InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 593
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/11/2010

Re: DewDiligence post# 41371

Monday, 12/16/2013 5:13:27 PM

Monday, December 16, 2013 5:13:27 PM

Post# of 80490
Dew, please teach us about standard formats for reporting SAEs. Is a standard format more crucial than standard criteria? If so, why did the doctors report SAEs per standard criteria without mentioning any standard formats? Are the clinical trial doctors patently silly?

Standard criteria for adverse events is not the same thing as a standard format for reporting them.

What really matters is the criterion rather than the format, which I patently sillily believe.

Details: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=94997236
------
The FDA knows more about standard criteria, per which doctors report SAEs, than the clinical trial doctors, at least it seems to me. If the FDA does not follow them, it must be intentional with an agenda.

And Doctors know more about Iclusig than the FDA, I believe patently silily.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.