Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sorry but your side stepping the facts. I've been on many survey and salvage boats and have worked a good number of wrecks so I do know what the game is all about.
The weather is good. thats been posted. You said the wreck is found. Doesn't matter what wreck. If you're on it you know it and identifiable items are normally recoverable after blowing the first couple of holes. So what are the SFRX variables. More excuses?
I think it would help if you could be more specific. Now you say "to search and uncover the wreck". Why the SEARCH when you just said they have the wreck. I don't know if you ever dove and worked on a historic colonial period shipwreck but if you're actually on the wreck or even in its more concentrated debris field, its very easy, even if not with dated coins or bullion, to immediately recover intact or broken ceramics, pottery shards, glass bottles or clay pipes which can, with experienced professionals present, readily establish the dating period within 10 or 20 years. That being said, a week or two of concentrated work effort will indeed produce those items (and more) I just mentioned or don't have "THE WRECK" as you so simply put it.
Well that said its all that much easier.
Quote:
They found a wreck and take it as my opinion.
Good weather, got the wreck, no reason for two weeks as previously stated.
For your sake I hoe that happens.
Opinion hasn't changed at all. You didn't seem to understand my meaning. Setting the stage for no excuses anymore. Perform, produce or sail off into the sunset.
With those sea conditions, permits in hand, anomalies and probable wreck site GPS pin-pointed, treasure and artifacts should be on deck in matter of days.
Quote:
Also i want Kyle doing his job on the Iron Maiden.
I'm simply inquisitive. What job does this Kyle Kennedy do on the Iron Maiden? He's not a captain, he's not an ordinary seaman, he's not a diver ,he's not a survey coordinator, he's not a salvage master. So tell me, what is a career penny stock hustlers job on the "Iron Maiden?
A wreck but what wreck? What do you know that no one else knows?
"Found a wreck" is a presumptuous statement which remains to be proven. You don't know me so don't label me as "primarily a treasure hunter". Being a businessman doesn't say one knows how to market treasure.
True. A fair and honest post.
They are actually cultural artifacts. Treasure by definition of most countries (Ministries of Cultures) is gold and silver bullion, gold and silver coins and unmounted gem stones. If mounted, treatment in any cases, is that of a cultural artifact. As all of this is new to SFRX in view of the fact they haven't found neither artifacts or treasure in near six years, perhaps a new learning experience may be coming up. Everyone needs to start somewhere.
Great weather (sea state) forecast - NOAA - for today and this coming week for the area. Permits in order and ready to go. As I'm lead to believe the trail and the wreck site area is already established by survey, treasure should be on the deck this next week without delay. Excuses are no longer part of the equation.
I have no dispute with any of that you said. Time and performance will be the determining factor.
The treasure is real? There was never any treasure found there (to date), so what's the basis of your "The treasure is real" statement?
The first thing one has to know is whether or not the SFRX contract with the state indemnifies them from any or all claims by foreign governments. Simply put, does it have a "firewall clause"? If the State of Florida is claiming sovereign rights - jurisdiction over all shipwrecks in its territorial waters, obviously represented by the fact that they are recipients of 20% (25%?) of recovery, Spain would have to sue them first or jointly. So, by terms of contract, is the State of Florida standing as the legal "fire wall"? I would believe that's something SFRX should be disclosing to its shareholders.
For some reason you seem to have that backwards. This "Kyle" has an extraordinary knack for acquiring permits, especially being a company with no achievements and no credibility in its + or - six years of existence. Makes one wonder what the magic touch really is? "Kyle's speciality is finding treasure" really? Based on what? Frankly, unless these following days of effort produce something this will go down in Fla. T.H. history as the grandest of folly.
In the water. You need a wreck, not flotsam I do surmise. Prove it out.
Absolutely not. I've made that quite clear here a number of times and I'm glad of it. I'm a critic of this companies field performance which is non-impressive. With a professional background, I feel qualified to say this. From its conception to present I have monitored this companies motives and performance and am not in any way impressed. Well, that's just me.
Sort of like a roman candle with a fizz. The bottom line is not the permit, there've been allot of those, its all in performance and field results. So the stage is set at least.
It is not very often that artifacts and treasure are just lying openly exposed on the bottom. Of course, that depends on what the bottom geology is; sand, silt, mud or coral. If coral, its conceivable that objects can be recognized not having been completely grown over. Circumstances vary.
Let me say from experience, pending the geological environmental conditions, if not in a hard coral bottom environment, little if nothing will be visible lying on the surface of the ocean floor. I find all so humorous that 90% of the posters here (respectfully as investors() really understand whats actually going on here. Sorry but thats what I see.
Well said. Right on.
What do you think is causing this? Perhaps word got out about the new super mango juice promotion coming up.
Seeking of carbon emissions, Goldy proves he's inexpert on the subject every time he exits the golden corral buffet. Drinking mango juice might help settle the stomach.
. Either that or it comes down to technicals, support, resistance levels, and trend signaling.
That's not yet written into the SFRX playbook.
Funny how if you look at the charts over the past three years there were always times of sporadic "somethings brewing here". Yes, the very bottom line comes to two things. 1.) the permit. 2.) Is there a wreck? So far all indications are flotsam and I stand firmly on that opinion until a competent "experienced", professional survey, proofing and identifying team proves otherwise. So good luck.
If there was a positive position on this waited for permit, don't you think it appropriate that this company do an up-date for its stockholders? On that subject, when't the last time there was an up-date on anything?
And the band played on. Does this stuff ever end? Stay tuned for the next suspenseful drama (next year?) Will they or will they not ever find treasure?
I do agree.
I don't follow the permit issue with is confusing at best. I follow the actual field performance which is zero as to results in six plus years.
By observation this company has been a three ring circus from its beginning. Approaching seven years, attempting to piggy-back on mostly what others initiated before them. To date that hasn't seemed to worked too well. I go along with the show on site #3 but as we approach July, that doesn't seem to be going too well either respective to the big question - where's the permit?
A buckle. Well golly gee. So you've been on the iron maiden and seen the goods.What goods. Is that a secret?
Not likely.
I appreciate your point but also know that many times lucrative shipwrecks have been found and although artifacts and treasure have been recovered, it doesn't necessarily mean the ship can be identified by name. The artifacts and coins certainly bring bearing on the dating period and if be a 1715 shipwreck, of course there aren't going to be any coins dating beyond this. In the case of SFRX they haven't even reached this point yet. Its rather obvious, the shipwreck isn't there. I thought thats what the permit was suppose to be all about. The ability to expand the area and try to define a trail (if there is one).
The likelihood of the shipwreck artifacts previously found by Heartland being from a fishing boat as you put it isn't exactly fair or accurate. That said, I go back to what I always said, that being the area represents a piece of shipwreck flotsam and not the actual shipwreck itself. The actual site could be a couple hundred yards away or many miles away. So far with what has been presented, there is no ballast, no larger concentration of cannons, no further artifacts and no treasure. That's the norm. in a shipwreck site and that is (thus far) apparently lacking.
I had asked this question here before but was not clear as to what the answer was. That being is this Huffman the current attorney for SFRX? If so, it seems to speak for who this company CEO is. If squire Huffman is in fact the company attorney, FBAR surely knows his background.
I have to really ask. What does all of this matter anyway? Six plus years - no treasure. Now no permit. I think thats the bottom line.
Peggy: Don't you get it? The mango man is back. He and Goldberg must have capped the super mango juice formula and they're ready for the launch. Should we all load the boat?
Actually, you need not one but two things. First the permit, second a shipwreck which is by no means a proven factor yet.
It was never a treasure site and enough of the old pros worked it thus proving same. That simple. Certainly do agree, site #3 is the make it or break it ball game as I see it. Well into the summer now, where's the permit?