When the time comes, you'll be judged for your actions.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
how could you have known they were still alive? A few posts on FB don't prove anything. This is a good release that gives the current status and the dogs's health is the primary concern for the future viability of the product
all the dogs treated are still alive..you don't think that's good news? Have you researched the alternative treatments currently available?
Haha. Cash burn from what? There are zero costs
Flippin for 100 bucks. No thanks
still missing?
What about this conversion?
Class D:
Dividend – none
Voting - 1:10,000
Conversion – 1:10,000
Liquidation Rights: None
Redemption Provision: None
Sinking Fund Provision: None
if that's the case why do they need to increase the number of O/S shares or R/S to be able to convert all. Don't they have over 500m available already or are they restricted?
How many shares are being given up for the $5mil? Is this a fixed conversion at current price of .003 so approx 1.6bil shares. Hence we need the R/S so all can be issued?
finding out about some key info a week after it happens shows your investment aptitude
he resigned a week ago so it is old news.
hit a nerve did I...lol
Yet you still read his blog...sad
lol - how much did Sinemia pay them to write that
old news but check the fine print
https://www.hmny.com/press-release/2019/3/6/moviepass-and-moviepass-films-announce-new-strategic-direction
Such forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions. Although Helios’ management believes that the assumptions made and expectations represented by such statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that a forward-looking statement contained herein will prove to be accurate. Actual results and developments may differ significantly from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein and even if such actual results and developments are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences or effects. Some, but not all, of these risks include, among other things: our capital requirements and whether or not we will be able to raise capital as needed; whether our new subscription plan and business model will be successful; our ability to successfully develop the business model of MoviePass, Moviefone, and MoviePass Films; our ability to retain our existing subscribers and market and sell our services to new subscribers following the change in the subscription plan and business model; our ability to integrate the operations of MoviePass, Moviefone, MoviePass Films and MoviePass Ventures and other acquired businesses into our operation; audience acceptance of the films and acquired content of MoviePass Films; delays, cost overruns, cancellation or abandonment of the completion or release of MoviePass Films’ films; failure of third party distributors to distribute MoviePass Films’ films and their failure to perform or promote such films; changes in consumer discretionary spending; the inability of MoviePass, MoviePass Films and Moviefone to compete effectively; Helios’ ability to fulfill its payment obligations to MoviePass’ merchant processors in a timely manner to prevent MoviePass service interruptions; changes in local, state or federal regulations that will adversely affect Helios’ business; consumer acceptance of the new uncapped MoviePass subscription plan; the success of cost-reduction and subscription revenue increase measures; the risk that increased monthly usage by MoviePass’ subscribers may cause MoviePass to incur losses and negative cash flow; risk of attempts at unauthorized or improper use of MoviePass’ services; the inability to maintain or rebuild the value of the MoviePass brand; the inability to successfully respond to rapid technological changes and alternative forms of delivery or storage to remain competitive; the inability to maintain relationships with program suppliers and vendors; the ability of Moviefone to obtain advertising revenues; consumer acceptance of Moviefone services; the ability of Moviefone to develop and offer compelling content, products and services and attract new users or maintain existing users; breaches of network and data security measures; a disruption or failure of networks and information systems; the impact of legal proceedings or governmental action against Helios and MoviePass; whether Helios will continue to receive the services of certain officers and directors; Helios’ ability to protect its and its subsidiaries’ intellectual property and operate its businesses without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others; and the risk factors described in Helios’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2018, including subsequent current and periodic reports, information statements and registration statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned to review such reports and other filings at www.sec.gov.
shorts going to pay today, they will reshort and then new plans will drop and bury the shorts some more
OOPS - that didn't age well did it. Thought there was meant to be a R/S? lol
To the stockholders of HELIOS AND MATHESON ANALYTICS INC.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the stockholders of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (the “Company”) that the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) has cancelled the previously announced special meeting of the Company’s stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), originally scheduled to be held on March 15, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Board cancelled the Special Meeting because it does not expect to have the requisite stockholder votes to approve the proposed reverse stock split at the Special Meeting.
The purpose of the Special Meeting was to obtain the approval of the Company’s stockholders to an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a one-time reverse stock split of common stock in a ratio of 1 share-for-2 shares up to a ratio of 1 share-for-500 shares.
The Board apologizes for any inconvenience this may have caused its stockholders.
You must have read a different tweet
it does beg the question though, where has the funding come from and at what cost?
I think GS would have worded it differently if toxic funding had been involved.
Yes - does that hurt your hit campaign?
How much did you lose here?
The 3rd dog Missy is still alive, discussed briefly in the comments section of mooses latest post.
"Doing ok, dealing with tumor Necrosis as expected"
"since 3 weeks after the treatment "
think it was moved again, this time to 2/21
that is the nature of the beast, Hedge Funds don't want to expose their hands.
All I know is they brought in at .0163 and the price hasn't been above that since. Any shares they have sold or continue to sell below this price would be at a loss.
Yes they have warrants with a strike of .0163 but these will also be diluted with a R/S
They are also down to receive dividends from any MP spin-off so again would benefit from a higher share price.
If they were really playing this on the short side they would have just shorted at the market.
4.99% is a nice stake for a forward thinking hedge fund. You obviously aren't around last year with the convertible notes and true dilution
Good luck to you. I'm here for the long haul.
MP films are down shooting axis sally at the moment with al pacino. MP Films are getting their own funding not through HMNY, they already got 7mm for 10 minutes gone.
Some bankers trust them, Armistice trust them too.
They needed funds to pay for the MPE spin off, S-1 has been filed and we should know in 4-6 weeks if ok and what they valuation will be.
I'm just thankful this isn't toxic debt like the prior offerings. The current and projected o/s is still a few billion lower than it would have been if all the old notes had been converted
The filing proves nothing as it has an effective date of the 31dec18. The offering was the 16th Jan 19
The $ notional you own will not adjust at the point of the R/S. It's only if price drops after that (which is likely)
MP Films borrowed $7M last year to produce 10 minutes gone
If you look back at all the notes, warrants, shares HB have purchased you can see that this time it is different. It started in October when they cancelled the convertibles. You can choose to believe what you want to believe.
As for the AMC conversation, you ignored my post where I referred to the 60% cut they pay.
Your point all along, which you're now choosing to ignore, was that A-list is a super deal as AMC gets a discount whereas MP doesn't. Whilst the discount is true, this has nothing to do with A-list. AMC has always retained 40% of the ticket cost, they use this money to pay for theatres, utilities, staff etc etc. AMC would make more profit without a sub model which is why they never had one until MP came along and forced their hands.
MP has always stated, for well over a year, they want a B/E model for their sub model. I believe this has happened or is very close to happening. This is why I will stay long and continue to be positive on the company.
If you're invested long or short you should care as they are the funding driving force behind HMNY
They would just be a hedge. And makes no sense.
They would just short naked if they wanted to short.
Last year that had notes that ratcheted down in price which could be shorted against
You realise that HB bought160mm at .0163. Tell me why they would sell all at a loss? Why not just short at the market
That's as of the 31st dec. They can still own under 5% (like armistice) and not report
Admittedly MP has changed the sub model and prices a number of times but its a completely different beast to what Sinemia do.
Sinemia offers huge discounts to get people to sign up and then increases their prices
so even with a 55/60% hair cut on what is actually paid to the studios AMC's bottom line is effected when someone uses A-List vs buying a direct ticket.
AMC would have made more money via an MP sub then one using A-list
Any further AMC discussion should be moved to their board. End of conversation
It's an average price for the whole of the US. Might be $15 in NY, but $5 in another city.
The average ticket price in the US is just over $9 which is why they $8.99 is fair price.
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/about/adjuster.htm
This has nothing to do with A-list itself , AMC has always paid a fixed price to studios for their tickets.
My point was, if an A-LIST member uses their membership to buy a ticket, AMC still pays the theatre $8.99 for each use. All those high users that switched from MP to AMC and utilizing between 4-12 movies per month cost AMC between $39.99 and $119.99 against the membership cost of $19.99 (or whatever they have adjusted prices to).
Even if they offer $5 Tuesdays they still pay the studio $8.99
get it now?
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1040792/000121390019001364/def14a0119_heliosandmath.htm
Q: What happens if I do not cast a vote?
A: If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the proposals at the Special Meeting. If you submit a signed proxy card with no further instructions, the shares represented by that proxy card will be voted as recommended by our Board in favor of the two proposals.
If you are a beneficial owner, your broker may vote on Proposal 1 and Proposal 2, which are considered by the NYSE to be “routine” matters.
check out the number of complaints on twitter for Sinemia vs MP...I'd say at least 10 times more.
Also remember all Sinemia prices are temporary by design. How many customers stick around when there 4.99 jumps to 19.99, or there 19.99 jumps to 89.99