Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
After receiving additional information, and upon further reflection... I am voting yes, and recommending other longs to do likewise...
Marzan... it is not about being vindictive... it is about an expectation of being treated fairly...
"what make you think that they are still not at the doorstep of a journal abstract release and top line data?"
What statement has the company given the shareholders that would lead you to believe it is about to occur...??? What deadline has the company given to the shareholders that they have met...??? Where are we right now with phase lll and the peer reviewed article??? Even flipper44 said it is late... how is all this shit supposed to result in shareholder confidence of the mgt of NWBO...???
Doc, you KNOW I have always respected your opinion... and this post of yours is filled with logical conclusions, BUT, pardon me when I say that what you are saying IS TOTAL CONJECTURE (some might say total bs). The reality is we shareholders are being asked to ok an increase in shares, thereby diluting the shares we have already purchased, and we are being told by several posters on this board that a NO vote equals BK for NWBO. We have not been told SQUAT by the mgt at NWBO...
Don't you think the shareholders DESERVE some sort of update... some sort of news on the progress that has occurred before we vote???
I do... and so do many other honest, supportive people who have invested their hard earned money in this company... THAT is a reality, not conjecture...
It is the additional 250M shares that bother me... how much more time will that draw out this trial...??? Here I was thinking we are on the doorstep... how much longer do we have to wait until topline data is revealed, much less fda approval...???
Well said GGB...!!!
Look Marty, I'm no short... I just want a little info for my vote. How hard would it be to give the 'expected' release date of the article, or when they expect the phase lll to conclude...??? SOMETHING we can look forward to..
I was expecting this peer reviewed article in January... it is April...!!!
VuBru... my question was: Where is the evidence that a no vote= BK...????
Either answer my question, or at least address it, or quit saying a no vote = BK.
Truly, it is starting to feel like the shareholders are being sold a bag of goods by several posters here I am starting to trust less and less... not sure who to trust on this board now...
Please!!!! Someone please show me valid evidence where a no vote = BK.
You are telling me that LP and company do not have the resources to regroup, present some compelling info, and call for another vote after satisfying shareholders before they go BK??? I will need to see some big time info to convince me of that... you are saying LP has waited until their last cent is gone before calling for a "make or break" vote that she is unsure of the outcome??? Please, she is smarter than that...
IMHO, increasing the shelf is an indication that a r/s will not happen... if a r/s occurs at this point (so near the finish line), the investors will be royally screwed, and I will be ruined... not everyone has deep pockets to continually average down...
Totally agree, Bill, but I would add my view would change if we, at least, would get publishing of the P-R-A prior to the vote... give us SOMETHING!!!
While I don't believe we will ever see a r/s now that LP has over 100M shares, it will be interesting to see what happens in trading today... has the market already included this dilution into the sp??? I don't think so... buying opportunity if you still believe and have the greenbacks...
Tadasana... yes, I believe in the science, but I also believe in fair play... collectively, we have invested much in this company, and they owe us (again collectively) for their material existence... so I believe that us shareholders DESERVE at least some information on the end game here... we were promised a peer reviewed article... give us that, some good news to sustain us through this seemingly ENDLESS waiting period... I have been waiting over 3 years now, and have seen much of my investment dwindling down... I have that many shares because I have had to average down... now, we are being asked to dilute the shares we have... I say, give us a reason to do so... just don't expect us to dilute with no reason, other than we need more capital... guess what??? I need more capital also...
Tad... I am a long... been long since the pps was $10.01... I have 579,190 shares.... not a short... don't you think the NWBO mgt. owes us some info in return for our 'yes' vote...??? Maybe a peer reviewed article they have promised for a year...???
I SO MUCH hope you are right, s55... hope so much... BUT, where is the pps going with the call for increased shelf coming BEFORE the peer reviewed article...??? Will the article not be able to overcome the raised shelf news...???
2 questions:
1. What is the date... April WHAT???
2. WHERE is the good news that is supposed preface this vote...???
Unless I get some good news and a corresponding increase in pps, it is a big fat no from my 580k shares...
My take is that the shorties are involved in one last huge push to cause a panic among the longs and shake out as many shares as possible prior to the peer reviewed article... get as many shares as possible to cover prior to news... l hope this goes on until around April 10th so I can buy more...
I can't add again until around April 10th... would like to add another 34k or so... I am thinking news comes before then and the pps will be too high... if not, come on shorties... drive it down for me!!!
Talk of a r/s is assinine at this point... just prior to the peer reviewed article, then unblinding or AA... and LP has how many shares... over 100 million??? WHY would she direct a r/s...??? Absolute fiction...
I sincerely hope you are right, because I will buy a TON more at $0.15... :)
S55... that is exactly what I was doing, as I initially bought NWBO at $10.01...
Just to summarize:
For years the shorties said LP was funneling capital, etc to Cognate... going to BK nwbo and rest easy at Cognate with all that cash... and low and behold LP sells her position/interest in Cognate and now her ONLY chance at big profit is with nwbo. She not only arranged a gift of nwbo shares to herself and other top management, but also to other employees. Then, she takes the cash she got from the Cognate deal and buys MORE nwbo shares... this act aligns her future with us shareholders and the only way she prevails is for the share price of nwbo to increase. You can bet SHE BELIEVES the pps is going to increase, and who else would better know??? Her positioning herself with as many shares as possible to me, is proof positive dcvaxl will be approved. I have NEVER felt better about my investment and my only regret is that I didn't buy more than the +/- 450k shares I bought in the $0.17-$0.18 range...
No offense, but I sincerely hope you are wrong... and hope NWBO exceeds $2 so some MM will be able to buy in which, I think, will propel the pps much higher...
His twitter account says he is a Clinical Pharmacyst with a focus in oncology and immunotherapy... has been a very strong proponent of NWBO and dcvaxl for at least 2 years...does he know more than us??? I do not know but I would say he knows more than me... :)
A full 6 days...??? Chris is waiting on news like the rest of us..
Rest assured he is still very confident in the outcome of this trial...as evidenced by his report of owning 1.1 million shares...
"I'm shocked that the whole civilized world isn't getting in line to be millionaires."
Me too... :)
$1 was one opinion, $10 was mine.... you probably think NWBO is headed straight for BK... that is another opinion... I am good with waiting to see who is right... I would say good luck, but... you know....
M2P... I believe there will be a lag time between 'great news' and the announcement of a vote for more shares... we will have to work within that lag time... it will be tricky, no doubt...
True, S55, but as more investors believe, like we do, that it is just a matter of time before phase lll approval, the price will reflect what the investors THINK the market cap will be, as apposed to what it turns out being, and when you add to that the mad scramble by shorts to cover, well....
I am anticipating (imo) a pretty sizeable spike, but as to how high, or how long it will stay at the top is anyones guess....
I also agree in that I believe there will be a pull back in pps, which will be a great opportunity for longs that sell on the the spike to re-invest if they want....
Looked like $10 to me... and is what I believe will happen due to panicked shorts... I look to 'get right' at around $8.75... then play with house money... as a long I really feel good about where I am right now...
True, but I wouldn't rule out that LP might have a plan to slide back over to NASDAQ after the article raises the pps... remember all the ducks that have been put in a row since they left the exchange... a lot less problems now than before...
M2P.... I believe the low volume shows that all the chess pieces are in their place on the board... all the longs who know about dcvaxl have purchased all the shares they are going to (I have), and are waiting for the peer reviewed article... I also believe there are a ton of folks just waiting for news to jump in, including money managers... WHEN (imo) good news comes, we are going to see a huge squeeze and surge in pps, much higher (imo) than the actual value as shorts scramble to get out...
Until then, the pps is going to slowly drift down... if the shorts have their way, and it goes WAY south, I might be persuaded to buy more... I started with a pps at $10.01 a few years back, and have bought most of my shares in the $0.17 - $0.18 range so that now my avg pps is at $0.35.... so now I wait for news like the rest of the longs... I grow impatient, but I am not skeered... :)
LP and LG have stated that dcvaxl and dcvaxd is worth a $100 billion... I think she will accept $60 billion for NWBO buyout...
If you are correct, it is amazing to me the current pps is a third of a buck... is not the article known to be coming out... and WHY would 65 surgeons demand to be co authors on an article that says dcvaxl is a dud...???
If you are correct, a person with a $100,000 could buy today, and walk off with $1.5 million when the article hits (I assume) in the next few weeks...
One would think the pps would be around a dollar...
What is the opinion of the board on the the resultant pps when the peer reviewed article hits...??? Assumming the article basically says dcvaxl should become the new SOC... what would you imagine this would do to the pps...???
$1...$3...$5...???
I will not guess because that is all it would be... I will defer to those more informed than I...
Longfellow... my strategy is to sell enough to get to even after peer reviewed article release... hoping that will be less than 20 percent of my holdings...
It would have a huge impact on me... with over half of my retirement invested, a bk would force me back into the work force. At 60, and with bad knees.... no one wants an engineer in that condition... lol.
I hope your nephew fairs better than my 2 aunts who died of brain cancer... one in her 80's, the other at 43...
I also appreciate your faith... I am a Gideon who does fear the Lord and not death...
So what does this mean for LP, and NWBO...???
About the peer reviewed article... do you think it will just be a synopsis with the information tabulated, or 65 separate sub articles, each about one case... the former may not be detailed enough, and the latter too laborous to read...