Marginal
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I love you too!
Somehow, I don't think you are being genuine, that's ok.
Gives me hope.
I hope so.
I'm glad you care, so do I. Let's hope we can all get a long together.
Yes, says me.
My questions are: Why do you want to impact our US politics? Why do you want our politicians to support left leaning issues? Why do you think you have any idea what is important in the US?
So you have been here before. If you are not a citizen of the US you have no say in what we as Americans want to do.
Ok. I understand. You are not a US citizen and have no impact on our government so please shut up!!!
Is your God a resident of the US?
Oh wise one in what direction do we look?
So you haven't answered my question of if you are a US citizen. Are we to assume you are not a US citizen? Thanks.
Huh?
What's my problem? I don't understand?
I guess it would be nice if you had some skin in the game.
I respected F6. What don't I have it right?
I was born in Illinois. Are you a US citizen?
I'm lost with your statement. I think F6 was genuine.
Who has problems with my claim of being American?
Actual reality of what?
I am all American. Are you?
The Benghazi investigation is the only reason we learned of the Hillary Clinton private email server scandal.
By the way, I believe we are a republic!
Do you understand what it means to be an American?
CC Writer, Silly. Trolling. Deflective garbage. What is it you don't understand about the value of democracy, and the values of American institutions which stand to defend yours.
This is why I question Mueller's competence:
FBI Director Mueller Doesn't Know Anything About IRS Investigation
Based on this Aleksej Gubarev was part of the Steele Dossier
Some questions in Trump-Russia dossier now finding answers
This is the Buzzfeed lawsuit
After being sued, BuzzFeed has apologized to a Russian executive named in the unverified Trump dossier
Aleksej Gubarev explained on national TV, with his attorney, that no one from Mueller's team had contacted them.
Actually, I don't trust any of the news sources all that much. That's why I shop around. It is enjoyable to watch the media go through different machinations changing a word or two from a live video I just viewed earlier, on another source, to sell their point. I don't even trust the fact checkers. They have been known to be biased. I try to learn from different perspectives and make my somewhat informed conclusions. Did you think Fox News was a state channel when Obama was in office?
I feel the same when I watch CNN, MSNBC, etc., that they have lost MOST objectivity for the opposite reason. However, I still watch them so that I stay informed on all differing opinions and thoughts.
When the propaganda network for trump pounds away at discrediting Mueller 24/7, they have lost all objectivity. So I don't even look at stuff like you posted.
It's a video of a man explaining his involvement in the Steele Dossier. Do you believe there was video tampering?
I see nothing
DesertDrifter: I wonder why no one from Mueller's team has interviewed this guy.
Man named in Steele dossier sues BuzzFeed
either found more crimes or didn't want flynn's canary song revealed yet due to the only person he is flipping on is your fuehrer. also, he might be forcing Agolf Trump's hand in the pardon game.
doubting mueller is a fool's wish.
fuagf: I haven't seen an example of "My Guy" having said "he and Putin get along very well". Please, provide a link. I agree gunballs' statement was a/an thought/opinion. Thanks.
Since your guy has said he and Putin get along very well, at least gunballs' thought/opinion there is feasible.
[/]
fuaqf: Forgive me if I overstepped my bounds, however I thought you were very insistent on links to provide background on statements such as:
gunballs: Or how about ceding military operations in South Korea without actually talking with the military or his defense secretary. Actually that's a bad example because he did plan with Putin. True story.
Do you not think this is a "true story" statement that should be backed up with facts. Thanks, for your opinion.
fuagf: I only asked for a link from gunballs to validate his statement that Trump planned ceding military operations in South Korea with Putin. The information you are providing has nothing to do with what I was requesting. Do you have any evidence that Trump planned ceding military operations in South Korea with Putin. If so, please provide.
gunballs: I only requested a link to support your "true story", which is normally a requisite on this site. Will you please identify the text in the links you provided that supports your claim? I don't find anything in your links that indicates Trump planned anything with Putin concerning North Korea. Sometimes if you are discredited on certain issues, some may be less apt to believe other ideas you bring. I assume the rest of your comment is only your opinion. If not, please provide a link of your evidence. Thanks.
Or how about ceding military operations in South Korea without actually talking with the military or his defense secretary. Actually that's a bad example because he did plan with Putin. True story.
gunballs Member Level Thursday, 06/28/18 12:49:58 AM
Re: CC Writer post# 282381 0
Post # of 282385
Maybe you thought you could pick the one part of my comment, which you discredit there by discrediting all of it.
https://www.vox.com/2018/6/25/17488206/trump-mattis-pentagon-nbc-military-north-korea
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/13/kremlin-says-trump-kim-summit-proves-putin-was-right-about-n-korea.html
gunballs Member Level Wednesday, 06/27/18 10:48:42 PM
Re: conix post# 282372 0
Post # of 282386
Are you for real? Articulating a plan for your ideas is now a principle? I hope your not a Trump supporter. Remember how Trump was going to provide health care for everyone and it was going to be cheaper and better, but didn't have a plan for it. "Who knew health care could be so complicated?" Sad part about that comment is it's one of the few complete sentences he's every spoken.
Or how about all the kids they recently kidnapped, without a plan. Or how about how he announced another branch of the military with no plan, no communication with anyone about it, nor the knowledge that he can't actually do that.
Or how about ceding military operations in South Korea without actually talking with the military or his defense secretary. Actually that's a bad example because he did plan with Putin. True story.
He doesn't have a plan for anything. He can't consult. He doesn't read. Their is literally nothing their but words. Divisive fear based words. If he stopped talking he wouldn't exist. It would be emptiness.
gunballs: Interesting. Got a link?
Or how about ceding military operations in South Korea without actually talking with the military or his defense secretary. Actually that's a bad example because he did plan with Putin. True story.
DesertDrifter: I wonder why and how much they paid all those people for showing up more than five hours before the the rally started.
Apparently his paid crowd hadn't gone on shift yet.
DesertDrifter:
Maybe photography or timing is not your friend's strength.
Doors have opened to the Scheels Arena in Fargo, North Dakota for this evening’s Trump rally, which begins at 7 pm. Note time posted at 1:58 pm.
Scheels Arena in Fargo
LOL, Agolf Trump couldn't draw a crowd if it was a car accident with him in it. Picture taken by a friend in Fargo, ND about 5 minutes ago at Scheels Arena, where the lying windbag is going to speak. There are less than 50 people in line for security. Almost as pathetic as his inauguration crowd. The press will make up almost half the crowd....ROFL, what a loser.
fuagf... Uh.. I'm not sure where you're going with this. Are you confusing cybersecurity with EMP mitigation?
You wrote:
So there you go. So much for Dr. Peter Pry's
Author-Nuclear Expert: Trump Policy on Preventing EMP Attack 'Night and Day' From Obama's
On the evidence i've seen so far i'd say the Obama administration took a pragmatic and scientifically-based view and
simply was not as interested in Pry's life-long alarmist mission as Pry himself and his fellow Fox people are.
Again, the article you posted contains nothing concerning EMP, it only discusses cybersecurity. What evidence do you reference to support your stance. Are you pointing to hacking of substations or switching stations, or standby generators? I think you may be confused.
Anyway, based on Dr. Peter Pry's interview. It seems the Obama administration took no view other than doing whatever it took to sign an Iran nuclear deal.
fuagf, you said: "How might someone do serious damage with one right now? You might spend a ton of money and time generating an EMP near a power plant. But—for instance—placing some explosives on the power lines coming out of that power plant would be a lot easier, a lot less complex, and a lot cheaper than building that EMP weapon."
You may want to watch the full interview or read up on EMP. Taking out one large power transformer (LPT) would not be a huge issue. We have a few spares and the world can currently produce approximately 200 transformers of this type per year. A strategically placed EMP, or a solar EMP, could take out 1000's of LPTs across North America. It currently takes up to two years to build an LPT with normal materials and labor supply. Of course if a large portion of the the country's electrical supply is knocked out, nothing will be normal. If I recall, Dr. Peter Vincent Pry indicated up to 90% mortality rate in the US due mainly to starvation, if a strategically placed EMP is successful.
Though you attempted to erroneously indicate we agreed, I do not agree with your original statement: CC Writer, Even Gingrich disagrees with you on that one.
I do agree with this:
Author-Nuclear Expert: Trump Policy on Preventing EMP Attack 'Night and Day' From Obama's
fuagf, Did you have a difficult time following the interview? Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, Executive Director of the EMP Task Force on National and Homeland Security was the one who made the comments Trump was stronger on EMP than others, not me. Your post proves the correctness of the information I posted. Thanks.
Newt Gingrich's comments were not directed toward Trump's handling of EMP policy, and his comments were from May, June, and October 2017. That was fairly early on in Trump's presidency. A lot has changed, for example, Rocket Man doesn't sound so tough anymore, we'll see.
Gingrich even stated a new start made sense.
From your post:
On Sept. 30, the Congressional Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack shut its doors after 16 years of operation.
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who has been one of the most vocal proponents of taking the threat of EMP seriously, said he decided not to fight the commission’s closure after consulting experts. “People I trust who are very concerned [about the EMP threat] thought that we needed a fresh start,” he told Foreign Policy in an interview.
It seems like the unprecedented slow pace of Senate confirmations may have the most negative impact of EMP policy progress.
From your post:
Though the administration’s “instinct is to take all this very seriously,” the slow pace of political appointments has made addressing EMP nearly impossible, according to Gingrich.
And the Obama administration shut this program down.
From your post:
For several years during the George W. Bush administration, the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency had a program involving HAARP, an ionospheric research facility based in Alaska, to see if it was possible to clean up the killer electrons created by an EMP weapon. That experimental program was shut down around 2009, however.
Politics drove the Pentagon to close the program, Papadopoulos said. “It was ridiculous,” he told FP. “The excuse they used was ‘politically it might disturb Chinese if we find the solution to that problem.’”