Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What does "149" mean?
When is the on-going lawsuit resolved?
First off, calm down. Emotionally regulate and articulate.
They were smart not to answer. Schwab has the money to sue!
Did you mean $0.000001 and not $0.0000001? Personally, I've never seen six trailing zeros although I'll admit that anything is possible.
GLTY. It's a rough market to prosper in.
How can you be sure of that?
Not the way OTC stocks work.
Not unique to this stock, especially in OTC.
I'm still waiting for $0.0001s to fill.
In a bear market, good news equals declines.
Please explain. Big boards? Most NASDAQ and NYSE stocks are beaten down to R/S cycles to remain compliant.
Market as a whole, you mean... for the time being.
I wouldn't know. I'm posting now!
You mean quick spikes followed by rapid declines?
Shorting reigns supreme in a bear market.
Whoa... let's start with $0.0005 first, buddy.
Without a R/S, a dollar is quite high.
Ouch. Too soon.
Like I said before, the OTC is stagnant.
Most of the OTC is presently stagnant.
Those conferences don't seem to accomplish much.
You can lead a horse to water, right?
I'm more curious about the latter. Please articulate!
Hard to tell what is truth nowadays.
Does the Reg SHO Threshold have any effect?
It's difficult to determine bottoms in this market.
This bit of news seems pretty darn bullish.
$10 seems reasonable.
Wuzzup? Looks like bid and ask are climbing.
You not only left out an extra zero but a comma as well... details matter, right?! And yes, shit has, does, and inevitably will continue to happen here and elsewhere. Thanks for playing.
Brah(?), challenge the pump-and-dumpers but please don't be illiterate. $WDLF was approved for a R/S up to 50,000:1, right?
Up late? Respond to post #64210. Your turn, chief. AGAIN, we'll wait...
Please, steadfastly explain what "Your serpent is showing" means. Your comment doesn't seem to relate to my post or the topic at hand, nor does it make any sense.
Lakota-45 (Xen?) neglected to post about that update here. Hmmm... imagine why? Let me quote (in bold) from that conveniently omitted update:
"NOTE: There is not an option for shareholder to sell back to the company, the shares they purchased. A stock purchase is final in all companies (private and public), and the only means of selling purchased shares in MjLink is after (and if) the company shares become publicly traded.
PLEASE do not contact the company with requests to buy back your purchased shares!"
LOL. Not only grammatically erroneous, but also not exactly the vote of confidence longs were looking for, and again... why didn't Lakota-45 post about this since he often references MjLink? Maaaybe, he's too busy running an illegal pump-and-dump campaign, as in... he pumped the stock prior, dumped around $0.04 (by his own admission), and wants to rinse-and-repeat the cycle. I'm here to halt that process. By definition, Lakota-45 did pump-and-dump, which is ILLEGAL.
Nevertheless, Lakota-45 accused me of never saying anything positive about the company ($WDLF). Ken has always presented himself as professional, confident, and concerned about shareholders. The company pivots based on market conditions (housing market crash, cannabis craze, crypto-mania...etc). To my knowledge, they don't dilute (major for an OTC stock nowadays).
Fun game, Lakota-45. YOUR TURN! You only ever have something positive to say about the company. Say a few negative things. We'll wait...
Which is which?
Agreed. However, there seems to be not just one, but two cults here... posting daily, ad nauseam.
Lies. You continually spread disinformation here about me, others, and the company. For years, you abused moderator privileges and controlled the narrative for ill-gotten gains as you ran an illegal pump-and-dump campaign. I just implored you with diplomacy to challenge your dogmatic commitment to this company, but instead you resorted to yet more defamation. Shameful. You are not helping the cause of the company or the longs by conducting yourself in such a manner.
Please... You don't get to claim moral superiority. Plenty of times, you have sanctimoniously made derogatory and disparaging remarks about anyone that expresses skepticism or doubt regarding this company. I'm neutral at best for $WDLF because I have noticed questionable practices that raise suspicions. Others have also noticed red flags. Therefore, I'm still long but skeptical. If you would consider the validity of dissenting opinions, you might find that civil discourse is a possibility. Let your dogma be challenged and give a little, and maybe others will do the same.
Avoiding the question much?