Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I agree - who issued it and let stay on track here WHere is the 43-101 by now it should have appeared. Amazing.
That's because doubt consumes this co. - that's why imo the 43-101 will change this - but is also now another factor of doubt bcause they haven't posted it & it's now beyond 2 weeks - and at the very least - the russian version could have been made available to stock holders - not smart to say the least.imo
I just don't see this having any run potential at the momment - I think it wants to run but we have to go lower in order to do so -imo of course - will watch - but that's my guess.
A non-event?I think people are looking for solid proof imo - something that isn't from the co. but a 3rd party.
IMO some people want out because it's beyond "soon" & tax day approaching for loss write off is coming up - Aurc hopefully will post at least the originals before mon 24. imo of course
Trading for next week..what are they?
Soon - day 15. It's a bit strange to me that they don't at least just post the originals..? Have you asked Christine about that?
So you don't think the 43-101 if and when they post it will have an affect? I think if it will, it needs to happen soon as per their pr.
If they dont produce the 43-101 by then - what pps do you think we will see here ..guesses.
How low do you think it will hit due to the no show on the report -?
And that takes now 2 weeks?
Yup - and fccn is getting crushed. Still think that is relevant considering it's Peacocks play. I say wait until the 1st is over then come out - but the pps might take a hit or 2 but seems to be ok today. Who knows, maybe it will come out sooner - but imo now - that may not be the best move.
No news yet...coming up here on 2 weeks. Questions - if they did have a prior buy-out offer from Kartex - and Kartex is legit - shouldn't that take some of concern off the table as to whether or not AURC is legit. But what is odd - is the price dosn't reflect it and why no reports 43-101 posted by now at leat the Russian version..confusing at best.
I still don't understand why they haven't at least posted the originals in Russian..That pr was on Dec 5th...it's Dec 17th? -
43-101- anybody have any idea when they will have it ready for the public & does everyone expect a pr on it?
Any guesses when the report will be available?
Questions - 1. Why are people talking about a buy-out when AURC now seems to want to become fully reporting - seems they intend to move forward as a company on their own ???
-The Board shall now take measures to raise the company to superior standards and the proceedings to become fully reporting shall commence in January 2008.
2. 43-101 some people are referring to it as a summary vs the entire report that has been put on AURC's web site - can some one clarify what is on their website.
And the reaction is..?
Hate to say it but I think we got to go lower before we go up. Fccn is relevant here and I have no doubt that Peacock has delayed the pr due to FCCN imo -of course. He will likely wait until dr gas is announced which will run FCCN up to .006- .008 imo - at that time he will suddenly say ok now we can give you the name which will make this run. But it needs to go lower in order to push through .001 imo into the.004/5 ish range. Just what I am thinking will happen..but not till Dr Gas is announced and fccn is far above .0029.
What 's up with the site - Is that the report in it's entirety?
Why no pr yet?
Yup - I agree.
Reports were done by a legit co.. cost alot..info not clear by reaction of the Share price - any thoughts?
It's very quiet here given recent events imo
Another pr - they have not pr'd this yet.
I agree - but that isn't happening I think until end of month or jan I thought?
I emailed the company 2x's about the report being out and haven't got a response..who is responding to you?
Since they are obviously aware of IHUB - maybe everyone on IHUB should email the company ...POST THE ORIGINALS in Russian & who did the report now - ?
Why don't they just post the originals.. they could easily do this? They choose to remain non-transparent.
If there is no news coming to at least next week and possible not for 2 weeks - imo it may go down a little more here - Just what I think - they stalled on that pr.
Those tasks were a bit bigger than putting out a translation - that's like comparing an elephant to an apple - this is a very different responsibility - one that should not require a lot of time. Imo -
I think it won't go up much without news of who they are talking about - which is being stalled - not ok imo - who knows - part of me really thinks Peacock is waiting for dr gas on fccn - I didn't think it was a factor - but this little delay - that's just what I think is now happening. anyways - if it goes up great - still holding.
Well - see you all in a few days. My guess is that we dip a little because it doesn't sound like news will be out this week - might buy lower if it does- someone - can't remember who said they may wait until after Dr Gas with fccn is announced, so this can run- because GRXI might have a harder time running when FCCN is down, maybe Peacock is stalling - who knows.-- But it seems like it. Anyways - see you all later.
Well simply put -they pr concerns about being perceived as a scam - this is from AURC -- logically, if they are concerned about it..why not just post the ones in Russian now given their own concern of how they are being perceived. This is a very logical solution- that if they are done...why aren't they doing?
A translation issue is a stall tactic that makes no sense - but to not see it done shortly - in days imo of course - is a huge red flag. This is my opinion - it's not about setting a time line, it's about a company proving themselves when they know admittedly they are being questioned about their real value.
According to the pr it says the development of internationally recognized brand - not developing it into a international brand - am I reading it correctly - that it is already recognized?
You got to be kidding me with your statement - you don't think they shouldn't have the ability to accomplish a translation in what they stated would be a very shortly...wow - sorry - says alot & it's scarry that "investors" think that's ok. Their tardy - what is this - 3rd grade and this is just a translation, not an audit.
I think something is definately coming in the next week or two however, I am still saying they should show us who in a matter of days to stay on my good side.
Considering the cancellations - and their pr - to not put it up in a few days from their prior dec 5th pr is non acceptable - a company of their calliber should have no problem what so ever in doing this.
The geological 43-101 report states that the assets of Krong are $3.9 billion US. The findings of OOO" BK Arkadia demonstrate a business value to Krong of $2.8 billion US. Summaries of both reports will be available on Aurus' website at www.auruscorp.com very shortly.
So some people claimed to have received emails that the translation will be out this week - anyone care to comment on that?
Well - I see your side but I disagree, they are entering an agreement and should provide people with that info soon - not another 2 weeks imo of course. But in all honesty - you are probably right - as soon as possible just worries me when I hear that .
Whatever way - I think it is obviously coming.
that is focused on the development of an internationally recognized green brand
To me that means that the brand is already interantionally recognized - if it wasn't would the wording different?
Well - that's interesting - a nationally recognized brand ..
They entered into an an agreement - & As soon as possible - to me that should mean in the next couple of days - not another 2 weeks - I could be wrong - but they need to give shareholders something concrete this week - I was right about the 2 week time frame - being today - so let's see what the rest of the week brings.