Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Still curious as to what Mustang66’s “friend of a friend” divulged.
Well, back in the red on this one again. It was nice while it lasted. The $7 bil estimates are a joke folks. Wake up!
Nice little pop today. Foot pedal patent huh? Thanks Dr. Fowler!
You really haven’t been in this very long have you? You realize it has been “less than 2 years away” since the start of 2014, right?
FFS STOP THE BLEEDING!
Interesting. Intuitive is being proactive because they know competition is knocking on the door.
Get it together TMDI / MDT!!!
My accountant guided me to the QEF election. Something each person must decide on their own.
Your choice Flenderson. Some people do things by the book.
Bidds, if YOU purchase a PFIC stock it is ALWAS a PFIC regardless of what happens unless you designate a QEF election each year that you purchase. Please do your own research on this.
For a bit of clarification...
Taxpayers subject to the PFIC regime may benefit from making either a mark-to-market election or a qualified-electing-fund (QEF) election in the year the stock is purchased. However, if they do not, under the "once a PFIC, always a PFIC" rule, the stock will always be considered PFIC stock subject to the Sec. 1291 regime with respect to the shareholder, even in years when the company issuing the stock no longer qualifies as a PFIC.
Taxpayers who fail to make a QEF election in the year they purchase a PFIC stock may make an election in subsequent years. However, to avoid being subject to the Sec. 1291 tax regime, the taxpayer must make a deemed-sale or deemed-dividend election (a purging election) for the stock.
Taxpayers may make a purging election on an amended return but should take care to file the amended return well before the statute of limitation expires, since it is not clear whether the timely mailing rule applies in such instances.
Sorry ‘66... “Once a PFIC, Always a PFIC...”
https://hodgen.com/when-a-pfic-stops-being-a-pfic/
I got in on a few of those in the $1.60s range. Titan is in good shape. Let’s hold their feet to the fire though. They still need to bring this home!!!!
Yo, seriously Liv... is a frog’s ass really water tite?
Take a look at the recent dilution.
Yep, that too!
Keep voting Democrat and this is what happens. Enjoy!
The patent portfolio alone prevents this from ever bottoming out at .25 again. And the company actually has a pile of cash to continue development.
Sorry you decided to take the loss rather than average down.
Agree! KAVL is setting themselves up nicely.
Nice!
Hence why retail distribution points are so important. KAVL will not be affected.
We may close in the green today. Congrats to a few of you for scooping in the low $2s!!
Nice!
Panic sellers never cease to amaze me. Investing 101: BUY LOW, SELL HIGH! They just cannot grasp this concept. I sincerely hope none of the TMDI longs here fell victim to the panic.
Mmmmmkaaaay!
Not sure how you get to that conclusion. This wasn’t any different than every other investor call. Let’s just add another year to the development.
Do you all remember the grease-board picture from the NC facility? This is the timeline we saw on the grease-board. IDE early 2022.
Looks like some sold below $2.62. Seriously not getting why. What were people expecting from the earnings report?
All great questions. Are they conducting a Q&A today?
I think you may be right Scalpel. The revenue generated is still most likely considered “passive.”
I hope so!
Joseph Kralicky was a Ximedica software engineer.
Nice!
Nice!
Scoooop to offset the dilution. You’ll thank me later!
SCOOOOOOOP BISHES SCOOOOOOP!
So OS doesn’t matter to YOU! It matters to others. Apparently it matters to HC. You agreed that OS matters to the guy that didn’t keep pace with dilution. It seems HC didn’t do that.
Yes, the buyout price matters most. But depending on one’s buying pattern, OS may have a huge impact on one’s potential gains.
Like you, I kept buying as our price was falling. I may still buy as we are heading up. With more dilution coming, that is the only way for me (and you) to maximize potential. SO OS STILL MATTERS! And for those longs that bought awhile back and are just sitting on it, it turns out that plan is not the best plan to maximize gains. So OS matters to them.
SCOOOOOOOOP YOU FRIG’N NUDNICKS!
On 100k shares ownership and a & $5 bil sales price I’d much rather have $5 million at 100 mil OS than $2.5 million at 200 OS.
He is right. OS matters!
I’m okay with it BigT. I’ve factored in most of the dilution. Just making a statement that HC is not wrong on this point.
BO matters too. But the OS affects your ownership percentage if you don’t keep buying at the pace of dilution. If we’re bought for $5 billion in a few months, and you do not keep buying, you’re much better off at 100 mil OS than 200 mil OS. OS matters!
But were you there when John Hargrove drove the dagger in our momentum? That was well before the RS. We watched our accounts disappear in front of our eyes.