Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Remember, the beneficiary of the sale of IAI assets is the IFRS shareholders of record on March 23, 2010. Very few of the AQLV shareholders held IFRS stock back then. I have two assets, the EVS royalty agreement and US Patent 7,738,008, June 2010. You will note the patent was patent pending at the time of the merger. I have been trying to sell both assets. Secondary paper has been killed in this economy. The patent is worth very little until it is proven in the market place. I have spent alot of time on publication, white papers, conference presentations, investor seminars and Security shows. See HarmAlarm.com
I know nothing about how AQLV has been or is being run. I work hard at maintaining an arms-length relationship that has not changed since the sale in 2010.
It was not practical. Attorney costs could exceed the value of the shell. The principles ran into problems typical of start ups. I took the road of trying to accommodate them believing this gave me the best chance at recovering. Time will tell.
The payment schedule was in the Transaction agreement, March 2011.
The default on the payment plan has been documented with several SEC filings. The last quarter filing addressed managements efforts to resume payments. Now you know as much as me. The SEC places huge restrictions on the owner of large blocks of stock. It is impossible to game the SEC, 1% sales per quarter is nothing.
Sorry, I thought you were refering to my post.
None of the escrowed shares have been released, they are collateral against the unpaid portion of the promissary note. I'm considered a major shareholder, any shares I trade must be reported. I have sold none of these shares. I have no idea how the escrowed shares are accounted for. Not my problem.
When the conditions of the sale of IFRS are satisfied the escrowed shares will be released, see Transaction Sale March 2010. Conditions of the sale in 2010 remain in effect without change.
Drinking wine is always a good ideal. No corporate connection between the old chinese company and AQLV.
The IFRS public was fully reporting and clean at the time of the reverse merger/buy out. I have not received SEC questions nor has the SEC or current management involved me. Do not know, but generally the revised 8K will identify the action.
Actually no connection. IFRS was a new public spun out from the Chinese reverse merger.
You will age fast.
How do you sell a stiff stock?
Depends upon what you mean with "is". I never recovered from that confusion, I'm waiting for the movie.
I think you can call this a transition phase. Nothing on the new-co, old-co is not relevant, see 10 Q.
Our Infrared Security System briefed to Gulfstream in 2008. This concept uses active RF, which is a cheaper alternative to the Infrared. It is probably not as good, but remember better is the enemy of good enough.
GULFSTREAM OFFERS UPGRADE TO AIRCRAFT
INTRUSION-WARNING SYSTEM
Securaplane’s PreFlite™ Provides Enhanced Levels Of Security For Operators
SAVANNAH, Ga., April 15, 2010 — Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. now offers an upgrade option for operators who want enhanced levels of security for their large-cabin aircraft. The Securaplane Technologies PreFlite™ System expands on its existing technology to provide worldwide, real-time event notification and remote system control/interrogation via a GSM-connected cell phone or land line.
The system enhancement also allows:
¦A quick and easy upgrade from Systems 500 and 450 with minimal downtime
¦New, more accurate, radar-based wheel-well sensors
¦Enhanced intrusion communications through system alerts via calls or texts to the aircraft operator’s cell phone
¦The ability to arm, disarm and check status from any phone
The PreFlite System uses metal reed relay switches to monitor door/panel status and range-controlled radar (RCR) detectors to monitor wheel wells. Each system includes a control display unit (CDU) that provides read-out capability of all intrusion data and a list of all monitor points.
A digital alarm indicator, in the form of a miniature CDU, is mounted behind a small panel such as the oxygen door, where it can be accessed from outside the aircraft. It can arm and disarm the system, and its LED display shows system status and violations.
More than 1,100 aircraft security systems made by Securaplane, a Tucson, Ariz.-based company, have been installed in aircraft ranging from turboprops to business jets. For more than a decade, Gulfstream has certified and installed Securaplane’s legacy aircraft security systems on several large-cabin airplanes, with some being a
A total solution to integrate and correlate all sources of security information remains a dream of the Security Industry
(14/01/2010)
Starting from the Age of Fire until today, man’s efforts have been directed at the creation and accumulation of wealth and capital. The 21st century will become the Age of Safety where man’s focus will shift from the accumulation of new wealth to the safeguarding and protecting of existing properties.
The emphasis on the protection of property in its many forms is the cornerstone of modern Security. Security Systems have evolved in response to the nature of the threat, taking a form dictated by the threat. These independent security systems can be grouped into three categories: Cyberspace, Personnel, and Physical. They coexist with virtually no operational integration, coordination, and communication.
The History of Independent Security Systems
Cyberspace, a term coined by William Gibson in his sci-fi novel Neuromancer (1984), derives its name from the electronic “free space” nature of the threat. As modern companies have embraced computer systems to manage all aspects of their operations, threats to the organization mask themselves in many avenues and streets that make up the information highway. They operate swiftly and undetectable within the bowels of information network to achieve their goal often reaping havoc on their host in the process.
Personnel Security is the oldest form of security. Starting with a guard at the gate allowing only those people who were judged to be friendly to enter, personnel security has evolved into a sophisticated automatic access control of ports for ingress and egress. The human has been replaced with automatic screening systems. The newly emerging RFID technology has shown great promise in its ability to screen large numbers of people rapidly with no physical contact using its proxicimity sensing capability. This same technology is used to monitoring the movement of non-human objects, goods, capital equipment, expanding the role and function of the gatekeeper.
The last element making up the security triad is physical security systems. These systems monitor activity outside and within the operation. Physical security has only been effective when used with trained operators to monitor and interpret in real time the events displayed on their monitors. The difficulty of detecting a problem is well documented. Often the Physical Security System’s most useful function is as a forensic tool to reconstruct past events from recorded raw video.
The End-User’s Challenge
End users are faced with the task of building an effective security system by integrating basic building blocks of Cyberspace, Personnel, & Physical into solution that reflects the need of their organization. Nobody in the Security Industry offers a Total Integrated Solution to end users. The Security Industry was created as a fragmented industry with unrelated and dissimilar technologies being the uncommon thread.
There are two primary reasons that have kept a Total Solution System from being developed and offered.
The first is that each of the elements of the Security (Cyberspace, Personnel, & Physical) has evolved from unrelated technologies at different points in time. They have always been separated and there is no compelling need to emerge them. Other than the top level goal of security for the end-user, these different systems have little in common from technology to operational practice.
The second reason has been a truly integrated security system must be automatic. This means all of the functions from monitoring, detection, and alert sounding in all of their domains must be automatic with minimal human intervention. Cyberspace meets the standard. Personnel systems using automatic screeners meet the criteria, but Physical Security Systems have failed in past attempts to achieve adequate automation.
Where is the Compelling Need?
A fully automatic integrated security system allows a common integrated data base where real time information is compiled by using all of the sensory and cyber-intelligence from all elements of the system. The integration of data allows the correlation of single events that by themselves are not suspicious, but taken in concert with others raises a red flag. This correlation of data events forms an embedded security layer which is both difficult to detect and even harder to defeat. Security in depth has been used to describe layered system.
The second advantage to the end-user is more pragmatic. The average end-user to day is over-whelmed with many options from hundreds of reputable companies. Often the end-user’s solution is to hire an outside expert to develop a security plan that tells him what he needs. The end-user may then select an outside integrator to manage the execution of the plan. A third party could become involved to provide a validation of the plan. A fourth organization than provides an oversight audit and an assessment of the system effectiveness. The end-user contracts with an assortment of vendors. The vendors give over lapping coverage, engage in turf disputes, provide conflicting observations, and leave holes in the security plan.
The lynch pin to achieving the utopia of a fully integrated common data base driven system is the Physical Security System, because it is the only one of the three systems that is manually operated. The failure of video analytics to meet fully automated standards with an acceptable false alarm rate has prevented Physical Security Systems to be automated. This has resulted in a room full of TV monitors with trained observers as the stable of today.
The advocates of Infrared Imaging technology believe certain physical properties inherent in Infrared technology can be exploited to create new data correlations that can overcome past short comings prevalent in the visual domain. One such Corporation, Infrared Systems International Inc. advocates a process called HarmAlarmTM based upon a unique patent pending solution.
A total safety solution to integrate and correlate all sources of security information remains a dream of the Security Industry. The elements of the Security Industry that are using wireless connectivity and associated equipment are on the forefront of taking Security Systems to the next level.
The advantages of an Integrated Security System are obvious. To the introducing company there is the prospect of a great reward. To the End-User the benefit is a single point responsibility with an understandable system, and significant cost savings. The realization of this ideal system is in the future. The question is who will make the bold moves to develop new solutions to these problems?
For more details, please contact Infrared Systems International, OTC: BB, Symbol: IFRS, Gary Ball, BaG370@aol.com, Tel: 1-(310)-213-2143
Opinion piece submitted by Gary Ball, President, Infrared Systems International
Propalms, Inc. Announces New Date for Its Nationwide Teleconference Due to Pending Sale of Wholly Owned Subsidiary
MALTON, ENGLAND -- (Marketwire)
03/24/10
Propalms, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: PRPM) announced that the Company has changed the date for its Nationwide Teleconference to Wednesday, April 7, 2010 at 4:15 p.m. EDT due to the pending sale of its wholly owned subsidiary, Focus Systems Inc. During the Nationwide Teleconference, Mr. Owen Dukes, CEO of Propalms, and Robert Zysblat, President of Propalms, will not only discuss the pending sale of Focus Systems, but they will also update the financial community on the Company's financial results from its fiscal year ending January 31, 2010.
Silent period is on going.
depends how it is said, but yes your X will be x/10 of the new stock. I surprised they didn't use a bigger number. would suggest they think the ferterizer biz beats frogs.
depends how it is said, but yes your X will be x/10 of the new stock. I surprised they didn't use a bigger number. would suggest they think the ferterizer biz beats frogs.
1:10 stock split, effective March 31, 2010.
Q is out.
Current report, items 8.01 and 9.01
Acc-no: 0001092306-10-000045 (34 Act) Size: 32 KB
Non binding LOI press release.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/02/prweb3551384.htm
You all know the drill, my last post for until all is completed or terminated.
Who knows?
Just an echo - echo - echo, what do you expect it is 2:00 am in Bejing.
Don't you need to know when to jump off the train? Pumpers are also the dumpers. SEC has locked down management so they cannot benefit much from a stock run. Pumpers can do little unless management is in bed with them, which leads to ajoining cells.
In some case it can work well. What you can count on is the stock will make a major move, up or down is the question.
Some darts don't have heads. Some dart boards are concrete.
Some darts don't have heads. Some dart boards are concrete.
vspc We talked about working together when they were $4.50/share. I passed after looking at their equity financing.
Corporations always have the power to issue more stock producing a dilution. It must be remembered, they are also diluting themselves, so they are not giving it away. The logic is getting something that is worth the dilution. I don't know the answer, I just know the rules. We all hope for the best.
They did a reverse merger with our old shell to the Fertilizer business. The frog stuff has been moved into a wholly own subsidary (like what we did), what happens next? Nothing said about a reverse split. Need to get a price per share that is useable.
http://www.securitypark.co.uk/security_article263970.html
Contact information has been added to the article.
Hearing reports that the Haiti airport shuts down because of no runway lights. Where are the 600 Gulfstream EVS planes? Maybe if the corporate jets were loaned the relief operations their PR would be greatly improved. EVS + GPS, would keep the operations going at night.
You are probably right. But, I have not had an SEC inquiry in 9 years (thank you PR firm). ISI is squeaky clean, translates into shell value. My SEC attorney approvals all releases, and all mangement discussion filings. It is what it is.
New World, Pump & Dump PR firms are a thing of the past, thank God. SEC heavy frowns on self-promotions, and who believes them any way? Tangible real advances we can all agree upon. Patent, okay. EVS increase sales and market, okay. I will be the first to release these 3rd party PR. You folkes can speculate to your hearts content, I'm not given that option. I really do not understand why people do not understand that. People act like I am withholding some secret great information, don't I wish.
New world. Public awareness, with a 150 word disclaimer. Promotion is a no-no. I tried to get an independent "worth analysis" from firms that do that. They were happy to take our money, but their report could not be publically disclosed, it was "for the board of directors". I told them the board knows are value better than you. We needed "independent third party, non-affiliated" analysis. They passed.
They offer several different options for $ to link the article to the company. When they published the article, they remove stock market references, because that is one of their sources of revenue.
Need a heart to have a pulse. There is no heart in penny stocks. Just got off the line with a NY firm, guess what he said "no volume". He questioned the 1001 shareholders, and I said that is what Pacific Stock Transfer says. They do not believe we have real shareholders because real shareholders buy or sell, they don't do nothing. So why would anyone be interested in a shareholder group that does nothing?
All of CSXB free trading shares was with the AVTX shareholders. The sell down was all driven by AVTX people. That is okay, people can buy/sell what ever, but NONE of the selling was from the Frog people.
Correction, our patent attorney says this is our EIGHTH engagement. But who is counting?