Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
acobra this is rock bottom as long as we don't have a R/S or merger we all we make out good on this.
there is not 100 billion shares out there thats 100 billion A/S not 100 billion O/S, there is probably 11 billion because of the note holder dumping like 9 billion shares and with the company owning most of those 11 billion saying investors only own what 2 billion and naked shorts have 2 billion fake shares that they will have to cover very soon and the company just bought up 9 billion shares and now they can hold on to those shares and retire the remaining 89 billion shares that makes up the A/S then no investor can own more the 50% of the company which is good.
good post thats what im thinking
we need some news of a buy back or something then you will get your $0.0004 or $0.0006
I think they been buying back shares if they where not buying back shares we would of stopped at a no bid no ask why put out a press release and then forces them self's to buy back at a higher price that's stupid they are not required to put out a press release in till there done so that's what there doing they will put out a press release when there done buying all the shares they can.
nice we closed up at .0002 hopefully we can keep .0002 and move to .0003.
I believe you Snowgoose don't even worry about these bashers your doing a great job thanks man
thanks
had it under bookmarks and it was hard to find I only found it because of googles little cache system because they already delete most of there website.
http://74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:cFdmv3IQYZIJ:www.liquacorp.com/ccmain.html+Liquafaction+Corporation+Moses+Lake+washington+address&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
Liquafaction Ethanol Plant
720 Road N NE,
Moses Lake, WA 98837
Liquafaction Corporation Headquarters
2221 180th Pl. NE,
Redmond, WA 98052
Mark Mollo
President
mollodesign@yahoo.com
(206) 399-9717
(425) 746-6204 Fax
why would they do that check this out if they have $1 million dollars to buy stock.
1,000,000/.0001=10,000,000,000 shares
and after a 1000-1 R/S
10,000,000,000/1000=10,000,000 shares
1 million dollars buy the same amount so why do a R/S they would have 10 billion at .0001 if they did a R/S those share would only be 10 million share thats point less to do that and then they would have no more investors around to support them so they would screw them selfs by doing that.
even if they waited tell after the R/S to buy share 1 million dollars at .01 would only get them 100,000,000 shares and will it hold the .01 if they did a R/S no it will go all they way back down to .0001 so they would be stuck again but permanently this time with no investors they don't want that and we don't wont that.
I know what your talking about Sbleau I heard the same show and I didn't hear willie say anything about dennis being a crook these basher are trying to use anything to turn around and use to bash the stock.
very good post Maestro111 your thinking what im thinking we just have to wait out the storm and be patient for management to do there jobs.
what dont you get the last financials ended march 31st they collected the $74 million dollars after march 31st so it wont be in that financial statement it will be in the next financials which where due in june they have to post them soon to stay current with pink sheets.
they do have 74 million dollars and it was collected after that last quarter in march so the next Financial release will have the money in it so 032798 you stop posting irresponsible statements.
they have 74 million dollars why would they sell shares?
willie resigned from evfl because he wanted evfl to pay 100% of the truck stop and he didn't get his way and evfl only payed for 50% and willie payed for 50% and he got pissed now if I was the CEO of the company I would have done the same thing why would you pay for the whole thing and willie claim it as his no you pay for half we pay for half its only fair.
you forgot a 0
$300,000 buys 3 billion share not 300 million shares
thanks Snowgoose keep us posted
what are you talking about 84 million?
you need to do your DD?
there is 90 million reduction of debt due to the sell of the natural gas company and then they got 74 million profit that adds up to $164 million of profit from the natural gas company 90 + 74 = 164
"In December 2008 the Company exchanged its ownership of 5,600,000 shares of PNG Ventures, Inc. (OTCBB:PNGX - News) stock to Castlerigg PNG Investments, LLC ("Castlerigg") for payment of approximately $90 million against its total debt of $100,651,173 owed to Castlerigg and certain secured note holders."
"The Company's financial statements reflect the recognition of a gain of approximately $74 million during the Company's fourth quarter of 2008 due to the retirement of corporate debt through the Company's PNG Ventures, Inc. ("PNG") share exchange agreement announced on January 16, 2009."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Evolution-Fuels-Publishes-pz-4274086931.html?x=0&.v=1
03279 that's the 1st quarter you are talking about it ended in march the next quarter is the 2nd quarter which was due at the end of june you are trying to mislead people they will release the Financials hopefully soon because they need them to stay current with the pinksheets.
they didn't receive the money in that quarter and it will be released in the next quarter Financial Report.
The LNG business was sold to pngx to get rid of 90 million dollars in debt and a profit of $74,774,435 dollars so it was sold for a total of $164,774,435 dollars.
Is Washington the New Wall Street for Cleantech?
By Jennifer Kho
June 22, 2009, 4:29 pm
In this economy, funding for clean technology is hard to come by. That explains why companies are turning increasingly to government — and less to venture capitalists and other private investors — for a financial lifeline.
Washington is becoming “the new Wall Street for green energy,” said Doug Faulkner, president of Chrysalis Energy Partners, a strategic consulting firm, and former acting assistant secretary for energy efficiency and renewable energy at the Department of Energy. The stimulus package signed by President Obama in February came loaded with provisions for clean energy, and more help could be coming if a major energy bill makes it through Congress.
In one sense, pursuit of government funding is no different than going after venture capital. Raising money usually becomes start-up companies’ primary focus, said Greg Chin, a partner with the emerging companies group at the law firm Latham & Watkins, adding that companies hire chief executives specifically to bring in money.
But Mr. Faulkner noted that government funding can change the decision-making process for companies. “It’s not better or worse,” he said, “but dealing with the government has its own set of dynamics,” which many companies will not have experienced before.
One important difference between government and the private sector is the objective: while venture capitalists set out to make money, the government has a broader range of goals, including reducing greenhouse-gas emissions and increasing jobs, said Steve McBee, chief executive of McBee Strategic, a consulting firm. So while it is “extremely important” to submit applications that highlight technological advances and financial security, it is equally important to explain how projects help meet political goals, he said.
Companies are honing their strategies to give themselves an edge, Mr. McBee said. They are forming partnerships, changing their business models and dedicating more time and energy to applying for the funding. A legion of consultants have cropped up to help. As an idea of the volume of paperwork that government applications involve, Mr. McBee said that his company submitted three three-ring-binders full of contracts for each of his clients’ federal loan-guarantee applications. “It’s a nontrivial amount of work,” he said.
And there are risks to relying on government: the Department of Energy has tentatively approved only one loan guarantee in several years, though Steven Chu, the energy secretary, has made speeding up the process a priority.
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/22/is-washington-the-new-wall-street-for-cleantech/
Douglas L. Faulkner is on the board members and if he was not then this company would have to rescind the news so fast there *** will hurt and they have not had to rescind the news that means Faulkner is on board which is very good for us.
DALLAS, Feb. 26, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Earth Biofuels, Inc. (Pink
Sheets:EBOF) (the "Company") today announced that former U.S. Department of
Agriculture Acting Under Secretary of Rural Development, Mr. Douglas L.
Faulkner, has joined the Company's Advisory Board.
Douglas L. Faulkner has served five United States Presidents, from Jimmy Carter
to George W. Bush. In his nearly thirty year Executive Branch career, Mr.
Faulkner held an array of posts, from the Central Intelligence Agency to the
Departments of Energy and Agriculture and on issues from foreign policy to trade
to technology and economic development. His first job in Washington, D.C., was
as an aide to the late Edward Madigan, a former Illinois Congressman and
Secretary of Agriculture. He later was a senior policy adviser to two
Secretaries of Energy.
Mr. Faulkner is co-Founder and President of Chrysalis Energy Partners
("Chrysalis") which is based in Washington, D.C. Earth Biofuels will utilize
Chrysalis, and the experience of Mr. Faulkner, to help develop the Company's
tactics and strategy, assist with working relationships with the various federal
agencies, chiefly the Departments of Agriculture and Energy as well as the
Environmental Protection Agency, and assist with effectively seeking funding and
regulatory/policy assistance.
Mr. Faulkner served the Bush Administration from 2001-08 in a number of
high-level positions at both the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Energy,
including Acting Under Secretary for Rural Development and the Acting Assistant
Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Mr. Faulkner has been at the center of the federal government's efforts to
expand global markets for renewable energy and energy efficiency. While at USDA,
he played a key role in the passage and implementation of the landmark energy
title in the 2008 Farm Bill, which contained significant new funding and
legislative authorities for the Department. He played a key leadership role in
the Global BioEnergy Partnership and the U.S.-Brazil biofuels initiative. Mr.
Faulkner also oversaw other significant rural programs, including business and
cooperative development, housing and broadband.
Mr. Faulkner and his counterpart at the U.S. Department of Energy, Mr. John
Mizroch, steered the development of the 2008 "National Biofuels Action Plan".
This plan was created to accelerate the development of a sustainable biofuels
industry in the United States, and focused on sustainability, feedstock
production, feedstock logistics, conversion science and technology, distribution
infrastructure, blending, and environment-health-safety.
At the Department of Energy, Mr. Faulkner proposed a bold and responsible budget
for fiscal year 2007, launching seminal initiatives in bioenergy and solar
power. He oversaw an annual budget of over a billion dollars for green energy
research and development. Under his direction, management reforms replaced an
outdated organization with a smaller, more streamlined workforce, saving
millions of dollars and increasing productivity.
About Earth Biofuels, Inc.
Earth Biofuels, Inc. endeavors to produce and distribute biodiesel fuel and
cellulosic ethanol through wholesale and retail outlets. The Company's Web site
is www.earthbiofuels.com.
Forward-Looking Statements Disclosure
This press release may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning
of the federal securities laws. In this context, forward-looking statements may
address the Company's expected future business and financial performance, and
often contain words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects,"
"intends," "plans," "seeks," "will," and other terms with similar meaning. These
forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to
different degrees, uncertain. Although the Company believes that the assumptions
upon which its forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, it can
provide no assurances that these assumptions will prove to be correct. In
connection with the "safe harbor" provisions of the federal securities laws,
including the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, important
factors that, among others, could cause or result in actual results and
experience to differ materially from the Company's anticipated results,
projections, or other expectations are disclosed in the Company's filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements in this
press release are expressly qualified by such cautionary statements, risks, and
uncertainties, and by reference to the underlying assumptions.
-0-
CONTACT: Earth Biofuels, Inc.
Media & Investor Relations
Randy Hepler
866-765-4940
investors@earthbiofuels.net
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS184304+26-Feb-2009+GNW20090226
this is what evfl has been trying to do with the EPA so they are working hard and it wont happen till dec 1 2009 .
RFA Makes Case for Move to E12 While EPA Considers E15 Allowance
Date Posted: July 23, 2009
Washington—Currently, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a formal waiver request from the ethanol industry to allow for the blending of up to 15% ethanol in a gallon of gasoline.
The RFA strongly believes that both the science and existing statute compel EPA to approve this waiver.
Under the law, however, EPA has 270 days to consider the request.
The clock is running and a decision is due on December 1, 2009.
In the meantime and regardless of its decision, EPA can immediately take steps to increase ethanol use in America safely and responsibly.
EPA has authority to define E12 (12% ethanol/88% gasoline) blends as “substantially similar” to fuels used in certified motor vehicles.
The basis for this conclusion is that the weight percentage of oxygen that EPA allows in oxygenated gasoline actually equates to an oxygen percentage that would be present in 12% ethanol blends.
Ethanol as a fuel additive is an oxygenate.
Including ethanol raises the oxygen content of gasoline, causing for a cleaner, more complete combustion of gasoline.
Much of the concern being raised has to do with the amount of oxygen in gasoline as a result of increased ethanol use and increased combustion temperatures.
However, it is likely that fuels containing oxygen levels equal to those in E12 have been in the marketplace since the early 1990s.
A complete explanation of the already provided statutory authority EPA has to approve E12 can be found in RFA’s official comments.
Considering this and the authority given to EPA in the Clean Air Act, EPA should acknowledge that it has already permitted E12 blends in terms of equivalent oxygen content and that, such blends are “substantially similar” to certification fuels under its interpretation.
“We need not wait until EPA decides on the formal E15 waiver request to increase the amount of ethanol we use,” said RFA President Bob Dinneen.
“This interim and legally supported step of approving E12 blends would provide an immediate boost to America’s ethanol producers and provide gasoline marketers the flexibility they need to meet the requirements of the Renewable Fuels Standard and capitalize on the cost savings associated with increased ethanol blending."
For more information, call 202-289-3835.
http://www.biofuelsjournal.com/articles/RFA_Makes_Case_for_Move_to_E12_While_EPA_Considers_E15_Allowance-79506.html
thanks keep us updated
your thinking there trying to up list now this will take time probably some time next year and the price should be up that high by its self the only reason they press released that is because all the share holders wanted to hear the future plans well that one piece of it.
no its bad for us if for example:
evfl merges to evln
but its good for us if for example:
evln merges to evfl
a merger is not good for us ether its the same as a r/s but it could be way worse.
im with you on that no r/s not having a r/s is key for the company and investors moving foward
and im sure there checking everything over and over before they release it because it would suck if they release something to early and we dont get a contract because we jumped the gun to fast and then we would have to rescind the news this isnt like loaning money to a friend this is the stock market you are gambling on a lotto ticket if you win you win if you lose you lose.
here is a link to the history channel documentary on the truck stop
actually they own 50% of the WN Truck Stop, LLC and yes Willie is not apart of the company now but he owns the other 50% of the truck stop and no the company is not diluting but you can believe what you want and no they will not do a R/S they put it out in press releases already go back and read them.
and time will fix that to you just to have patience when messing with these smaller stocks
Sbleau you don't lose anything in less you sell
what are we mcdonalds now
I dont know I never seen the bid size 0 before
ezyy8 it never changed it still is .0001 bid x .0001 ask
bid size 0 and ask size is 5000
0x5000