"I refuse to believe that someone would lie when all they could hope to get out of it is millions of dollars! It's unthinkable!"

LOL. And Dave Foley has Federal felony convictions for doing just that! He knows fraud for a few million or less. It's his MO ... or now we should say MO-JO.

Counterfeiting for dollars. The way of the game grifter.

I wonder if his NTEK checks are being cut to "B.B.", the checking account he used to conceal the payments from the eBay sales of his counterfeit game sales.

David Russell "B.B." Foley

All Dave Foley, convicted game counterfeiter, did is take the MOJO motherboard, rooted it, and loaded codecs to play 4K video.

It's a smoke-and-mirrors demo gimmick. Using somebody else's equipment to show a feature (4K) that you've added to their hardware with a software add.

That's why you only see the NP-1 at demo's controlled by Foley, and NOT in reviewers' hands and not sold on the market.

It's not his hardware to sell. It's Madcatz's.

But it makes some great shows to sell FoleyFamily shares of stock.

Wrong again. All you need to do is look at those photos in the FCC test report and the posted pics of the NP-1 motherboard. They are exactly the same.

And air-cooled enclosure is typically larger to allow airflow, but the money shot is if you measure the I/O port array and you will see that the I/O ports match up EXACTLY - to the 0.1 mm level.

Same MOJO motherboard. Proven!

And the Compliance Certification Services report T131106D02 is NOT for the wifi - it is for the entire device - page 1 even shows the Madcatz logo.

You certify entire devices - the WHOLE motherboard. And that is the Test report on the fake FCC sticker on the NP-1 at CES photo.

It is the EXACT same motherboard. Exact.

I can't post pics out of a PDF doc, so you'll have to look by doing this:

MOJO: (1) go to: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=708861&fcc_id=P25H560211A

then, click on "Internal photo" which will pull up a PDF file of the Compliance Certification Services, Inc. report on the MOJO motherboard,

then go to Page 4, and look at the photos - first and second photos on page 4. That motherboard is the same as the NP-1 photos. Pages 1 and 3 show it the aluminum heatsink (the MOJO uses a fluted black aluminum heatsink (as it has an enclosure that have air vents for airflow cooling and the NP-1 has a solid flat aluminum heatsink as it has a flush enclosure with no air vents for air cooling - it cools by direct heat transfer to the enclosure so the aluminum fits flush to the enclosure top.

Same exact motherboard.

PROVEN!

David Foley caught in another lie in a iHub post:

DavidRFoley99 Member Level Wednesday, 12/11/13 11:21:27 AM
Re: Old Tymer post# 126491
Post # 126854 of 182659
As I have posted before, the certification was done by our contract manufacturer, and the certifications are in their name with their factory. Products can be certified at any point in the manufacturing / sales / distribution chain, we chose to have it done at the manufacturing point.


Oops-whoops. The cat is now out of the bag - the NTEK NP-1 is a counterfeit product using the Madcatz MOJO motherboard and using the same Madcatz MOJO FCC Report Number - but NTEK is not authorized or licensed by Madcatz - and Madcatz is NOT a contract manufacturer for NTEK as Foley stated in the post above. That post is false as of the date he posted it. The NP-1 unit shown at CES references the MadCatz FCC Test Report and as of that date, NTEK did not have any "certification done "by our contract manufacturer", as Madcatz was NOT a contract manufacturer for NTEK and NTEK used MadCatz's test report certification.

David is going to have some new counts in a new indictment coming soon to a theater near you. Securities fraud for one. Material misstatement of fact relied upon by investors during a period when the person making the statement or his relatives or nominees are selling the security with the knowledge than the statement is false or misleading to the investment community.

Why is Madcatz allowing NTEK to pirate the MOJO motherboard and use it in an NTEK product that purports to compete with MOJO in the gaming arena, including their own deal with OUYA to host all the OUYA games?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=100787527

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=100787482

PROVEN!! MadCatz MOJO motherboard - FCC Report Number T131106D02 by Compliance Certification Services, Inc.

MadCatz FCC ID P25H560211A

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=708861&fcc_id=P25H560211A

Now, Look at the fake FCC sticker on the NP-1 from CES - SAME FCC Report Number T131106D02:



The NP-1 has a sticker referencing a test report for FCC Grantee P25 (MadCatz)

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?RequestTimeout=500

And references the MadCatz motherboard FCC Test Report by number.

MORE FOLEY PIRACY AND COUNTERFEITING!

Same EXACT motherboard as the Madcatz MOJO!

Pic from Nanotech Facebook pictures:



https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=505622849556237&set=pb.386517031466820.-2207520000.1397798515.&type=3&theater

And here is the MadCatz MOJO board from the FCC website (see pages 3-6):

https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2194826

Same board - the Madcatz board made by Foxconn.

Looks like more David Foley game piracy and counterfeiting.

Even has the same nifty blue LED placed in the same spot.



http://www.frys.com/product/7891359

Same Foxconn motherboard. Just different enclosures.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/03/06/ouya-games-coming-to-mad-catz-mojo-micro-console-this-spring

Foxconn manufactures the Madcatz MOJO motherboard.

https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Mad_Catz_M.O.J.O.

"Mad Catz M.O.J.O.
Jump to: navigation, search

Mad Catz M.O.J.O.

Manuf/OEM/ODM Foxconn

FCC approval date: 20 February 2014
UPC: 728658041632 (UPC DB, On eBay)
Country of manuf.: China

Amazon image

ASIN
B00FM5IS48 (Flag of the United States.svg, On Amazon, On CCC)

Type: game console

FCC ID: P25H560211A
Industry Canada ID: 4633A-H560211A

Power: 5.2 VDC, 3 A
Connector type: barrel

CPU1: nVIDIA Tegra 4 (T40S-A2)
FLA1: 16 GiB (Sandisk SDIN8DE4-16G)
RAM1: 2 GiB (Samsung K4B4G1646B-HYK0 x 4)

Expansion IFs: USB 3.0, USB 2.0
USB ports: 2

WI1 chip1: Broadcom BCM43241
WI1 802dot11 protocols: abgn
WI1 MIMO config: 2x2:2
WI1 antenna connector: none

ETH chip1: SMSC LAN9730
ETH chip2: SMSC LAN9730
LAN speed: 10/100
LAN ports: 1

abgn

Additional chips
Audio codec;Realtek;ALC5639;;1;

Stock FW OS: Linux unknown Android

Flags: HDMI out, Audio out (3.5mm)

802dot11 OUI: none specified
For a list of all currently documented Broadcom chipsets with specifications, see Broadcom.

Micro-Console for ANDROID

This device would seem to have been originally FCC approved on ~12/18/2013, dismissed by the FCC on 02/19/2014, and approved again on 02/20/2014."

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:phT6BqwOmXgJ:https://wikidevi.com/wiki/Mad_Catz_M.O.J.O.+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=96429308

That pic looks exactly like it. Exactly.

"This device is sold at premium price and marketed as such but it just feel as 'yet another chinese Android HDMI stick/box' and behind the curtain, it seems to be the case: in the Play Store the MOJO is shown as "Foxconn International Holdings Limited Mad Catz M.O.J.O." ..."

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2566440

Um, if David Foley is no longer employed by NTEK, why is he the representative of NTEK at that booth in the photo?

Please explain.

"Why would you want to waste money on marketing before a product is on the shelves?"

Indeed, then why spend money sponsoring a UFC fighter when you don't have the mythical NP-1 unicorns on any shelves nor UltraFlix online selling anything?

Oh wait, NTEK is just selling stock - like many other penny scams that have been promoted by putting advertising in sports stadiums, athletes, and race cars. Not for selling sponges, diamonds, or landmine detectors - but as an advertising medium to attract new buyers of the companies' newly minted stock issued to insiders and nominee accounts. NTEK is just following the same pattern trod by many infamous pennystock scams where the object was not to advertise product sales, but rather to gin up new investors to buy the stock (which was the real produce the company and insiders produce and sell).

So when you enter the FCC ID that NTEK IR gave you into the following FCC website, what result is returned?

http://transition.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid/

You also wrote (and since deleted) that you were satisfied with the FCC ID sticker IR showed you.

OK, so if you claim they don't need a sticker, why did they show you a sticker with the FCC ID?

But NTEK IR told you an FCC ID number for the "NP-1" which you admit you could not confirm. Now you've asked them for the TCB info to confirm the number that they gave you - but they haven't given that to you.

So they ADMIT they need an FCC ID but refuse to disclose the info needed to prove that they have one, and have given you one that cannot be checked out and verified.

Simple. WHY?

IR should have no reason (or at least give you one that makes sense) for giving you the alleged FCC ID but withholding the TCB info to allow one to confirm it is a valid FCC ID and that it is for the mythical NP-1 unicorn and not a Gameboy.

But they won't.

Kind of like they will promise shipment in 7-10 days.

Anything to sell stock.

No, if production units exist of the mythical NP-1 unicorn, SHOW US THE FCC ID for it. A simple pic of ONE production unit with the official (not FAKE) sticker will suffice.

Bet you can't do it!

NTEK can't. And won't.

THAT IS THE POINT!

I don't care that they used a fake sticker at CES, but if they have produced any, then IR could give you the FCC ID and TCB information, and/or post a simple pic of the official sticker from one of the production units "in the US warehouse" and "shipping in 7-10 days".

So exactly WHICH of these facts are you disputing and what is your basis for claiming this is in any way erroneous (it is info from the TA and the company's own filings on OTCMarkets.com):

Since August 14 2013 till today's current date NTEK has dumped a tad over 89,000,000 million shares on the market.........wow.......go back and check the average price at the time they were dumped and we come to the staggering figure of a hair over $ 8,000,000 million dollars..........DO TELL......THOSE ARE SOME
" ROBUST " revenues..........that's about a MILLION DOLLARS a month in "ROBUST" revenues..
Not bad income for a company that does absolutely nothing but print shares AND worthless PR's.....

Those are HARD FACTS........

Hope this helps:

"$24 for every 100,000 shares which is roughly $6000."

Oh, well then, that is a bargain. Tell ya what, I'll top that offer. You give me just $5,000 and I'll promise to send you a check for $25.

DEAL?

FCC ID, BCG-E2430A - Apple iPhone 4S

http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/02/ask-ars-what-do-the-symbols-on-the-back-of-iphones-mean/

"Question: There are a bunch of symbols and numbers on the backs of iPhones. I know what 16GB means; what about the rest?

A jumble of symbols have been trying to communicate with us from the back of the iPhone since it launched, and indeed, from a number of other non-Apple communication devices. What distinction do they mean? Compatibility with different radio frequencies? Recyclability? Edibility?

The truth is a bit more boring. Most of these symbols indicate only that the iPhone has received approval to use the various frequency spectra reserved for mobile and wireless communications and that it has passed various safety checks. We dove into hundreds of pages of regulations to see what the iPhone's various tramp stamps mean.

This symbol, an F and a C nested within a C, confers the approval of the US Federal Communications Commission. Looking through all of the stipulations the FCC places on gadgets, its heart is not easily won—everything from the the output power of the directional beams of an antenna system to what radio bands it can operate in is covered. The FCC appoints a number of Telecommunications Certification Bodies (TCBs) that can review and grant applications for FCC certification. Not all TCBs handle all kinds of devices, but if the device isn't FCC-approved, as you might guess, it has no business in the United States.

The iPhone also carries an FCC ID, another indicator that it's gotten the FCC's approval for operation. The FCC ID consists of a three-letter grantee code (Apple's is BCG) followed by a model number.

The next symbol, a garbage can with an X through it, indicates compliance with the WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) Directive. The WEEE Directive is upheld by 27 states in the European Union and represents their desire that devices like the iPhone be disposed of in an environmentally friendly way, rather than thrown in the trash as electronic waste.

The EU is so passionate about e-waste that it not only puts the symbol on devices, but it has been moved to artistic expression: as part of their effort to draw attention to the e-waste issue, the Royal Society of Arts in the United Kingdom created "WEEE Man," a 23-foot, 3.5-ton sculpture meant to equal the amount of e-waste a person in the UK will create over the course of a lifetime.

The WEEE symbol is often mistaken for representing compliance with the Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive, which mandates that manufacturers provide a way to dispose of products' toxic parts, like batteries. The RoHS doesn't have a representative symbol, but Apple and the iPhone are still subject to its regulations.

The next symbol is called the "CE mark." It used to stand for "Conformité Européene" but now just works as the general stamp of approval for a product's sale in the European Union. The CE mark indicates compliance with all relevant directives that govern things like voltage and frequency band use. Companies can self-certify for some of the rules, like those concerning electromagnetic compatibility and interference. A product's ability to meet other directives, though, must be certified by an accredited testing firm.

A number next to a CE mark on a device indicates that the manufacturer used a notified body (an organization accredited to evaluate CE compliance) to make sure their product meets CE standards. In this case, notified body 0682 points to Cetecom ICT Services, a firm accredited by Germany to evaluate for CE directives. Cetecom would likely have evaluated the iPhone for its compliance with the telecommunications terminal equipment directive, one of those things that companies can't self-certify.

The exclamation point is known as the "alert symbol," and it supplements the other CE markings. States in the European Union have restrictions on various frequency bands—for example, a wireless device being operated outdoors in France can only use frequencies between 2.4 GHz and 2.454 GHz. When a device can follow all these restrictions, it is said to work on "harmonized frequency bands" and is called a Class I device. When it doesn't, like the iPhone, it is a Class II device and must carry the extra alert symbol so that users know the phone might try and operate on frequency bands it isn't allowed to use in certain countries."

HTH.

The mythical NP-1 unicorns (production model), will:

(a) ship in 7-10 days, where the word "days" is a term of art meaning an indeterminate time period assuming you are in a stationary frame of reference to an observer moving away from you at 99.9999 percent of the speed of light as a day is perceived by the observer;

(b) ship in 7-10 days from 7-10 days following 7-10 days after 7-10 days subsequent to a 7-10 day period beginning the second Tuesday of next week;

(c) ship on July 34th, but only to pre-orders beginning with the numbers pi or SQRT(3) or 7i^(6.69)* cosh(f(x) for x>9) but only if included with a pre-soaped sponge;

(d) be lost in the South China sea aboard a Chinese junk sunk by an errant North Korean training torpedo, never to reach the shores of the Americas;

(e) formally be added to the US Endangered Species List after wildlife biologists are unable to spot one in the wild and not a non-production prototype under captive control of a FoleyFamily member or NTEK EVP;

(f) has already shipped to pre-orders in the THOUSANDS according to Lorraine Cullivan-Foley as of February 6th, so long as those pre-orders were from addresses located in North Korea;

(g) all of the above, (a) through (f) inclusive.

So the FoleyFamily will (allegedly - IF it happens) pay you $24 to buy $61,000 of FoleyFamily shares.

Wow, sounds like a solid strategy to get suckers to buy FoleyFamily shares coming off restriction - all 45,000,000 of them.

Keep watching CHDN (Chardan Capital Markets) dumping all day on the ask moving those shares that have been delegended into the float.

And the Form T trades to square up the selling of the block being worked during the day in a true-up Form T transfer reported after the close at VWAP or similar price and often with a discount (broker rip) transferring the sold share amount off the block from the insider account to the broker account to cover the broker's day sales.

So, now that you asked NTEK IR for the TCB, what is the TCB or what is NTEK IR's excuse for not telling you that information???

No reason to cover it up, unless they don't have an FCC ID or a TCB.

Or a production mythical NP-1 unicorn.

Such an obvious SCAM. Fake FCC sticker. Nothing but prototypes at all shows, including NAB and CES - why? NO PRODUCTION HAS BEEN DONE!

Nothing but magic shows and FoleyFamily shares flooding the market via CHDN accompanied with the IR lies, FoleyTweets, FoleyPosts.

So what was IR's justification for keeping the TCB secret and not disclosing that to you also (I presume as a follow-up you asked them for that - or should).

If they know a number is useless without the TCB information, they should give you both the lock and the key to validate their claim. Otherwise, they could simply be making up numbers that cannot be checked out - like posting photos of empty boxes that cannot be opened.

Sounds like they have no reason to withhold both the FCC ID and the TCB information. It would be on a sticker on every unit they plan to sell - ones that IR claims already shipped in January and February and the ones that they claimed to be shipping in 7-10 days just 10 days ago.

So it's no secret - but why won't they give you the same information now to verify that a product DOES exist and was manufactured?

What is it you think they are HIDING ?? - since if they had shipped the units as they promised on March 31, anyone could get that info off the sticker - of course, assuming that manufactured units in fact exist!

Any processor can DO h.265, but they cannot do it FAST enough to decode highly compressed video with fast motion and high complexity content without significant image quality degradation.

Tegra 4 is obsolete. Even the Tegra K1 apparently doesn't have enough power, even though it is 4 times more powerful than the older, lowly Tegra 4. That's why the WCCF Tech articles states:

"Scoring a rock solid 60fps in an off screen 1080p Benchmark it fares significantly better than the Tegra 4. The predecessor to this chip can only manage a measly 16fps (at only 1080p!) so you can see for yourself how great a difference this is."

Read more: http://wccftech.com/tegra-k1-superchip-benchmarks-revealed-4-times-faster-tegra-4/#ixzz2z0JmFTXS

The Tegra K1 is only able to do realistic 60 fps at 1080p resolution, and the old Tegra 4 is only about 1/4th as powerful as the new K1.

Probably better to wait for a more powerful chip that has the horsepower to to the job on fast motion and high image complexity video with 60 fps at much better than just a 1080p level image quality that the new K1 does.

As long as NTEK is sending the mythical NP-1 unicorns back to the "factory" for software upgrades and new motion sensing hardware for the controller, may as well have the "factory" use a much more capable, newer GPU than the old, weak Tegra 4. Or maybe NTEK should just rebrand the ZXV10 B803 if that really has the ability to do a good job decoding HEVC at better than 1080p quality levels and better than 30 fps. And doesn't require progressive downloading but can stream a continual long video of fast motion and high image complexity. The Broadcom chip may or may not be powerful enough, although one manufacturer claims it is:

"The ZXV10 B803 is designed based on the Broadcom BCM 7252 chip, and supports the 4Kx2KP60 decoding capability, which can decode Ultra HD video with the maximum resolution of 3840×2160. In comparison to traditional HD Internet STBs, the 4K UHD STB can display more vivid and precise images to significantly enhance the user experience.

4K video technology (also named as 2160p) is a new type of resolution standard. Its UHDTV specification can deliver a resolution of 3840×2160 pixels, and the maximum Full Aperture 4K specification reaches 4096×3112. In comparison to the current mainstream 1080p resolution of 1920×1080, 4K can provide over four times the image definition quality. In the future, 4K HD TV sets will be very popular, and the 4K HD and HEVC decoding technologies will help raise the HD market tide. However, in the current market, 4K chips are mainly 4KP30 – only a few chips can support 4KP60. The ZTE ZXV10 B803 STB uses a 4KP60 chip, making it one of the first HD STBs to support 4KP60.

Fang Hui, Deputy President of ZTE, said: “As a global leader in the IPTV market, ZTE offers a complete series of Internet STB products across the range of available resolutions, and is focusing strongly on the development of high-end STB products. This 4KP60 HD STB product will help build our presence in the high end market.”

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also supports the H.265 format. H.265 is the next generation super HD code transmission specification, which delivers encoded video using half the bandwidth of the previous generation (H.264), with the same quality. The H.265 standard will gradually replace H.264 to become the mainstream standard of the next generation of video transmission.

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also has a powerful CPU with a processing capability of 10k DMIPS (Dhrystone million instructions per second), enabling faster processing and a better user experience in comparison to current mainstream HD Internet STBs."

Read more at http://benchmarkreviews.com/13009/zte-zxv10-b803-4k-p60-ultra-hd-set-top-box-launched/#h48CwhXTZMCq5tAU.99

"ZTE has launched of its 4K p60 Ultra HD set top box (STB), the ZXV10 B803, at Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2014 in Barcelona.

The ZXV10 B803 is designed based on the Broadcom BCM 7252 chip, and supports the 4Kx2KP60 decoding capability, which can decode Ultra HD video with the maximum resolution of 3840x2160. In comparison to traditional HD Internet STBs, the 4K UHD STB can display more vivid and precise images to significantly enhance the user experience.

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also supports the H.265 format. H.265 is the next generation super HD code transmission specification, which deliversencoded video using half the bandwidth of the previous generation (H.264), with the same quality. TheH.265 standard will gradually replace H.264 to become the mainstream standard of the next generation of video transmission."

- See more at: http://www.voicendata.com/voice-data/news/209836/mwc-zte-launches-4k-p60-ultra-hd-stb#sthash.HcvQdZTZ.FtezOjwf.dpuf

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=100650811

Time to change the carrot to the NP-2. Give them til July and they can just announce the next story the NP-2 and take your mind off the non-delivery of the weak NP-1 unicorns.

Watch the right hand while the left hand picks your pocket of money.

CHDN (Chardan Securities) dumping more FoleyFamily(TM) insider shares today. Dumpity-dum-dump goes the FoleyFamily(TM) share sales, as yet ANOTHER 20,000,000 restricted shares are eligible to come off restriction, be delegended, and dumped into the market. Watch CHDN sitting on the ask again today dumping insider shares.

As Emily Litella used to say "It's always something."

Or "The shipping promise - NEVERMIND. Just buy our shares."

The next storyline "shipping date" is 7-10 days after July 33rd. then they will issue a new/recycled excuse.

Most likely it will be another delay to update the mainboard from the obsolete, old, and too weak Tegra K1 to a much more powerful chip that might be able to do the job with HEVC at 4K levels and 60 fps.

They will promise to send the new "NP-2" to all the unfulfilled mythical NP-1 unicorn pre-orders.

Another repeat of last June, when the MOJO came out into the market with the Tegra 4 and NTEK dumped the ARM Cortex A7 for the Tegra 4.

"Industry First 4K Ultra High Definition Experience Delivered Over Streaming Wi-Fi Network

SAN JOSE, Calif., May 29, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- NANOTECH ENTERTAINMENT (OTCPINK: NTEK) is announcing price and availability for its 4K Media Player, the Nuvola NP-1, and 4K Streaming Video service, NanoFlix UHD - both industry firsts. The new NP-1 Player will cost $299, the lowest price 4K player in the market, and will be available for order online and at retail beginning July 15, 2013.

"4K Ultra HD Televisions are just now starting to arrive in homes and are sure to bring an enhanced viewing experience of 4K to a whole new audience," said LX Rudis, NanoTech's Media Group, Senior VP of Development. "With 4K TVs able to deliver a vibrant and natural picture that is four-times clearer than high definition, users need a low cost solution for content delivery. Unlike other 4K players, our unit will work with any brand of Television and a variety of content delivery services. The availability of the Nuvola NP-1 will be followed in fall by our streaming 4K video distribution service that will demonstrate how NanoTech continues to lead the market in bringing the 4K entertainment experience to consumers."

This summer, consumers of 4K UHD TVs can purchase the Nuvola 4K Media Player bundled with 10 videos in true 4K resolution, 10 video games and 5 multimedia applications, for $299. In the fall of 2013, users of the same 4K Media Player will be given access to a fee-based streaming video distribution service, NanoFlix UHD, offering a library of 4K titles.

The Nuvola NP-1 4K Ultra HD Media player features an ARM Cortex-A7 Quad Core processor and a custom 3D GPU optimized for 4K video playback. The player uses the Android Operating System allowing for a complete entertainment experience. In addition to the ability to steam 4K content, users can play a variety of games and select from thousands of compatible Android apps that will be available at launch. Cinematic experiences are further enhanced as the player also supports UHD 3D Movies at a stunning resolution of 3840x1080 at 30 frames per second. The NP-1 ships with a standard IR remote. Also available is the optional Nuvola RP-10 RF remote that features a 3 axis motion sensor for game play, handheld mouse control, and a full QWERTY keyboard for fast and convenient on screen text entry.

NanoTech CEO Jeffrey A. Foley closed by saying, "We are extremely excited to be on the forefront of the 4K movement. We feel the Nuvola NP-1 will be a great success as it provides a complete entertainment solution at an affordable price. The NP-1 is the first in a line of affordable consumer devices that we are bringing to the market. Unlike the other 4K offerings, our products are two to four times less expensive while offering a much greater set of features, and are compatible with any Television set. Our product is also upgradeable and expandable featuring a variety of industry standard ports including SD, SATA, and USB connections that allow for the installation of an assortment of accessories, options and storage attachments. With the Nuvola NP-1 and associated streaming 4K service we truly feel that NanoTech represents the Future of Television."

History repeats itself. Wait and see!

I'm surprised this Eric Cousens' SCAM is still up and printing shares. Never underestimate the gullibility of penny stock gamblers to chase pyramid schemes built of BS stories and cooked books.

Man, when the SEC suspends this stock distribution and insider enrichment scam, the poor bagholders will have the pyramid collapse on them.

I love watching these pre-stressed disasters when they finally implode. This should be very entertaining.

The stock promoters on this NTEK stock distribution and insider enrichment scam, including NTEK founder and chief technologist David Foley - the biggest stock promoter of them all, are truly not only unethical, but I believe criminal in their lies and deceptions.

From claims that the mythical NP-1 unicorns were being made by Foxconn (which they have not been) and pictures of the unicorns being "assembled" on a roller conveyor by a woman who is NOT wearing Foxconn clothes or hair covering and with no grounding strap! and implying that it is a picture at a Foxconn factory (which it isn't).

To claims by Lorraine Cullivan (who happens to be another Foley Family member) that "thousands" of the mythical NP-1 unicorns had already been shipped to pre-orders by February 6th.

To pictures of inconsistent and Photoshopped (badly) empty boxes, which we later learned were only prototype boxes, not even the boxes used for any "production" unicorns (which apparently still don't exist), posted on Facebook on the company page and a promoter's page, and tweeted by David Foley from a "US warehouse" with one Foxconn box on top of a bunch of other non-labeled boxes that David Foley stated WERE the mythical NP-1 unicorns in a US warehouse on January 22nd.

To several weak paid promotional campaigns using D-list pumpers for short pushes to move some volume for the 45,000,000 Foley shares coming off restriction since February 21st.

To a promoter receiving one of the prototypes and promising to publish a report of its performance in a week or two, only to never publish any review except, on the 10th day after the company promised (and failed again) to shp the mythical NP-1 unicorns, the promoter stated that the interface needed improvement and cleverly deleted his "April will be huge" prior prediction and replaced it with "by the end of May I hope we will have good news" - all posted several hours before NTEK emailed selected pre-orders and told them the "shipment" wasn't happening, and three wild (drunken?) insider material posts by a new alias claiming to be NTEK EVP Aaron Taylor and attacking "martin shorties", where Aaron Taylor the next day emailed out a letter announcing the non-shipment of NP-1s with a ridiculous excuse.

To a promise by the company to pre-orders who have been waiting since July (that's 2013, for those keeping track) that their mythical NP-1 unicorns would ship within 7-10 days, only on the evening of the 10th day, to learn that - oops, no we're not shipping, we need to tidy up the interface and add some motion sensors to the controller - maybe next time.

Like Lucy and Charley Brown, these promoters keep holding the football and urging the sheep to buy more FoleyFamily shares coming off restriction, only to yank away the football each time at the last minute and Charley comes running up to kick the mirage.

And the unicorns are still missing at this hour. But don't worry, more promises and carrots will be coming. There will soon be ANOTHER 20,000,000 FoleyFamily shares coming off restriction and into the market.

$24 to buy $66,000 worth of FoleyFamily recently-delegended stock. Such a deal!

Please help a Foley so they can buy food and Maseratis for Christmas!!!

And help the Chardan Capital Markets trading desk broker to get a down payment on his Long Island condo and a new BMW 5 Series. He's the guy sitting on the ask, filtering the insider shares into the market.

(Appealed to IH[Linda])

New management cannot "step in". There is no BOD to appoint officers. There are no directors to even nominate directors. There is nobody with authority to do anything - including to put any directors or officers in place.

When the trustee is resigned - that's it. There is no way to "reboot" the entity. It is dissolved.

"those Foxconn workers"

Ummm ... those are not Foxconn workers in the pic. Wrong uniforms and headgear - plus they don't use roller conveyers for assembling.

Oh, and no grounding straps. But that's just poor practice for assembly - and not the way Foxconn works. Most likely this was done in a warehouse for a photo op.

There are earlier posts on this.

The stock promoters on this NTEK stock distribution and insider enrichment scam, including David Foley - the biggest stock promoter of them all, are truly not only unethical, but I believe criminal in their lies and deceptions.

From claims that the mythical NP-1 unicorns were being made by Foxconn (which they have not been) and pictures of the unicorns being "assembled" on a roller conveyor by a woman who is NOT wearing Foxconn clothes or hair covering and with no grounding strap! and implying that it is a picture at a Foxconn factory (which it isn't).

To claims by Lorraine Cullivan (who happens to be another Foley Family member) that "thousands" of the mythical NP-1 unicorns had already been shipped to pre-orders by February 6th.

To pictures of inconsistent and Photoshopped (badly) empty boxes, which we later learned were only prototype boxes, not even the boxes used for any "production" unicorns (which apparently still don't exist), posted on Facebook on the company page and a promoter's page, and tweeted by David Foley from a "US warehouse" with one Foxconn box on top of a bunch of other non-labeled boxes that David Foley stated WERE the mythical NP-1 unicorns in a US warehouse on January 22nd.

To several weak paid promotional campaigns using D-list pumpers for short pushes to move some volume for the 45,000,000 Foley shares coming off restriction since February 21st.

To a promoter receiving one of the prototypes and promising to publish a report of its performance in a week or two, only to never publish any review except, on the 10th day after the company promised (and failed again) to shp the mythical NP-1 unicorns, the promoter stated that the interface needed improvement and cleverly deleted his "April will be huge" prior prediction and replaced it with "by the end of May I hope we will have good news" - all posted several hours before NTEK emailed selected pre-orders and told them the "shipment" wasn't happening, and three wild (drunken?) insider material posts by a new alias claiming to be NTEK EVP Aaron Taylor and attacking "martin shorties", where Aaron Taylor the next day emailed out a letter announcing the non-shipment of NP-1s with a ridiculous excuse.

To a promise by the company to pre-orders who have been waiting since July (that's 2013, for those keeping track) that their mythical NP-1 unicorns would ship within 7-10 days, only on the evening of the 10th day, to learn that - oops, no we're not shipping, we need to tidy up the interface and add some motion sensors to the controller - maybe next time.

Like Lucy and Charley Brown, these promoters keep holding the football and urging the sheep to buy more FoleyFamily shares coming off restriction, only to yank away the football each time at the last minute and Charley comes running up to kick the mirage.

And the unicorns are still missing at this hour. But don't worry, more promises and carrots will be coming. There will soon be ANOTHER 20,000,000 FoleyFamily shares coming off restriction and into the market.

$24 to buy $66,000 worth of FoleyFamily recently-delegended stock. Such a deal!

Please help a Foley so they can buy food and Maseratis for Christmas!!!

And help the Chardan Capital Markets trading desk broker to get a down payment on his Long Island condo and a new BMW 5 Series. He's the guy sitting on the ask, filtering the insider shares into the market.

Nope, FACT. GO ahead, make my day - name ONE company that filed a fatal Form 15 and ever got re-registered and listed on an exchange.

I'll wait for you to find one - it will be until the end of time, as there are NONE.

There are only renamed shells where the prior shareholders were zeroed out and a whole new company name, management, and shareholders used the purchased shell to do a fresh registration under a different name. And the old shareholders were zeroed out.

Sure, any Form 15 filer can apply to re-register, but the SEC always finds a way to deny them.

No Form 15 filer, not one, has succeeded in becoming re-registered and getting listed on an exchange.

NONE. EVER.

Kinda like the Tea Party groups applying for tax exempt status back in 2010 and still not getting an answer from the IRS in 2014.

The SEC just doesn't approve such Form 15 filers re-registration attempts.

July 33rd or 34th. Then they will use the excuse that the old, weak Tegra 4 is not up to the task so they have to ship the mythical NP-1 unicorns back to the Chinese factory (not Foxconn!) for new mainboards with a modern GPU that has enough horsepower for h.265 and fast motion/high complexity images.

It'll always be a new excuse and new promises - the NP-2. Already shipping to pre-orders since the 12th of Never. Announced on the second Tuesday of the first week of February.

"Has a pink who filed form 15 ever been allowed to Uplist? Nope."

That is why it is known as the FATAL Form 15. There is no coming back - in theory possibly, but in reality never - not one single company that ever filed the fatal Form 15 to become voluntarily non-reporting and non-compliant has ever regained registration and listing on an exchange. Not one. Ever.

David Foley filed the Form 15 deregistering NTEK back in 2012.

Any processor can DO h.265, but they cannot do it FAST enough to decode highly compressed video with fast motion and high complexity content without significant image quality degradation.

Tegra 4 is obsolete. Even the Tegra K1 apparently doesn't have enough power, even though it is 4 times more powerful than the older, lowly Tegra 4. That's why the WCCF Tech articles states:

"Scoring a rock solid 60fps in an off screen 1080p Benchmark it fares significantly better than the Tegra 4. The predecessor to this chip can only manage a measly 16fps (at only 1080p!) so you can see for yourself how great a difference this is."

Read more: http://wccftech.com/tegra-k1-superchip-benchmarks-revealed-4-times-faster-tegra-4/#ixzz2z0JmFTXS

The Tegra K1 is only able to do realistic 60 fps at 1080p resolution, and the old Tegra 4 is only about 1/4th as powerful as the new K1.

Probably better to wait for a more powerful chip that has the horsepower to to the job on fast motion and high image complexity video with 60 fps at much better than just a 1080p level image quality that the new K1 does.

As long as NTEK is sending the mythical NP-1 unicorns back to the "factory" for software upgrades and new motion sensing hardware for the controller, may as well have the "factory" use a much more capable, newer GPU than the old, weak Tegra 4. Or maybe NTEK should just rebrand the ZXV10 B803 if that really has the ability to do a good job decoding HEVC at better than 1080p quality levels and better than 30 fps. And doesn't require progressive downloading but can stream a continual long video of fast motion and high image complexity. The Broadcom chip may or may not be powerful enough, although one manufacturer claims it is:

"The ZXV10 B803 is designed based on the Broadcom BCM 7252 chip, and supports the 4Kx2KP60 decoding capability, which can decode Ultra HD video with the maximum resolution of 3840×2160. In comparison to traditional HD Internet STBs, the 4K UHD STB can display more vivid and precise images to significantly enhance the user experience.

4K video technology (also named as 2160p) is a new type of resolution standard. Its UHDTV specification can deliver a resolution of 3840×2160 pixels, and the maximum Full Aperture 4K specification reaches 4096×3112. In comparison to the current mainstream 1080p resolution of 1920×1080, 4K can provide over four times the image definition quality. In the future, 4K HD TV sets will be very popular, and the 4K HD and HEVC decoding technologies will help raise the HD market tide. However, in the current market, 4K chips are mainly 4KP30 – only a few chips can support 4KP60. The ZTE ZXV10 B803 STB uses a 4KP60 chip, making it one of the first HD STBs to support 4KP60.

Fang Hui, Deputy President of ZTE, said: “As a global leader in the IPTV market, ZTE offers a complete series of Internet STB products across the range of available resolutions, and is focusing strongly on the development of high-end STB products. This 4KP60 HD STB product will help build our presence in the high end market.”

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also supports the H.265 format. H.265 is the next generation super HD code transmission specification, which delivers encoded video using half the bandwidth of the previous generation (H.264), with the same quality. The H.265 standard will gradually replace H.264 to become the mainstream standard of the next generation of video transmission.

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also has a powerful CPU with a processing capability of 10k DMIPS (Dhrystone million instructions per second), enabling faster processing and a better user experience in comparison to current mainstream HD Internet STBs."

Read more at http://benchmarkreviews.com/13009/zte-zxv10-b803-4k-p60-ultra-hd-set-top-box-launched/#h48CwhXTZMCq5tAU.99

"ZTE has launched of its 4K p60 Ultra HD set top box (STB), the ZXV10 B803, at Mobile World Congress (MWC) 2014 in Barcelona.

The ZXV10 B803 is designed based on the Broadcom BCM 7252 chip, and supports the 4Kx2KP60 decoding capability, which can decode Ultra HD video with the maximum resolution of 3840x2160. In comparison to traditional HD Internet STBs, the 4K UHD STB can display more vivid and precise images to significantly enhance the user experience.

The ZTE ZXV10 B803 also supports the H.265 format. H.265 is the next generation super HD code transmission specification, which deliversencoded video using half the bandwidth of the previous generation (H.264), with the same quality. TheH.265 standard will gradually replace H.264 to become the mainstream standard of the next generation of video transmission."

- See more at: http://www.voicendata.com/voice-data/news/209836/mwc-zte-launches-4k-p60-ultra-hd-stb#sthash.HcvQdZTZ.FtezOjwf.dpuf

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=100650811

NTEK bagholders getting DeFoley-ated with the coming flood of 20,000,000 David Fooley restricted shares eligible to be delegended and sold into the market anytime after 12 April 2014.

25,000,000 restricted NTEK shares of David Foley came off restriction after February 12th, 2014 and

ANOTHER 20,000,000 restricted NTEK shares of David Foley can be delegended and dumped into the market after April 12th, 2014.

Watch CHDN (Chardan Securities) on the ask dumping insider shares into the market when Foley completes the process of getting the latest tranche of 20,000,000 delegended and deposited in broker street name.

It'll be a FLOOD of DeFoleyant as the shareholders get exFoleyated.

Even the new Tegra K1 is not powerful enough, even though it is 4 times more powerful than the old Tegra 4.

"Scoring a rock solid 60fps in an off screen 1080p Benchmark it fares significantly better than the Tegra 4. The predecessor to this chip can only manage a measly 16fps (at only 1080p!) so you can see for yourself how great a difference this is."

Read more: http://wccftech.com/tegra-k1-superchip-benchmarks-revealed-4-times-faster-tegra-4/#ixzz2z0JmFTXS

Quote from NTEk long's post:
On Feb 6, 2014, at 9:14 AM, [ ] wrote:

"Thanks Lorraine,

When you say that "Many customers have received them." are you referring to average consumers who purchased them online?
Is there any way to determine specifically when I should also be receiving my pre-ordered Nuvola NP-1 other than getting an email notice about their shipping soon?

Will keep the timeline for the retailers in mind."


On Thursday, February 6, 2014 12:28 PM, Lorraine Cullivan <lorraine@nanotechent.com> wrote:

"Thousands.

What is your order number.

Remember that ihub represents less than 50 customers"


Does ANYONE have the FCC ID number for the mythical NP-1 electronic device???? It would be on the FCC sticker on the bottom of the unit IF ANYONE ACTUALLY HAD ONE ... and if Nanotech actually had an FCC ID approval code.