Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
and why a "cannabis holding corp."? (GNCP)
good luck
write them and ask for a written confirmation...
request a written document about the mandatory removal, i.e. without your order
you need a written document, if you have not the shares in your depot.
you need it in written form, if the shares are not in your depot.
Management of FFGO has sold the Bouse- and S.C.-assets of the firm before the corporation was delisted and lateron was administratively dissolved in Wyoming.
no problem, read the laws of Wyoming about corporations a.s.o.
afterthought:
1.) the laws of the state of Wyoming - that was the reason for FFGO to go from Delaware to Wyoming - allow an "administratively dissolved" corporation to sell the assets (FFGO) and to distribute the result among the former shareholders.
2.) to me it is not understandable, why management of FFGO has written down to zero the value of HGLC shares in possession of FFGO. I have asked management if for tax reasons (??). no answer. but no problem: shares of HGLC must exist until now. but they can make additions to fixed assets.
FFGO is delisted and administratively dissolved in Wyoming. FFGO imo has gone.
B U T :
there are LIQUIDATUION DIVIDENDS (preferred A+B, "3900% are worth waiting for..."):
these (liquidation) dividends are the "purchase price" for sold assets of FFGO.FFGO has not gotten cash for Bouse and S.C. but these often mentioned pref A+B, which Mr.Lowenthal as CEO and President of NMGL (FORM D, 2010) has put into the vaults of NMGL. these pref.A+B did never belong to NMGL, they belong to the shareholders of FFGO. it was a kind of parking. Mr.Lowenthal should answer our questions.
this action was necessary, because FFGO was not current with the documents. several weeks after the sale of Bouse and S.C. the law has changed. then the sale would have been impossible.
I think Mr. Lowenthal will sell the pref. A+B for us or he brings these shares to an exchange and delivers to us. about 23% of the pref.A+B belong to Mr. Lowenthal, if you remember. so he should be interested in the fate of these shares to get his part of the liquid. div.
everybody should keep his FFGO shares for the proof of justification or another proof, if the dividends are paid. imo
HGLC: interesting these meterlong purchases of 10.000 shs and later 999.999 and 50.000.000 shs. especially, if several brokers don´t allow the purchase of HGLC to retail investors. meaning? I don´t know.
Mr.Lowenthal should be asked, he was and is (cf. otcmarkets HGLC) a director of HGLC too. another question: where are the shares of HGLC hold by FFGO?in Form 8K from 01/16/2009, point#12, management of FFGO writes:
"...the lender has agreed with the company`s management that the company must retain their shares in Hunt Gold Corporation ...common stock primarily to make the company a more attractive candidate for a Reverse Merger in the future and because of the inherent value of these shares in HGLC..."
i.e. after the sale of Bouse and S.C. the value of the remaining FFGO was determined by these shares of HGLC. here follow further questions.
there is a little mistake:
Prime Time was named HGLC not GNCP. Sorry.
post #33652 (HGLC): only my personal opinion, no advice etc.
if the purchase price - these 620 mil US-$ - was in stocks and the corporation is bankrupt (proof??), management of HGLC should have taken back the "American Molygold" shares, i.e. Molygold is an assett of HGLC again imo.
Mr.Saner I S CEO of HGLC, Mr. Lowenthal I S a director of HGLC, cf. otcmarkets (HGLC).
I think Mr. Lowenthal as CEO of GNCP and 23%-shareholder of FFGO will make payable our Liquidation dividend (FFGO, 3900% are worth waiting for...) and answer our questions about HGLC too.
what about the sale of "Lookout Silver" by HGLC? 62 mil US-$?
what about these (about) 15 gold/silver properties of HGLC???
what about the announced restructuring - to maximize shareholder value -of HGLC in 2009?
what about the group trying to buy HGLC for about 3 cts/share in 2008?
should be about 10 cts/share today (minimum)?
considering the announcements of HGLC in 2008 and 2009 there should be
considerable values in HGLC, possibly the reason for the ongoing purchases of HGLC shares ( a lot of 10.000...).
I don´t sell any share of HGLC for these ridiculous prices.
I think people now buying shares of HGLC know the values in HGLC.
I have never heard this name.
I can´t find this name on your document.
nobody of the management of FFGO has gone to jail - you confuse FFGO with HGLC, before our managmt. has purchased Prime Time Corp. and named it GNCP.
not one member of the management of FFGO, HGLC, NMGL...has ever gone to jail, nobody had a legal problem. members of the old Prime Time managmt. had gone to jail (i.e. from the time before HGLC).
but FFGO is delisted and administratively dissolved. FFGO imo has gone.
B U T :
there are LIQUIDATUION DIVIDENDS (preferred A+B):
these (liquidation) dividends are the sold assets of FFGO.FFGO has not gotten cash for Bouse and S.C. but these often mentioned pref A+B, which Mr.Lowenthal as CEO and President of NMGL (FORM D, 2010) has put in the vaults of NMGL. these pref.A+B did never belong to NMGL. it was a kind of parking.
this action was necessary, because FFGO was not current with the documents. several weeks after the sale of Bouse and S.C. the law has changed. then the sale would have been impossible.
I think Mr. Lowenthal will sell the pref. A+B for us or he brings these shares to an exchange and delivers to us. about 23% of the pref.A+B belong to Mr. Lowenthal, if you remember.
everybody should keep his FFGO shares for the proof of justification (pref.A+B).
let me correct a mistake:
the price of gold for the estimate was 400 US-$/ounce (2004).
management has declared that there was a drilling campaign 2008/09 with good results. mgmt. informed about a restructuring to "maximize shareholder value". thereafter the great silence.
similar with FFGO: FFGO held about 500.000.000 shares of HGLC. they declared a write-off of these shares and...silence. all very strange.
if worthless, I´m not sure. but there was an expert from SA, a professor in geology, who has given an estimate of only one property of HGLC: 400mil US-$ for a price of gold of 1.000 US-$/ oz (2004).
before the company disappeared there have been recorded about 15 properties, mostly gold, cf. otcmarkets. and these are recorded until today. I don´t know what is the reality there.
I´m convinced you are right.
in summer 2008 management informed shareholders about a bid by an interested group to gain control of HGLC. the first bid was about several cent/share. today such a bid should be a lot higher because of the higher price of gold. mgmt. of HGLC rejected the bid finally at that time.
I´m sure these series of purchases (every one 10.000 shares) are steered by algorithms and an attempt to gain control.
i`m not convinced.
we speak about "not published" FTD. such secret FTDs are criminal.
you see them only, if they are revealed.
as TFF says NSS or naked SS is a crime . the criminal doesn´t reveal his crime as long as he is not forced to do so.
has nothing to do with FTD.
It´s all o.k.
if you want to takeover a company, you try to pay the smallest amount of money.
so there are algorithms which make it possible to purchase not a big number of shares or a few, but the purchase is split into a lot of buys with only a small number of shares each, e.g. 10.000 shares/ purchase.
I think so,..., I hope so.
I hope the choice of the words BIT...COIN is intentional.
several years ago the Lanza family has sold BDGR to a group trying to develop an algorithm based on blockchain technology.
perhaps the patent is granted. all speculation.
HGLC:
breakout boards #6 momentarily
restructuring???
the last share price (0,000001)is FALSE. why?
altogether there have been 22 trades, every one for a price of 0,0001,
only one trade (#11 with 760 shares) was for 0,000001.
among the trades: 2 trades (each one 50 mil shares),
1 trade (20 mil shares).
we should ask Mr. Scantini because of the FFGO liquidation dividends,
Mr. Saner because of the AmerMoly dividend.
I hope Mr. Lowenthal ultimately will answer our questions.
they are not responsible after the sale of Prime Time. our "partner" is only the management of HGLC. of course the fine (300.000 US-$) against the corporation remains with the corporation, independent of the name, if there are no special contracts. but if you consider these 15 (about) gold properties, HGLC shouldn´t have problems to pay.
our management is "clean". hopefully soon mangement will bring the restructuring announced in 2008/09 and pay the dividend from the sale of American Molygold a.s.o.
"Premier may possibly..." (or may not...)
if Premier acquires HGLC, it will be done only if Premier (with HGLC, GNCP, pref A+B) wants to build a joint venture imo. why else? to get HGLC a.s.o. premier has to pay the owners/shareholders. source of the money?
in this case more or less all daughters of Premier incl. HGLC...would be under the roof of Premier and go into this jv.
I remember, there was a discussion in 2008 when a firm was interested to acquire a controlling stake in HGLC for about 2,5 US-ct/sh.
.
if mgmt. wants to sell all the properties a reorganization is unnecessary, imo. it would only waste money.
perhaps a "partial" reorganization: several properties (e.g. the "silver daughters" of GNCP) are sold, the rest incl.CBD will be retained and "restructured (?)": a CBD - holding and a gold company under the roof of GNCP. interesting especially, if Bouse and Mockingbird really contain these terrific numbers of ounces ("Detachment fault").Premier could sell its controlling majority??? Purchaser? perhaps Searchlight?? who owns the rest of bouse, s.copp.?
I don´t know - it´s all speculation.
I have no knowledge about it.
sorry, I don´t understand the question.
or what about HGLC? the corp. is neither delisted nor is it administratively dissolved. it could be used too imo.
HGLC a/s: 2.000.000.000.000
o/s: 290.000.000.000 (nearly)
there was NSS imo.
Mr. Lowenthal (GNCP) could be a witness with the documents (times & sales) as proof in PDIV´s favour.
what if PDIV were the plaintiff as the majority holder of GNCP. is this possible?
they are in full control of the cost of the corporations.
I am convinced too: "the best is yet to come"
why? there is GNCP with its "silver daughters" and a daughter called "cannabis holding corp.".
you can sell every single daughter: they are all "body corporate".
why a holding corporation? the holding corp. is able to purchase other (daughter) corporations. could become very interesting too.
there is HGLC with about 15 (gold) properties, many (or all) of them held in corporations, easyly tradable too. HGLC is momentarily "CE expert", but this can be changed too.
there are these parts of corporations (bouse, s.copperstone),which have belonged to FFGO, and the preferred As and Bs.
a.s.o.
and in every of all these corporations a firm with the name "SEARCHLIGHT EXPLORATION Inc." holds 9,99% of the shares. and all these corporations have "AGREEMENTS" with Searchlight", you have mentioned very often.
and I am sure, they have explored more or less. very interesting times ahead.
we have forgotten "molybden": sale of American Molygold by HGLC in 2008 for about US-$ 650 mil in stocks - promised as a stock dividend to HGLC shareholders.
mgmt. has not sold shares to the market. they have used shares to pay bills for services like maintenance fees a.s.o. these shares have not reached the market imo.
not the management of HGLC but the management of Prime Time, i.e. the management of the predecessor, before "our" management - among them Mr. Lowenthal - took over the company and changed the name to HUNT GOLD Inc.
especially interesting seems to me point (a) in "transfer of titles":
(a) completion of a "positive" feasibility study for the property.
IMO this means an important precondition for the transfer of titles are "positive" feasibility studies, not only feasibility studies. and these studies should even be complete.
IMO this means that the properties should have been explored with a rather high probability (before and/or after our mgmt. had accepted them).
and don´t forget: mr.blom is an expert in mining. also: several years ago he has exchanged silver properties for gold properties.
mgmt. must have had realistic estimates of the values of these properties. how else will you compare them?
and further: searchlight exploration corp. holds about 9,99% of several or of all these companies which "own" the properties.
and I am convinced that our management has not taken any property without the results of all predecessors.
you find hints to the exploration history in the assessments of Prof. Colliston for the Bouse/S.Copperstone property as an example.
in the assessment for "Mockingbird" (HGLC) we find hints like:
"...certain of the company´s gold mining properties have proven reserves and have completed bankable feasibility studies..."
"...this company...has no need to raise cash to fulfill its objectives..."
and finally Mr. Blom and Mr. Lowenthal have not taken any cash payment - only shares. to get cash they must generate cash... by
selling the properties e.g.