Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There you go. "Patience" as you say? What are ones to be patient for? Just like it was stated on this board by a respected poster.
It's looking more likely that the title of the song by Aerosmith is more likely the final outcome here. "Dream on."
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
Yup just a wealth of information posted at the time proving that huh? Speculation is always the best form of DD right Huggy? What little actual information you posted here at that time proved nothing.
There was so much information out there Huggy that even the Mayor of Gary, Indiana and others (news etc) got sucked into that. Were they all in on it Huggy? How did that end up?
It goes right counter against the point you're attempting to make man.
Snow white and the seven dwarfs were apart of the charade also.
$TTCM
PEPSI
So it was a "vast amount of public knowledge" was it now.
He didn't fulfill his obligation. He's gone man.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Thank you for your post nodummy. It's much appreciated.
Respect.
$TTCM
PEPSI
That's not an accurate statement. If it is accurate, what are you basing that on? How would you or anyone know that?
$TTCM
PEPSI
That ended with Akyumen as everyone who follows this company knows and good riddence. Is there some kind of point you are trying to make? If so what's your point?
$TTCM
PEPSI
It may or may not be relative to some. What futher information do you have that has not previously been discussed here on that? Anything significant?
$TTCM
PEPSI
Great question? It's a question for the company man. It's a normal question anyone might have. And?
$TTCM
PEPSI
Well the company is TTCM so split NOT splits. This discussion/chat board is about TTCM.
Why are you asking such a question as that? That's a general question man that anyone could ask. So?
Talk to the company man.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Yup.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Good morning to everyone who is in $GVSI
PEPSI
Yes they are a dime a dozen out in the business world but generally ones in pennyland serve no useful purpose. Innovative patents are a different story so as not to minimize the significance of patents.
What do you think about the latest patent filing? Not innovative enough?
I think it is very much appropriate and worth commenting on instead of just dismissing.
I would say assuming he was a "roofer" as you claimed. Not bad for a roofer huh?
It's NOT reverse splits either as in plural. It's reverse split as in singular.
The company has always been quite solid as to their filings.
And it's not hard to change the status from "provisional" either. It's just a process.
$TTCM
PEPSI
That is actually a good post man.
Noted
$TTCM
PEPSI
The poster referenced the new patent application and this is the response? Your response has nothing to do with the discussion thread man.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Yup.
$GVSI
PEPSI
Cheers wasn't in order then? I thought it was a nice sentiment. Sorry?
And cheers to the fairytale millions man
$TTCM
PEPSI
Ok. Cheers to your son who mows lawns. That's hard work.
Sold to marks? Are you saying that the capital public markets should not allow companies to ultize what they are allowed too? If not then they should overhaul the system.
$TTCM
PEPSI
So you say. 5 minutes in the real world is far back especially on discussion boards to some people. To others perhaps a day or more isn't far back. So? Your remark to me on the discussion thread was wrong. They never paid 2 million dollars.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Of course because I shouldn't have had to go that far back on the discussion thread. I know what was said and didn't take issue until you stated it incorrectly to me bro.
$TTCM
PEPSI
This is the LOLOL man. No I didn't miss that. I'm referring directly to this discussion thread and to me you didn't specify shares. I'm not talking about on the discussion thread where you at first referenced the shares.
So for clarity it's about shares, NOT about having given them 2 million dollars as this discussion thread reads after that point
Look back at the discussion thread man. I had no issue with that point when you responded to Victoria and I followed up with you. It was after that point brother when you stated that they gave 2 million dollars. They didn't give 2 million dollars.
$TTCM
PEPSI
You stated on this thread that they gave 2 million dollars. That is 100% Bullshit. You never referenced shares.
$TTCM
PEPSI
WOW for referencing a fact? SRAX is somehow TTCM and TTCM was supposed to have done their filings? Is that what you're trying to say?
That company didn't keep their books in order. That's their problem dude.
What are you talking about? TTCM didn't give them 2 million dollars.
$TTCM
PEPSI
SRAX didn't keep their company in order. So they got hit which they should have for their own mistakes.
Has absolutely zero to do with TTCM so whoopee.
Nonsense man.
$TTCM
PEPSI
That goes absolutely to my point man. You just made a bold statement that in no way has any factual basis to the claim (no facts to back that up).
Of course, "scam," "CONsultants," "carnies." That bogus list goes on and on.
Much like this statement you made which is not factual:
$TTCM
PEPSI
Here is a question for you Huggy. Let's say a person buys a house that's say $200,000 and pays an average of say 5% over 40 years, what does a person pay for the house over 40 years, with calculating all of the interest and all that stuff, what does it come out to be?
$TTCM
PEPSI
They should get him for that and we hope they do. The lie would be on him IMHO.
Regarding assets: Explain magic assets? Where does any 8K reference anything about that? Please point that out anywhere in the recent 8Ks.
$TTCM
PEPSI
He's gone man as the company updated that man as everyone who follows this knows.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Has there been any recent updates there? If so then please post. We haven't seen anything new in that regard.
$TTCM
PEPSI
What about it? Has the company updated that issue? If so what's the latest?
$TTCM
PEPSI
The company has stated their position at different times Huggy. They have not just all of a sudden thrown in an RS either so not buying that argument.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Why then did you state it as a fact Huggy? It was something easily verifiable. 13% is substantial so not buying it. Why not when making the remark just state the correct percentage. There is nothing wrong in not knowing but that's not what you said:
Here is another interesting remark:
And where in the Hell did that come from? Rhetorical. Unbelievable.
SMH
----------------------
How about this from the recent 8K:
$TTCM
PEPSI
You are making a general statement regarding toxic financiers Huggy. So what did this exercise prove?
This statement you made wasn't correct man.
That immediately came to mind, therefore the use of the word Bullshit was in order IMHO. 37% man.
Noted.
$TTCM
PEPSI
When statements are being stated as fact over and over with nothing to support the statements (opinion) of course it's Bullshit bro.
Oh excuse me... "Bullshit man."
IMHO
$TTCM
PEPSI
Of course the usual statement must be made.
Bullshit man.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Ok then.
$TTCM
PEPSI
You are talking about OTC land which is a general man.
That BS has been discussed in depth.
Goodness bro
Noted.
$TTCM
PEPSI
From "assets" that don't exist in the land of OZ to consultants. Wow. I can ask you the same question. We can ask anyone on this discussion board the same question. And?
They are receiving shares for something. Perhaps something tied to those platforms? There is the PXR Tactical Platform and the PXR Strategic Platform as highlighted in the 8K.
If it was part of the deal to license those platforms then they are obviously tied to the platforms somehow IMO.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Just like Bill Gates. Do DD because he went bankrupt once or twice before Microsoft.
Interpret and state the assets don't exist so are illegitimate because you say so?
Santa's elves performed the appraisal Huggy?
Nah.
It states who performed the appraisal in the 8K.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Correct. Right DD would not include speculation on an outcome to get a conclusion one wants to believe but accurate information that tells the whole story. Any bits and pieces of information can be taken and presented to put forth certain narratives that might be and at times are totally off the mark.
$TTCM
PEPSI
Anyone can "imagine" anything.
$TTCM
PEPSI