no one was let in the roome were the shareholder metting was being held. So you most been someone special to get in.
So can you tell me what I
am asking?
Please tell or show me
and how are you working for.
Are you getting paid by any one like
Scottrade or any hedge fund
or bank .
or third partner money mover for
any of the above. Or any lawyer of
The above.
I think when the new
SEC DTCC laws start on Oct 16
That is when some one will do
someting about what has been done
to us shareholders. There just may be
something in the Oct 16 Laws that will make
some one pay up or short cover and soon
after the Oct 16 SEC DTTC Laws come on line.
You no not what you talk about I
talk to scottarde and scottrade can not revok a symbol
only the DTC can and he said they will
not revok the BCIT symbol. And that the share holder
owne that symbol. And he said sharolder paid for that
symbol as dose M G s
And that is why it still show,s in my acount as BCIT
and how many shares i have.
So stop the B S
I think if a CO. moves to a higher exchange
The lest price per share that can be listed at is a $1.00
On the NAS @ $3.00 on the New York Exchange.
Am I right on that
Wish we'd just stay a penny stock and increase pps, so I could make some money. I have done the math. I have approx 3 mil share, if it gets to 10 cents my value is $300,000.00 After R/S I will have approx 80,000 shares if I understand it right, (3mil / 100 = 30,000 + 50,000 cause I am long time stock holder). Correct me if I am wrong. So then I will have 80,000 shares and even at $1 I only value at $80,000. This totally sucks. What did she say after R/S we would be about .01 pps? I have been a real supporter of Basu and felt she was the real deal. This is upsetting unless this things gets to $30 per share.
What is the cut off date for long term holder
I think this will be
all good for the long time holders
as I am one.I will be here for the big
bucks as we move up.Thank's to all the people at
PPJE that work SOOOOOOOOOO hard for all of us.
And a CEO that has here eye's on the prize for
all here hard worker's and us shareholders.
Thank you PPJE
Show us were she said that she
may do a R/S
She did say she was looking to buy back shares
whit the law sute money .
So why would she say the buy back.
At what price .0003 or .0002
Yes should be receiving something.
And it is time for me to Lawyer up.
I have had it being in the dark
for over a year. And RMTD tells us ZIP
about what is going on. Whit the 99 year patent.
RMTD at least should tells shareholsers
about that.
But then if no
One says they did any thing wrong.
And that case is closed for illegal or unethical activities
of individuals .
Will the sec pay don't think so.
But there is this
What Does Fair Funds for Investors Mean?
Provision introduced in 2002, under Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Fair Funds for Investors was put into place to benefit those investors who have lost money because of the illegal or unethical activities of individuals or companies that violate securities regulations. Essentially, this provision enabled the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to add civil money penalties to disgorgement funds for the relief of the victims of stock swindles. Investopedia explains Fair Funds for Investors
The SEC anticipates that fair funds will play an important role in encouraging investors to continue to place trust in U.S. stock markets. Fair funds are playing an increasing role in the SEC's enforcement of regulations, and they are particularly favored when investors who have lost money can be identified and their financial losses can be calculated. So far, however, these funds have paid out little of their value.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fairfundsforinvestors.asp
Yap and
then sec will only fine them
and no one will say they did any thing
wrong. And there insurance will just pay the bill.
And every thing will stay the same
And for the 99 year patents W/T is using
That for traveling + wining and dinging
Every one. So kiss that good buy to.
That is why I am doing what I am going to do.
Tuesday, March 22nd, 2011, 11:08 am
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined a Dallas-based financial advisory firm and barred a Florida investor for naked short selling.
Southwest Securities agreed to pay $650,000 to FINRA for deficiencies in its due diligence, risk assessment and supervisory procedures after FINRA found one of the company's correspondent firms improperly shorted a stock. Southwest Securities is broker-dealer unit of SWS Group Inc. (: ).
FINRA also expelled Cutler Securities from FINRA and barred the Florida firm's president, Glenn Cutler, for violating a rule stipulating short sale orders be designated as such. The regulator said Cutler was aware of the rule, but around July 2007 he "stopped marking his sell short orders as short and instead entered all his sell short orders as long sale orders."
Then in August 2009, Cutler Securities purchased 17.8 million shares of a stock and sold 20.3 million shares of the same stock. Southwest allowed the trades, despite receiving alerts, according to FINRA. Cutler wasn't able to meet the margin call on the 2.5 million share balance, leaving Southwest Securities with a $6.3 million debt, the regulator said.
"Southwest's systemic failures in overseeing its clearing services led to considerable financial losses for itself, and illustrates the risks that can be created by correspondent firms," FINRA Executive Vice President and Chief of Enforcement Brad Bennett said. "Southwest's failure to effectively monitor Cutler's reckless behavior jeopardized its ability to meet its obligations to its other correspondent firms and counterparties."
FINRA said Cutler Securities had its own "significant regulatory and supervisory deficiencies relating to its short sales, including a history of failing to comply" with regulations and emergency orders from the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Neither Southwest Securities nor Cutler admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to FINRA's findings as per the settlement agreement.
FINRA is an independent regulatory body comprised of members that oversee each other.
Apparently FINRA fines people for naked short selling:)
I thought NSS wasn't real, lol.
This may be my last
post.
I will be going to talk to a
Corporate sec Law attorney come Monday
He just may tell me to stop posting.
I a going after the people that are trying
to pull a fast one.
Thanks for posting what
RMTD must do to go dark and delist
from pink sheets.
From looking at all of what RMTD must
do to go dark + deregister and delist.
RMTD has not done all they should have
one only need to read the SEC Filings
they must do and RMTD did not do as the
SEC says most be done in a time line.
And RMTD did not even complete the prose's.
FOR it's workers + shareholders.
Every one need to read the SEC Law.
RMTD has let them open to a lawsuit
plane and simple.
By not completing all SEC filing's.
to go dark + deregister and delist
That the way I see it.
Please reed it for your self.
http://www.blankrome.com/index.cfm?contentID=37&itemID=2374
We need in put on this so please jump in on your thinking on rhis.
Go you think RMTD
did all this open this
http://www.blankrome.com/index.cfm?contentID=37&itemID=2374
Yes that is what I am saying and
That is why I am digging till I find out
if there is more them 40 or more
if a CO has 40 shareholders they must
file whit a stock exchange.
Why does it really matter
If RMTD said there were only 34 shareholder
like they said in there pink sheet filling to become a no
Reporting CO.
And there were rely more then 40 shareholder
That would be Froude on a pink sheet filing. And would of not let RMTD become a no reporting CO.
And we shareholders would have been on the in on ho got what
because they would of had to make it public
In there pink sheets filing's .
And we would of seen all the thing’s
that maid RMTD do what they did and why.
And I would like to no why they did what they did.
And why me as a shareholder may have lost my money
And were all the money went from RMTD.
+ I think that is my right as a shareholder.
I will not stop digging till I see how many shareholders
there were to let RMTD to become a no reporting CO.
And if I find what I think I will
sue and RMTD can count on that.
So how many shareholders
hold there shares in certificate.
They never said are there no one
holding certificate don't think so.
And I think there would be more then 6
Or do certificate shareholder not count?
And the shareholder count would not change from
2008 to 2010 that is hard to believe.
I am looking at
the number of shareholders more then the price.
It just dose not add up.
Shareholders of Record 34 a/o Mar 24, 2008
If they used the shareholders of
Record number 34 a/o Mar 24, 2008
So RMTD can be a pink sheet no reporting CO.
And why did RMTD do that.
By doing that they had the right not to tell
us shareholders Zip and get lost when it came
to hoo got what when it came to moving
everything to T/G
There is no way the same number can stay the same
from Mar 2008 tell 2010 when RMTD became a no
reporting CO.
I smell something and it's not fish.
were you get that from got
a link thanks
Is RMTD using the a/o Aug 07, 2008
on it delisting look WOW
RMTD Security Details
Share Structure
Market Value1 $187 a/o Mar 16, 2011
Shares Outstanding 1,872,888 a/o Aug 07, 2008
Float N/A
Authorized Shares N/A
Par Value 0.01
Shareholders
Shareholders of Record 34 a/o Mar 24, 2008
Beneficial Shareholders N/A
That tells me there
is stil froud going on
and no one give a dam.
But like they say tere
not going to get me in froud
And then some do go to jail for a long time.
But we need more of it.
-- Denise Crawford retired last month after 19 years as a state securities regulator; she was commissioner of the Texas State Securities Board and the most recent president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, the state regulatory group. Not that the other folks I talked to were shy with their opinions, but there’s nothing like someone who’s no longer on anyone’s payroll if you want to hear straight talk. The SEC has “a failed culture” and doesn’t work anymore, she said. Echoing Aguirre, she said the agency “hires lawyers who ultimately will go to private practice and make big bucks” -- no formula for protecting investors. “Maybe it’s time to do away with the SEC.”
Gary Aguirre isn’t exactly a neutral commentator on the SEC, but you can’t say he doesn’t have an insider’s view. The SEC paid him $755,000 in 2010 to settle claims it wrongfully fired him after he pushed to depose Morgan Stanley (MS) Chief Executive Officer John Mack in an insider-trading investigation. Today, he says the SEC “has been so compromised by its connections with Wall Street, it cannot function.” To make things right, Aguirre would require that at least five years go by before an employee could get on a financial firm’s payroll. The way things are now, “a guy at the SEC makes $200,000 a year, leaves for a $2 million a year job, and when he needs a favor, calls an old pal at the SEC.” The Government Accountability Office plans to release a study on the revolving door issue in July
-- Denise Crawford retired last month after 19 years as a state securities regulator; she was commissioner of the Texas State Securities Board and the most recent president of the North American Securities Administrators Association, the state regulatory group. Not that the other folks I talked to were shy with their opinions, but there’s nothing like someone who’s no longer on anyone’s payroll if you want to hear straight talk. The SEC has “a failed culture” and doesn’t work anymore, she said. Echoing Aguirre, she said the agency “hires lawyers who ultimately will go to private practice and make big bucks” -- no formula for protecting investors. “Maybe it’s time to do away with the SEC.”