Goldseeker/Kag, since you only allow me 1 post I will use the opportunity to prove AGAIN YOU ARE WRONG (there is a pattern to to this). First off, TheBocx was being sarcastic when he/she says "Abbott presented results that were obtained with a test that is not feasible." What are you saying? Why in the world would they present results to an INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS full of the most knowledgeable scientists in the field of cancer. It was sarcastic to show that what YOU personally claim is FALSE. ABBOTT PRESENTED NOT BIOCUREX!
Secondly, you stated "Feasibility would cover a lot of aspects on a product and since no feasibility milestone has been paid, Abbott does not yet consider it feasible and on top of that, they now state that they have no further obligation to commercialize the product. You get the picture with Abbott yet? If not, I'll give you a hint. THEY'RE GONE." Let me just say AGAIN YOU ARE WRONG. Biocurex repeatedly states that they have 2 licenses. One with Inverness and one with ABBOTT. Why don't you put out multiple press releases, put out audio and video interviews, send out a newsletter stating this and see if Abbott will allow you to make this claim if it were not true. Go ahead. Do you see that it would be unlawful and it obviously means that YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN. They are NOT GONE!!!
