ZZ<<>>ZZ
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lol, when that fight took place in 75 I wanted Frazier in a bad way, and was disappointed Ali won. Today I have great respect for Ali's style; the showmanship he demonstrated throughout his career is some of the best in history. He knew how to get people watching and paying attention to his every move.
"Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/audio/40627000/rm/_40627302_9933_1_10_75ali.ram
Muhammad Ali wins 'Thrilla in Manila'(1975)
Anything on KEITH T. FOGG? Other than DOC STARLING ENTERPRISES, LLC? I think Fogg is the name we're looking for.
I think so, I remember digging up the name Fogg from somewhere before, can't find it yet.
Good find, Could it be ?;
http://www.sos.louisiana.gov/cgibin?rqstyp=crpdtlC&rqsdta=34791800K
Charter/Organization ID: 34791800K
Name: DOC STARLING ENTERPRISES, LLC
Type Entity: Limited Liability Company
Status: Not Active (Action by Secretary of State)
2006 Annual Report/Reinstatement form is required in order to reinstate Print Annual Report/Reinstatement Form For Filing
Mailing Address: C/O KEITH T. FOGG, 64340 FOGG LANE, PEARL RIVER, LA 70452
Domicile Address: 64340 FOGG LANE, PEARL RIVER, LA 70452
Organized: 05/17/1999
Registered Agent (Appointed 5/17/1999): KEITH T. FOGG, 64340 FOGG LANE, PEARL RIVER, LA 70452
Manager: KEITH T. FOGG, 64340 FOGG LANE, PEARL RIVER, LA 70452
Member: KEITH T. FOGG, 64340 FOGG LANE, PEARL RIVER, LA 70452
Member: CONSULTSTAR, INC., 2361 CHEVY CHASE LANE, DECATUR, GA 30032
Amendments on File
REVOKED (08/16/2005)
The L2 looked great today. I hope to pick up some more before news hits and this thing rockets.
LOL, Ok "Prince Strongus" get this thing back to 2.5 cents Next week and I'll coordinate the Coronation. All kidding aside, I think this week may mark the turnaround we badly need. The company opened up and shared some details and a secret is out and the short term damage behind us. I'm looking forward to hearing more details from the investor who recently visited the company. His news sounds good.
Buys going off at .008 and the bid sits at .007/wtf. Games are being played with this for sure.
I looked a many pinks; I am in PBLS, and SLJB. I think PBLS is one of very few value plays (company with real revenue and assets). The pop after Katrina was a fluke in my opinion, no real reason for it to ever run that big. The cash generated selling shares on that run and the subsequent business generated at the pit and construction divisions afforded the company a unique opportunity to expand far beyond what they originally thought possible. The asset value of the company alone screams, "BUY" at these prices.
Many I-Huber's are waiting for SLJB to make it's big move, when that happens I see alot of money coming back to PBLS. That should help move us up.
Sounds good, I hope so...
No drugs on this board. LOL
Judging by our past success I pick the date with the least number of replies, Nov 1st.
Most of the longs have been through enough of them that it doesn't count as a blip on the radar..
Niko heil, I kinda like this guy's brass balls style. It's no more out of line than some of the bashing that has been going on here lately. Dose anyone think this company isn't worth way more than .0075/share? I agree that up is where we go from here, the ghost is out of the closet. In any event time will tell the true story.
For anyone who hasn't seen these;
http://www.emaar.com/
http://www.propertyworldme.com/content/html/1629.asp
OT: LOL, ABLE and NITE in the boat, SLJB the shark that will gobble them up.
At this point I hope they wait until the share price is heading north again before releasing the AF. I may shoot myself for saying that.
Looking for that to happen soon, I hope it's soon. I want to split that money between PBLS and IPKL.
Love that upside, that's why I'm taking a chance.
I agree, This bait and switch is getting boring. I'm long on this but would rather have no news or information than this. Possibly it's what they want? I think so. When they are ready this will move. GLTY
Alias Born On: Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Boards Moderated: 0
Total Posts: 5
Allinone,
Are you working with multiple document formats?
SEC Publisher Supports All Document Formats, Including PDF Documents
SEC Publisher™ is a powerful EDGARizer (SEC Filings Preparation) software that makes it easy and affordable for filers to convert all document formats, including PDF and Microsoft® Word, into HTML and ASCII that are 100% SEC compliance.
Show me how it works | Request a Trial Software
http://www.secpublisher.com/?gclid=CIHdtK3okIgCFU5xFQodzxCMNg
You probably should sell at the open, Yea, I can't stand being f'ed over. I bought at .02 and now the price is what, 16.5, yep, I got screwed...LOLLLLL
Great information, thanks.
E*Trade, TD Ameritrade Are Targeted in Online Brokerage Fraud
By Bradley Keoun
Oct. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Customer accounts at online brokers including E*Trade Financial Corp. and TD Ameritrade Holding Corp. have been infiltrated by computer hackers in Eastern Europe and Asia in one of the biggest cases of identity theft to strike the U.S. securities industry.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASD are trying to unravel the fraud, which has cost New York-based E*Trade at least $18 million and caused losses at Ameritrade of Omaha, Nebraska, company officials said. In one ``pump-and-dump'' scheme the SEC uncovered, thieves used customers' money to drive up the prices of little-traded stocks and then sold shares they bought earlier at a profit.
``The perpetrators were more organized, and it was a bigger issue this quarter than it had ever been before,'' E*Trade Chief Operating Officer Jarrett Lilien said in an interview. ``It wasn't just hitting one company, it was hitting everybody.''
The case shows how criminals who ply the Internet from countries beyond the reach of U.S. law enforcers are turning to financial markets to commit fraud. Online brokers are a growing target for identity theft, a crime that in all its forms will cost Americans $56.6 billion this year, according to Javelin Strategy & Research of Pleasanton, California, which has prepared similar estimates for the Federal Trade Commission.
``Identity thieves appear to be directing increased attention to the securities business, and their attacks are growing in sophistication,'' said John Walsh, chief counsel in the SEC's office of compliance inspections and examinations, at an industry conference in Phoenix on Oct. 5.
Customers Compensated
E*Trade disclosed on a conference call last week that it spent $18 million in the third quarter to compensate customers affected by trading fraud. The company, the fourth-largest discount broker by assets, is cooperating with the federal investigation and the probe by the NASD, E*Trade spokeswoman Pam Erickson said. NASD is the industry's self-regulator for more than 5,100 brokerages.
TD Ameritrade, the third-largest online broker, also suffered losses because of bogus trading by unauthorized users who pried their way into customer accounts, said spokeswoman Katrina Becker. She declined to specify an amount. TD Ameritrade may provide more details tomorrow when it reports fiscal fourth- quarter earnings.
Charles Schwab Corp., the biggest online broker, didn't experience ``anything unusual enough to warrant a financial disclosure,'' said spokesman Glen Mathison. The San Francisco- based company reported earnings on Oct. 16. Adam Banker, a spokesman for closely held Fidelity Investments of Boston, the second-largest discount broker, declined to comment.
`Global Problem'
E*Trade Chief Executive Officer Mitchell Caplan told investors that investigators traced the illicit trading to ``concerted rings'' in Eastern Europe and Thailand. The company hasn't determined whether the reimbursement costs will be covered by insurance, he said. TD Ameritrade also was targeted by cyber- criminals in Eastern Europe and Asia, spokeswoman Becker said.
``Internet crimes that result in the theft of personal and financial data from consumers continue to be a significant and global problem,'' FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said. ``We work closely with our foreign law-enforcement counterparts to pursue these cases with all applicable laws.''
Bresson declined to comment on the FBI investigation. John Heine, a spokesman for the SEC, and NASD's Herb Perone also declined to comment.
Some of the losses were straight theft. In his presentation, Walsh of the SEC explained how criminals use personal information such as Social Security numbers to break into accounts. Once in control, they loot the accounts by selling securities and wiring out the proceeds far from the U.S.
`Pump and Dump'
The online version of the ``pump-and-dump'' fraud sets off few security alerts at brokerage firms because no money is withdrawn from the compromised accounts, Walsh explained.
``This is an increasingly popular variation,'' he said in Phoenix. ``If you are looking for a single `hot topic' in the world of identity theft, this is it.''
In ``alias fraud,'' a thief opens an account in an individual's name, then uses it for illegal trading or money- laundering. Because the victim's name is on the account, he or she appears responsible for the crimes.
Walsh said the SEC recently began a ``sweep examination'' of brokerage firms to determine if they have adequate technology and staff training to prevent and detect online fraud.
``This thing is so widespread and has such a significant impact on the industry at large,'' E*Trade's Caplan said. `You're going to end up seeing structural changes in the industry.''
Reducing the Fraud
Caplan told investors E*Trade reduced the fraud to ``almost zero'' in the past three weeks after beefing up security for electronic trading. The company declined to say how many accounts were infiltrated or explain the security enhancements.
While the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. covers bank accounts against fraud or insolvency for as much as $100,000, brokerages get no such protection.
E*Trade promised in January that it would reimburse customers for any losses due to fraud in an effort to allay concerns about trading over the Internet or keeping cash in online bank accounts. TD Ameritrade and Schwab offered similar guarantees in February and Fidelity followed in May.
To contact the reporter on this story: Bradley Keoun in New York at bkeoun@bloomberg.net .
Last Updated: October 23, 2006 00:04 EDT
http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a0tTA2Ko30As
I hope we get it right the next time
This may help in the endeavor to define “hopefully” in Petar's statement;
Bill Clinton's statement below defining the word is, is my favorite;
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."
http://www.slate.com/id/1000162/
Possibly Petar could put one on the SLJB site and alert us when we should stop playing.
Hope and certainty are two different things.
"I am hoping that late Monday"
This leaves the door wide open, imo.
Yea, let's give her that much.
Something more to celebrate, imo..
Message In Reply To:jantinna
"I'm so confident that if the AF'S come out this week I will agree to never post here again."
KLGE @ 0.07(It ran from 20 cents to 3 dollars last year around christmas season)..Nice xmas play..
Only because of the TV ad campaign for the Klegg Mini Player, are they doing it again with a better product?
I do think it's a good play from this level, a real company with real products. Probably will reach .30's with some good news. JMO
Petar's Q&A from Blog;
• Petar says:
Hello All… I am writing here to tell you all that I now have in my possession the audited financial statement. I am reviewing the document now, and will release all the information through appropriate channels (including this site) as soon as I am done…Thank you again for your patience.
Comment by Petar
October 20th, 2006 @ 3:12 pm
• Petar says:
AF review is very boring but must be done of course.
As far as future contracts are concerned, I fell our offices in the Middle East will easily reach their targets. Our Egypt office is actually looking into the partial purchase of a cement plant. Very expensive but very profitable.
Hope you are having a good weekend also.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 8:55 pm
• Petar says:
I will be announcing some completed deals very shortly.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 8:58 pm
• Petar says:
I wish I had more time to spend with all of you. Unfortunately, however, I do have a job to do. I am hoping that late Monday I will be able to post what everybody is waiting for. There is nothing that would make me happier.
I should really have our people clean up this site again. Either that or I just don’t know how to work it too well.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:02 pm
• Angela says:
Hi, Petar
Is Marquee still the IR firm representing Sulja?
Thanks
Angela
Comment by Angela
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:02 pm
• Petar says:
Hey Angela. It was nice to have finally met you.
Marquee has done a wonderful job representing our firm in the past. I believe that every firm and its board should be directly responsible to the shareholders. This is why I have made the decision to handle IR in house. Marquee did the best they could with the information they were provided, however, at this time it will be my staff and I who will be handling IR.
I would like to that thank the people of Marquee for all the hard work and taking a few on the chin for me.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:09 pm
• Petar says:
This audit touches very little on the 2006 year. Our year end was May 31 in the past but has been changed to Dec. 31 now.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:11 pm
• Petar says:
The company who owns the mill has reconsidered the original sale price since a resolution has been reached on softwood lumber tariffs. We are now forced to revisit the project and see if the higher cost still works.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:15 pm
• Petar says:
I’m sorry…my answers seem so rude and short. Under meds tonight: don’t want to appear rude.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:17 pm
• Petar says:
Nothing but room in Windsor. Everybody is welcome to visit. I am sure the tourism bureau will love it.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:19 pm
• Petar says:
I would really rather have it somewhere warm.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:20 pm
• spaceheater says:
So you’re saying that this audit will encompass the period up through May 31, 2006? Will it also be for three years to satisfy a requirement for listing on DIFX?
Comment by spaceheater
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:20 pm
• Petar says:
Spaceheater….that is what I am saying. One year. May 05- May 06. I have promised nothing else and that is what I am posting next week. I want that to very clear to all.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:24 pm
• Petar says:
It was a signed deal with stipulations, one of which was the return of funds to the Canadian mill by the US government. We would retain those funds under the original agreement. Their lawyers seem to have a different interpretation of this matter.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:27 pm
• papajohns says:
Petar,
So I guess the year 2005 is from June 2005 - may 2006?
If so, is the audit with minimal issues or are there any major restatements? Apologize if this question seems persistent.
Comment by papajohns
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:24 pm
• Petar says:
Well papa….I really don’t want to answer too many questions about the audit @ this time (and yes your dates are correct). I’m sure I will be doing enough of that shortly.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:30 pm
• October 21st, 2006 @ 9:27 pm
• fdjr13 says:
Can you answer anything about the DIFX listing?? Will you try to get listed and when?
Comment by fdjr13
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:28 pm
• Petar says:
fdjr13: As we speak our people are looking into that matter. I have nothing to report at this time.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:33 pm
• abbam says:
Also, are you going to supply the materials for construction of the world trade center ?
Comment by abbam
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:32 pm
• Petar says:
abbam: We were not formally invited to do so and I am not certain that any contracts at that level have been awarded. A project that large so far from our North American Locations really doesn’t make sense.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:35 pm
• mksdaddy1 says:
I was hoping the tariff refund was coming our way but I can see why the are balking (not laughing). Maybe split it with them and move on???
Comment by mksdaddy1
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:34 pm
• Petar says:
mksdaddy: That’s the way I negotiated the deal. Obviously nobody thought the refunds would be coming so soon.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:37 pm
• Jerry says:
Petar, is the 350 mm concrete deal, a done deal for us. Thank You.
Comment by Jerry
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:37 pm
• Petar says:
Hi Jerry: Over the past couple of months we have managed to put together new concrete deals locating suppliers in Polland and Buyers throughout the ME region. I just signed on Wednesday one deal for $98,000,000.00 and there is more to come. Awaiting banking docs. from buyer.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:42 pm
• mksdaddy1 says:
You the man! (lumber mill deal)
But the cement deal? That wasn’t lost with the phone call issue? You got a lot of investers waiting for that answer. You got the $4 they way we figure without it. How about a bone?
Comment by mksdaddy1
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:40 pm
• Petar says:
First deal was lost daddy. Simply went to find more. That is why you guys are paying me right?
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:44 pm
• fdjr13 says:
Petar…Last one from me..How long before AF’s are filed on EDGAR???
Frank
Comment by fdjr13
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:43 pm
• Petar says:
Fdjr13: As soon as they recieve them….same time I post here. Very soon I hope since they are actually in hand. Would be nice to turn the page wouldn’t it?
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:46 pm
• mksdaddy1 says:
By the by, if we voted, I would vote to purchase the cement factory. We/you’ll need it later anyway! Go for it! I’m here for years not months!
Comment by mksdaddy1
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:44 pm
• Petar says:
I promise you daddy…A purchase this large….I would love to share some of the responsibility with all of you. (voting on it)
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:48 pm
• Petar says:
I am CEO sharing with my shareholders info. on completed deals. I see nothing “insider” about it. For all I know you are not investors or are twelve years old. (But I will ask the lawyers thanks. Don’t feel like spending time with Martha during Xmas)
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:51 pm
• cactus says:
Petar–Could you please give an approximate cost of the audit procedure that we just completed?
Comment by cactus
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:50 pm
• Petar says:
cactus: I am truly sorry but I simply could not answer that question with any certainty. I am sure it wasn’t cheap.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:53 pm
• Petar says:
Thank you all very much again. I am not feeling well and really need to catch up on my sleep. I will be back soon and I promise I will answer some of the questions in the forum (once someone could explain to me why I can’t reply).
Thank you again and good night.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:57 pm
• Jerry says:
Petar, one last question from me. Will we see some updated performer numbers for 2007 with the A/f’s Thank You Petar. Jerry
Comment by Jerry
October 21st, 2006 @ 9:59 pm
• Petar says:
Yes Jerry…just need a small break from numbers for a couple of days.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 10:00 pm
• Tanana says:
Good evening sir,
Are there any more acquistions/mergers in the works at the moment ? I am not asking specifics.
Thanks
Comment by Tanana
October 21st, 2006 @ 10:02 pm
• Petar says:
Now there is a question I like..Yes there are…Thank you Tanana.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 10:03 pm
• Petar says:
Thanks illusionist.
Night all…and thank you again for your support.
Comment by Petar
October 21st, 2006 @ 10:04 pm
Party's posts on RB back in May, very happy I stayed with it./em
sandbath,
"I'm basically just theorizing now, though."
It's all any of us can do until we see the real deal. GLTY
What if the company's book value is high enough? The Balance Sheet..?
Thanks for posting that link, I always presumed it would take longer than the time frames they have available for filing.