Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly so Zerosum : there is a book to be written
about the technology and its evolution
and how the Longs have Held On and with what subsidiary effects
on all aspects of their lives..
To put it very,very politely and simply, I will need
to do a lot of mending and repairing...relationships, house,
nervous system..life..
which also means I am hoping for all the bonuses that will
also compensate for shares sold ::
a swift move of share price, dividends and royalties as soon as possible and what a Marilyn Monroe
moment if we could have a forward split or whatever it's called
Now I pray that the whole industry does not wait for KM and a
brand new unit of sale : an entire and integrated and remote controlled system
no-one prepared us for that final twist
Smile --Russia -- I seem to recall a meeting
at which it became very clear that AOT loves the cold..
and has a lot of prime time for ice..
and Russia being so full of ice and multinationals,
what juicy prospects await the investors ...
the only challenge for the Very Longs being to remember
who they are and where they put their marbles..
Truth of Matter.....what is this about February ??
a new suggested date for the AGM perhaps ??
there has been no pattern in a negative
sense ...nor have things 'gone around' ie around
and around a static or failing product ..
it is all moving in a very straight line
as determined by the norms of R & D
moving into commercialisation..ie forwards
and
as documented by SEC filings - that linear progression
remains the norm , however frustrating the fluff and
hype in which it is wrapped
no-one has been described as about to buy AOT and
no-one has failed to buy AOT ...ie so that further
justifications or hype are needed ..
what has remained static has been the need
to iron out the natural problems and the legal necessity
for silence or fluff and hype..
to accuse management of both constantly deceiving us and while having other options is pretty feeble
You are right in a way Zeppelin
I have often wondered whether there has been all that
self-serving hype going on ...
I did Sales jobs when I was a student and cold calls generate just that kind of stuff..
and many years later I was
earning good money as a copywriter..so I know how corporations
like to be represented ..
but I just can't bring myself to apply that experience or any such cynicism to the selling of such a product as AOT : borne of years of research/ testing/ validation etc across every kind of institution
and expertise....and weighing 110 tons !
Sorry, the QS copy can be irritating but I simply do not accept
that years of collaboration and communications end up being flippantly or misleadingly assessed after another positive phone call or development
the potential clients can also read these assessments..and
why would anything misleading be risked after so much successful progress has clearly taken place, however it is or is not described ??
this post is final proof of my validated expertise in global
communications etc
So while some ponder on whether Don Dickson flushed $70,000
down the toilet - and others speculate whether that would be
legal - we have a glimpse of the global insanity being expressed
via its interest in AOT in all its variations...not forgetting the
total idiocy of QS managers who have omitted to prepare for any
orders (being too busy swindling us)...
strange to see the stock valued at 0.149927 and going up 0.004127
let's hope that degree of compression is inversely proportional
to what happens when the sales start
giving yourself a lot of credit then Tickertape
well done for such a belief in yourself
that you want to publicly share it with us
and while spreading your scepticism over an ever expanding
time-scale..
in a few lines you go from nothing
within 90 days since your last prophecy, then within 2016,
then it's only a tiny project, then it's nothing ever
possiblky
aren't we the lucky ones ?
perhaps you've noticed the numbers of people and
companies with whom QS regularly works and the number of times
we have been told of the financial support that has
been organised...
Just like Mr Dickson did not flush $70,000 down
the toilet
so it is that QS publicity displays confidence in the next phase and the final outcomes : you don't publicise one area of apparently unfinished business unless other facts tell you how it will finish...
Well posted AISI - that kind of clarity
helps anyone new to this board to appreciate the
reality of what was always authentic
Despite unhelpful factors like NDA's - which offer easy assistance
to negative posters - Don Dickson's purchase is management support of its own promises..
Clearly the length of time has been a test of patience but the
substance remains the same
Thanks very much - that is a great document
Very comprehensive and good to see it all and also
what is pending around the world
I had forgotten about the Joule Heating System
any chance the JHS could win a contract on its own,
before AOT ? Or are they complementary ?
SMILE - with apologies, which SEC document are you
referring to in that last post ?
Yawn and more yawns
Another fact : only one version of events can be authentic and
true
and that version of events derives from the obvious need for
multiple tests and phases
all of which derive from the scale of change offered
to an entire industry..
it is slow and complicated because it is authentic
all the other stuff is just messing around with message
board communication and all of which is rightly ignored
by QS managers
Yes, this is London .....
I have no strong views on what could or should have been
It just seems excruciating that QS has created no leverage through publicity - if it was logical or predictable to be eventually trading in integrated systems, then at what point does an NDA end or QS stand up for its shareholders ?
when an entire and gleaming system is on its way, installed , producing profits,,maybe ?
or when a single AOT on a working pipeline is repeatedly successful?
it seems as if the piece of string is always getting longer and while QS remains ever-obsequious to the hush-hush brigade
Agreed Zerosum - but no-one told us and no-one said on this board
- and certainly it was never part of the QS publicity - that the
units of sale would be entire and integrated systems..
a silence which is perhaps odd or perhaps not
AGM - was not the talk of Sydney this year ? Then London ?
all part of the global picture...
oh dear, it's time for all the AGM stuff again...
and the first anniversary of the arrival of the billionaires,
Messrs Nicholson and Scott....via Hawaii ?
Gosh, hasn't our investment benefited hugely from their arrival and ..er...support ..for the Bifurcation etc ..?
Good to have them on the paperwork I suppose
Zerosum : my main point was that the sale unit is no
longer a number of AOT's
it is now an integrated system , remotely controlled , as applied
to a given quantity of pipeline and its variations in oil and as managed by people
familiar with the Manual..
that finished product represents a qualitative change and one we were not
prepared for..
and it explains why every possible client is watching on KMI..to
see how the integrated system works...
I was getting hyper-frustrated by the silence from non KMI clients
..but now it seems more reasonable...
Zerosum - anyone - do my last two posts accord
with how you read the current situation ?
Creating a User's Manual is a pretty major
step...
Some people would say that it was worth a Press Release
on its significance ....and which allows QS to blow its trumpet
without naming names..
??
The global silence - this will surely be at an end
once the User's Manual is ready to be dispensed as part of the
overall kit..
whatever oil or oils the client is managing, there will be a
User's Manual to come off the shelf with whatever variation of AOT has been selected...but that trimming into a universal formula and kit will require a lot of trial and error
the latest technology at Christmas time, up and running
before going to Church via the Manual :: let's hope our Manual and pay day is during Q3
So : we are now selling integrated remote controlled systems
rather than any number of AOT's..to be applied to various oils ?
which unit of sale would explain the global silence while KMI
leads the way
the fact of the KMI tests being re condensate oil - which is more difficult - is irrelevant...
every potential client wants to know about the best overall system
and its management...even if there is only one type of crude
involved....the same principles apply.
yes ?
this was never part of the management of our expectations by QS..
that much is certain...
not surprisingly I suppose
And without advocating a predatory kind of PR,
could this not be used by QS Energy in some way..?
no-one can move a muscle because of the NDA's ?
even if no mention is made of the companies' names ?
just of the support of the PRCI
of the Dept of Environment
of Temple University
of all the other institutes and individuals
and of the ongoing collaborations with multiple
corporations around the world..
DOING SOMETHING APART from waiting
We need PR with balls & brains ...
No more sitting in the corner, all shyness and modesty at the
party...
we need the most beautiful girl at the party to stop waiting to
be asked to dance - and to get out there and dance with her lucky first choice..
There is too much from Gregg of this excruciating shyness or modesty or 'knowing my place'...'oh,really, you think I'm beautiful?' ..
Get Mr Kinder interviewed - he can open his mouth and respect the NDA ; get the ECO journalists and Greens writing about Oil and QS in the big newspapers; show photographs of AOT in testing and commercialisation...and stop allowing the the oil producers to treat themselves (and their money) like the
dark prophets of Klu Klux Klan..
there's going to be a ******y User's Handbook/ Manual for goodness sakes.....and still no-one can talk about it ..???
It's crazy
...on a major crude and condensate pipeline....Eagle Ford.."
and are all the other companies standing in a queue ..
waiting for KMI ?
like a load of ******y sheep ?
would it be too dashing or revolutionary for our PR
people to organise something...? maybe an interview
with Richard Kinder ?
or are we still obliged to be shy and under-selling
in a kind of sadistic, pseudo-modest, shareholder-torturing kind of way ??
...due to its positive ongoing evaluation "
and the rest..
yes, every time the insults are thrown,
they reveal a very poor level of thought and
judgment ..that never defines or connects with anything outside
a message board
where ,here, as long as it meets the site rules, you can
say anything
oh what fun...you can then even quote it
yes,"you can even quote it " (quoted)
so, what is there to say ? and what individual
contributions do you have for this board ?
to initiate , of your own ?
Yes, that is the evidence and "yes, (quote), "that is the
evidence " says I
and "says I " (quote)
DefinIte that this is the last phase and we definItely
need another voice in support
let's hope our PR people are pressing for an
interview with Mr Kinder
definItely ....a good idea
I I I I
Good post Z/SUM
everything being done for KM is so clearly
for all the industry
so let's hope the share price reflects that from
the get-go, rather than relating only to the value of
one contract etc etc
440,000 miles of Rolls Royce management..
The Rolls Royce of Pipeline Management
No Turbulence, no pipe pressure, fewer emissions,
better and cleaner pipes, diminished costs in pumping and
in chemical additives and in maintenance , less viscosity
and more oil moved..
And all of this - a cleaner faster cheaper flow in every part of the stream - being remotely controlled courtesy of a beautiful manual..
welcome to a brave new world of green Rolls Royces
come on baby....up to 17 cents...you can do it !!
" currently in case study review with leading pipeline operators"
noting the plural ..operatorSSSSS
I guess it was clear enough that while KMI were the first
and most involved ...there had to be others..
I wonder if the others - in less difficult crude - are
as involved in quieter ways...faster ways even !!
This was new in giving publicity to the science ??
and we saw the first scientific diagrams ??
This supports the
normalization of AOT as applicable to the whole industry
and gives depth to what is going on with KMI..before
it all goes into the Operators' Manual..
also - when the first contract is announced, it is
now more likely to be responded to as the first of
many more..??
sadly, for me, that seems to rule out this week
as far as any further news is concerned
for me, it's got to be this week..
If there is any justice, the week will bring
news to change our share price..
13 years 6 months and 3 weeks later...
yes yes...but WHEN ? and are they all waiting for KMI ??
Even though 'they' could or even should have been
progressing at a very different pace...??
not being managers of condensate ??
other crudes are a stroll in the park ?
Tckrtape - where does that 90 days come from ?
I have asked before and got no response..
And with apologies for repetition, I can find
no references to 90 days or 3 months in recent
Updates..as the projected timeline for AOT's real arrival..
have I missed it ? refused to admit it ?
And thank you Earth1 - good to have a professional's input
And I am banking on Gregg's understatements being as Under
as Gold...
I do not want to scrape through 90 days ..
It would be worth a lot to hear from someone apart from
our CEO..maybe that nice Mr Kinder could be encouraged
to say a few words..
FML - what a pilgrimage it has been...
and now someone is talking 90 MORE days...
I will re-read the Updates but I have no recall
of such specific timelines..
Part of the ambivalence of all this has been
the idea that " it could happen any day "
I suppose the day it does happen will be in 2016
and will begin like any other day..
Thanks again - and Tkrtape got the 90 days from a
previous QS update re KMI or Middle East
or he was making an educated or provocative guess ?
I never expected the market to be so absolute
ie nothing - not one fraction of a scent - is given on the basis of potential or clear progress towards a goal or good science or anything of that nature
maybe this is a kind of inverse snobbery - until you have everything, you are allowed nothing - if you make such claims for a technology across an entire industry, with a potential share price of...hundreds of dollars...OK, then you must sit at rock bottom
until the first sale is made..
and there is nothing in between...NOTHING
Apologies Snoop - where is your figure of 90 days coming
from ?
What was the estimated time frame for the KMI Scada / integration
work ?
I recall a post from Pie which mentioned 30 days ..in some
KMI context I think...