Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So you mean it could reach 0.85? That was the same price it had in December '16 when it was going to delist from Nasdaq and go to OTCBB.
So let's do some basic math. If A/S goes to 1.2B and those remaining 250M or so shares are issued, if the stock will ever go back to 0.33 that would be almost a 400M market cap...
So where are those who talked about a 6-9 months timeframe of the publication starting from when it was first hinted at (June 2017)? Do you at least realize that you all were, once more, wrong?
IMO non sense post. Keep it up.
This is your original message:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125848007
mind to read what you write?
I believe most people that don't own any share would agree with the view you are expressing in first part.
Kab, you are kidding, aren't you?
I have to admit that I am wordless. Last year when that PR talked about a multi-month process, I thought results were coming. Then the hinted publication, and everything seemed to point out to a good outcome. The anticipation to disclose interim blinded data seemed to fit perfectly and the stock could finally give some temporary relief to long term shareholders. I have to admit that it's hard to realize how the stock price plummeted again and still no meaningful news out. Simply: wordless.
Let's hope for some news today.
Sometimes I believe you don't even read what ppl write. I don't blame you on this, will add some posts to the guinness world record.
Ex, you are really a patient person. Bunch of people in this message board are just totally confused and don't get a clue, and you always take your time to patiently explain the IMO obvious to them. My sincere congratulations.
But nice try anyway, lol.
LOL, IMO perhpas the SEC is investigating why 65 authors and not 67? You crack me up, lol.
Why do you ppl keep on posting the same things over and over and over?
Still you haven't replied to my question. It wasn't difficult though.
They can not do that. The fact of being confident, the basis of confidence, would IMO be under SEC questioning. As far as the roadmap and timeline yes, I do agree, but I question you: would you take it as gold?
Share price almost cut in half in about a month. Shorts? Personally I would say IMO people tired of waiting for an announced publication that never materialized (so far) and/or those interim blinded data anticipated to be released in an 8K back in September.
If they don't have info to release, what info could they release? Unless you are assuming they are witholding info, which I do not think.
Actually I don't see the publication.
Why not a pr?
No news. No publication. Incredible. Never seen anything like this.
With all of the last offerings at an incredible low price, anyone could well be. How could this be not expected?
Question you should ask yourself is: who would ever buy if offerings were at that low price and no meaningful news since so long? Should you expect buyers for an expected publication that didn't ever materialize, so far?
It seems many people in this message baord see ghosts, attemps, naysayers, shorts. LOL, how do you pretend a stock price to increase with no (IMO) meaningful news? Out of what should it appreciate?
Incredible that we get IMO no meaningful news for so long.
I don't know if you have the same feeling, but I start to believe there won't be any publication on interim blinded data...too much time has passed since first hinted, and the SEC investigation in my opinion doesn't look as a good thing.
Are you kidding or serious? Why should there be any effect on the PPs?!? OMG, please!
You sure they are all locked untill June 1st? That would be good, but I haven't checked that.
LOL, why doesn't IHUB allow more than 5 ignores?
Effect on what?
Not anyone from UCLA?
Did you sell?