Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Agree. Also wasn't aware that ximedica had 30 Software Engineers, the only company that I have seen bring on that many software engineers over the last 12 months to work on a surgical robot is Verb
There goal was always to sell before FDA, one reason I invested. If they sell right before FDA, my est is $13/share.
like i said, ask those others that were present for the vote.
For those who are long and strong:
http://www.eetimes.com/author.asp?section_id=36&doc_id=1330048
no, the question that was asked was "if other board members wanted him out and voted him out then it could mean dissension among the ranks", did that happen or was it another shareholder? I am answering the question that it was not dissension among the board and they voted him out, it was a large shareholder who is not on the board. In essence, answering the question that was posed that the board DID NOT VOTE hargrove out. Again, someone else who was at the AGM who was there for the vote (which was public for attendees) can share there own version. Reiza didn't vote him out.
There was a vote at the AGM by the board that confirmed reelection, anyone else who was there can confirm that.
He was voted out by 1 outside shareholder who owned enough shares so Hargrove didn't get the required % of votes (think bball HOF voting process).
Agree
Whoever invested your money is responsible.
Just curious why would you invest in an OTC penny stock if you want it to perform like a NYSE stock? That's what I can't understand. I didn't think this was a stock anyone would invest in to trade in and out of regularly. Its obvious though by reading post that many investors want to get in, get out, get back in and trade in/out or short it to make a buck.
They have the right to invest and do whatever they want w their money just like I do. I've been in it 2 years and the progress Hargrove/Fowler have made on the product is great (see TRXC for the opposite), the progress they have made with partnerships to help manufacture SPORT are great. The groundwork they have laid at large institutions (who will be big customers - Mayo, Shands, UCLA, Cleveland clinic, medassets, etc). I believe that we are 12 months away from pay dirt. That's a 3 year investment with a huge payday, that seems good to me. I'm hoping that they keep Hargrove on as ceo thru FDA at least
Like
Puffy, it all depends on the parameters each investor set in place when they invested. For example, there were a bunch of investors that praised mgmt at trxc for the rise in pps but they ended up having a dud product.
Over and over and over
Can they take you too?
That's not what James shore indicated, he mentioned that the CE process has been initiated.
He's probably at Hamlyn
was the link to the AGM meeting removed from the board? I thought someone posted it but can't find it, strange if that post was removed.
Could the person repost it? Thanks
Thanks, it describes Verb to a "T"
Talarico
It's not like talkative is tearing it up elsewhere. That was not a big loss at all
Exactly
You are saying it was good that pope let the jnj rumor leak it (even though it was false)? Not what I am looking for in the next ceo
I'd be curious to get cptsjd take on the Hargrove vote. As for Paul l, look at his track record w trxc. I am sure there are 2 dozen better options, if not more to take over the board seat.
Paul L resume includes the debacle of trxc, if he is chosen for the board seat, I unload my shares immediately.
What is chocked?
That's right, it won't be the first meaning verb will have more than one robotic platform, this is where Titan comes in
Served w Distinction
For those at the AGM meeting, anyone want to comment on the Hargrove vote? The way some are portraying it on this board vs the comments from the board itself upon hargroves resignation don't match. Seems to me that it was premeditated and part of the plan Titan has in place.
Rarely does someone get let go from a position like this and the terminating party refers to their service at Titan as "distinguished"
And that's what a guy like Paul l will do, did it with trxc , RS
He'd be a part time CEO, we don't need one of those, we need a Scott Huennekens type
Paul L would be a bad choice. Titan would just be another project (look at his trxc project).
I hope not
Heck yea, didn't they work w ethicon on the harmonic scalpel
I think that is what glg20 is saying: he has given him his time and has had enough
That is a fascinating new patent - great find. I really can't wait until we see this thing fully operational and with the verb software. This patent along w the wristed roll patent are going to be beautiful to watch.
This one definitely points to a possibility for micro robotics as well, definitely beneficial in tight, constricted space within the body.
It all depends on the buyer and what value they put on a next generation surgical robotic platform in a market that will grow to over $30B by 2020/2021. I am pretty certain no one on this board has any idea what PPS will be in buyout.
That is entirely possible and certainly the theory of others I know who have invested in Titan.
exactly
so this is a good example, would you exercise your warrants to help the company before it hits the strike price?