Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There has been no update with the court share cancellation case, at least with regard to what is available online. October 2 still showing as the last entry.
Maybe something else or maybe folk just fed up and bailing.
"These minor dips mean nothing on light volume. "
I'm not sure a pretty steady decline since July counts as a "minor dip".
"I'll be adding again once my funds clear. "
Nobody gives a shit. Pretend to buy all you want.
"Great buying opportunity."
The last time you proclaimed a buying opportunity the low price of the day was .0203 with a high of .0259.
"BUYING opportunity!!!" - awesomed007, Monday, February 13, 2023, Link
Anyone that managed to snag the low then is now down 58%. If you bought the high you are down 68%.
That was one shitty-ass "opportunity" call.
Your screengrab included just a portion of an interesting post down at the bottom. That @carrie person claims Dr. Vin stiffed her after performing some work for him.
She admitted to being that person in the Discord.
Never trust someone calling the price a gift. Just look at history. It rarely is.
Anyone claiming to know the future "for a fact" is either lying or insane. Which applies to you?
Anyone claiming nobody is selling is clearly lying. Just look at the chart, sheesh. Only the truly naive would fall for that and it's despicable to prey on them.
And what reverse merger? The most recent filing says there isn't one in the works and that searching for a candidate hasn't even started. Anyone can read it for themselves, https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/378041/content
Why would that be "Lmfao-worthy"? It looks like all you got was the same page Keith was using to lie with by pretending that Bloomberg was "anticipating" a name change. But the page is only refering to the Nevada entity which yes, already had its name changed back in April. So what?
That's not what is at stake right now. Right now it is the trading entity which is up for name and ticker change at FINRA. Which no, Bloomberg has not "anticipated" any name change for. Bloomberg very much still calls it Good Vibrations Shoes Inc with ticker GVSI. Here's the link: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/GVSI:US
What link did Google give you? I couldn't help but notice you did not supply it in your post. Why is that? Let's see it, big boi.
Or are you just trying to pull the same lie Keith did and hope people are dumb enough to fall for it?
That's despicable and anyone trying to fool people with it is a piece of shit. Is that you?
Incidentally, the first result I got for a Google search was actually OpenCorporates. And yes, that was for the Nevada entity that already had the name change back in April. It was not for the trading entity that is up for a name change with FINRA.
And no, I do not give buy recommendations. I am not a lying pumper. Thanks for noticing!
Bullshit; Bloomberg is not "getting ready". You are straight up lying and hoping that the naive and those that don't do any DD will blindly believe you.
The link you gave is the page for the Nevada entity where the name was already changed back in April. Hell, when I pulled it up it even gave a side link to the GVSI trading ticker entity page, which is entirely separate.
Here is a link to the GVSI ticker entity page which obviously is still ticker GVSI and very much still has the name Good Vibrations Shoes Inc: https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/GVSI:US
Gotta laugh at the price, Bloomberg doesn't even recognize sub-penny prices although they did properly recognize the -4.3% loss today.
Are you comparing two different things and claiming that Hi_Lo changed his story? When they are actually two entirely separate things?
Not discussing the SEC/FINRA administrative proceeding is one thing.
But then you refer to a withdrawal of an application as if it is acknowledgement of the administrative proceeding.
But the thing is, George never withdrew any application dealing with the administrative proceeding.
He withdrew the SEC 10-12G, as everyone knows. But that is not an application that deals with the administrative proceeding.
He withdrew the SEC appeal, as everyone knows. Now that does in fact deal with the administrative proceeding.
So are you trying to conflate the administrative proceeding appeal withdrawal with the 10-12G application withdrawal in order to try to make it appear Hi_Lo's story changed?
If that is the case then wow that is some scumbag stuff right there, trying to confuse the naive and those that don't know better into thinking someone has lied when in fact it is you who are lying.
If that is not the case then please provide full links to where you pulled your quotes from so everyone can get the full context of what was going on and not just see your little cherry picked snippets.
It sure looks like you are trying to pull the wool over folks eyes and hope they don't notice that the phrases "withdrawing an application" and "withdrawing an appeal" are not actually the same thing.
Prove me wrong.
The free money plus lockdown making everyone stuck bored at home definitely played a part in that era.
Some just do not realize that those circumstances are no longer with us and expect everything now to perform like then.
Oops, sorry Charlie. Not happening. The runners are few and far between now.
It will finally start to sink in when they bag out of the market.
His LinkedIn and Instagram appear to be gone as well. The ones he linked on his website at least, which itself still seems to be up. As of now... https://www.drvinmenon.com/
The fraud was trying to fool idiots into believing the quote was altered when it wasn't at all - by just making different words bold or not.
Wow, somebody would have to be dumb to fall for that.
I can't believe it was even attempted it was so effing stupid.
What the hell is wrong with you?!?! That's the exact same effing quote, you just put different words in bold to make them "look" different. Cripes on a fugging cracker and yet you have the balls to call other people liars on other boards?
How about trying to refute his arguments instead? Oh that's right, you can't so you have to resort to pathetic tries at cheap parlor tricks in any attempt to discredit him.
Guess what? His arguments are sound. Suck it.
"Please show a link from either the SEC or FINRA that this still applies to GVSI now"
Neither SEC nor FINRA offer public access to any ongoing issues.
You know this, you have been reminded of it multiple times.
Yet you persist in throwing out the challenge as if to insist there cannot be any issues if none are made public.
The fact that you keep on continuing this line is just more proof of how disingenuous you are and that you are counting on board followers to be naive and/or dumb as a box of rocks.
I hope members here understand that you are in fact lying to them and also insulting their intelligence every time you ask for links to current SEC or FINRA issues. By design no links exist, whether there are issues or not.
"Go ahead and tell us when Kuldip Singh officially joined the Mekaddesh Group knowing you portray them as “business partners for many years”!"
I only know what their own fugging filing says. Try reading sometime. You can find it for yourself on page 22 here: https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=16955291&guid=eA5-kaCl65JmB3h
"And just so you know, only YOU have perceived that I made a poor financial decision here! "
My bad, I assumed you were so angry on this board because you have lost your ass here. I guess you are just angry in general? Mea culpa.
"But as already discussed, you don’t disclose your holdings! "
This makes no difference whatsoever to the truthiness of my statements. My trades are none of your business.
"Those funding options more than likely would apply to almost ANY otc penny stock offering which would include paying insiders and other officers! "
Looking at you making sense this early in the morning!
"Knowing how much you dislike Antonio Cesar Guel"
And you know this, how? I've never met the dude. I have no opinion of him other that what is due to knowledge gained through publicly available sources.
"JPEX is still always in your radar for some special reason."
I follow plenty of stocks and occasionally comment on some. Your precious little stinky pinky here is no more special than any of them in my eyes, don't flatter yourself.
Instead of misplacing and directing your anger at me maybe you should put some of that energy into pondering your poor decisions that you have made entirely on your own.
BTW, just because some dude has an Indian sounding name and does business with Hispanics doesn't mean he is automatically some kind angelic pure-hearted being. He could be just as crooked as any other OTC clown, you never know.
I'm not sure why you replied with a big N-O no just because I referred to the generic "they" for company leadership instead of singling out Kuldip by name, but whatever.
It doesn't change the fact that he can do whatever he wants with offering funds, which yes, very much includes paying himself and other officers or employees and/or paying Frank if he so wishes. Those are still among his funding options no matter his heritage or age.
BTW, from the offering: "Mekaddesh Group Corporation, is founded by Antonio Cesar Guel and his friend and business partner for many years Kuldip singh".
Yes, that would be the same Antonio featured here: https://www.fcc.gov/document/bureau-issues-hdo-hccnantonio-cesar-guel-and-jennifer-juarez?fbclid=IwAR0vI2p9kqrwino6P4gzvZHFhkDwROME-zdXsRBPlyqphqwf1trOmsdoqMU_aem_AfqUV9E3VpCqiVq7yrKc52iV8QA0y6u2GW3SGNSYVkTw8o_d6ARLMO9hL31opYXCZpw .
Make sure you read through the document for some insight into these folk.
Ya, the maximum is more "best case scenario", pretty much. If you delve into the offering again, head down to the "use of proceeds" section - they break down how much gets spent on what depending on how much they collect. It's just the same stuff ratio-wise as a portion of the proceeds but in larger amounts if more comes in.
Mind you, they also spend several paragraphs pretty much saying that is all subject to change and they will actually spend the money however they damn well feel like.
(Which includes salaries for personnel and paying Frank $475,000 for his note. Just something to keep in mind)
I think they will take whatever they can get.
There is no mandate that the entire $16M be collected, that is just the maximum that would be had in a perfect world where every share sold at the maximum price.
They wouldn't do a public offering if there were specific targets they had made deals with. They would do private placements instead.
"one basher claims Sharps filings are wrong.. because he was wrong"
If your filing is right you don't require 4 separate attempts at it.
"another basher claims OTC Markets are wrong..because he was wrong"
I never said OTC Markets was wrong. I simply pointed at they did not act in accordance with their own published guidelines. "Wrong" was a word you interjected yourself.
"never showed a winning trade"
I've never showed a losing trade either. That's because I don't show my trades at all. They are none of your business.
"but loves to give out what NOT to buy"
I've never instructed anyone not to buy anything. People can buy whatever the hell they want. They do however deserve to know the bad along with the good in order to make informed decisions. I know you hate that. But I don't care. Suck it.
Maybe one day your memory will actually work. You have been reminded over and over and over and over that your beef is with OTCMarkets and their not following their own published guidelines.
Let me know how it goes when you finally lodge your complaint, you can reach them here: https://www.otcmarkets.com/contact
"Keep an eye on FINRA daily list, 78 days since tweet of application, in that timeframe now it will show up."
Wait, what the heck happened to this? -
"TREN to AVAI submitted 5/23 approved 7/18 = 38 business days.
GVSI submitted 7/18 = 38 business days means this week or next." - HokieHead, Wednesday, August 30, 2023 Link
I can't help but notice that you do not include a link to where you took that quote from.
Why don't you link it so everyone gets the FULL context.
Does that even refer to corporate action requests?
Go ahead, show everybody the link so we know EXACTLY what your quote refers to.
Wow, so now you are photoshopping a statement from an OTC disclosure onto a screenshot from the court documents as if to make it look like it's part of them.
That is full-on lying scumbag material right there..
That statement about "all defendants have been served" is nowhere to be found in the court documents. It is only in the OTC alternative disclosures.
Yes, the same alternative disclosures that George has previously had to revise due to inaccurate representations. George's 20 million shares, anyone?
Anyone can check for themselves that there are several out of state services by publication that were okayed by the court that have still never had any affidavits entered into the docket for them showing that they were actually carried out. And yes, that is how it works. When any service is carried out then an affidavit must be filed with the court proving that it was done. This goes for service in person, service by mail as well as service by publication.
https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Anonymous/default.aspx is a link to get to the quick and dirty dockets, you are looking for case A-23-864342-B.
If you want to delve into a case and the documents more fully then you will want to go through the "portal": https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/ and sign up for an account.
Learn to do your own DD people. Don't be stuck at the mercy of some lying scumbag photoshopping entirely different things together to make it look like the court acknowledges everyone has been served when that is not the case at all.
GVSI is an alternative filer, not an SEC filer.
How about those 20 million shares George missed and had to revise the disclosure for? Lovely, huh?
So when is the GVSI reverse split coming?
Same management also hit GRDO with a reverse split. So when will George hit GVSI with the reverse split?
After all it's the same management. You are trying to claim that everything for one company applies to the others.
So you are saying that there will be a GVSI reverse split too. When can we expect it?
That's a FORW filing, you're posting on the wrong board.
GVSI's filing in contrast goes a little something like this:
List any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, acquisition, spin-off, or reorganization either currently
anticipated or that occurred within the past 12 months:
NONE
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/378041/content
Oh bullshit.
Show me where George said that he is now posting cancellations because FINRA processing is about to hit.
If you can't then that's just crap you're making up.
What merger? George's very own filing says there is no merger on the horizon and that he hasn't even started looking.
"The plan is in place and the party starts NOW" - MrNormal, Sunday, October 01, 2023
"George has cleaned and cleared the $GVSI shell. Time for the real party to start" - MrNormal, Sunday, June 04, 2023 Link
The share price is right back to where it was when the party was supposed to start in June. You don't seem to be very good at calling the start of the party.
"Share cancelations have started. "
Actually, share cancellation updates have been coming in for months. The problem is they have all been dismissals until now, and that has been the majority of the parties named.
Finally one has come through. For a whopping 1/10 of 1% of the OS.
I suspect the time stamp is perhaps the uncooperative bit.
Perhaps try your link again without the "&t=578s" at the end?
AI freelancers are a dime a dozen on sites like Fiverr. Heck, it's getting easier and easier for every Joe Schmoe with no experience whatsoever to generate their own AI creations these days, for free even.
"So, what can we tweet today, boys? Let's tweet that we have a new AI division! Make sure to include a quote by a pioneering graphic designer on the webpage! It shows that we pretend to know graphic design marketing stuff!"
Well look at that, an actual share cancellation. Albeit a small one. The Koenig Grandchildren Revocable Living Trust 2,500,000 shares were canceled.
Did they actually sign it back in June? But it wasn't given to the judge to sign until today? What's up with that?
Too bad anyone with all "bashers" on ignore doesn't get to see this information immediately, the very first actual cancellation news in the case.
Of course, they're mostly all actually faking it in order to get just the noobs to ignore. So if you're a noob that is actually gullible enough to put all "bashers" on ignore you just learned a lesson. They don't want you to hear news first, they only want themselves to hear it first. Sucker.
Links to ongoing issues are not provided to the public.
Pretending that "I cannot find them" is entirely disingenuous and just more of you lying your ass off.
George withdrawing the appeal demonstrates that those things from the past are still an ongoing issue no matter how much you lie about it.
George withdrew the appeal. He would not have if that stuff did not matter any more. He wouldn't have bothered.
Yet he did bother. Obviously because that stuff is still an issue.
It's also stuff that is not publicly commented on while ongoing. Providing SEC and FINRA links as if details would be found is a red herring.
You know that as well as I do.
You are depending on your audience of the naive and the stupid to think that you somehow have cornered me with a "gotcha" when that is not the case at all.
George withdrew the appeal because that stuff still matters and you are lying your ass off to pretend that it does not.