InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 3458
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/30/2015

Re: HokieHead post# 147091

Monday, 10/02/2023 5:18:54 PM

Monday, October 02, 2023 5:18:54 PM

Post# of 172763
Wow, so now you are photoshopping a statement from an OTC disclosure onto a screenshot from the court documents as if to make it look like it's part of them.

That is full-on lying scumbag material right there..

That statement about "all defendants have been served" is nowhere to be found in the court documents. It is only in the OTC alternative disclosures.

Yes, the same alternative disclosures that George has previously had to revise due to inaccurate representations. George's 20 million shares, anyone?

Anyone can check for themselves that there are several out of state services by publication that were okayed by the court that have still never had any affidavits entered into the docket for them showing that they were actually carried out. And yes, that is how it works. When any service is carried out then an affidavit must be filed with the court proving that it was done. This goes for service in person, service by mail as well as service by publication.

https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Anonymous/default.aspx is a link to get to the quick and dirty dockets, you are looking for case A-23-864342-B.

If you want to delve into a case and the documents more fully then you will want to go through the "portal": https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Portal/ and sign up for an account.

Learn to do your own DD people. Don't be stuck at the mercy of some lying scumbag photoshopping entirely different things together to make it look like the court acknowledges everyone has been served when that is not the case at all.