Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
sawdin/Xylan
The land in Brazil is off the table. Ron told me well over a year ago that the seller could not obtain a clear tittle in order for Phoenix to broker any sale.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time To Roll
http://www.mpsac.com/news.htm
Tired man recap of article:
Plant in Mobile Alabama.
Supplier in Norway.
Shipped by container.
Polysilicon from quarts gravel which is crushed and refined to black sand.
Head still hurts.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
PBLS Roars
The name of it could be "The twelve-steps forward, 15 steps back, shot of jack and off to the AA meeting club" lol
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time To Roll/ripleysmom
The only other thing I found that search was another company called EPC Carting and Diana Promuto.
http://oaspub.epa.gov/enviro/fii_query_dtl.disp_program_facility?pgm_sys_id_in=NYD986988665&pgm_....
FYI TTR - Just for "fun" I started looking into the LDK Solar filings that mentioned Komex you posted and the more you read into the filings and research, the more interesting it gets.
Speaking just purely off the top of my head (I am very tired), so keep that in mind. Their biz call for processed sand (polysilicon) and they have as of now Komex has an 8 year contract with LDK and is listed as a "materials trading company" in the filings. Polysilicon is anywhere around $55 to $140 or more per kilogram from what I have read and in very short supply. If some of the sand Phoenix owns meets the specs needed to manufacture polysilicon from common sand, it all makes sense on the surface. 1 ton is 900 or so kilograms, so IF 1 ton of the right sand at $44 a ton can make a couple of hundred kilograms of polysilicon, it fits. AGAIN this is all off the top of my head and I ran out of searching time for the actual process of making polyslcon from common sand, yeilds etc. I was searching, just for the sake of searching, so take it all with a grain of ummmmm sand. lol
Oh yea...and LDK is in China, but incorporated in the Caymans?
My head hurts...lol
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Forgive our skeptics....
But that is in a most probable range of $150,000 to $500,000+
depending on when you got in.
You live in NO and are coming across as though a big contract is coming "very soon", you have a new and free account and have not discussed the preferred deal with your "broker" yet because you are not that smart about it.
Hrrrmm. Do you realize that you could cash it all in for preferred and it would pay out $2,125,328.19 over 5 years?
*sigh* I guess forgive me too! I am skeptic.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
quiet
LOL
I was thinking along the lines for advice more like:
If you know something, just spill it.
If you do not know something, do not act like it.
If you can not say it, then do not even mention it.
If you are being sarcastic, be a little clearer about it.
If you are just looking to trade it, just do it and put your profits in Nike.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
MRDALE
Sheeesh, I hope not. We are suppose to be worth over a billion right now. That would be a huge step back. lol
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time to Roll
Was searching from different angles. Do not remember seeing this posted. Wish I had the time to just search, search, search and search some more. lol
"Under the agreement, Waste Management said it will own a majority interest in the partnership to be known as Waste Management of New York City L.P. Vincent and Salvatore Promuto will own a minority interest.
The partnership will operate an existing commercial transfer station and recycling business in the Bronx. The transfer station previously was operated by SPM Environmental Inc., owned by the Promutos."
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3MKT/is_n40_v103/ai_16633299
There is also refrences I wrote down while searching about "Promuto vs. Waste management, Inc.". It was an 8k filed by Waste management, Inc. I believe. Was a breach of contract by Waste management from what I can make of it.
Everything I thought I was on to was side tracked so I started all over. So, please disregard if already posted or known.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Renavatio
I think I need to slap you around a bit!
"Ron says it's not Pmo-Komex"
Why the fork did you wait to share that little tidbit? LOL
I suspected we were on the wrong trail, but the connections seemed pretty dang plausable....but sheesh
Son of a.............
*sigh* *sigh* and *sigh* some more!
PS - Just upset over how much time I spent focused on one thing.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Tedwitt
Good luck and we have to know one way or another eventually.
Great work on the Bulk storage facilities, but I think the disconnect with Phoenix and its investors taking its toll is ever present here. I can not blame you what so ever, but it is not like they announced it as a huge profit making aquisition. It was an all cash deal and to begin the bulk storage developement. It will be interesting to see what they have down the pike on this. I think they presented it as it was, which is a start and nothing more.
I have been trying to make the connection from Phoenix to Komex/Lindsay/Mittal as well. Any light you can shed on how you arived at whatever conclusion you come to will be greatly appreciated by any of us "green" bloodhounds and only help us in later investements. That was very valuable info you passed along about how you obtained the info on the fuel storage facilities, very valuable!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
PBLS Roars
You can set it for 4 times whatever the current ask is.
If you wait until the market is closed, you can catch some of the MM's punched out. A couple of days ago after market hours, the ask was displayed as .05 cents which allowed me to put in a sell order for a percentage of my shares for .20 cents.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
sff
They would have to tender an offer in order to buyout which would be voted on. Keep in mind that management I assume hold more voting power even if all shareholders converted, so the fact that the preferred shares have voting power is moot. If management likes the deal, they will vote to take it, regardless of what you our I think. I assume with a buyout though, the offer tendered would include them cashing out your preferred shares.
I think that basically that is how it would work, but mind you I am not involved in that line of work. Worst case scenario for the ones that converted is "I think" that you get the $10 per preferred share before a dividend is paid out or less than the 5 year sum. So basically you would be getting paid .08-.104 cents per common share. It is not a "bad" deal, even if the share price runs higher. You still made a profit if your average is below the sliding scale of .08-.104 cents.
The risk taken by commoners in not converting is that they decide to beat the commoners into submission to take the deal by continuously diluting to keep the common PPS low. I do not mean by selling into the open market necessarily, but by handing out these shares unrestricted to "acquisitions" which down the road to keep the float high. As people get disgusted and sell and/or convert, they can continuously buy slowly on the open market and pay out the preferred until they own all common shares and take it private. Just a random thought, I do not know if it is possible, but it seems possible.
The risk that unconverted commoners take on the upside is that we upilist or become fully reporting and the share price skyrockets.
The best thing for each shareholder to do is to do what you are comfortable with. If the deal gets to a number I have set in my plan to convert, I would do it and not think twice. I am still willing to risk it at this point and now have till the end of November to decide.
From some discussions on other boards and from what I have read in the SEC rules, I believe that the company must become fully reporting just over 3 years after they meet the threshold of 10 million in assets. According to company PR's that threshold has been met since 2004 and would require compliance shortly after the end of 2007. I personally believe they included Pit assetts in 2004 that they do not actually own because of the lease, so I am under the impression that by at least shortly after 2008, we will be at that point.
That means that by that time, they must either sell off assets, go private or be taken over.
All just my opinion.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
roach4091
Take the number of common shares you have and
shove them up yo.............errrr...ummmm....I mean
multiply it by .104 cents for your 5 year return.
The old deal was .077 over 5 years.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
tedwitt
I think this is what you are looking for.
http://www.lindsayindia.com/index.htm
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Oldteck
We could just call Phoenix and order "one of everything". LOL
All I am looking for is a solid connection. I have as a couple of others sent a nice request to Komex for verification right after someone posted the site. No reply yet.
Time to Roll in the sack for me thought.
Perhaps tomorrow we can all sleep with no questions.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time To Roll
I would not think so, we would have to be way off base with the Komex in Poland. If hat were the case, it would more than likely be a contract with a company in Silicon Valley.
No time to look tonight, but isnt that Komex Inc. in the article the Canada Komex? Plus, to ship to Poland and then back to the Camens I would think would not be feesable.
*shrug* I am beyond tired this evening. hehe
Regards,
Fizzlegig
TimetoRoll/Oldteck
Just FYI, perhaps one of you can find something further whilest I am busy most of the day in/out of meetings.
The director of Komex is also tied with another refractory group and appears to be a director of several LLC's. No laughing, the first thing I thought when I saw the picture was "mugshot". LOL
http://www.ifglref.com/kdalmiya.php
Also peak at a company published report. Interesting considering that we put Komex involved heavily in Mittal, whom is owned by a firm in India. Sheeeesh I need some asprin.
http://www.ifglref.com/IFGL%20coverage%20Dalal%20Street.pdf
They are part of a bigger group that also has an insurance brokerage firm, but I did not find anything about Captive Insurance. Perhaps thay are expanding to the Camens via Phoenix.
OoooooGreat, more speculation. LOL
http://www.bajoria.com/
AGAIN TO ALL READING, NOTHING IS VERIFIED. IT IS ALL SPECULATION. IT COULD AMOUNT TO EXACTLY SQUAT AND MORE THAN LIKELY DOES! So cut the people that spend some free time searching some slack. The only thing that will end the speculation is when we get hard facts!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
If Komex or a partner has its own ships, the costs are less drastic than one might think.
I pointed out the other night that Mittal has its own shipping fleet, so for the sake of example, lets use that.
I am not saying there is any connection with Mittal. We do not even know 100% that we have the correct Komex. THIS IS ALL SPECULATION FOR EXAMPLE!!!!
FYI Poland is a leading producer of coal, so that is why there are several industries that process steel and other items that require extreme heat centered in and around Poland.
But anyways, say Mittal has a shipment of Steel bound for the US. We know Mittal is tied with the Komex we think is involved. What do those ships bring back? Who knows, perhaps nothing.
Mittal requires refractory materials for thier process. Komex is a refractory manufacturer and needs different minerals to manufacter its products.
Komex contracts with Mittal to bring back materials from the US pit belonging and/or leased to Phoenix after it dumps its steel load. So what extra costs are associated with doing that? Labor and Fuel. The ships have to return anyway for the next load.
The biggest cost additive is probably going to be the fuel, but wait, Phoenix has fuel located near the port. Phoenix contracts with Mittal for fuel at a discount, which almost eliminates the extra fuel consumed by returning with a heavier load than unloaded. IF Progas lines were used, well that woudl be a dream deal right? Mittal ships do not come back empty and everyone profits, everyone happy....well almost.
Speculation, but definitely plausable.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Thank you!
I was bloodhounding something and you saved me a couple of hours.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Is captive insurance and reinsurance the same thing?
Anyone know?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
caycehopeful/bulldreamer
Cayce
I am showing 412,700 as of just a moment ago.
Bulldreamer
The most reliable answer to your question would come from the company. If it were my money and I was "concerned" about it, that is what I would do.
PS. You do check you mailbox everyday anyways right?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Renavatio
What is FRS?
The Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high-quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. The FRS provides Internet access to a single integrated source of comprehensive (air, water, and waste) environmental information about facilities, sites or places.
Why is it needed?
The FRS responds to the increasing demand for access to high quality information and the public need for one source of comprehensive environmental information about a given place on the earth. FRS achieves that integration. In addition, the FRS is integrated with the Locational Data Improvement Project and the Error Correction Process. FRS fully implements EPA's Facility Identification Data Standard, and is compliant with the Facility Identification Template for States (FITS) Model.
What are the benefits?
The FRS will:
Reduce the long-term reporting burden for facilities, states and programs.
Improve data quality by helping to reduce errors in state and Agency facility information.
Provide better tools for cross-media environmental analysis.
Provide better public access to the Agency's environmental information.
Give facilities the flexibility to review and update their identification information.
Who is involved?
EPA's Office of Information Collection in the Office of Environmental Information is the organization responsible for implementation and management of the FRS. Important partners include EPA media programs, EPA regional data stewards and data system coordinators, state data managers, public interest groups and regulated facilities.
What is the scope?
The Facility Registry System (FRS) is a centrally managed database developed by EPA's Office of Environmental Information (OEI). It provides Internet access to a single source of comprehensive information about facilities subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. The FRS contains accurate and authoritative facility identification records which are subjected to rigorous verification and data management quality assurance procedures. FRS records are continuously reviewed and enhanced by a Regional Data Steward network and active State partners. The facility records are based on information from EPA's national program systems and State master facility records and enhanced by other Web information sources. The Central Data Exchange (CDX) registration, when fully implemented, will also be used to create and update facility identification records. FRS has over 1.5 million unique facility records linking over 2.0 million program interests such as:
Toxic Release Inventory Submitters (all years: 1987 - 2002)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo)
Risk Management Plans (RMPs)
Permit Compliance System (PCS) - Majors and Minors
Biennial Reporting System (BRS) 1995/1997
Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS)/AIRS Facility Subsystem
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS)
State master records from Pennsylvania, Utah, Mississippi, South Carolina, Nebraska, Minnesota, Ohio, Indiana, Maryland, Georgia, Oregon, Hawaii, and Washington.
Facility Registry System also includes locational information which provides accurate mapping (EnviroMapper) of the facilities regulated by EPA. Detailed facility data can be retrieved using the Facility Registry System Query. For a more focused search, use EZ Query, which enables you to individualize the investigation of data elements and structure your report by selecting from a number of predetermined views.
There is a graphic Facility Registry System model and table and column information available for the technical user.
http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/fii/
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Imirish
Do you mean for commoners? We have those with II's.
I am not following you here. If they wanted to give the partners or anyone voting power, they can convert to II's or III's.
None the less, at least we can track the T/A now. The simple things can have the biggest impact.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Cutting Corners
The common shares are non-voting shares, so I do not think the partners will have control.
While we do not know the intricate workings of it all. The III's could have been a means to keep control of the company.
A trump card for lack of a better term.
Just thinking outloud.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shiz
Sok.
Being shunned and ignored is what I get for playing with the "bashe...."..er shall we say less than honest people.
Hope all is well, I know you have to be busy. Little over a month and the temp starts to cool and you can relax. Hope to see ya on Paltalk in a time frame which is a word that I will never say again......Soo_....cant bring myself to do it. LOL
Regards,
Fizzlegig
cdaniel394
If that is the case, that covers why, where, who and HOW.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
bigbass66
Was responding to someone else, but about the same answer.
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PBLS&read=84028
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shiz/Jim
Posted last night:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21833129
They have a "camp office" which names Mittal and Mittal put up money to start up Komex in partnership per the Komex website.
Here is buisiness they have done with Mittal in 2004, 2005 and 2006.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21833977
Just FYI too, Mittal has its own ships.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21832844
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time to Roll
I think there are more.
Look at the form 20 -F/A for Mittal
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?SessionID=7xumW0vu1ALxUfB...
PAge F-38, F-39 and F-40
F-38 shows transactions with Lindsay International whom appears to control Komex. (in millions) 2004 = 40, 2005 = 57, 2006 = 36.
F-39 and 40 show all of Mittals Subsidiaries. There are probably more connections, but I am on information overload right now.
If I only could read Polish or whatever language they speak and write in. LOL
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Lindsay International?
Lindsay International takes over the managment of PMO-KOMEX
PMO - Komex Ltd. is the most comprehensive and one of the biggest refractory materials manufacturers in Poland. Company is continuing refractory material production since the year 1953. Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd. has taken over the managment of PMO-Komex Ltd and has been running it successfully. Visit www.pmo-komex.pl
Introduction
Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd. is a Kolkata Based company successfully supplying equipments, spares, consumables to steel plants all over the world. Recently there has been a huge demand in the world steel markets. In order to keep pace with the continuous developments in steel making process, the Indian Steel Industry has acquired the best of technology available all around the world. To satisfy the continuous and varied demands of the massive framework of Indian Steel Industry many ancillary units have been set up which manufacture spares, equipments, consumables of international quality.
Our Growth
To tap this potential Lindsay was incorporated in August 1996. In a short time of 9 years operation LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL has emerged as leading supplier of engineering goods to steel plants in INDONESIA, KAZAKHSTAN, GERMANY, CANADA, USA, MEXICO and the CARIBBEAN ISLANDS.
Success Story
Our success lies in selective choosing of vendors and due weight age is given to ISO 9001:2000 certification in this regard. LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL is associated with reputed Indian manufacturers of Equipments , Spares and Consumables for key areas of Steel Plants like Blast Furnace, Coke Oven, Sinter Plant, Steel Melting Shop, Continuous Caster, Material Handling Division . LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL has been successful in extending to customers around the world advantages like supply of optimal quality goods, timely delivery and input cost reduction to their entire satisfaction.
http://www.lindsayindia.com/index.htm
*****Click on "contact us" and look at the Camp Office*****
Camp Office - Kazakhstan
Room No - 104 ,
JSC Mittal Steel Temirtau,
1, Republic Avenue
Temirtau - 101407
Karaganda Region
Kazakhstan
Phone Numbers:
Direct No : +7-32139-65692
Contact Person: Mr. Jayanta Chakraborty
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Mittal Shipping
*****NOTE: THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN SPECULATION PER EARLIER CONVERSATIONS!*****
Mittal Shipping
8th Floor
St. Magnus House
3 Lower Thames Street
London EC3R 6HE
Tel: +44 20 7398 0720
Fax: +44 20 7626 1173
Overview
Mittal Shipping was incorporated in 1995 to facilitate Mittal Steel’s growing shipping requirements. Today, the company manages five modern Panamax dry cargo vessels, which are owned by Mittal Steel companies. The Group also owns one capesize vessel.
Mittal Shipping provides chartering services for the Group’s manufacturing operations. Its expertise in global shipping and international freight rates, together with its innovative approach to freight forwarding, make its services highly sought after.
The Group’s customers are major beneficiaries of Mittal Shipping’s services. Its competitive freight rates reduce the end cost of products sold. Its market leadership and the presence of its own officials to provide assistance with port logistics help to ensure easy and timely product delivery.
Mittal Shipping is growing rapidly and is expected to surpass an annual cargo of 25 million tonnes by 2005. It continually surveys new opportunities for buying or chartering more vessels and expand the fleet. It is also involved in the launch of a shipping portal with major shipping industry participants to provide chartering services to the dry and wet market.
http://www.mittalsteel.com/Facilities/Europe/Mittal+Shipping/
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Oldteck
Nah. Rich is probably too strong. I do not have several millions of shares. If i can accomplish what I wanted to do with PBLS which is to sell 1/4 to 1/5 of my shares after long term status and get my money back, I will be as happy as anyone. I have been long term for quite some time now so 1/4 to 1/5 is far less than it was. 1/3 used to be my goal, but the share price kinda stumbled. All I want is my initial money back. Crazy I know.
I will stick this one out regardless for many years to come and trade other stocks. Again, crazy I know!
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Oldteck
If I gave any indication of doing such, I can almost guarentee that the Pit vid cams would be up super quick and the next PR we would recieve is "Turn in your commons for prefered or else!" with a link to my demise. I was a linebacker in high school and I am not out of my prime, I just never had a football prime. LOL!
Seriously, we went to state when I played JV, but our varsity team NEVER won one single game my entire time there. Schools would reschedule to make us thier home comming.
Baseball was a different story, we always made state and call me nerdy if you want, but myself and another guy placed 2nd and 3rd in state in debate and those private schools throw BIG money at this "sport".
Regards,
Fizzlegig
MRDALE
LOL! Perhaps they can use the carriers plane launcher to skim river rocks over the Atlantic, buy Prudential Life Insurance company and restart the "Get a piece of the rock" commercials.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Oldteck
I agree about the contract and that a company of that nature and with ties to other companies that big that they woudl know what they are doing. I contract released on the Komex site would probably light a HUGE fire under PBLS stock.
I do not know enough about the supply demand currently and tomorrow we should have enough pieces to better estimate what kind of supply we have of PBLS stock.
I do not care if I ever hear "soon" again in my lifetime. LOL
If it is here, we are going to have to figure out what we will do with all the free time we have. LOL Guess I am going to have to ride down PBLS HQ with a football in hand and run around the office and taunt Paul into trying to takle me. I am sure it would be much more fun to him though. LOL
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Whirligig
There are ships that actually carry raw materials vs. barges. I do not know a great deal about it, but I woudl think tugs pulling barges would be very unsafe even along the safer shipping channels.
Since Komex already had offices set up in the US and Mittal definitely does, I think it is more plausable that they have either contracts with shipping companies to bring finished product to the US, those ships have to go back and could possibly carry back raw materials.
Kind of lke Walmart does domestically and internationally with China. Alot of this is just guess until we know, so I could be totally off base.
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Shipping costs.
I do know a little on the finished goods side, very little on the aggregate side. We do not know if it will be shipped on bulk container vessels or if the product could be sent in 40 ft. containers on standard container ships. I know first thought is bulk, but if the product is being blended and bagged, it might be ok in a standard container.
Again, I do not know on the aggregate side, but there are MANY standard conainer ships from all around the world that drop the load in US ports and leave back home empty. You will find that it is less expensive to ship products from the US than to the US.
Just a thought.
Another thought and a big WHAT IF. But we are aout to set up a bulk fuel storage facility right? "(gasoline, diesel fuel -- both on road and off road, and possibly aviation bulk fuel)"
Does Komex, Mittal or another partner own a boat fleet? Hrmm.
My head hurts. Going to get outside and "mow de lawn".
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Whirligig/Oldtek
Steel furnaces do have liners made of similar or the same materials. What kinds of materials are used to make those liners depends on the temperatures that the process needs to withstand. There are special mineral properties in some silica and clay deposits that can be quite rare or at the very least limited.
Sure you can find just sand and gravel at much lower prices. I would suspect that the sand and gravel valueseeker666 listed prices for in Germany were almost as basic as you can get. It costs money to separate and blend minerals in spec ratios. Even those minerals that do form together. The mark up on unfinished aggregate is obviously not going to be that great.
Sprinkle (for instance) some Magnesium Oxide in the sand though and the price jumps. Magnesium Oxide, which is totally off base here I know, sells for $3000 to $5000 a ton from what I have read. I am just using it as an extreme skyward example to the ground base example given in Germany aggregate.
I went and watched the pit videos again when TTR pointed out one of the big players in the recent PR. Rogue mentions an automated machine that can separate I think up to 10 products at once, one of which is a $40 product. No mention of the other minerals.
Tie all of that in with the facts of whom Komex is tied in with and there are a whole lot of good things that can be speculated from. I posted this last night:
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=PBLS&read=84028
What would be nice to know is what are the more specifics about the "blended aggregate" we will be contracted to deliver.
Silica, clay, limestone, coal, concrete and various other minerals are used in refractory materials and per the video, Murphy is 820 acres and was only working from 5 or so acres at the time of that video. Combine that with the other pit, strip coal mines and limestone deposits and this has much bigger and profitable potential than shipping sand to backfill levees, gravel to backfill potholes or backfill dirt to level building foundations.
The last PR was pretty good information and just like the pit, there are 820 questions of which we have the answer to 5. LOL
We have plenty of reasons to be bullishly here. Anyone speek polish?
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Time to Roll needs two beers!
Excellent DD 4 days ago TTR!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21683054
Regards,
Fizzlegig
Cutting Corners
The almighty knows we have changed enough diapers. Hope we are potty trained and ready to toddle around. Hope we can ditch the pacifier and wean on to some big fat juicy red meat. LOL.
Regards,
Fizzlegig