Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
30 days isnt enough time, the sec could be in there right now and we wouldnt know..
hey CS, what companies do you work with? you can pm me with that, thanks.
most are bashing the company, the stock is a vehicle to trade with no relation to the company.
it would be a slamdunk, since pinkies are not protected by the safeharbor provisions.
The funny thing is how Jared is now talking like the company is a total startup, and has almost forgotten all those "forward looking statements" like contracts, projections, buyouts, etc..
like I have always said, they raise enough money to appear to have a company, plant,some product etc, and pump stock out like it is TARP money. those billions of shares have been sold to the market, good luck, you will need it.
lol... no one will ever try to pry them from you. don't worry.
those shares were not sold, they were gifted, and retain their restricted status.
so they can't pay their vendors.. and need to sell shares to do so..
i think that offer was 10 pesos per share.. and even that is too high..
looks like china finance is still a seller of GFRE, should be out of stock soon..... I hope.
cmon, get with it, EESO is a just a story to get you to buy worthless paper... They sell paper to private form D investors, they get bogus opinion letters that the transfer agent accepts, no questions asked, (does this TA have any non pink sheet clients?), the "investors" dump 5 billion shares worth not even waiting for the ink to dry when it is all said and done, they have millions, they never ship any real product and they blame the bashers, naked short sellers and ex employees, while you all sit there wondering how such a good company could wind up like this...
why would anyone buy a company for 200 million when they need to isssue shartes at this price to "grow the compay"?
you got it.
actually, that isnt 100% true.. you own non voting stock, and he is issuing himself preferreds which are senior to the common shares. You essentially own toilet paper, that have some percieved, but no real value. there is no board of directors, and no independent board members since there is no board.
You are buying/have bought crap.
dead rat bouce, put in all you can.. a fool and his money deserve to be parted.
companys that trade on the pick sheets ARE NOT protected by the safeharbor provision, therefore that disclosure at the end of EESO's announcements are legally worthless.
that is the standard first answer to a lawsuit, ask the judge to dismiss. that response happens in every lawsuit.
lets see, theres a buyout at better than .10 , but we need to issue shares to "grow the company" , but we are 1/2 through a year where we will have 136 million in sales, and have contracts out the ying yang, but, since the company is worth so much more than .10 a share, we need to issue more shares at less than 1/2 penny a share.
Makes total sense to me, I am so glad you pumpers told me off.
He sounds like the ceo of a startup with no sales instead of one with a buyout offer and 136 million in expected sales
LOL... but they are halfway through a year where they are going to do 136 million in revenues! how about using that money to grow the company!
This guy is lying through his teeth and is writing his own arrest warrant.
not true..
Being on the pinks does not give a company a right to defraud shareholders. It does not give them the right to make false and outrageous claims,it does not give them the right to violate US and SEC regulations... and they are NOT protected by the safe harbor provision, and do not ask for a link to that, go find it out for yourself. I did not learn what I know from "links" and I am not about to find links for anyone.
Well, well well...
If they try to say the additional shares was to appease the "buyers", it is time to get a class action lawsuit together before there is nothing to get.
I tried to tell you guys, but nooooooooo... I was a basher that wanted to buy it lower... NOT!
just wonderng, how is that information garnered?
make sure you alert the media when you know.
nice work.
yeah, but they limited me to 5 posts there, and there is just way too much entertainment there.
BTW, look into GFRE, they have already lived through CHFI dumping their shares, and have disclosed uplisting plans in their most recent CC. Looks like they are attracting real buyers.
i got tired of the fails to pay..
Sounds like GFRE, btw, nice work on that eeso scam...
you still doing IR?
you think this already went to court? two weeks after being filed? what world does that happen in?
lol. i bet you wish that was the case.
that is how lawsuits work. the claim by belmont does not need to show proof. that is what the trial is for. the paperwork both sides request is called "Discovery".
dont think for a minute any of you have any of the lawsuit figured out.
it isnt a conference call if there are either no questions or if the questions are pre-screened.
another Joke PR..
we met with people.. oh boy..
if they liquidate everything, the leinholders and then their unsecured debtors, then the preferred shareholders THEN common shareholders...
There is no PR that can be put out. It is past that point...
The problem is that when a company puts out a buyout PR and then nothing can confirm it, all credibility is lost. The only thing that they can do, if real, is put out audited financials.
Everything else is total BS
BTW, PURDUE, what is your connection to the company?
who told you it is worth more than .10/sh?
Same guy that would benefit most from you believing that?
look for another independent director named, and an application for NASDAQ with a reverse split. They just completed a roadshow. Also note the new 22 million share holder has signed a lockup letter.
GFRE.
Interesting article
http://seekingalpha.com/article/140139-beware-of-chinese-stocks-on-otcbb
I have seen this more than a few times. It is no reflection on the quality of the deals, but when you are playing the OTC BB china deals, make sure the dreded massive sell off has already happened.
you mean like issuing 1.7 billion shares without registration? Telling the truth, huh?
not all preferreds are convertable. Have you seen the preferred share discription? If it is owned by management or partners, preferreds on the pinks are used to usurp ownership of the company from common shareholders, and preferred dividends is how the insiders keep any income away from the common shareholders...
sure I understand , but see the comment i answered
sure they do,, thats what a form 13D is for.