Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Possible.
But if we see significant new investor influx, they wouldn't likely be as priced in.
Yes I saw photos. You splurge a lot...
Pupon Grey on everything.
Very accurate. It was difficult to accumulate in the grey market but was plenty of capitulation.
A lot got out then and in the Canadian markets. It is all relative, I suppose. A few thousand dollars makes or breaks some.
This is a very good point to my theory regarding the tightening of DBMM float. May that were going to get out are gone. Rest already considered this investment zero long ago. So now that it's come back to life, why dump it now. Only those in financial distress will do so IMO. So I foresee DBMM trading as though it has a far lower float for the near future.
I like gambling. Been a bastard for me over the years without any doubt.
I will accept your .05 prediction and raise you .5.
Only because I think the float stays tight until then and PR is on the way.
These are all huge if's obviously. But given the correct planetary alignment and proper number of chicken sacrifices, DBMM could get there. That range doesn't make the MC look so ridiculous as well.
Plus I did good on the tables at Ca' Vendramin Calergi during the holidays lol.
It is in his discord appearantly. A video is in the works. Was funny because I am actually in $MULN.
I know someone who is in the discord and they know my association with DBMM. Said it was brought to the groups attention because obviously this guy follows the OTC stuff.
Brendan Gustaferro
dedicatedtrading.net is what I was sent.
Guess I forgot something here. DBMM and slight intoxication can do that lol.
Brendan Gustaferro
"youtu.be/vONxN3F-5ag"
Moon market? Not sure I understand?
Sorry for the delayed response, vacationing still lol.
GLED is not necessarily institutional, but more does support similar practices as PAUL in the past.
CDEL
rarely toxic diluters, they can be heavy short sellers at times though. They are obviously a large wholesale broker.
NITE
Probably top of the heap MM of the OTCBB. Major intimidator in the markets. NITE is the shaker on most stock runs. Most commonly is the ax.
(You are familiar with what the ax is in level II I am assuming? This is the market maker that controls the price action in a stock. You can find out which market maker this is by watching the level II action for a few days, the market maker who consistently dominates the price action is the ax. The ax isnt always trading the stock in one direction or another. Sometimes they keeping it in a tight range and sometimes is not there at all and another ax may step forward. Sometimes there is no ax present. The ax is not static. On any given day any MM can be an ax, there may be one ax in the morning and another in the afternoon. If a big order comes onto the trading desk of a firm that doesnt do big volume in a certain name, the ax will take care of it and command the action. An ax can easily use an ECN to hide much of their action. They can and will use fake outs.)
INTL
Probably largest international securities trade broker in OTC. FINRA and Bloomberg rank them as largest foreign securities OTC broker.
GTSM
GTSM is the largest DMM at the NYSE responsible for a large majority of the market capitalization.
Hope this helps. Best of luck for you in DBMM!!
PR is picking up. I have it on good authority that a video is coming from this YouTube influencer. Apparently in his private pay for access Discord account DBMM is being discussed for a video soon.
He has 60k followers and deals primarily with penny stock reviews and short squeeze plays. Is also on this site.
Looking more promising
Lol. Yes I agree DBMM has potential given al the recent developments.
Let's hope they capitalize on the momentum.
I was pointing more, to the fact PR had been put in place, as I mentioned several days ago. The linked YouTube review is classic paid promotion. Which is a great sign in my opinion. This is the new boiler room at work. There are traders, that literally get most there information from search engine trends in a desired demographic. The teams working with many of the larger "penny stock guru's", comb through this data for trending action in the financial markets.
Getting corporations visible digitally is exactly what Digital Clarity does...
It is true, I started trading in an era that is unrecognizable today. But just the nature of good due diligence, forces one to be receptive to change.
DBMM has changed considerably since my first interaction, if you take their word at face value.
My reason for investing in DBMM has not changed in almost 4 years. Not because DBMM has not changed. Because my strategy doesn't change...
Agreed. I stand behind the fact individuals such as this don't spend 3 years burning time and money for nothing.
Does not mean it always plays out as desired. But absolutely there was adequate risk/rewatd.
Considering current market conditions I think investors are looking for the "millionaire ove night" plays. DBMM fits this narrative with an uplist.
I suppose this is not part of a company initiated PR lol. This isn't the only one out there either.
DBMM is many things, stupid is not one.
YouTube is the perfect quid pro quo environment for "paid" PR. Little bird says hey, I have a story for you that is going to get you likes and subscribers. I will give you everything you need, you will be early on the news, could even get in the stock if you like. Pass it to your viewers and I will give you the next news early as well. Sure small viewership now but this is how it works.
Next someone is going to start blowing up another YouTube channel, in the same space but has more followers. "Dude! You got scooped!" That channel is going to watch the video and do their own, rinse and repeat.
It is how promotion works today with social media. DBMM is good at SEO so you can bet, soon it will be trending higher.
True. Money to be made on both side. Timing is the only denominator.
Curt is right here now working out.
40.785441,-73.726242
Vwaping is the sound a fat guy makes on a scooter.
Not trade terminology...
I think like most things here, malevolent is a perspective. For the most part they all play a useful role.
When that role goes against someone's perspective, well then they become malevolent and opposite is true if they go in the desired direction.
This is why it is illegal. It's also why r/s often accompany naked shorting.
Only entity that can legally print monopoly money out of thin air and pass it as the real thing, is our government...
True. I was speaking more to her history much prior to DBMM.
She has tried this before.
As it has been pointed out, the 505 could be signaling.
CDEL and PAUL could be a result or coincidence. MM's can do a lot on a slow churn if coordinating, that is why it's not legal. A huge "if" here, but if there was NSS, you would want to cover it over time on a slow roll.
Factually, GLED has a similar reputation as PAUL. It needs to be said that disposing of institutionally acquired shares is not necessarily nefarious and traditional markets use the same process to mitigate dilutions effects on share price.
But in OTC MM's serve many different entities and just because the core business is one thing doesn't mean they didn't see opportunity with DBMM in another capacity.
As to why on the sidelines, their purpose is to make a market for DBMM, if the market is being made without their interaction, then probably hanging back for that reason. I would say it is a bullish indicator overall. If they were active I would think it might show weakness or some desperation in the stock.
Thanks for the good questions!
Hurts knowing Kramers are spending DBMM long money so frivolously lol.
DBMM circus is in town lol!!!
I think the most important denominator regarding NASDAQ is Linda.
I believe that would be an important feather in her hat.
Yes. These people are not notable in anyway and not hiding. They are approachable but if someone comes off as a questionable personality, door will shut quickly.
Plus many forget there are actually rules regarding private information in a public company.
But a lot can be discovered in over a cup of tea...
True. I don't see dilution obviously but it is expected with the higher short bias now.
Upside for DBMM is these things can go up or down, we'll see I guess.
Could be. Personally would like to see a bigger player show. But just getting started...
Well if there was ever a really good reason to save DBMM, that would be it.
From the position of a private company. Merging with an existing public company, that had a significant catalyst in place and very limited liabilities present, DBMM would be a good choice.
Obviously, we aren't talking Tesla or anything but wouldn't need to be. Any legitimate entity that had possibility could complete the goal for NASDAQ uplist.
Which in regards to share price would be significant.
Could be. Coincidence is not punishable by the law.
Everything in context is important. Never means certainty but should be kept on the table.
Would like to see them complete the uplist, which should be easy enough now.
Then a significant PR release, preferably a notable business development or a merger.
That one two punch could very well gain a lot of traction, in consideration of all the present catalyst.
Yes. Institutional MM's coming is meaningful. Retail doesn't have access to PAUL. They are know for dilution. Covering institutional shorts could very well be why they are here. PAUL most commonly converts shares from toxic lenders, or really any individual or institution that received shares in exchange for something.
The 505 signals could be significant but these signals are just like baseball, they change them every game. So meaning is difficult to decipher.
Certainly hope DBMM keeps winning. They may get invited to the bat cave!
Green and hopefully to stay that way
Would be more excited with.03% float.
Definitely would need profit then...
I know the only reason DBMM was saved is money. It is going to make someone, something.
Only way too see if it can be you making money, is buy a ticket to the show. Experienced investors and smart money can get behind that, because it makes sense.
It is 100% why I am long and bullish here. Because I don't buy they went to all this effort to flip Kramer the bird, garbage.
By putting up unsubstantiated claims of vetting a company, just says desperation...
IMHO of course.
Real investors are not foolish. They will do a little research. They will investigate why DBMM has crap fundamentals and has never been anything. They will Google DBMM and see tons of comments made about this ticker, that are obvious fabrications or exaggerations. It simply sheds doubt, when experienced money sees this activity, they know it is being PR'd. Paid for or not.
Instead of misrepresenting, try focusing on a few of the facts.
Focus on the fact DBMM had a horrible history prior to being stomped on by toxic financing.
Focus on the fact regardless of previous actions, they have built a case solid enough that the ALJ decided against the DOE, a rarity.
Focus on the fact that during this time DBMM managed to keep current and stay in the game for 3 years once the toxic financiers were displaced.
Finally focus on the fact, there has been no obvious reason come to light as to why save DBMM. Experienced money is going to know, it would have been far, faster, cheaper and beneficial to just let DBMM get revoked and start new.
This will bring up the elephant in the room. Why save DBMM?
Uplist in OTCM and get to a higher level in the cesspool? Doubtful.
Have a magical digital media deal waiting for them, if only they could successfully beat the SEC? Wouldn't bet the farm there.
Possibly, have a private company looking at a reverse merger, that could run on what is already a great catalyst? That could be interesting.
Honestly, I don't know and it's not from a lack of looking.
Let DBMM stand on facts not embellishments.
There are plenty of ways to get around a PR reporting requirement. Not the least of which is the "paid" part.
Curious, exactly who vetted DBMM? Bullish shareholders? Twitter? YouTube?Because last I checked, DBMM was pinksheet OTC rag, with horrible fundamentals and a long time sketchy reputation.
Obviously, it is always possible for that to change. Plenty of pink garbage eventually crawled from the sewers of OTC. But to put a turd on a pedestal and try to sell it as new age art, is in itself a reflection of why pinksheets stay that way.
I think that is accurate.
No reason why not at this point.
Doesn't take much to qualify, except follow the rules.
Finally, DBMM is doing this.
Maybe they can soon afford cigars and planes...
The lucky part I believe. Really, how can some average Joe get homies???
It's called stinky pinks for a reason...
With 780ish float DBMM would need to see close to 100mil volume to trade meaningfully. IMO
Don't know who suggested magic? Anyone can do that. Kind of the point behind trading.
Only magic here is the explosion of 5 figure deals, from post pandemic sales...