Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
A PPS drop does not constitute a company being a scam.
See, I believe the definition of LONG is not apparent.
LONGS do not tremble or get troubled by day to day PPS movements, comments or emotions sprung on investment boards.
They conduct their DD, trust in their DD and hold their Securities for the LONG haul; the future of what can and WILL be with regards to investments.
It's maturity.
NOT IF an 8k is submitted to the SEC stating otherwise.
NOT IF SPCL and Pixelmag's are in constant contact with the SEC with regards to the Merger and Filings.
NOT IF the SEC is aware of the current status.
Negative. That is incorrect.
6.1 Publicity. No publicity release or announcement concerning this Agreement, the Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be issued without advance approval of the form and substance thereof by Holdings except as may otherwise be required by law (in which case the party making such release or announcement will provide concurrent or, if practicable, prior notice to the other Parties hereto).
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
Pushing and wishing desperately that the deal is off that much?
Nevada filings updated days ago states otherwise.
Very interesting.
Again, CDEL has a large ASK block, attempting to keep the PPS down.
CDEL is taking advantage of the situation.
CDEL is placing big blocks on the ask to deter a rise in PPS.
Coupled with bid wracking and shaken investor confidence, CDEL places a large BID wall, expecting investors to sell and give them shares.
I have noticed this the last few days.
Alpert,
Can you reply to ART with this link? On mobile.
Read my previous post.
Never did I say I manipulated anything.
The PPS ran up due to enthusiasm, along with the latest updates on the Nevada filings. Manipulation happens in the OTC. PPS can rise or fall at anytime. Taking a look at the last 2 weeks shows that.
As I stated previously, Due Diligence is the ONLY smart way to invest, and that's how I invest; with research. I present facts with ACTUAL links to back my posts, good or bad.
Not from comments or emotions of others.
Art, what's your opinion on this "email"?
It was an email sent and received by someone on this board.
I find it odd that an entity, other than Pixelmags, would comment on such Merger without consent.
As per 8K:
"6.1 Publicity. No publicity release or announcement concerning this Agreement, the Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be issued without advance approval of the form and substance thereof by Holdings except as may otherwise be required by law (in which case the party making such release or announcement will provide concurrent or, if practicable, prior notice to the other Parties hereto)."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
Do you hear yourself?
This is the OTC. Manipulation at its finest occurs here. Anything can happen to the PPS.
In fact, SPCL hit a high of .02 recently, so it goes both ways.
Due Diligence is the only smart way to invest. The PPS can do what it wants.
How does this pertain to Solaris (SPCL)?
Got extra funds coming next week.
Patiently waiting to load more.
I go by Due Diligence and not the comments or emotions of others.
But much, much appreciated though!
Recent updates tell me otherwise.
Please keep us updated.
This is my thinking as well.
Per the 8k, a LEGAL document, only Pixelmags can state and update with regards to the Merger.
I can't imagine a law firm violating that.
This phone call was made?
What exactly did they say with regards to this "email"?
I agree. I think this is very well the case.
Interesting.
Thanks for the snapshot Q.
But it's odd another entity would comment on this. Per 8K, only Pixelmags can, depending on the info.
"6.1 Publicity. No publicity release or announcement concerning this Agreement, the Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be issued without advance approval of the form and substance thereof by Holdings except as may otherwise be required by law (in which case the party making such release or announcement will provide concurrent or, if practicable, prior notice to the other Parties hereto)."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
Odd. A screen shot would provide more clarification.
Per 8k, only Pixelmags are allowed to comment on said Merger, no other entity.
Wouldn't make sense for the Nevada filings to update with new directors, directly related to Vert Capital.
Can you provide a screen shot?
That's not a promotion.
That's investors enthusiastic on the completion of the reverse merger.
It's confidence in a stock.
I agree
First, let's get some things straight.
The "4 days until 8k" was purley speculation. I myself thought the same, but in no means was that the actual date.
Second, the company is an empty shell, hence no public information. This, on top of the fact the 8k states no information will be PR'd until completion of the merger.
Third, the SEC is aware of the situation of SPCL and it's Reverse Merger with regards to its 8k. Once the Merger is complete, all remaining financials from SPCL AND Pixelmag's will be submitted, AS OUTLINED by this legal document, the "8K", that was cordially submitted to the SEC:
"5.3 Post-Closing SEC Filings. Not later than four (4) Business Days following the Closing Date, Solaris shall file with the SEC (a) a Form 8-K Interim Report disclosing this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, and include therein, audited financial statements for Pixel for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and quarterly financial statements for the two fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015."
SEC EDGAR link to 8K below:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
The PPS dropping hold no merit to whether or not the Merger is going through.
On top of that, the PPS dropping has many factors. Manipulation, impatience, or investors downplaying a stock.
First, let's get some things straight.
The "4 days until 8k" was purley speculation. I myself thought the same, but in no means was that the actual date.
Second, the company is an empty shell, hence no public information. This, on top of the fact the 8k states no information will be PR'd until completion of the merger.
Third, the SEC is aware of the situation of SPCL and it's Reverse Merger with regards to its 8k. Once the Merger is complete, all remaining financials from SPCL AND Pixelmag's will be submitted, AS OUTLINED by this legal document, the "8K", that was cordially submitted to the SEC:
"5.3 Post-Closing SEC Filings. Not later than four (4) Business Days following the Closing Date, Solaris shall file with the SEC (a) a Form 8-K Interim Report disclosing this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, and include therein, audited financial statements for Pixel for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and quarterly financial statements for the two fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015."
SEC EDGAR link to 8K below:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
The deadline was speculation, based on the Nevada update that occurred on the 21st.
I myself thought the same. Regardless, the DD shows the Reverse Merger is making forward progress.
This is your opinion.
If the Merger is not happening, that is a material event which requires a PR of some sort.
Oh, apologies. Meant for another post.
This one will be number 9 still.
Per 8k:
4.8 SEC Filings.
"(a) Prior to the date of this Agreement, Solaris has furnished or made available to the Company and Holdings complete and accurate copies, as amended or supplemented, of its (a) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC, which contained audited balance sheets of Holdings as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operation, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended; and (b) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the three quarterly periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, and (c) all other reports filed by Solaris under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act with the SEC (such reports are collectively referred to herein as the “Solaris Reports”). The Solaris Reports constitute all of the documents required to be filed or furnished by Solaris with the SEC, including under Section 13 or subsections (a) or (c) of Section 14 of the Exchange Act, through the date of this Agreement. The Solaris Reports complied in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder when filed......"
"5.3 Post-Closing SEC Filings. Not later than four (4) Business Days following the Closing Date, Solaris shall file with the SEC (a) a Form 8-K Interim Report disclosing this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, and include therein, audited financial statements for Pixel for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and quarterly financial statements for the two fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2016 and March 31, 2015."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
Number 8! Let's make it to 10th time facts are shown.
Per 8k:
"6.1 Publicity. No publicity release or announcement concerning this Agreement, the Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be issued without advance approval of the form and substance thereof by Holdings except as may otherwise be required by law (in which case the party making such release or announcement will provide concurrent or, if practicable, prior notice to the other Parties hereto)."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
If anyone has an answer to this that would be great.
Perhaps art?
They will not tell you, most likely.
Per 8k:
"6.1 Publicity. No publicity release or announcement concerning this Agreement, the Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby shall be issued without advance approval of the form and substance thereof by Holdings except as may otherwise be required by law (in which case the party making such release or announcement will provide concurrent or, if practicable, prior notice to the other Parties hereto)."
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1411730/000149315216010214/ex10-1.htm
No, that is incorrect.
The Nevada filings show the "intended" AS after the 1:10 split.
Your posting inaccurate information.
I agree.
DD points to the Merger making forward progress.
Technically the date was speculation.