Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The patent application they submitted in 2011 was a JOKE.
It was a PROVISIONAL. That is basically nothing. There is no data or anything with it and it just establishes an effective date. The real application must be submitted within a year and it was not done. Status Lapsed.
I found this funny also: "They used the patent attorney firm AMDL Australia Pty. Ltd. to file this."
Now they are claiming to be "patent attorneys"
These guys are true scammers through and through.
Thanks for bringing this to light Woofie.
Woofie, there is no mention of Jim Green in the link you posted.
YOU FAILED AGAIN.
Woofie stated: "Jim is connected to AMDL Australia..AMDL Australia was the distributor of Onko-Sure."
Prove that.
"James Edward Green
Appointed Non-Executive Chairman of EDSI on 26 October 2001.
Jim has been a director of companies associated with his brother, Graeme Green, in the development and marketing of smart card systems for 17 years. He was previously a Non-Executive Director of Coms21 Limited, a technology focused entity listed on the ASX.
By profession Jim Green is a pharmacist, and he continues to be involved in the development and operation of a variety of business concerns including public relations and media, function centers and retail distribution. He resides in Melbourne, Australia."
This guy has probably never even heard of UNI Pharma.
DC stated: "There is a coordinated attempt by the angel investors to control Radient without having to file a SEC 13G. They choose to be hidden from public view until they are ready to come forward. They have legally manipulated the laws to their advantage."
No one can manipulate the law concerning disclosure of stock ownership. If there is any group planning a takeover of Radient and their combined ownership is over 5%, then they are "crooks" because their ownership has not been disclosed.
Do you think Provista would be stupid enough to violate the law and come under sanctions from the SEC?
No Jim Green is not any angel investor with UNI Pharma or any other ridiculous assumption. I previously posted the last company Jim Green and his son ran went bankrupt.
The only real pertinent question at this point is what the Aussies are going to do. They have control and can do anything they want including sell off any remaining assets.
Anyone holding former shares at this point are in my opinion, SOL.
Wolfie, you keep claiming that only 4.5 billion are outstanding. That is only the number of shares outside of the employee incentive fund which contains 10% of the shares.
Mac's personal lawyers were paid via the employee incentive fund with the remaining shares up to the limit of 5 billion authorized.
You can see exactly when the lawyers sold their shares after the class action settlement was approved.
On 2/24/2014 749K was the total of the days trading. The lawyers dumped it all in one day.
2014/02/27 0.00020 0.00020 0.00010 0.00010 9,893,169 0.00010
2014/02/26 0.00020 0.00020 0.00010 0.00020 14,104,370 0.00020
2014/02/25 0.00020 0.00020 0.00010 0.00020 34,910,285 0.00020
2014/02/24 0.00020 0.00040 0.00010 0.00020 749,805,220 0.00020
2014/02/21 0.00010 0.00020 0.00010 0.00020 2,961,982 0.00020
2014/02/20 0.00020 0.00020 0.00010 0.00010 7,181,353 0.00010
2014/02/19 0.00020 0.00020 0.00010 0.00020 18,750,179 0.00020
2014/02/18 0.00010 0.00020 0.00010 0.00010 7,206,704 0.00010
Living, I have not found any time limit to file. Why would the SEC put any time limit on it? The stock is gone as far as the SEC is concerned at this point anyway.
It just becomes harder to file as time passes. How are the Aussies going to come up with financial data when they know nothing of what went on with Radient with all of the former management gone?
If none of the "takeover groups / crooks" have done anything at all by now, how did they allow the Aussies to take control?
I don't think Provista is part of than takeover because they are not crooks. Gartner has denied any connection so he is not part of anything. You have posted the USA connections of UNI Pharma and they no longer have any association with Radient at all. That is proof that the former agreement between Radient and UNI has been cancelled when the last issued patent expired.
The lenders sold every share they could right up to the maximum of 4.5 billion. The other 500k shares were in the employee incentive fund by contract and could not be issued to lenders however, it is legal to pay consultants such as lawyers from that fund.
All evidence totally points to no "takeover groups / crooks" even existing. All of the stock is just in the hands of foolish speculating investors buying on etrade and any other broker who was allowing retail to purchase the former shares.
Wolfie, you have been claiming the Aussie are part of the "takeover group / crooks" for a long time. If the Aussie are not part of any group, how did they get in charge and how are the "takeover group / crooks" going to get control? There is no longer and business address for Radient, no website, no phone, no way at all to contact the Aussies. Are the "takeover group / crooks" just stuck with worthless former shares?
Wolfie, Are you now claiming there are more than one "takeover groups / crooks"?
Claiming the Aussies are part of the "takeover group" is clearly more than just intent. The Aussies also absolutely have no shares as those would have to be declared in form 4 flings when they became management.
No form 13 filings clearly indicate that no one holds more than 5% of the former shares and it also clearly shows no one is acting together in any manner of activity to exert control if the combined former shares total more than 5%.
The above proves the Aussies are totally independent or everyone involved is breaking the law and facing jail time.
If anyone continues to refer to a "take over group", then we should call the take over group the "take over/crook group".
No, the argument cannot be "put to bed" because DC and Wolfie are claiming the "take over group" put the Aussies in charge. That would clearly be acting together for a purpose and require from 13.
It has to be acknowledged that the Aussies are totally independent and are doing what they want to with the company.
Jimtash stated: "Either way. 10 people can own it without having to file and have 50% control of the OS and more importantly, the AS."
That is absolutely untrue. The SEC rules clearly state that if a group of investors own over 5%, they have to file even though they each may own less than 5%. The SEC defines a group as anyone acting in an effort to control a stock.
No Jimtash, it is NOT 10% for form 13's, it is 5% ownership.
Radient did in fact tell the former Canadian owners of CIT to cease claiming CIT still belonged to them. Radient even filed suit. That lawsuit was trumped when the Canadians filed their lawsuit. It is in the filings but you have to go back to about 2003.
DC, the below statement was made by Radient. Do you not understand how much life left in a patent is required to develop a product. It is not a medical device, it is a DRUG.
CIT is worthless and no company is going to put money in a product and have it go generic before they can recoup their expenses.
"The CIT technology was fully impaired as of December 31, 2010 due to the lack of any potential future revenue and future cash flows, the high cost of future clinical studies, and limited time remaining on the patent."
Radient stated the reasons for the write off of CIT. The main one was limited life left on the patent.
"The CIT technology was fully impaired as of December 31, 2010 due to the lack of any potential future revenue and future cash flows, the high cost of future clinical studies, and limited time remaining on the patent."
Radient's cit patent applications.
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=7&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=Lung-Ji.IN.&s2=Chang.IN.&OS=IN/Lung-Ji+AND+IN/Chang&RS=IN/Lung-Ji+AND+IN/Chang
Abandoned in 2010. failure to respond.
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?TERM1=20100316603+&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=0&f=S&l=50
Abandoned in 2012. failure to pay fees.
These were both children of the original patent application.
United States Patent 6,730,512
Chang May 4, 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combination immunogene therapy
Abstract
The present invention provides to immunogene therapy protocols for the treatment of tumors. In particular, the present invention provides combinations of immune-modulating proteins that induce systemic immunity against tumors. In addition, the present invention provides humanized animal models suitable for the evaluation of anti-human tumor immunity and permit the identification of combinations of immune-modulating genes which when delivered to human tumor cells induce an effective anti-tumor response, including a systemic anti-tumor response.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventors:
Chang; Lung-Ji (Gainesville, FL)
Assignee:
Amdl, Inc. (Tustin, CA)
Family ID:
25277845
Appl. No.:
09/826,025
Filed:
April 4, 2001
Thank you SEC. It is about time Biocurex is shut down from trading.
Moro is certainly not paying anything to keep the scam going. He has even allowed Texas to void the corporation.
I remember that quite well. The lawyers sold a few days after the agreement was made and absolutely UNLOADED. It just killed the stock price.
One thing you can be assured of. The lawyers got their money.
Wolfie, the same firm who represented Mac in the class action was also the same firm who did the legal work in the agreements with the lenders. The note is for the legal work with the lenders and the agreement further spells out how the lawyers were to get paid in stock which they were.
Jimtash, Radient no longer a corporate shell. Radient Pharmaceuticals was VOIDED as a Delaware Corporation. What Radient is now is a private company, just like Provista.
Radient would have to incorporate again somewhere. File all of the back financial reports and apply for reinstatement. Then file bankruptcy to get rid of all the former shareholders. What would be left is dealing with the $25 million debt to the lenders.
It is way more complicated and expensive than using a ready made shell.
Bulldog, Radient had insurance who would cover the claim and Mac used the last 500k shares to pay for his lawyer. No need for bankruptcy, it was all paid for.
The Gaur Diagno takeover rumor is based on excellent DD.
The Gaur Diagno Onko Sure survey van was seen making multiple trips from the airport to their New Delhi headquarters transporting Radient stock certificates.
Someone tell Jimtash that both of Radients issued patents for Onko Sure have expired. The first on Oct 12, 2013 and the second on June 3, 2014. The patent on CIT will expire in about 6 years.
I think he has me on ignore.
The real takeover group who owns a majority of the stock is
ta-da.....GAUR DIAGNO
Nothing has changed about the amdl.com website. It has been the same for several years.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=amdl.com&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl
DC, we are referencing trademarks, not patents. The trademark DR-70 and Onko Sure are USA trademarks only.
There is nothing in the agreement with UNI that they have to honor. It was cancelled when the last issued patent expired.
END of Story. UNI no longer has any association with Radient.
GetSerious is correct. No trademark protection outside of the US unless one was filed in Taiwan. The fees for registration has to be renewed in 6 years so no fees are due until 2016.
The trademarks will remain current in the USA until no one pays the renewal fee.
Jim, Bloomberg probably has some sort of automatic system to gather information. Just because Mac did not publicly announce his resignation as president certainly does not mean he is still there.
None of the others listed are still there also. Dilek Mir is certainly gone. I communicated with her years ago and she is definitely gone. So is the doctor and the sales guy. It is just bad info.
Wolfie, your post contains mostly false information. Provista had NO reagents for LC Sentinel. All of the reagents were from Radient. LC Sentinel was just another application of the DR70 test. That is a FACT and public record.
If the Aussies did not takeover, then why was there an 8k filed saying they took over? Mac is gone and the Bloomberg website is a piece of trash with false information.
Jim, you should ask yourself a few simple questions.
Why would the Aussies even contact MacLellan?
What would they have wanted?
Do you think they actually read any of the lengthy list of SEC filings?
None of the Aussies have any strong financial backgrounds. Charter and Brown are both convicted felons.
Here is my opinion. Charter is a dreamer. He probably did a lot of dreaming while in prison. He puffs himself up to be a man of importance which is also just a dream.
I think Charter actually wanted to do a saliva dr70 test, hence the website in Hong Kong. I think he contacted MacLellan to get some sort of deal like the one Mac gave UNI with the know how to manufacture dr70 but one problem, Charter had no money. The last patent was about to expire so I think Mac just decided to wash his hands of the entire operation. Mac probably just told Charter to take over an management and they could then do whatever they wanted. Mac had just escaped a lawsuit by a stroke of luck and wanted no more. Charter then threw together the group of four and took over a short time later.
You will never hear anything from the Aussies except maybe a statement on their website that reorganization was not possible and the company has been dissolved.
Jimtash, stock options are not set in concrete. They can be cancelled with the flick of a pen. Not that I think any stock options matter right now.
As a matter of fact, you don't even have any stock right now because Radient is no longer even a corporation. All of that would have to be done over. Radient is a private company and there is no corporate shell.
What would any takeover group be getting at this point? No shell, lots of debt, no patents, no manufacturing facilities, no FDA registered product and no markets.
UNI is manufacturing their own DR70 and if you actually read the agreement, after the expiration of the last patent this past June, the agreement is cancelled. They are paying zero royalties to Radient. Whatever UNI does right now makes no difference to you or anyone else who previously held shares in Radient.
The takeover advocates claim the value in Radient is a "shell" for other companies to go public.
There is a HUGE problem with that.
Radient is no longer a corporation and there is NO shell.
Radient will have to incorporate elsewhere if they want to incorporate and that costs money.
Everything about the "takeover" rumor is a total fabrication.
They even claim McClellan is still part of management totally contrary to the SEC filings. Bloomberg is just full of old information.
The lenders do not own any stock. They sold every share they could right up to the maximum of 4.5 million. The other 500k shares were reserved in the employee stock fund and were used to pay lawyers for McLellan's class action defense.
Charter and Brown appear to be doing nothing in their new management positions as things continue to worsen for Radient.
Both patents expired.
Patent application rejected.
Patent agent resigned. No longer a valid address for Radient.
Corporation is now void in Delaware.
FDA approval for Onko Sure has lapsed with no annual payment.
California business registration has expired.
Website was cancelled.
Phone was disconnected.
Dcspka, once again you are posting bad information from Bloomberg.
Dilek Mir was hired by Radient in July 2011 and resigned about a year or less later. She was replaced by a former PR guy for Radient but was never paid so he eventually just disconnected the Radient phone line.
The same for the doctor. She left in 2012 and so did all the sales guys.
The only ones remaining for Radient pharmaceuticals are the 4 Aussies.
William Gartner has denied any connection with Radient.
From an email received from William Gartner, CEO of GCDx:
"I will say this to clear up that very old rumor. We have no connection whatsoever with Radient Pharmaceutical in any way – company-wise or personally."
Any attempt to claim there is a connection with Radient is totally fraudulent.
William Gartner of GCDx denies any connection to RXPC.
Dear Mr. Gartner,
I am intrigued by your recent press release about offering a new Lung Cancer Test.
How do you get your financing? Is there an opportunity for a private investor like me to invest, and if so, how would I accomplish that?
In researching GCDx, I am finding several rumors on the internet (particularly on InvestorsHub.com) that your company is merging with, or taking over, Radient Pharmaceuticals and/or Provista Diagnostics. Is there any truth to that rumor? What is your current business relationship with Radient Pharmaceuticals and Provista Diagnostics? Do you own RXPC stock?
I am concerned that Radient might be carrying a lot of debt -- if you are involved with taking over or merging with Radient, what kind of debt responsibilities are you incurring, and if I invest in your company, how would I know that my money is not going towards paying off Radient's debt?
Finally -- do you have any patents or patent applications for The Lung Cancer Test for Early Detection?
Thank you for your time,
AND HERE IS HIS REPLY:
Good morning,
Before I answer all of your questions, I need to know more about you, especially whether or not you are a qualified investor under Rule 144. I will say this to clear up that very old rumor. We have no connection whatsoever with Radient Pharmaceutical in any way – company-wise or personally.
Do you represent a firm or is this personal? We must be very careful to comply with all of the regulations.
Regards,
William Gartner
President and CEO
Global Cancer Diagnostics Inc.
2343 W. University Dr.
Suite 105
Tempe, Arizona 85281 USA
602-908-9604 Office
602-300-4901 Cell
Run Coach, no one in their right mind would invest in a product with no patent protection.
What Gartner sees in this is about 3 years of a good CEO salary until the "fish" money is all gone.