Numbnuts. This STILL stands, so there’s no confusion.

10k:
>>Ms. Powers and Mr. Goldman are subject to a voluntary blocking agreement under which they cannot exercise any options, warrants or other derivative securities unless they provide the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice.

I thought you said you saw an actual language change from the 10k verbiage but you didn’t so never mind. Mod, please remove those last few postings.

>>Could somebody tell me if all the securities that were blocked from being allowed to exercise were unblocked by authorizing share raise, OR perhaps on March 16 now that shareholders were given 60 days notice yesterday on the website?

I’d guess it’s the latter.

See what I’m getting at? We just received the 60 day notice.

Private companies have shares too.

You’re confusing opinion with facts. It’d be misleading if he said something was in a factual document that wasn’t.

Sure looks that way. And we’ll never know about the 90 employees or how much was paid to consultants.

Still not seeing it. But you I’ll believe. So that means the plaintiff demanded a change to shareholders from the company/board, yes?

Are you misleading investors again, Flip, because I don’t see it?

>>YY. Defendants Jasinowski and Goldman died during the pendency of the
Action—Jasinowski in January 2025 and Goldman in August 2025. After
Jasinowski’s and Goldman’s deaths, their estates and the executrices of their estates
were substituted as defendants.

I assume anyone here claiming to hold hundreds of thousands of shares have access.

Flip, what page is that on please?

>>but the settlement notice on the website is for shareholders to be notified for 60 days.

Don’t be a wanker. Nobody can ask questions because she’s not talking. All we can do is mostly guess. If it’s been changed to “Shareholders” than that’s change for the good. Maybe a demand?

10k:
>>Ms. Powers and Mr. Goldman are subject to a voluntary blocking agreement under which they cannot exercise any options, warrants or other derivative securities unless they provide the Company at least 61 days’ advance notice.

Not talking about the lawsuit again mm’s I’m talking about the true-up suit. I person could’ve handled that zero research suit and they’re getting $3.5M?

You’re asking what I’ve been asking for a long time now with zero replies. Shareholders don’t get 60 days notice the board does. My take is there’s a 30 day window where the blocker can come down before shareholders read it in a filing, but I could be wrong on that?

>>Could somebody tell me if all the securities that were blocked from being allowed to exercise were unblocked by authorizing share raise, OR perhaps on March 16 now that shareholders were given 60 days notice yesterday on the website?

I’d guess it’s the latter.

See what I’m getting at? We just received the 60 day notice.

You disciples have left a mountain of questions and observations behind. Another red flag.

Does anyone else find this figure shocking for a tiny little nothing suit that apparently had no other demands than to lesson the true up options? Further, it’s disturbing that these plaintiffs did not have to share an ounce of information with shareholders.

>>The Company understands that the Plaintiff intends to apply to the Court for an award of up to $3,500,000 in attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with the litigation

Amazing Zivic can chime in here without proper disclosure. Pretty shocking.

Zivic, are you still a consultant to NWBO?

Can you give us an idea of what your interactions are like with LP? Have you ever complained to her about her website, being an artist and all?

Can we commission you to paint a portrait of “The NWBO shareholder” for her conference room?

Does anyone else find this figure shocking for a tiny little nothing suit that apparently had no other demands than to lesson the true up options? Further, it’s disturbing that these plaintiffs did not have to share an ounce of information with shareholders.

>>The Company understands that the Plaintiff intends to apply to the Court for an award of up to $3,500,000 in attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with the litigation

A little thicker a little grayer. But I don’t see him recommending DCVAX only trials?

https://nyulangone.org/doctors/1588860688/lee-tessler

Was not aware this was a category. LOL

“LGBTQ+ health”

Told you already same as the Hubble Telescope screw up where they confused metric with imperial. That or it was just another way for LP to tell investors about progress that never really happened and won’t need to be paid for. 🤷‍♀️

I’d make sense the Invisible Woman runs an invisible company.

If it was a $mistake$?

>>IMO, the biggest mistake LP has made is placing too much trust in 3rd parties in accomplish company goals.

Pulling on heart strings is not going to help investors but it will help draw in retail. They should’ve included some evidence in the video that it was actually DCVAX that helped him live longer.

MHRA knows the results are nebulous and it can’t be paid for in the UK, so they’d just rather not say anything then be pulled into a social media war, is the most likely scenario, IMO. That or LP was already told it’s a no-go but she’s just not telling retail. 🤷‍♀️

But the real important question is what exactly is Advent doing to help poor shareholders?

…Forgive me for mentioning “Management style” since I don’t see how the Invisible Woman with a severely outdated website qualifies as such.🤷‍♀️

https://patch.com/new-jersey/across-nj/brain-cancer-patient-nj-becomes-1st-northeast-receive-new-treatment

True, the run has nothing to do with NWBO. BUT they are the competition. You could also pick up some lessons on management style, generating actual revenue, and how to run lots of trials.

>>Despite advances in medicine, charities warn that treatment choices for brain tumours - the biggest cancer killer of children and under-40s - remain severely restricted. Access to cutting-edge immunotherapies, specialist drug trials and clinical studies is scarce for British patients, leaving many to fund their own care.


That's exactly what Matt did after supporters raised funds enabling him to receive DcVax-L, a bespoke vaccine not offered through the NHS but obtainable privately in Britain for £100,000. He said: "I was only able to have the DcVax-L because of the random kindness of strangers.

"Without them I'd never have raised the £100,000 needed. But I was only able to have four doses because my tumour tissue had been stored incorrectly. Proper tissue storage can change lives, people need to understand how important it is."

>> Matt added: "It is deeply frustrating to see treatment options available elsewhere in Europe and the USA that aren't accessible here on the NHS. Even in France, people are reimbursed by the government if they pay privately for treatment abroad. Why isn't the UK doing the same? The NHS needs to be brought up to speed, more needs to be done."

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/health/mans-warning-pins-needles-leads-36516209

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/desperate-family-race-against-time-36512671

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/tv/antiques-roadshow-expert-shares-emotional-33151800

The financiers / LP and trust are likely hoping for something just a little positive from MHRA so they can unload before retail realizes without NICE and FDA, it’s all smoke and mirrors.

I figure counting down instead of the usual counting up might actually have some impact on retail’s small brains for when the next authorized raise request comes.

Couldn’t it be both, or have a patient facing portal? Seems like 101 to most clear thinking investors.

Yeah,I saw all that on their website. 🙄🤷‍♀️

80,800,966 (900,000,000 - 9,199,034)🤷‍♀️. It’s no wonder she didn’t want a ASM transcript out there.🤷‍♀️

>>Let me put it in perspective. Our burn rate in 2023 and 2024 was particularly high, very intensive years, in the low 50 millions. It’s down substantially this year. But if we kept up that same burn rate, and we did all equity financing, and the price was still in the 24, 25 cent range, it would take years to use those shares.

And we’re not going to do all equity financing, and we certainly hope that our share price is not going to stay at 24, 25 cents. We plan to focus on non-dilutive.

So no to the fear mongerers. We are not going to just burn through a whole bunch of shares at a crazy, fast pace.

Whatever happened with that Ashkan chat? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Now should be the volume. And I don’t mean in a good way.

Stay high.

I just didn’t see any point highlighting the Advent “Arrangement” now that it’s finally owned by NWBO. But now we have a parent company who’s not even mentioning Advent financials, potential, or adding them to their awful website, so I’m not sure what to make of it?

MajorRiskLittleReward, you do realize that LP hasn’t even bothered to play up Advent and she continues to dilute down here at a quarter, right?

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/13/warren-buffett-still-searching-for-big-elephant-deal-in-his-final-time-as-berkshire-ceo.html