Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why is it Thursday?
nobody wants mongo and pseeker here so,
dump the fckn guys to the banned list and be done with it.
the subject is overdone now.
Is matt related to these guys maybe? lol
50ma .052
have you called them about it.
I never use etrade pro because you couldn't trade more than 10,000 shares at a time. Maybe it's changed.
has anyone who uses etrade tried the new market trader software?
after about 30 minutes ameps level two cuts out. I have made a couple of calls about it. I guess the phase out of the old version has been postponed while they tweak the new one some more.
Last time we were here, we went straight to 12.
It went .075 to a .115 close.
there are no sec non compliance issues and I think everyone on this board knows the scoop.
This run has a lot of room left when you look at the last two moves to .145 The MACD tells the story.
right through the wall this time.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=AMEP&p=D&yr=2&mn=0&dy=0&id=p58471304743
Those clowns are good for the board. Trust me.
These sewer rats are refuted with facts that is great for everyone.
These guys totally inadvertently help out the board with terrific DD that is given back to their BS.
I say leave them. It gets more comical as the stock goes up.
ltg
gotter all figured out aye Mr. Birdseed?
Maybe you should write a book. lol
the prelim came out last thurs.
the definitive will not be out before next week with 10 a day wait.
there is some around .092 I believe.
I think the .09s will drop fast.
power building up to move through .085
good post mom and totally agree.
What's for dinner?
fish you must have a secret to life longevity.
I'll take the money now and it could not be any sooner.
As far as amep staying under the radar, ba hum bug to that idea too.
Slow steady gain may be great for your wife but not here. lol
I see a 5 bagger here for starters. That means .40
ltg
what possible difference could it make?
wHY not contemplate the universe?
50ma up a notch .051 eom
.092 eom
Last time we were on the upswing and we landed at .08 I had sold my .05 shares. The move from 5 to 8 was very rapid and it seemed like a good trade. But to my complete dismay the stock went immediately to .145.
I think like most everyone here, the "perfect storm" as one poster put it makes this ripe to blow through that old resistance as I have said since early December.
And that is what I think is about to happen here as word filters out that the padgett 11 wants to blow it's top.
I think we are lookin at .20 sometime in February.
ltg
your next alias should be Mr. FOS
I'm laughin at you guys big time. You know why?
It is because everything you and mongo have tried to do here has had the reverse effect. You prod and poke around in filings and post up little snippets and one by one everything you post is brought to the real truth for all to see every fckn time.
You guys are done here and you all know it.
lmfao
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
(pseeker is named as a defendant for his bashing activities, I think this speaks volumes regarding his character.)
SOMERSET COUNTY
CHANCERY DIVISION
HONORABLE ROSEMARIE RUGGIERO WILLIAMS
RETURN DATE: March 5, 2004
DOCKET NO.: HNT-C-14001-04
DIGITAL BROADBAND v. “DBBDISFUNNY”, “DALILAMA”, “STOCK_PICK”, “SMOOTHER_1999”, “WNSRFR”, “MRWRIGHTAIDE”, “PSEEKER”, AND JOHN DOES 1-10
EX PARTE MOTION TO CONDUCT LIMITED PRETRIAL DISCOVERY
MOVANT: PLAINTIFF (Digital Broadband Networks, Inc. and Patrick S. Lim)
MOVANT’S ATTORNEY: Jay McDaniel
Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference
OPPONENT: NONE
ORAL ARGUMENT: NO
I. Background
Plaintiffs, Digital Broadband Networks, Inc. (“DBBD”) and Patrick S. Lim (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek to ascertain the identities of persons (“Defendants”) who anonymously posted allegedly actionable messages on the internet in order that Plaintiffs can comply with the requirements of service of process. In the underlying action, Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendants and their agents from posting defamatory messages on the internet which are intended to manipulate the price of the common stock of DBBD. They also seek damages at law for violation of New Jersey statutory law, libel, and civil conspiracy.
DBBD is a publicly traded corporation which files periodic reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Lim serves as the DBBD’s chief executive officer and chairman of the board; he is also the company’s majority shareholder.
Beginning in December of 2003, Defendants, through various aliases on internet financial message boards owned and operated by Yahoo, Inc. and Lycos, Inc., allegedly posted numerous false statements regarding DBBD, DBBD’s business, and Lim. Plaintiffs allege that by posting such statements, Defendants engaged in a pattern of behavior constituting an unlawful scheme to manipulate the price of DBBD’s publicly-traded stock. Plaintiffs also believe that Defendants’ conduct has contributed to a significant and steady decrease in DBBD’s stock.
II. Discussion
When considering a plaintiff’s request to conduct discovery (prior to service on defendant) to uncover the actual identity of a defendant, the reviewing court must determine whether the plaintiff has set forth a prima facie cause of action against the fictitiously-named anonymous defendants— in other words, whether or not the plaintiff’s underlying claims can withstand a motion to dismiss—although the court is not required to apply such a deferential standard. See Dendrite Intern., Inc. v. Doe No. 3, 342 N.J.Super. 134 (App.Div. 2001). In so holding, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial judge’s reliance on Columbia Ins. Co. v. seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. 573 (N.D.Cal. 1999) to resolve the issue at hand. The Court in Columbia Ins. established a four-pronged test to determine whether or not to permit a plaintiff to conduct discovery to ascertain the identity of a defendant. On plaintiff’s request to conduct discovery, prior to service on defendant, to uncover actual identity of defendant, plaintiff should:
(1) identify missing party with sufficient specificity such that court can determine that defendant is real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; (2) identify all previous steps taken to locate elusive defendant; (3) establish to court's satisfaction that plaintiff's suit could withstand motion to dismiss; and (4) file statement of reasons justifying specific discovery requested as well as identification of limited number of persons or entities on whom discovery process might be served and for which there is reasonable likelihood that discovery process will lead to identifying information about defendant that would make service of process possible.
See Id. Plaintiffs maintain that they have sufficiently “identified” Defendants by their internet aliases which they have used and continue to use to post messages on the Yahoo financial message board and the Raging Bull financial message board—which is operated by Lycos. Message board users must register to become members before they are permitted to use these boards. Registration requirement forms require registrants to provide personal information, including names and addresses. What’s more, before given access to the message boards, registrants must respond to a confirming email further confirming their identities. Because these registration processes themselves, are geared towards the ascertainment of an applicant’s true identity, the court agrees that by naming Defendants by their internet aliases, Plaintiffs have identified Defendants with sufficient specificity such that their true identities are likely to be revealed by service of subpoenas on Yahoo and Lycos.
Next, Plaintiff asserts that all if its claims against Defendants can withstand a motion to dismiss. The court notes that, for the purpose of this motion, they need make only one showing. Here, Plaintiffs claim to have stated facts in the Complaint sufficient to sustain a cause of action in, inter alia, defamation.
The New Jersey Supreme Court, in Romaine v. Kallinger, 109 N.J. 282 (1988), defined a defamatory statement as one that is false and injurious to the reputation of another or exposes another person to hatred, contempt or ridicule or subjects another person to a loss of the good will and confidence in which he or she is held by others. Id. at 289; citing Leers v. Green, 24 N.J. 239, 251 (1957). The Restatement (Second) of Torts § 559 (1977) describes a communication as defamatory if it tends so to harm the reputation of another so as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him. Romaine v. Kallinger, 109 N.J. at 289.
The threshold issue in any defamation case is whether the statement at issue is reasonably susceptible of a defamatory meaning. Id. at 290; citing Kotlik
Realistic value is .25 going higher with 5 wells coming on line.
let's not forget goldrunners prediction of .70 sometime ago. I agree with that one.
and you're pretty good at it.
My guess was based on a just a hunch from how it's climbed from less than .04 to where it is at .05. It needs another 20% to make the cross. So sometime in the next 3 weeks if not before. A climb to .10 or more will move it fairly quick to .06.
ltg
my guess was feb 15 if not before on the cross.
magic fingers that is pleasant music to mongos ears for you to say that.
Does it really look like they are having a detrimental effect here?
Doesn't look that way to me.
dave you can go back and look at the chart yourself and see.
As I said before. Mongo is a clear example of irony if there ever was one.
The more this group tries to clutter the board with BS, the clearer the DD becomes as the lies and deception are cleared up one by one.
I think that funny as hell.
Those ask walls are house of cards period.
If I have shares for sale, I don't join an ask wall that creates selling at the bid.
that is if I have any brains.
think about it.
certainly easy to see the cup and.....
rumor has it that the longer these cups take to form the better the launch to new highs by far.
Anyone want to wait longer?
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=AMEP&p=D&yr=3&mn=0&dy=0&id=p62635083002
all of the MAs are trailing up nicely.
I think this is going to light up real soon.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=AMEP&p=D&b=5&g=0&id=p63617390332
Tonights close signals the pending breakout as it will be the highest close of this recent climb from hell. Imo
419 record holders meaning 419 divided into 495 million?
would make the average hold a little less than a million shares.
dude are you from another planet? lol
birdseed you need a new accountant big time. I honestly don't know where you come up with this stuff. lol
Just call me Mr. Savvy. lol
075 was a past resistant point and good breakout point but, I think once we get into the .07s period folks will realize that the 05s and 06s will be gone. At that point they will have to make a quick decision.Do I want to be in on this next big run, or not?
You know as well as anyone here that launch time can come at anytime without warning just as it has in the past.
ltg
I think a great time to buy would be to wait after the official proxy comes out and the meeting takes place and the end of the BDC is official.
At that time you will probably pay at least double what it is today.
ltg
the 50ma @.05 ahead of schedule.
Golden cross by 15th of Feb no problem
dart my take on it is that the lawyers have addressed all the sec concerns concerning the language of the prelim and now they need to type it up and submit it and then it will show up on the sec website.
We don't need another rig.
The increased share price will be the dividend so, no dividend.
Use the money to drill what they have is what they will do.
Buying new leases is in their minds for sure.
I doubt that they have any intention of buying back any shares now or ever, especially at 5 bucks.