Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How is it possible they don't have any news to release???
Incredible! Down from a high of 0.33-0.34 to 0.2x in a month and not a single word...
Aren't they locked up untill June 1st?
IMO it is quite obvious to me that the SEC would not be interested in the publication itself, we are talking about the SEC, not the FDA. We do not know what exactly they are looking for, but I believe it has nothing to do with the content of the publication. Besides it, the publication was first hinted almost 10 and a 1/2 months ago, why isn't it out yet?
Obviously all IMO. P.s. intended not many itself but those we know of.
IMO this might have happened in September and it could explain why they started cancel many conferences since then on.
Was this a post of yours of 1 year ago?
Well, since the publication didn't come out in between it was first hinted at (June 2017) untill today, it would be odd (though not impossible) that it would come out these few days prior to the vote.
As for other news, if news ain't released it means there are not, what you think?
Your post would deserve to be a sticky. Besides the fact that people could have different views and thus agree or not with you, it should be a sticky.
I plan to do the same.
Question: if you didn't have the news you wanted untill today, why should that happen in the next few days? Just curious.
I do not have any idea, nor any opinion. The only thing I know is that 10 months ago someone from the co. talked about a publication and I haven't seen it, as of today. The other thing I know is that about 7 months ago I personally was forced to believe from an 8k that interim blinded data were to be released soon and that didn't happen so far either.
Trial is still blinded.
This has been a mantra in this message board even 1 year ago...
What is the point of this? They do not disclose if this applies to the holdings you are referring to. How clear is that?
OMG, are you serious? LOL!
Who cares about arguments brought by other people, I am only explaining you a good example of when an investor decides to write off an investment but still doesn't sell it. Whenever this applies and whoever this applies to, I do not mind.
Perhaps he didn't need to, who knows? Certainly not you at all.
Once you write it off in your mind, you only sell it whenever you need to offset gains, othernot you keep it 'till you need to sell.
Alright, but what's in the pipeline of worth?
What's left in the pipeline? Anyone minds to discuss?
So what? Current SEC's regulation is the one I gave you the link of, plain and simple as it is.
This has been discussed multiple times.
A RS does NOT require a stockholders' vote:
https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersreversesplithtm.html
Obviously unless I missed them and someone wants to update on that.
Is that a good reason for not releasing any info on the following matters?
1) OS numbers reached or not and when exatcly?
2) Updates on Direct?
3) Updates on the SEC matters?
4) Updates on combo trials?
As far as my personal own estimates and in my opinion, since March 16th there has been an acceleration of share sales due to the ATM. In my estimates total volume is around 5.4M and I do estimate around 10% might be short sales. If my math and my hypothesis is correct, they might have raised around 4.2M at an average selling price of 0.9 pps, in 18 business days. With a little below half of this timeframe left to raise the additional needed money to reach 2.5M s.e. (around 2 to 2.5M left to raise in my estimates before deadline), and once volume has settled down a bit after the shake-up, if volume in the next days will be low, there might be some high volatility on the stock. Just my own personal opinion.
I believe OS (as a whole of the entire ITT pop) is doing fine. Since I believe that PFS failed due to possible pseudoprogression, they might want to have a long tail to strengthen the trial with given OS. My opinion.
I do understand it's not easy to admit the statement was incorrect, but I will try once (and last) more.
This is what marzan originally said:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139978531
he stated that "Dr. Liau just concluded DCVaxL gives the most OS to date"
which is not what was stated (and this is even quite obvious since the trial is still blinded and therefore it is IMO again obvious that her reference is about dendritic cells generally speaking).
Marzan lately even recognized his mistake, and apologized for it:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139990217
which was a very balanced and welcomed reply.
Besides the fact that I do believe 100% of the people writing in this message board would like that statement to be soon good for Vax (which in turn would mean that OS is finally demonstrated to be stat sig), what brings someone to still try to report it incorrectly is beyond me.
Heck, volume is so low that if the publication comes in the next few days and is extremely positive, price could spike at least to the 0.40-0.50 area IMO.
Thanks for the reply, yours seems an interesting observation.
Where is the passage when
Do you know at what prices those investments were made and at what prices were shares sold (if any)?
I agree, but that info just came from the same person in this message board that posted not too long ago to be happy when the price declined so that could buy more shares. Go figure.