Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Speaking of Bananas, How about that $HDIH$ razor thin float? A "low float" stock is one with a relatively low number of shares available for trading. Stocks with a low float and low market-cap tend to be volatile, and can make huge moves to the upside very quickly if they have a positive catalyst.
Source Information
LOL! I am certainly looking forward to the upcoming week $HDIH$
Let's hope so! Until then happy trading $HDIH
Only time can tell! $HDIH$
Yes, in fact, they did a stock split! $HDIH$
The only way to know for sure is if the company would allow the TA to divulge the current float. But we all know they won't.
Some will even agree that this $HDIH$ float is very low.
Of that there can be no doubt. HDIH has a very low float.
This low floater is building pressure $HDIH$
Let me rephrase that then!
So we all received information that was posted here that was over 5 years old with 1 complaint from a single individual in attachment to a company that created a website.
Then we have information that has been recently posted containing information from the company via email. The time frame, being so recent certainly make me question the validity of such a complaint in today's market conditions. I just don't understand what is being uncovered here?
That's great news! $HDIH$
That's the 2nd time now I have heard the 80,000 number for the float, stated from the company, and you also confirms the information I received in a P/M that said that the company stated directly that the rest of the O/S are RESTRICTED.
Maybe this will help understand why the O/S increased. The number of shares outstanding will increase if a company undertakes a stock split including shares held by institutional investors and restricted shares held by insiders and company officers. Stock splits are usually undertaken to bring the share price of a company within the buying range of retail investors; the increase in the number of outstanding shares also improves liquidity. While outstanding shares are a determinant of a stock’s liquidity, the latter is largely dependent on its share float.
Source Information
Now that's some solid DD right there... $HDIH$
That's down right hilarious!
I love how one disgruntled post from another board makes it's here almost 5 years later.
THEY STOLE 450 US DOLLARS FROM ME TWO MONTHS AGO VIA TRANSFER AND NEVER WILL DELIVER THE LAPTOP THAT I PAID THEM FOR. THESE PEOPLE DO NOT RESPOND TO EMAILS.
They stole me.
Truly yours,
Username
igarcia
Rank
Registered Member
Posts
4
Joined
Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:51 am
Still trading as thin as it has been $HDIH$
Again very big claims with nothing supporting this OPINION
Now, because the share price is artificially inflated peeps trade that token stock amongst themselves at an inflated/premium of $3.51 giving this dark/defunct non-reporting pink-sheet/shit with a STOP sign a market cap of $6.98 BILLION.
Absolutely NOTHING to explain the absurdly monstrous dilution.
Talk about complete and total indifference towards stockholders!
I thought we weren't allowed to post messages from other message boards?
Yes, Thank you!
Thanks for citing an obvious disgruntled post from another message board from 2013. I found that to be very useful
Please show me the proof of how you can to offer such an opinion.
Now, because the share price is artificially inflated peeps trade that token stock amongst themselves at an inflated/premium of $3.51
Exactly
It doesn't say what the exact share structure of $HDIH$ is but it lends to the idea that in the actions of reverse mergers they often lead to a majority of shares being restricted. The reason that this is accomplished is to gain financing without tanking the company and obliterating the publicly traded float.
The float is still, at the moment, far too small for those shares not to be restricted. Now that solely is my opinion, I admit. I also admit that I shared the path that led me to that opinion. Again, very clearly sated!
You keep speaking of legacy shareholders but at the same time you say they are 2 different investments. Again, please clarify how this is to be understood. Are you saying that it's only the shareholders that have been stuck here in this play own shares and we have no new shareholders since the split? Does it mean that it's only the shareholders who sold out and came back to repurchase after the split?
I appreciate the concern but I'll form my own opinions
I would gladly accept new information from anyone who so chooses to come up with something and provide some useful material that can hold more than just an opinion. Until then, I will continue to search for signals and connections that confirm my previously shared information.
Awaiting something new $HDIH$
Yep, I sure did...
I also sourced the information in a previous post that states how that conclusion was determined. It refers to the restructuring necessity and the number was 80% to 85% of the shares that you so proudly boast in the O/S.
The FACT of the matter is that none of us know, as of now how these shares are held. It would make sense that the O/S has risen because that's how they obtain their PIPE financing, through the issuance of restricted shares. Thus, the O/S being very high and the Float being so low could speak volumes in the amount of money that is being invested into this company from these, usually huge, investment firms.
#stillyawning
As far as the share being restricted Under the current Rule 144, when the issuer or company issues restricted securities, the investor who purchased those securities has to wait a minimum of one year before reselling the shares
All you have to do is read through some of my previous posts and you will see the evidence that backs up these claims. It's really not hard to look into how these restructuring events usually take place. There are hundreds of Attorney sites that address this issue and they speak of what happens when the affiliate shares are transferred to the parent company.
Source Information
I don't make any claims of such numbers...
If I did I would provide the information and allow others to form their own opinions. It's all too easy to fall into the depths of misunderstanding if questions aren't asked and your own DD isn't done.
Again, opinions are just that and not to be trusted in the pinks!
Again, Here is Another Good Example
In the sense of remaining objective and passing along useful information I have put together some more. Notice how I reference source material and allow an opinion to be formed on the basis of that information alone.
Recently approved SEC proposals may also benefit smaller public companies by providing a more favorable regulatory environment for those involved in the capital formation process.
Since 1999, however, the SEC has established new rules regulating reverse mergers that have brought integrity to the transactions.
Nimish Patel, a lawyer specializing in reverse mergers at Richardson & Patel LLP, believes that the opportunity for liquidity has driven what is known as the Private Investment in Public Equity or "PIPEs" market.
However, as these funds now have a tremendous amount of money to deploy, they have started looking at companies that are still private in order to get a good return for their investment. The condition is that the private company has to do a reverse merger in order to get the funding from the PIPE fund. According to Patel, "This is how reverse mergers became 'mainstream' as a weapon of choice to attract PIPE financing."
The clock is ticking...
You ask for a reply and to have someone post information but I can only think it to be fair for you to share your sources of information, in any way other than pure speculation or opinion. I believe I have remained objective and provided all the necessary sources so individuals can at least attempt to see how I am putting my information together.
Thank you in advance
Could use some clarification please
Otherwise, it's ONLY an absurd and baseless claim, which it is.
They ain't the only one's in the game either $HDIH$
#laughingontheinside
Those Legacy shareholders you speak of either sold out or have been buying new shares to lower their cost. As you mentioned previously, these are 2 separate investments now that it is a new company with a new structure. I'll guarantee they have more shares now then before the split! That's why the price is where it is now. Those Legacy Shareholders have been busy little bees!
I have posted DD that clearly shows the exact opposite. I'd suggest you browse through them again.
Post#5978 is a good place to start!
In our reality, such claims usually lend themselves to links and sources of information that can help confirm a stated or challenged view point. I have yet to see such DD! Please enlighten me further. #realitycheck
there's absolutely no reason they should have effected such a massive reverse split (1 for 1000) unless their goal was to wipe out the TRKG legacy shareholders to a tiny token amount of ownership of this company.
I find it interesting that there is a fraud department here but my post that led to a report on those on the other side of wanting positive upward results, when it comes to the boards was removed. I think that's a bit counter-intuitive!
I'm certainly no stuckholder, $HDIH$
I'm way green on this ticker
That's very nice, thanks! are subject to the resale restrictions imposed by Rule 144 under the 33 Act, which generally means that such shares are not tradable at all for one year, and thereafter limited to an amount of 1% of the outstanding class of shares in any three month period.[9] Only two years after the acquisition do shares held by non-affiliates become freely tradable The shares held by the shareholders of the Public Shell might have been previously registered. However, typically a majority of these shares are held by affiliates of the Public Shell and are therefore, as will be described below under (c), not freely tradeable either.
Source Information
Listed In Publications
Where is the source information?
Where's the link that provides insight to the time frame you're challenging?
It certainly doesn't take 4 months to produce an OTC disclosure statement
I'll be waiting
LOL!!!
Where's the link to all these
Complete garbage stinky pinky shit-stocks