Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They are seasonal biotech stock players:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=95077463
My sincere congratulations to the shorts! I will have Johnnie Walker Blue Label at dinner.
Let the shorts dance on the ceiling in hell!
It's not for me. It only works for you. Were you there dancing on the ceiling? Nice job!
Will the criminals involved in the takedown go to hell and bring the ceiling dancers with them?
It is interesting that certain old-timer Ariad believers, who used to claim they knew what they owned, have shorted what they knew due to the taken-down.
Certain old-timer Ariad longs have jointed class action lawsuits against Ariad, hoping to get $0.001 shares per 1000 qualified shares. LOL! It's normal, too. Anyway, money is money.
-------------
True longs and only the Ariad true longs will be greatly rewarded. Ariad will be the next BIIB and the next Amgen despite the painful set back.
All my posts are factual. Each of them is good enough to make bloria_research dance on the ceiling. Thank you!
One who cheers about pre-market dawn must be long on the stock. Do you agree?
Evidence Supports AP26113 in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases, by Alice Goodman, The ASCO Post, December 1, 2013, Volume 4, Issue 19
I will vote him for the greatest CEO of all time if Harvey Berger's legal team acts against the FDA.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94997236
I thought I was obligated to answer your questions politely.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94998974
Haven't you started our conversation and then replied my posts with "???" and "????"?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94990415
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94992739
I was just answering your ??? + ???? = 7 questions.
--------------
How is the magic phrase patently silly you suggested to the ceiling dancer working for him? Are you terminally stupid?
IIIVerson is a TA expert. He is a very honest guy.
Some others are with us, too.
Thank you, kiki27.
ARIAD strength attributed to inclusion on EMA meeting agenda
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Agenda/2013/12/WC500158398.pdf
The European Medicines Agency will review Ariad's Iclusig at its December meeting, according to a meeting agenda posted to the regulator's website. Ariad shares are up 9.8% to $4.24 following circulation of the agenda.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ariad-strength-attributed-inclusion-ema-161303306.html
Iclusig (EMEA/H/C/002695/A-20/0003), Orphan (Ponatinib Hydrochloride), ARIAD Pharma Ltd.
16 December 2013
EMA/CHMP/723655/2013 Rev.3
http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Agenda/2013/12/WC500158398.pdf
Dew, please teach us about standard formats for reporting SAEs. Is a standard format more crucial than standard criteria? If so, why did the doctors report SAEs per standard criteria without mentioning any standard formats? Are the clinical trial doctors patently silly?
Will br vote HB for the greatest CEO of all time, or will he continue dancing on the ceiling in hell?
AP26113 - Solving the Treatment Resistance Riddle, www.curetoday.com article, Dec. 8, 2013
Standard criteria per which docs report SAEs is not the same thing as stand nonsense per which the FDA reported Iclusig SAEs. You are right.
There are certain standard criteria per which the clinical trial doctors report SAEs as evidenced by an ASH presentation titled "... ... 2-Year Follow-up of the PACE Trial"., in which each SAE-reporting slide is labeled with "per standard criteria".
http://t.co/MP4P3hn3FM
If there are no such standard criteria, what are the doctors taking about? Are they lying? Have I been misled by the doctors?
I incline to believe the doctors. I don't trust jq1234's post based upon which you have made your point.
I think you can get the proof/evidence yourself. Please do me a favor and get it yourself.
Or you can go to the post linked by the following URL:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94977421
I have almost reached my daily limit of 15 posts. So I cannot deal with you any longer today. So I would like to ask you another favor. Can we stop here today? You are welcome to request whatever tomorrow. Thank you very much.
How is the class action lawsuit you have jointed progressing? Do you think the lawsuit will kill Ariad? If so, it will be a better Ariad killer than the Novartis Ariad killer Dew was talking about a while ago.
I understand you are an old timer Ariad believer looking forward to the rising of ARIA's price. Is it my delusion?
I will vote Harvey Berger for the greatest CEO of all time if his legal team takes actions against the FDA.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94970959
I agree with Clackson. Ariad is obligated to stay with the standard.
When standard criteria get violated, a lot of confusion and questions arise, which are real, not my delusion.
Why do you think 2a's post I quoted is rubbish? What about your posts? Rubbish or treasure?
What do you think about my recent post:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94970959
Doctors know more about Iclusig than the FDA, I believe patently silily. They report SAEs per standard criteria. The FDA knows more about the standard than the doctors. If the FDA violates the standard, it must be intentional with an agenda.
The clinical trial doctors have treated and examined the patients physically. Don't they know about the safety/toxicity of Iclusig more than anybody else?
Patently silly or not, I firmly believe Doctors know more about Iclusig than the FDA, for a large number of doctors have concluded that "Ponatinib is well tolerated and Adverse Events are manageable". They are a great deal more than any individual doctor, no matter how renowned or how malicious to Ariad an individual may be.
I have to admit that I am patently silly as pointed out by the wise individual who is malicious to Ariad. However, this individual is no less patently silly than me. This bright person even cannot count. The wise man failed to count how many doctors had contributed to the ASH presentations. His wisdom patently sillily beleved that it was an individual's presentation.
I would not believe the conspiracy theory at all if someone who is malicious to Ariad and always speaks for Novartis did not attack the conspiracy theory constantly.