Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They must have read your post "Relationships are being developed with foreign dignitaries and scientists around the world" That must have done it. Besides the international meetings and diplomacy, might this company get back to the supposed plan of doing some treasure hunting? Assuming they have the permit in hand. Do they?
What a joke. Same pattern as MEXP, now INOH. When Webber left and they couldn't steal his contract in the Dominican Republic, treasure hunting was over. Then they pulled a switch in names to Inovation Holdings (INOH).
Foreign dignitaries and scientists around the world, Really? What in this wide world would "foreign dignitaries and scientists want with this flop no revenue producing treasure hunting company??? Is this in some way implying there is no permit coming?
Why be surprised? Thats what the mango man said.
Boy! And the band played on.
Did you check that out with the mango man?
Right. Including checkbooks, purses and wallets.
As I have mentioned this in the past, I'm probably one of the few persons who actually met this bull shit artist in Santo Domingo. that was the time when we had a meeting up on the foredeck of the Rv Hispaniola and he told us how sorry he was about our back pay debt accumulating but we would all get paid plus with interest on said monies due. He was so excited about a big mega-bucks deal he was closing that would change all. You know the rest of the story. Screwed out of our pay and left stranded in the Dominican Republic without even air fare back to the USA. Yes, thats right folks. Goldberg's the guy you just can't wait to get a new "exciting" up-date on the companies next new deal. Don't you get it, the man lies. That's his stock and trade. Lies. I'll rejoice the day this scam company is shut down and (hopefully) Goldberg goes to jail. Oh, I forgot to mention, he also tried to screw Webber out of his Dominican contract and have it transferred over to an entity he controlled. Never happened as Webber was well respected by the Dominicans and they pretty well knew what Goldberg was all about.
Outside opinion. This is beginning to look like a turd spinning around in a toilet bowl trying to avoid the flush down the hole - into the trips. Frankly, just the way it appears. Where is the contract. ?
Is it too late to buy into this incredible stock with such a bright future. After all the mango man highly recommended it as a big money maker??? You've got to wonder what happens to people like that that, recommending a crap stock like this fully knowing its a rotten scam and then disappear under a rock somewhere.
Honestly, what did you expect? Goldberg is an out and out scam artist crook. A number of us posting here have been constantly alerting people for years now.
Right into Goldberg's pocket would be better said.
Although this company has never found neither treasure or worthy artifacts in the history of its existence , you've prided yourself (meaning numerous posters here) in its strong ability to acquire contracts. So winter and now spring is passing by, where's the contract?
Worse than that, the crystal ball is broken.
And the farmer hauled another load away. Time has proven that out.
Give it a break dj, mango mans crystal ball broke some months ago. Goldberg won't front the money for a possible repair.
May I kindly say its about both. Obviously you got to have a permit and you've got to have a shipwreck.
Move. Move where? The only way it could conceivably move is if there are any remaining fools out there foolish enough to invest in this SCAM. Goldberg doesn't make his living telling the truth. He never did. HE LIES.
But you must be reading the mango code wrong - $$$$INOH$$$. Didn't that mean this is on its way to the moon?
I agree with you totally. The worse thing (in my opinion too) is to leave investors in the dark respective to whats going on with the operations. good or bad. It shows good intent doing so. Neither you or I really know whats going on out there (if anything) but as you bring up the cannon here again, we know that was a "re-find". There was no problem making that a news issue.
As everyone knows here, I'm of the firm opinion that this is a piece of wreckage flotsam. Such was the case with the Jack Haskins researched "San Joseph" 1631 treasure galleon shipwreck. The galleon sank on a remote reef on the Pacific side of Panama. The main wreck was immediately located and heavily salvaged by the Spaniards. Part of the upper decking with a portion of the stern castle broke away and was seen later wallowing along in heavy seas. From that testimony, Haskins was able to conclude where that piece of FLOTSAM headed. He believed it contained significant treasure. He was right but never lived to make that final find. It had drifted on for miles, grounding in the front of a little cay. Those that inherited the Haskins documents and personal notes followed up and found the site. The site was worked by Danny Porter and Jim Sinclair was also involved for a short time. Unfortunately, the greater amount of treasure Haskins believed the Flotsam contained obviously trickled out into deep water has it drifted on in those heavy seas. The point is here is a perfect example of what does happen when a ship breaks up. This not being the only case. Applies to the 1622 Atocha, 1641 Concepcion, 1656 San Francisco Xavier off of Cadiz, and others.
For many, many posts in the past, the silver plates (as found by Heartland have been flaunted with the connection of them belonging to the captain's wife aboard the 1715 Concepcion. Perhaps that might even be so but no evidence that I've ever seen here makes that connection. That could very easily be done by the companies researcher by posting the Florida States study, analysis of the pates and then including the section of the passenger list that proves this person being on board at the time of sinking. Its never been done. Why? This certainly would eliminate any speculation but from my perspective not the belief this is a piece of FLOTSAM. When you're on a real wreck site you've got lower hull ballast. Any ballast to your knowledge?
Actually, as I've said it all before in my more recent posts, all of which I've written above means little in so much that without winding up with the proverbial, egg on the face, they've got to follow through and bring this to a conclusion. One way or the other. For the sake of the stockholders I say good luck.
AND THE BAND PLAYED ON or putting it another way, THE FARMER HAULED ANOTHER LOAD AWAY.
They don't. Apparently a company that tells their stockholders little when there's nothing good to report.
Definition of an INOH up-date - a pump - dump LIE. Was, is and always will be. That's the Goldberg way. What a joke. An up-date.
Why, in this report, does Sinclair specifically say no gold coins found? Why is he avoiding the giving of a simple statement of "no gold or SILVER coins found?
Have no worry on my part as I predict great joy being no part of this. Miracles do happen, and if so, my apologies as a skeptic, and a hearty congratulations to you and those who endured.
But, but, but it may be the mango. He believes in this stock.
And those who cry last cry profoundly.
I'm not exactly a back seat driver in this matter as probably ninety plus persons posting on this board are. You obviously don't like the messages I bear but thats well with me. Based on experience, I'm quite analytical which obviously contrasts with your views. As I believe the poster scots once said " (?) let the games begin" (?). Indeed let the games begin. Sorry, but I am not an investor and post what I see as stern observations in response to many clueless postings here. (In fairness). So enjoy the ride. Im not on it.
So what does that mean. "Fools rush in where angels fear tread" as that old saying goes?
Well said.
Does it actually matter? Perhaps its a number of company loyalists that posted addressing this coins on the beach fact or rumor. I was only responding to your stated opinion of "rumor" as is my opinion.
I do appreciate your thought out explanations but first of all do not agree with your comment about "captain would sail close to shore in storms such as these". On the contrary. First of all you, of course, know this was not just a storm but a severe hurricane. The last thing a captain wanted in a storm, particularly a hurricane was a close lee shore no matter what kind. A lee shore normally meant outlying reefs before a ship could attempt to beach. In most cases it simply meant a death warrant. The norm was to gain as much open sea room as possible. Thats why the "Griffon" survived. Disobeying sailing orders, she set her course a couple points easterly thus gaining crucial sea room.
If one reads through the translated (and published) testimonies of the 1715 shipwreck survivors, its quite clear after striking the outer reefs close to the beaches, those on board wound up washing ashore dead or alive. In the case of Haskin's brief statements regarding the 1715 N. S. Concepcion", I cite it again.
Archives of the Indies, Seville, Spain.
ESCRIBANIA 1058C, From WWNB #12, page 68
"The Concepcion grounded on Cape Canaveral with only 7 men escaping, who stayed in the water 3 days on a quartel of the ship. (Must have been a way off shore is Jack Haskins comment).
Only seven men escaping and hanging on a part of the wreckage of the ship for three days certainly doesn't fit the descriptions of wrecking close to the beaches as the other 1715 shipwrecks did. I agree with Haskin's in so much that she hit a shoal, sand bar, reef (whatever one wants to surmise) way off shore.
Actually, take a careful look at the chart you attached to your post. there's Heizel Shoal, Ohio Shoal, The Bull (and further in) there's Chester Shoal and Southeast Shoal, all of which are applicable to the above described circumstances of sinking.
Seriously, I don't know why you're insistent on pumping this coins on the beach story. Where are the acceptable and validated testimony's (with photos as provided by these people?) The coins found on the beach stories range far and wide over years. Some true, and those not true. Regarding the we're close comments, the Jack Haskins research (Haskins was one of the top AGI shipwreck researchers in the business) as regarding the "N.S. Concepcion" of the 1715 fleet hit a sand bar and broke up way off shore from Cape Canaveral. I'd be happy to post that NON-HERESY factual research statement again. In my opinion, I maintain that what has been found so far from past to present is a large piece of flotsam. The dots just aren't connected yet in the right direction. I could go on rendering my opinion which, actually, is pointless. The game must go on and played out to a completion one way or the other.
I too know what you're referring to. VF did a thorough posting on the subject. Goldberg actually used it some time ago to imply that this was INOH headquarters. What a liar.
And this just goes to show that the world needs a sleazy slime ball company like INOH to solve water shortage problems. Isn't that photo INOH's world headquarter building? Slightly different from the small residential apartment in Doral, Florida. The clown show never ends, does it mango.
All this being so, tell me why (in your opinion) this attorney Huffman hasn't already been disbarred? Appears to have a very sleazy background. Going further, why is this a SFRX attorney or need I ask. "Birds of a feather flock together" seems to be implied. So if the CEO of this company is purring himself under oath (?), why is this tolerated. What a drama if one is to believe your investigative research.
A real circus. Hope its more legitimate in the water side of things.
He couldn't sell it as it was put in lien immediately for the unpaid wages to webber and divers. To make matters worse for all the bag holders was the fact that the Dominican lawyer turned out to be just as much of a rat as is Goldberg. Actually everyone came out losers including the lawyer as the ship cannot be sold without U.S. Coast Guard and American Bureau of ships documentation which is no longer accessible. In fact, Goldberg (INOH) is still libel and subject to very large fines.
But, but, but the mango man said, said, said?
Allot of speculation. Time will tell, assuming SFRX can get the permit.
Indeed it should be allowed to play out but in the meantime previous factors are a preference to be ignored. I maintain a very strong opinion that all of this site #3 issue is not more than a significant piece of flotsam which is really supported by the research of one of the best Spanish Colonial archivists by name of Jack Haskins (now deceased). I have actually posted his research as relating the the" N.S. Concepcion" of the 1715 fleet, previously (at least twice), obviously no one wants to see.. I was then challenged in so much that it was said there were three "Concepcion's" lost in the 1715 fleet. I asked for supportive documentation which was never produced. Why, there apparently was but one "Concepcion" which (according to the Haskins research) sank and broke up on an outer shoal (Canaveral area). So indeed, let the play out but you seem to be lacking permits???