Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This is entertaining for some and an obsession for others. The upcoming 8K is like viagra to Goldseeker. What was that last post? I only can post 1 time a day so mata hari are those your words or kag's?
mata hari, yes there is manipulation because of the low volume. We get it. Naked shorting is illegal and the SEC will prosecute, and Lampost and whomever is involved WILL BE PROSECUTED!!!
Now I really would appreciate any response to the following: When do you think we will get news from Dr Moro? Do you think that he will garner a new licensee, be bought out, launch oncopet with or without a partner, move toward 510k, sell the elisa first, or all of the above? Can you help me out on some of these questions, please? You have explained the Abbott situation logically and I respect your thoughts.
Goldseeker forgot to mention that Dr Moro received only HALF of the MUTUALLY AGREED UPON MILLION DOLLAR UPFRONT royalty payment from Inverness Medical and AFTER the amended agreement with Abbott PAID the other HALF MILLION DOLLARS! That is why Mata hari continues to say that you have no idea what is happening and Inverness Medical is LEADER IN Lateral flow and Elisa. They KNEW and KNOW NOW EXACTLY what they were investing in, just as I KNEW and KNOW NOW what I have invested in. YOU (Goldseeker) on the other hand have no idea what is going on at Biocurex or Inverness or Abbott.
Mata hari, you have made it clear about the manipulation, and it is also clear that no one from the inside is selling. Point taken. Now, I am more interested in your opinion whether the lateral flow will lead us to revenues in the near future or is the more likely to be several months from now? What do you think is the hold up when revenue is the exact medicine to propel this company forward and validate the technology and silence the naysayers? Where do you see the revenue from first? Oncopet? Elisa? A new licensee? Do you possibly own a crystal ball perhaps? Any thoughts whatsoever would be appreciated.
This was taken from the Inverness website:
As with all cancers, the early detection improves prognosis.
What? Early detection improves prognosis!!! The self-proclaimed DrGoldseeker does not agree).
Did I hear that recaf has been proven to be successful in early diagnosis of cancer? Hmmmmm. That must bode well for Biocurex.
Inverness is a leader in elisa and lateral flow. Dr Moro has been successful with BOTH. Now Inverness is putting it to the test and once results are corroborated (maybe already have) we get the 510K.
The absolute single most relevent (and miraculous) aspect of recaf, is that with this technology recaf detects that one molecule that all cancers exhibit. It is critical that every investor understands what that actually means.
There is no other test that has this attribute. Other cancer tests are specific to a particular cancer type. Recaf detects CANCER, period. Any and all. Now we find that cancer cells present in other species exhibit identical characterics on a cellular and molecular level as humans. Recaf is again detecting all cancers in species other than human. Awesome. But why is this so important for all of us to understand? It proves that Dr Moro has discovered a huge piece of the puzzle that will be utilized to find a cure. Not just cure breast or prostate cancer. ALL CANCER. This is a major discovery. This is equivalent to cracking the code in DNA sequencing. It is hard for most to realize what Dr Moro has really discovered, but what I am stressing, is the commonality of this particular receptor present on ALL cancers. This is not blind luck. It is a major discovery and Biocurex OWNS this technology. We can't own a molecule, but we can own the way that cancer is detected (and eventually cured). I totally understand the dilemma Dr Moro is having with disclosing TOO much information. There are scientists all over the planet working on detecting and curing cancer. I am proud to be a shareholder and we are blessed with the abilities of Dr Moro and his loyal team of scientists. The share price has been severely wounded because of manipulation (due to low volume) and let's be frank..... no revenues. We fix the revenue situation, then we simultaneously fix the volume which will disallow the manipulation. This will turn out to be an exceptional investment. JMHO. Good luck to all.
Goldseeker wrote, <"Opportunity, I know enough about RECAF to swear on a mile high stack of bibles that I would never buy another share of this stock.>
That works for me!!!! I will hold you to it!!!
What you fail to believe is:
1)Abbott is working WITH Inverness and your failure to comprehend this important symbiotic relationship.
2)The importance of early detection, and the cost SAVINGS by early treatment.
3)The fact that NO ONE IS SELLING stock when there are thousands of investors in Biocurex that obviously don't share any of your thoughts.
4)Oncopet IS a genious idea and is about to launched.
5)The ISOBM is around the corner.
6)Biocurex did not close its doors and file for bankruptcy, on the contrary, we had private investors lined up.
7)Wittenberg stepped down and has sold very FEW shares over a 5 year period (he absolutely did not quit to dump shares).
8)We will see revenues THIS YEAR.
9)Goshen and Bhlokin continue to provide outside independent data and more patents will continue to secure the technology.
Do you know of any company that has not had setbacks only to prove the naysayers were wrong (look at HGSI, DNDN, FUQI, OGXI) all biotech companies and I am aware of many, many more. Why is it so hard to believe that Biocurex WON'T emerge. Hasn't Biocurex been down this road before and the share price went from .05 to 4.00 in a matter of months. Can you say "deja vous?"
Goldseeker, just need to clarify something that I feel is extremely important. You said, "There isn't any way I would buy any of this stock even if Moro signed another licensee. I just do not think there is a viable market for the test."
I hope you are a man of your word, because I don't want any reason for you to get back into this stock, period. No reason!!!! You don't deserve any of the upside that IMO we will see. I just want to put to rest any ideas you have to buy so you can gain unknowing shareholder's trust to then turn around and bash the company. Biocurex and Biocurex shareholders do not want you around once we get are feet off the ground.
Please reverify you will NEVER EVER EVER EVER buy 1 share of Biocurex. Thanks.
Half, it is and will happen. Unfortunately, baby steps are par for the course. The burden of proof is overwhelmingly favorable and the data is undisputable (independently varified by scientists in Japan, Russia, China, Austalia,and of course Canada and the US. The proverbial "foot in the mouth" was when Goldseeker (hopefully under investigation right now by the SEC) said he was quoting a veterinarian saying recaf won't be used on animals until it is proven valuable in humans. WHAT???? That bodes well for us because we know that it is about to be introduced in vets all over the US, so then recaf for humans should be a done deal.
I have a question for MataHari. IN YOUR OPINION (notice this is your opinion only) do you see Oncopet leading up to a licensing agreement SOON and who are the possible partners? Would it be Pfizer, Abaxis, Inverness, Abbott, all of the above? Also, is DrMoro reluctant to give the Elisa to universities because he wants to make sure he is fully protected by patents? Why not get recaf into Russia (is there patent protection in Russia) when the largest cancer center in Europe is comfortable using recaf and must realize early detection would be a huge step in the right direction? Why no push recaf in Russia as well as China? I have my opinions and have expressed my OPINIONS, just curious about YOUR OPINIONS. You and I agree on many fronts and I respect YOUR OPINIONS.
Everyone get ready for comments and the usual spin from the peanut gallery. Good luck to all shareholders. I see no one is falling for the manipulation anymore.
Vile. That about sums it up. Why don't you (Goldseeker) debate all of your "concerns" with DC STEVE. Oh sorry, he is in jail.
I want to thank MataHari (or Mata and Hari). I can fully understand why NO ONE IS SELLING!!! All the pieces fit about the manipulation and I wish that the SEC would end this charade. The headwinds created by the continuous churning has made it a difficult situation for investors as well as Dr Moro to concentrate on the science. Why not show Smithline and explain it to them and let them blow the whistle on the SEC. They have to be just as pissed off about this. It has to be illegal. I feel violated. I knew the science is amazing and hasn't stopped bearing fruit and there had to be a reason for the stagnant and depressed share price. WOW. Let me go on the record and state that I would want Biocurex to use whatever means to uncover and bring these individuals to justice at any cost. I knew we should have a market that truly reflects the worth of the science. I feel great about the future. Thanks for your hard work.
<Why is it a problem to get long term placement holders to invest when Moro could just have them sign an insider agreement and see those Inverness reports?>
That is absurd that he would show POTENTIAL INVESTORS what is unequivocally against the law. The SEC would most certainly put Dr Moro behind bars and that would serve YOUR purpose, but not shareholders.
Also, what happened to the end of Agora? Another foot in your mouth.
These argument are becoming less and less worth even a response. I bet you are getting frustrated that DR Moro CONTINUES to deliver and you end up wrong. I don't think anyone is surprised except maybe Kag.
Your argument about recaf after a positive mammogram will avoid unnecessary biopsies and confirm a malignancy if presented to the FDA would likely get us fast tracked. It seems pretty compelling to me. A no brainer when you combine much greater odds that the biopsy is necessary with the cost savings. If you haven't presented those facts to Dr Moro please make sure he has those numbers handy. At least with the education (and the drubbing) you are giving Goldsseker I feel even better about the future of recaf and Biocurex. Awesome job! Good stuff.
I can't stand whenever Biocurex (Dr Moro) has progress to report and new novel ideas to expand the use of recaf to Kag and Goldseeker that is hype.
Please stop equating progress with hype. That is not what Dr Moro is doing and it is your only way to refute that he is indeed making progress (in the medical space he is working at the speed of light). There is no one with the aptitude of Dr Moro when it comes to recaf, and the fact that Goldseeker is trying to go head to head and rebut a proven medical miracle and a huge leap forward in understand ALL TYPES OF CANCER is astonishing. It is clear as day that this technology WILL save lives and because 2 individuals can't grasp the magnitude of this discovery and try every angle to disway unsuspecting readers of this board, it certainly does not mean that Abbott and Inverness don't get it. On the contrary, they are working diligently EVERYDAY toward commercialization. Pick up the phone and call the lab.
You will see that Dr Moro AGAIN will return to upcoming ISOBM and what is he going to do there in front of the most respected and knowledgeable scientists in the world. Is he the world's greatest illusionist?
The FACT that he had investors lined up speaks volumes.
<One more thing Dr. Ogilvie told me. "If the test is not successful with humans, it wont be successful with dogs either. >
TheBocx response,"Great, because the test is successful with humans!"
You beat me to it. That was exactly my thought. Bottom line, IMO, I don't think Dr Moro has really thought about the exposure this company will receive from oncopet or he would have gone this route much sooner. No one has asked where he got those samples from. Could it be a potential licensee that is alrady into the animal pharmaceutical industry? Is it another diagnostic company? I think this should be a good topic for discussion. Kag/Goldseeker, still think you should compare us to another marker? No one has a rapid test, a saliva test (which will hear more about soon according to Dr Moro), and oncopet. You seem to have selective memory and a very short one at that, because we have a scientific board (Dr Gold and Dr Sell) that adds more credibility to our discovery UNLIKE ANY OTHER. Can you think of company that can match us? I'll answer for you. NO!!! IMO, this story (oncopet)has legs. Don't be surprised to see Oglive added to our scientific board....then what would you say? I see this as a real possibility since we are branching off into the animal sector.
Recently there have been alot of fun and games on this board, however, I am serious. The future never looked better. The manipulation of share price is apparent, but IMO that won't continue much longer. Has anyone else noticed that there are only 2 holdouts that feel the need to bash Dr Moro and Biocurex? Everyone else either conceded or got on with their lives. The table has turned and the straws being grasped by the bashers are getting smaller and smaller. There is no way that this discovery won't benefit all living beings like it or not.
I have one more compelling fact to present. Did anyone here know that Myriad Genetics was in the top 5 percentage gainers in the stock market over the last 5 years? What they do is sell a genetic test for cancer to individuals predisposed to cancer. Now with the illogical comments made by Goldseeker he states that what is the doctor to do if you get a positive result and are asymptomatic? Well, what medical value is there in a test that says you can develop cancer in your lifetime. When? That's anybody's guess. Now if you get a positive to Myriad's test then follow up with recaf you have a definitive answer. My point is that this is obviously acceptable to the medical field and is used with great demand, but what value oes it have WITHOUT RECAF? None. So keep bashing if you think you are saving us poor investors, but you are falling on deaf ears. Your predictions have all been proven false and your INTERPRETATION of events are just that. Your interpretation. You never qualify your statements with IMO. Kag has limited me to 1 post a day.
Happy Father's Day all. Hey Gold, are you seeing a pattern here. Haven't you figured out that Dr Moro was not exaggerating when he said many irons in the fire. It must have been killing him not to talk about all the positive advancements he has recently made. I bet anything we are about to sign another licensee. With all the time you spend looking for negatives aren't you beginning to see the positive. You want to make money? Isn't that your objective?Wasn't that the reason for discovering this company to begin with. Don't you see the possibilities? It is unfolding right before your eyes. Then this is your window, but even you must realize that window is closing fast. You have to realize you have been consistently wrong and that only bodes well for shareholders. Take a look back at all of your doomsday scenarios. Not one of them happened. Next time you think you have something to stick Dr Moro with, think before you leap.
I like that Gold refers to the other website as sanitized. I have to make a comment about your so called phone conversation to the veteranarian. Reminds me of the so called Goshen phone call. Dr Moro must really be pissing the whole world off with his evil plot to diagnose and cure cancer early. Kag, Delete? There goes my 1 post. Shucks.
Kag, is that the best you could come up with. Recaf is unparalled and it is now just amatter of time before we hit the motherload. I wouldn't be upset if you bought some shares and came over to the winning side. Don't be stubborn. You can clearly see where this company is heading. Stop the shenanigans. This is now a bargain. Even you can admit to that. Delete?
Goldseeker says alot of things. What about the million plus shares you said you bought on the open market? I don't think so, nor does anyone else. You tripped up and got caught in a lie.
YAWN.............UP WE GO!!!!!!!
Face FACTS (much different than someone's opinion that does not own any shares):
1)We have done several placements
2)Goshen is working with Biocurex on "something" (IMO either saliva rapid test OR/AND imaging)
3)Inverness sees dollar signs (so do I)
4)Dr Moro is hinting that our lab is working with new samples (IMO a new licensee from the Spain conference).
My last post was deleted unjustly. Kag you ready to step aside?
Now Goldseeker/Kag is on a new rant about Wittenberg with NO PROOF as usual. The problem is he never has REAL proof. In a court of law you would be laughed at. Where is the evidence. No form 4, (which has been filed after EVERY SINGLE PREVIOUS SALE), so where do you get off lying and repeating yourself as usual. You have never answered my question on your fantasy losses, because you have been caught in a tremendous lie. Did you think you could stir up emotional support because you pretended to lose a large amount of money? It failed and you have been caught in a lie. What we do know is that this stock IS DEFINITELY being manipulated daily. I find it hilarious how obvious it has become that Goldseeker ran out of daily posts so IMMEDIATELY Kag took over within minutes. Coincidence? NO WAY!!!!
WARNING: I suggest you find a new topic, because you could be in trouble if you continue saying Wittenberg is selling with no proof (no filed form 4). You MUST qualify this statement by saying IMO, or again you could be in court for manipulation which is obviously what you have been doing.
Where's the FACTS to support Wittenberg sold. <I guarantee Wittenberg sold stock> Baseless, hearsay. Why else would you say this unless you want to create more negativity. You are very predictable.
Goldseeker, please!
<I will continue to post the facts I read about the stock and also express my opinions. We all have a right to do that. Tell me, have I ever told anyone here that they should not post? Anyone can express their opinions and if my opinion differs, I will not yell at them and state, wrong, wrong, wrong but I will just counter with facts and state my opinion.>
I am limited to 1 post a day, so I have to counter your previous statement by the following: You never supported FACTS to answer my question of how you said you lost 150,000 dollars in this stock and claimed to have lost 25% of your original investment. Again, did you purchase a million shares on the open market? Where are the facts. I also noticed another deleted post. I suppose Kag does not agree with you allowing their opinions. Obviously I am a threat when I question you. This is not the Spanish Inquisition, just answer the question. Please don't mix opinions with facts. There is a major difference between the two.
Inverness=rapid test. Abbott=automated. China=home brew.
1)Need experienced CEO
2)Need experienced CFO
3)Need more scientific presentations (Dr Moro's time should be primarily focused on this)
4)No more wasted money on penny rags or hype
5)New website with updated information.
6)Exposure thru Youtube
7)Accept research funding
8)Alert all research, and educational institutions, as well as pharmaceutical companies working on cancer therapies
9)Notify healthcare governmental agencies worldwide
10)Advertise in medical journals
The rapid test is our golden goose. Mark these words. See you all at the finish line.
Goldseeker, what happened to your promise? I provided more than enough information to refute your antagonistic cries. Please uphold your end of the bargain. Also, I never got a response about the supposed 800,000 dollar investment you made on the open market. I hate to tell you that you are fighting a losing battle. You were blind-sided so many times with positive information about the progress Dr Moro has made, it is reflecting poorly on your exhausted posts about the end of days for Biocurex. I am sorry to tell you that just because you wish for the demise of Biocurex for whatever personal reasons, it won't make it happen. Now pound away that keyboard! I have another question. Is there any skin left on your fingers?
First let's define an "ideal universal cancer marker".
The ideal marker is a molecule that's present in all cancer cells of all tissue types -- none of the present markers can do that; and RECAF is the only one discovered to date that comes very close to that ideal. Cancer markers are molecules found in human cells that identify certain cellular characteristics. By notating whether markers are present or not, scientists are able to determine whether a cell is normal, benign, or cancerous. The best cancer markers to date (AFP, CEA, PSA, and Ca125) are limited by their ability to identify cancer only in certain organs. RECAF works across the board, showing very high sensitivity and specificity in ALL cancers. Having the ability to find the marker in the bloodstream is a tremendous advantage over doing a biopsy. It's simple, it's efficient, and it can be applied to some of the most common types of cancer for which there are no other useful markers.
A further advantage of RECAF is that it's found in not only the tissue of cancer patients so biopsies can be examined, but also in the bloodstream so that a simple blood test can be used to detect cancer.
WE HAVE IT ALL!!!!
1) You have NO IDEA what is happening w/not only Abbott or Inverness, but also Bhlokin or Goshen. Did you know that Goshen was working on a rapid saliva test before they published their preliminary results?
Do you know what they are working on right now? I don't. I admit it.
The collaboration with Biocurex and the Center for Cancer Care is LONG TERM and will consist of THREE PHASES: The first one will CONTINUE AND EXPAND the applications of serum and biopsy tests using RECAF(tm). The second phase will focus on IMAGING applications using RECAF(tm) to detect the location of cancerous tumors in the body. The third phase includes CLINICAL TRIALS in which RECAF(tm) will be used as a way to specifically deliver therapeutic agents to destroy the cancer cells with minimal damage to normal tissues. The third phase is contingent to the previous development of animal and culture models demonstrating the benefits of RECAF for targeting cancer cells.
Dr. Douglas Schwartzentruber, medical director of Goshen Health System's Center for Cancer Care stated, "In many ways this is an ideal partnership that brings together the strengths of our institutions, both in the basic sciences and the clinical arena."
Dr. Douglas Schwartzentruber is a surgical oncologist who completed a fellowship in Immunotherapy at the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland where he subsequently worked for 13 years as a senior investigator. Dr. Schwartzentruber's research on the role of vaccines in the treatment of malignant melanoma, has gained both national and international attention. He serves on the editorial board for the American Journal of Oncology Review and the Journal of Translational Medicine.
An ideal cancer marker is a molecule present in all cancer cells but not in normal or benign tumor cells. RECAF(tm) could become the one cancer marker suitable to detect all cancer types. The potential benefit RECAF(tm) offers to patients is a superior diagnostic tool and a new way to deliver targeted therapy. RECAF IS UNIQUE! IT IS THE DEFINITION OF AN IDEAL CANCER MARKER.
2) Most recently in Feb 2009 in Barcelona, Spain Dr Moro presented in front of 400 scientists. Dr. Moro's presentation was very well received and as a
result, two top clinical chemistry groups expressed an interest in developing collaborations with BioCurex to independently validate the usefulness of RECAF
in the clinical environment as well as to further advance the research on this marker. The directors of these teams are members of the European Group on Tumor Markers, an institution heavily involved in creating the recommendations for the
use of cancer markers in the European Union, which are also followed by other countries. These two scientists have published over 250 scientific papers on the
use of cancer markers.
(READ ON, THIS IS GREAT STUFF!!!!!!!!!!)
Dr. Moro stated: "We are very pleased with the interest elicited by our results. These collaborations translate into several important elements for BioCurex:
* They will work completely independently from BioCurex and therefore the data thus produced can be used for regulatory purposes not only in Europe, but also in America.
* They will perform all the work at their expense with the exception of the cost of the tests, which BioCurex will initially provide
free of cost.
* The two groups evaluate and publish results for diagnostic products marketed by large diagnostic companies, including Abbott and Roche, and therefore their opinions and recommendations are important for companies working in the field.
* Finally, since these scientists are leaders in the field; their independent validation of our results may prompt of other scientists to work with RECAF, which besides the obvious scientific impact could also become a source of revenue.
***********THAT IS 2, WANT MORE?*******************
We can detect ALL types of cancer multiple ways via immunoassays (The specificity of the antibody-antigen interaction makes immunoassays an ideal diagnostic and research tool.....The higher the affinity of the antibody for the antigen, the more stable the interaction and the easier it is to detect in immunoassays).
1)Radioimmunoassay (RIA)----The basic principle of RIAs is that antigenspecific antibodies are allowed to bind to a known quantity of radioactive antigen. The bound radioactivity is then measured.
2)Enzyme immunoassays (ELISA)----There are essentially two main types of ELISA: (1) sandwich ELISA and (2) competitive ELISA. Sandwich ELISA is used for detection of larger antigens containing at least two epitopes. A micro-plate is coated with antibody specific for one epitope of the antigen of interest. Then the sample containing the antigen is incubated on the coated plate. Finally, an enzymeconjugated antibody specific for a second epitope on the antigen of interest is added, the presence of enzyme conjugate bound to the plate is detected using an appropriate substrate, the resulting signal is measured with a micro-plate reader.
3)Chemiluminescent immunoassays----Chemiluminescence refers to the emission of light caused by a chemical reaction. Measurement of light from a chemical reaction is highly useful because the concentration of an unknown can be inferred from the rate at which light is emitted. The rate of light output is directly related to the amount of light emitted and proportional to the concentration of the luminescent material present. Chemiluminescent assays have become more widely used in recent years because of their excellent sensitivity and the reagents are stable and nontoxic.
Bottomline, Goldseeker it is time for a vacation. See ya!
I am only allowed one post, so I will say something worthwhile. Goldseeker, you are wrong AGAIN. No private placements? Wrong!! There are 12 parties interested in this company. The money is there. Sorry to burst your bubble. Biocurex is a VERY viable company. The technology which we own is groundbreaking and the advances we have made will be valuable in the armamentarium in early diagnosis as well as monitoring cancer. Another roadblock has IMO been removed this week. China will be our first victory.
Goldseeker/Kag, since you only allow me 1 post I will use the opportunity to prove AGAIN YOU ARE WRONG (there is a pattern to to this). First off, TheBocx was being sarcastic when he/she says "Abbott presented results that were obtained with a test that is not feasible." What are you saying? Why in the world would they present results to an INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS full of the most knowledgeable scientists in the field of cancer. It was sarcastic to show that what YOU personally claim is FALSE. ABBOTT PRESENTED NOT BIOCUREX!
Secondly, you stated "Feasibility would cover a lot of aspects on a product and since no feasibility milestone has been paid, Abbott does not yet consider it feasible and on top of that, they now state that they have no further obligation to commercialize the product. You get the picture with Abbott yet? If not, I'll give you a hint. THEY'RE GONE." Let me just say AGAIN YOU ARE WRONG. Biocurex repeatedly states that they have 2 licenses. One with Inverness and one with ABBOTT. Why don't you put out multiple press releases, put out audio and video interviews, send out a newsletter stating this and see if Abbott will allow you to make this claim if it were not true. Go ahead. Do you see that it would be unlawful and it obviously means that YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN. They are NOT GONE!!!
It sure looks like there is no need or want for new novel biomarkers. Yeah, right. More proof. Thanx carefree for pointing that out.
Goldseeker, that is a must read. I read it again and everything lines right up. Very interesting. It is worth reading a second time. It really reinforces the fact that you are very good at what you do.
Can I make a suggestion? Go away until the deal is done. I will also. You keep saying employees will sell stock. Clearly not happening. You also speak about Smithline like you know what they will do. What is true is YOU DO NOT KNOW.
You said you lost almost 200,000 dollars.... you said you saved 75% of your investment. Let's see. 800,000 dollars minus 25% is 200,000 dollars. You could not have bought at over a dollar cost basis, so you had close to or more than 1 million shares. How is that math? Did you embellish just a little bit? Clarify, please. How else do you claim to have lost 200,000 dollars and save 75% of your investment. Pretty hefty investment in a speculative stock. Sounds like gambling. It also has nothing to do with what I think of you it addresses why you should not be here.
Goldseeker, you act as though readers of this board forgot the claim you made. It is relevant, because it pertains to YOUR credibility, and reason for you to end this charade. You post here only to form a negative opinion, and you say you own zero shares. Failure to answer has never been your shortcoming, so I assume you were lying. If so, why would you make such a claim unless you are here for ulterior motives.
Please answer the question. Here it is again: Goldseeker, here is what you JUST posted, "All of the investors remaining in the stock are in a worse position than either myself or Smithline. I got out with about 3/4 of my money."
You also said you lost close to 200,000 dollars on Biocurex stock. Simple math leads all readers of IHUB to reach the same conclusion.
That means you personally bought 800,000 DOLLARS of Biocurex stock (not 800,000 shares much more than a 1,000,000 shares) on the open market, because we all know that you have said you did NOT do a private placement. I just want you to clarify.
Yes, you are guessing, and you have been guessing incorrectly in the past. That is a fact. Please enlighten the board on your last comment about your loss of 200,000 dollars in Biocurex stock, but you said you saved 3/4 of your initial investment. You just stated that today. Was that misleading or is it true? I think it needs some clarification. I will be happy to repost your exact quote if you need to see your own words.
Goldseeker/Kag, you have to realize that EVERY post since the last news release is, and will continue to be, only YOUR OPINION. You have no idea what is happening, so it would behoove you to begin all of your future posts with IMO, because nothing you say will be more than just...YOUR OPINION. That is the only thing that is certain for now and for the next 2 weeks. (Maybe sooner!)
Goldseeker, here is what you JUST posted, "All of the investors remaining in the stock are in a worse position than either myself or Smithline. I got out with about 3/4 of my money."
You also said you lost close to 200,000 dollars on Biocurex stock. Simple math leads all readers of IHUB to reach the same conclusion.
That means you personally bought 800,000 DOLLARS of Biocurex stock (not 800,000 shares much more than a 1,000,000 shares) on the open market, because we all know that you have said you did NOT do a private placement. I just want you to clarify. Also, I am just curious as to what other stocks you own. Was it ISV and NFLD? How are those doing for you?
TheBocx, a question to you. Please give me your personal opinion on the following: I posted on the shareholder website today a question to Dr Moro, and asked if he would correspond with his shareholders in a press release that there CURRENTLY is no insider selling, and there will not be, so it would send a message to current and future investors that he, his employees, Dr Wittenberg, and Dr Gold are willing to stand resolute next to his shareholders to ensure and instill confidence in the future of this company. Thoughts?
Goldseeker, you are hilarious.
You wrote, "If I thought the product had value, (I don't), then I would just wait and make my deal with Smithline. I would then have all the assets and if Moro wanted to continue to work with RECAF, he would have to deal with me."
If YOU bought the company.....even hypothetically it's funny. I realize you are being cynical. No need to elaborate. I just have a picture of you wearing all black to work and Dr Moro wearing all white.
It's time. Move on. Volunteer your time where you would be respected and admired. There are so many MEANINGFUL things you could be doing. If you can't even think of one, I would be thrilled to assist you. It won't cost you a cent, and it will make you relevant and proud. Maybe even be a big person and wish Dr Moro luck and then move on. I don't expect it, but boy you have an opportunity to prove me wrong.