Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ISOBM. In the past, it has been a platform for our technology. The wait is almost over to see what Dr Moro has been working on. Get ready for the peanut gallery.
Gaboy, the answer is a clear and resounding, yes!!!! It has been frustrating for most of us. We can eliminate the cost of Agoracom. There is no freedom of speech or ideas. The only requirement I would ask individuals is to simply state their thoughts with IMO to make it clear what you are inferring.
With that said, the turning point was adding the new directors. From that point forward the stock has been on an upward journey. Bottomline, those of us that have been around the block can clearly see the score.
IMO, no one selling. Director buying. News is reassuring and the anticipation is building. This stock is a coiled spring. Boooooiiiinnnngggggg!!!!
899,852 in block trades. That is some serious accumulation. Broke thru the 52 week high. There isn't much that the doubters could do about today as far as disputing the future of the company.
Step 1 was Dr Wittenberg's resignation. Step 2 was adding 2 qualified board members. Step 3 was raising the funds. Step 4 four was ignite the fuse and watch this rocket launch. That was sweet. Just the beginning (IMO).
Tommyb, I just have to wonder how investors that sell their position in a stock still spend time in chatrooms discussing the pros and cons of the company. It's like dating in highschool and breaking up with your girlfriend, and you follow her the rest of her life. Move on or we'll have to get a restraining order. Kag, that was a joke.
I agree with Mata Hari when he said that Goldseeker unintentionally helped shareholders, because the negativity perpetuated after all the theories and incinuations were put to rest, it made it obvious that the future was looking very bright for Biocurex. As it was pointed out earlier, the dilution will be smaller as the price rises. I am glad I did do my due diligence and can now watch my investment prosper as well have the satisfaction that I will be helping to save lives. I would say to Goldseeker, please accept your doctor's request when he advises you to have a new test that can save your life because it can detect cancer at the early stages. That test will be called RECAF.
FACT: It is most definitely getting ugly for the doubters. Accumulation is underway. Anyone shorting after today's news IMO is playing with fire (that last statement may be a fact OR an opinion....you decide). I sure don't want Kag to question my ethics.
OK Tommyb. You can also watch from the sidelines. WOULDA COULDA SHOULDA.....
Think about what just occurred over the last year with our economy. People were terrified. The banks were folding up. Financial firms that were household names for more than a hundred years are no longer around. Raising money under these circumstances Dr Moro had to be pretty persuasive. There has to a very good reason for anyone to take even a small risk after you couldn't trust your own bank after a lifetime of trust. Recaf is a life saver, money saver, noninvasive, inexpensive, simple diagnostic test with HUGE potential. It has impressed some of the most respected doctors to the point where they were willing to put their time, energy, and reputation on the line when associating with Biocurex. I have seen this story many times before that just when you were about to count them out they not only rise to the occasion but they exceed expectations. Everyone loves a comeback....maybe not everyone. Hmmmmm?
Is it me, or is Gold trying to find a straw to grasp on since he has been consistently wrong. Now Smithline is in control of OUR company? Good one. Inverness has been very successful with all of their products. Look what their stock price has done. 13 to 40. We could not have a better partner. IMO, more good news coming.
Kag, let me correct you, sir. It is a FACT that it is getting ugly for the naysayers. READ THE 8K!!! Thanks double I (short for I Invest) for having my back. I can feel the love. Our trust and faith in both Dr Moro and the technology IMO will turn out as we had originally planned. The polish is beginning to give this diamond in the rough some sparkle. Exciting stuff. Mata Hari, I want to say thanks for uncovering the manipulation. IMO, I think we have proof. All the hiccups will make the success of Biocurex even sweeter.
It's about to get ugly for the doubters. I am thinking about putting this in all my bathrooms. What do you guys think? http://www.acf-fr.org/i/08-01-17_money8.jpg
You cannot go back and erase those trades. They are there written in stone for regulators. Isn't greed a terrible thing. It causes people to make mistakes and do things they would not ordinarily do, and it usually ends badly. IMO, greed will be the reason the perpetrators get caught. I count 4 erroneous trades today. Let's see where the share price ends today. Sorry, those were not marked with a Z. They are Not out oif sequence.
As far as sales and buys you must have a seller to match a buyer. Could it be possible they are cashing in after tripling their investment?
THE AMOUNT OF MANIPULATION IS VERY APPARENT TODAY!!!!! SEC....ARE YOU SEEING THIS?????? LOOK AT TODAY'S TRADES. (MARK THIS DAY AS THE DAY THE SCAMMERS ARE BUSTED!!!)
How many trades went by that were filled well below the bid. How does someone ask a price higher than the bid and it fills lower than the bid? Comprende? Not Kosher!!!
Gold, are you beginning to second guess yourself? How does it feel to watch from the sidelines as we are all making money. Don't you know that patience is a virtue and that good things come to those that wait. The addition of the 2 new directors was the pivotal point for Biocurex. We are laying the groundwork for a an up and coming biotech company. Something does appear to be moving the share price. It usually precedes more great news. Giddy up!!!!!
I think the SEC should look at 2 trades today that PROVE manipulation at 11:31 bid .125 ask .14 traded at .112 HOW????
at 12:14 bid .1235 ask .14 traded at .116 HOW????
Blatant Manipulation!!!!!!
<there is no way you can win a discussion with me for screening using RECAF.>
I would not equate what TheBocx just said as your person opinion being unequivocally correct. What he was saying is you distort fiction with facts, and as I said earlier you repeat the same things over and over again so in your mind you have won. I anticipate more news that will prove factually you have been wrong. 5000 posts and you own no stock. Reread some of your posts that shows you flip flopping. Gold, do you know what is going on at Bhlokin or Goshen or with Oncopet? I'll answer correctly for you....NO!!! The financial panic had nothing to do with share price? You originally stated that the 2 new executives added bodes very well for the agreement with Inverness. Do you remember when everyone stopped answering your posts? Didn't seem odd you were answering your own questions. I am just trying hard to understand why you labor endlessly on a biocurex chatroom when you said you own NO shares.
<as one expert stated, screening tests need to be developed that find early cancers with high precision that in fact actually need to be treated. He also stated that what we don't want are tests that find even more cancers that do not need to be treated.>
First off, is this guy an expert because he is expressing HIS opinion. Secondly, I would ask him how much time he spends gambling. I would respect the opinion of Dr Philip Gold over some obscure individual.
I am king of the world! I am king of the world! I am king of the world! Goldseeker, you seem to think that if you repeat something over and over again it means that it is true. Do you really think that anyone reading here believes your opinions to be true. There is something called reality and your arguments are just plain false. Maybe Dr Moro is not Svengali, maybe it's you.
The other thing I have a serious problem with is that you think you can give 20 people a paintbrush and they will all paint the same thing. I am in medicine and it is the painter not the brush. If you have a recaf test and it is positive and you go to the wrong doctor you are relying on their expertise to properly diagnose. Out of sight out of mind is a sure way to lead to a dangerous mistake. I would certainly want to know I have cancer, and secondly, I would want to catch it as early as possibly.
With your reasoning why would anyone ever go thru genetic testing just to see if they PREDISPOSED to an illness when they don't know with certainly if or when they will be afflicted. Do you have a problem with the BRAC? It tells you that you MIGHT get cancer. It has been widely accepted and what do you tell the patient when they test postive? Call me when you feel sick or develop a noticeable mass? Give me a break!!! You cannot be serious with your argument of out of sight out of mind. That is why you must be in the medical field to understand what you are saying is just illogical. Do you think that Dr Moro is going to the ISOBM and they said to him this test has no value whatsoever, but we'll see you next year. Wrong. Do you think at this stage you would add 2 very educated, experienced executives, have Dr Gold, and Dr Sell on our board if recaf has no value.
Give me an I....I
Give me an S....S
Give me an O....O
Give me an B....B
Give me an M....M
What does that spell....MONEY!!!!!!!!
Up we go.....WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
Goldseeker, I have a HUGE problem with your comments not being clarified as YOUR OPINION. Do you understand that you never qualify your comments with IMO!!!! It is most certainly NOT symantics. One way you are making a claim that it is fact and the proper way is to make it clear that you have formed a personal opinion. Please stop the deception. You are not a doctor, a financial guru, nor do own a crystal ball. Opinions are just opinions and MUST be qualified as such.
IMO, you don't suddenly get two new executive board members with their caliber if they couldn't (or didn't already) have raised the money. Not even remotely possible!!!!! Common sense will prevail. This stock is a coiled spring.
Dr Moro has not only developed the technology he now has a board of directors that will no doubt raise the funding once the shareholders approve the additional shares. Everyone who has supported Biocurex and has ridden out the storm has to realize Biocurex has one remaining roadblock. That is to have the full support (or a majority) of shareholders vote correctly and allow the additonal shares. Without the approval which will allow Biocurex to fulfill the ability to raise additional capital it would cause all of the initiatives that Dr Moro has proposed to be in jeopardy. I don't know any other company with this much potential that can operate a biotech company on such a small budget. IMO, the rewards of those that do their due diligence and fully comprehend the virtue of being patient are going to be bountiful. It has not been a secret that our company along with countless others have seen the abyss. It would have been easy for Dr Moro (and his team of lab technicians) to give up, but no one even considered the thought simply because this is a major breakthrough in medicine and it would be a tragedy to not utilize recaf to save countless lives and prevent unnecessary surgery. Soon Dr Moro will ask all of his shareholders in the upcoming shareholder meeting to allow for the ability to issue additional shares. I will not hesitate to give my support and advise others to comply so recaf will be available as a tool to avert the loss of my loved ones and end much of the unnecessary suffering. I will freely admit that I don't want to experience the repercussions associated with detecting cancer after it has metastisized or the possibilty that I am diagnosed in the late stages of cancer. Just to put a face on cancer, I encourage you to volunteer at a children's hospital and look in their eyes. We have an opportunity to change medicine, and have a chance to become a major biotech company by everyone voting to allow for the shares. For me it is a easy choice. If you see the upside and have not sold, you will vote positively to allow the shares. If you think you should vote no, then you don't see what I see and what several thousand investors that currently hold shares see, and you should not even be invested in biocurex.
Good luck to everyone. Please feel free to respond to my post, especially if you are concerned about the upcoming vote. It is a no brainer for me, but some may have reservations and I think it would be prudent to discuss this prior to the vote.
Nice post Gaboy. Ditto on Gold. Can anyone say manipulation??? Give me a break. This company is about to break out. I've been thru this before and came out the other side way ahead of the game with no where near the potential of Biocurex. Dr Moro is going to succeed. Just spend 5 minutes talking to him and you know you will be more than impressed with his knowledge, drive, dedication and determination to succeed. He is a winner and I am excited being on the threshold of greatness. ISOBM is around the corner and as usual IMO there will be something new and exciting. I would be shocked if he did not attend. If he does Gold, do you still think he still his days are numbered? Gold the more you post, the more positives we find. Thanks. You are actually swaying more investors to see the true potential of recaf. The near term up and down in share price is due to manipulation, and Mata has been all over this ruse. He has spoiled their gig and they will eventually have to retreat.
<Nothing has changed.>
The only thing that hasn't changed is that you will NEVER concede that Biocurex is turning the ship around. Are you perplexed by the recent addition of 2 new highly respected board members? Obviously the "real" doctors that actually have earned a medical degree agree believe that recaf has a bright future. Still think Inverness is returning recaf? Still think that Dr Moro screwed up renegotiating a higher royalty with Abbott? The shareholders (obviously this will exclude you since you own zero shares) will benefit emensely from this in the not so distant future.
If this were an arm wrestling match, you would be about a millimeter from being pinned. I can see the beads of sweat forming on your forehead. Dr Moro has not mentioned the ISOBM, YET. What NEW data will he present? More hype I suppose, right?
May I suggest you follow in the footsteps of my 2 good friends
<I have not checked the background of the nominated directors but my first impression is good.>
Did you say good? It is time to connect the dots. Let's see..... Previously Dr. Walsh was Managing Director of Cambridge Diagnostics Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Inverness Medical Innovations Inc. Does that sound like In verness is returning recaf? Smithline is patient. Now why is that??? This company has been to the brink, but will prevail. Would these two NEW board members associate with Biocurex if the ship was about to sink. No one would EVER waste a lifetime of talent. Revenue is the #1 priority and these guys will and should bring NEW contacts and experience which we were lacking. Good luck longs. This is very good news.
<In other words, if Management gets lucky, they will be praised for talent they do not have and if Management gets unlucky, they will be criticized for what is not their fault.>
As a major shareholder I place ALL blame on management. When did shareholders have a vote on the Smithline deal? Anyone with common sense would NEVER "bet the farm" on a loan and use its technology as collateral. NEVER!!!!! That is the most obscene business move I have ever witnessed and I can bet very few shareholders would have given management their blessing. Yes, the technology works, but praising Dr Moro for his discovery and his ability to find clever ways to capitalize is not the same as managing operations. They will get shareholder approval, but I bet he better be ready to assume that shareholders are going to be reluctant to allow the current management to continue without adding (notice I said adding) new competent EXPERIENCED board members. It will have a very positive effect on the image of the company as well as shareholder sentiment. Instead of promoting the company via penny rag newsletters and the waste of shares to the thief at smallcap newsletter or more BS crystal reports that WASTE money, let's better capitalize on a proper CEO/CFO. Dr Moro IS Biocurex. That title of CEO is unimportant. He will certainly be better served focusing on recaf. I would like to see a return on my investment instead wasteful spending that could have been used to pay for a CEO that could close some deals instead of negotiating till the technology is obsolete. You have to know when something is better than nothing. Hardball tactics have failed and it is time for shareholders to make a stand. Fortunately, shareholders only want what is best for the company. Even Agoracom is a waste of money. I actually learn more over here, because there is so much negative inormation that has been demystified and cleared up by a few that either are close to individuals at Biocurex, in the medical field, or have extreme knowledge about recaf. What is exciting is that this will be an "all in" moment for Biocurex and we will either be rewarded and hit the jackpot or we will have been conned into substantial losses and be wiped out. We will have our answer THIS YEAR. Place your bets.
My belief is recaf WILL be used for screening/monitoring cancer, AND recaf with be used IN ADDITION/IN CONJUNCTION with current sreening tools. When combined with PSA it is a slam dunk. The numbers are far above what is considered the standard of care in modern medicine. Just like in treatment when you are prescribed a COMBINATION of drugs I believe a COMBINATION of screening tools SHOULD/WILL become the standard.
Answer me this one question (I challenge anyone): what is every human beings' most valuable possession? Correct answer is life. If anyone wants to debate this, bring it on! What is your life worth when you explain things under the correct perspective? I would say that none of your worldly possessions have any value if you are erased from existence. In other words, why would you not want recaf WITH a PSA? Inverness IS well aware of this powerful combination and WILL capitalize and shareholders WILL be rewarded. Recaf will save the healthcare system billions and it will save LIVES (and that is priceless!!!)
Wow. The last one to bed last nite and now the first one up this morning. What dedication for someone that owns NO shares.
Gold, you are joking, right? You now say that Dr Moro is about to launch OncoPet and, "there will be about a million shares or so selling into the news again. Once again, you will find that my prediction will come true and further prove that Dog RECAF is more hype than anything else."
I'd like to know what prediction you are talking about? I can just as easily say that when OncoPet is launched and the website is running there will be a press release and trading will be intense. I guess I can say I have a crystal ball as well, because also see that there will be heavy volume upon the announcement. It has already been brought to the attention of shareholders the manipulation that has gone on as evidenced by interactive brokers website showing the number of shares being shorted and then bought back in to churn and create the illusion of selling. You have been misleading investors by saying that insiders are selling and I provided a link to prove you are wrong. So what is this prediction that you will be right AGAIN?
Like many have said. GoldSeeker appears to be the ultimate contraindicator. Oncopet is about to create revenue and you say that is a pump. Everyone sees right thru you. When Apple released the first IPod I suppose investors said that was a pump. Those that thought like you missed the beginning of a revolution. Enough said. It is good to be alive and it is a beautiful day. Time to get outside and enjoy it.
Gold should have quit before we all figured him out.
As of today, I am personally focused on Oncopet, the upcoming ISOBM, the PIMA analyzer, and the shareholder meeting. All will bring a positive momentum to the stock and rejuvenate investors. Thanks to Gold, I believe every potentially detrimental issue has been laid to rest, so Gold your work is done. You may have actually reassured investors which is obviously not what you intended after making your case for investors to give up on recaf. I think the most intelligent post is from nutinbutnet when he said that you lost 150,000 dollars and invested at the peak and were claiming this was a slam dunk investment. Now we are about to make a 180 and you are screaming get out, the place is burning to the ground. Classic sign of a bottom. The ultimate contraindicator is the opposite of your OPINION. Good luck longs. It's coming.
You want the truth, and I mean the TRUTH. Use this link and go back as far as you want to dig on Wittenberg or anyone else to see who is selling.
ZERO SELLING!
Translation:
NONE NADA ZILCH AUCUN KEINE NESSUNO NENHUM GEEN
MY proof and not speculation http://www.mffais.com/mffais-search-wittenberg
I challenge you to go back as far as you want, but be ready to admit defeat! Confuscious say, "Repetitive lies does not equal the truth." Where's your disclaimer?
Does Inverness need a 510k? Will recaf be used for monitoring if added to PIMA? Why not marry recaf with the BRAC by Myriad? Myriad has commercials on the major networks about early diagnosis. I feel like Moro is missing some golden opportunities. IMO, stem cells are going to be the future and Moro needs to sign a licensee or his technology will be obsolete. The window is closing. I'm not denegrating the technology available TODAY with recaf, but there is frustration due to his inability to accept A deal which is better than NO deal.
Mata, you seem to think Inverness is going to use recaf on their new PIMA analyzer. Why?
Mata, it is very important to elaborate on your last statement. No one is selling, but it could motivate indiduals to add to their position. What is your opinion on what and when Inverness will even acknowledge recaf? The ISOBM is near. It would be nice to hear something before that. You seem convinced recaf will be a part of pima analyzer. Why? How does it work? Does it require a 510k? Who's paying for the 510k? Any light whatsoever you can shed on this piece to the puzzle will greatly help investors since Dr Moro seems content to avoid answering questions.
Goldseeker, why do keep saying this has to be a one trick pony. As in treatment doesn't it often take multiple medications? So why can't you accept that recaf is just one of many tools to diagnose cancer. You continue to lose perspective constantly. No one is saying stop every acceptable tool used in medicine and substitute it for recaf. This is just another avenue. Your tone never changes. We are all seeking answers, but remember we have limited knowledge and it would be nice to hear you once in a while see that someone else can be right other than you. Hubris, my friend.
I need to add my thoughts on this conversation where IMO I believe Goldseeker is sadly mistaken
<The bocx stated: "Whether you or they like it or not, I have the right to know and if my doctor had a way to detect cancer and he did not offer it to me and I find out I got cancer I would make sure that he understood that he ALSO needed to know and for that I would use my lawyer. Clear?"
You cannot be any further wrong in stating the above. The patient must prove the doctor violated the standard of care. If you wanted to pay for a lawyer yourself, go ahead but no lawyer is going to take a case that is a clear loss.
What is even more important, if a doctor did give a RECAF test and it was not consider a standard of care, the doctor would be liable for lawsuits if the patient was injured from any resultant medical procedures.
IMO, the doctor would be more in hazard giving a RECAF test than not giving a RECAF test.>
Here is where you are wrong. Read my previous post. To recap:
You pay absolutely nothing unless we win
Free Consultations & Case Evaluations
Misdiagnosis of Cancer Lawyers
Today, there are many screening tests physicians may utilize for early detection of cancer. Cancer can be treated with surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or biological therapy. However, successful treatment is dependent upon a rapid and accurate diagnosis. Early detection is the key to most successful outcomes.
The more the cancer is allowed to develop without treatment, the greater the likelihood of the cancer spreading. A medical misdiagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis can delay critical treatments, worsen a disease or even cause death, especially in cases of cancer.
A medical misdiagnosis may be the result of medical malpractice when:
• Early detection tests are not ordered because of cost considerations
• A Doctor hastily offers a diagnosis without a proper medical evaluation
• A Doctor fails to order necessary tests to help diagnose or rule out cancer
• A Doctor fails to properly address a patient's signs and symptoms including:
• unexplained extensive weight loss
• enlargement of lymph nodes
• change in bowel or bladder habits
• unusual bleeding or discharge
• thickening or lump in a body part
• Early cancer detection tests are not properly administered
• A mammogram is misinterpreted or misread by a radiologist, leading to an enlargement or spread of breast cancer.
• A biopsy is misread or does not properly sample the suspicious tissue in question
Goldseeker wrote: " The patient must prove the doctor violated the standard of care. If you wanted to pay for a lawyer yourself, go ahead but no lawyer is going to take a case that is a clear loss." NOT TRUE (refer to the above). He also states, "IMO, the doctor would be more in hazard giving a RECAF test than not giving a RECAF test." Again, NOT TRUE (refer to the above).
I am looking forward his presentation at the ISOBM. Can Inverness be presenting with Moro? I don't know and it is wishful thinking on my part. All I know is that Smithline seems content to let it ride with their loan, so they must know something. Also the share price is holding steady in the anticipation of good news.
On the positive side of this biased chatroom, most, if not all of the doomsday scenarios have been PROVEN wrong. There are some intelligent posters here and I do learn from the conversations. What I can say is that my conviction is only stronger after the myths and heresay is dispelled. Everyone keep up the god work. We know what the truth is.
Kag stated:<My comment: Who created the “hole” that BioCurex is in? Who is responsible for the unpaid Smithline loan with a lien on all of BioCurex’s assets? kag >
Wouldn't that have to be Wittenberg? Wasn't he the CFO? Could that be the reason he is no longer the CFO? Hmmmmmm?
Could that be why he did NOT sell his shares, but is no longer with the company? Hmmmmm?
The more the cancer is allowed to develop without treatment, the greater the likelihood of the cancer spreading. A medical misdiagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis can delay critical treatments, worsen a disease or even cause death, especially in cases of cancer.
A medical misdiagnosis may be the result of medical malpractice when:
• Early detection tests are not ordered because of cost considerations
• A Doctor hastily offers a diagnosis without a proper medical evaluation
• A Doctor fails to order necessary tests to help diagnose or rule out cancer
That is not subjective Mr Goldseeker. THAT IS PART OF AN OATH. DO NO HARM.
You need to take a step back and hear what you have been saying. Early diagnosis is a second chance at life. It is encoded in our DNA to fight death and there is a innate sense to compell us to live. Do you not possess this will to live?
Statistics: Here's a list of the leading causes of death in the United States compiled by the CDC.
10. Septicemia (aka the presence of bacteria in the blood) - 34,136 deaths
9. Nephritis (aka inflammation of the kidney) - 43,901 deaths
8. Influenza/Pneumonia - 63,001 deaths
7. Alzheimer's disease - 71,599 deaths
6. Diabetes - 75,119 deaths
5. Accidents -117,809 deaths
4. Chronic lower respiratory diseases - 130,933 deaths
3. Stroke - 143,579 deaths
2. Cancer - 559,312 deaths
1. Heart disease - 652,091 deaths
How many lives EACH YEAR IN THE US ALONE will be saved by early diagnosis?
One more point that I have to question you on is do you honestly think that it is MORE cost effective to treat late stage cancer which in reality is not treatment but added days of additional suffering ultimately leading to death anyway? What is ROI (return on investment) on that outcome? Now was that money well spent when the outcome is death anyway or does it make sense to treat cancer early and actually TREAT cancer and the individual lives.
Put another way. If you had a chance to buy a lottery ticket and it cost 1 dollar and you had a chance at say 1 in 1 million odds of winning or would you pay 5 dollars for a lottery ticket that had 1 in 100 million chance of winning. You profess to say that it is makes no difference. Statistics don't lie. It is a numbers game. Your odds of TREATMENT are significantly better if you TREAT cancer early. Do you not understand that early treatment IS TREATMENT. Late stage treatment IMO is not a treatment only a slight detour to the same place. Death's door!!!!
Here is another question. Which is the better doctor(more competent doctor)? The doctor that says you look fine and you have no current complaints, and your vitals are WNL (w/in normal limits), so let's skip the recaf test. Or the doctor that says I believe strongly in early detection and preventative medicine so I RECOMMEND a recaf test? HMMMMMM?
Which one is doing NO HARM? Which one will be a hero, and which one will have to tell their loved ones that he erred on the side of judgement? Which one will have to defend his decision in a court of law?
Dr Goldseeker are you ready to defend your answer? It is more like HOW CAN YOU defend your answer?
Goldseeker, if you did not have a recaf test after it is being offered you would be "dead wrong." Pardon the pun.
Why don't you ask this guy are the hundreds of thousands of other lawyers what will happen when they fail to use recaf.
Here is a glimpse at the near (very near) future.
Free Case Evaluation - Kelley Law Group - A Plymouth County Medical Malpractice Law Firm - MA Personal Injury Lawyers- Click to learn about Medical Mistake Cases and Negligence Claims against Doctors, Nurses and Hospitals.
Kelley Law Group, P.C.Home About Us Practice AreasMedical Malpractice Workers Compensation Auto Accidents Product Liability Nursing Home Abuse Sexual Abuse Animal Attack Defective Drug Premises Liability Wrongful Death Verdicts & Settlements Legal Resources Legal News Common Questions Web Resources Legal Glossary Contact Us One of Massachusetts' Premier Personal Injury Law Firms call anytime (508) 747.8854
Click Here For A Free Online Case Evaluation
home and hospital visits anywhere in MA
You pay absolutely nothing unless we win
Free Consultations & Case Evaluations
Misdiagnosis of Cancer Massachusetts Cancer Misdiagnosis Lawyers
Today, there are many screening tests physicians may utilize for early detection of cancer. Cancer can be treated with surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or biological therapy. However, successful treatment is dependent upon a rapid and accurate diagnosis. Early detection is the key to most successful outcomes.
The more the cancer is allowed to develop without treatment, the greater the likelihood of the cancer spreading. A medical misdiagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis can delay critical treatments, worsen a disease or even cause death, especially in cases of cancer.
A medical misdiagnosis may be the result of medical malpractice when:
• Early detection tests are not ordered because of cost considerations
• A Doctor hastily offers a diagnosis without a proper medical evaluation
• A Doctor fails to order necessary tests to help diagnose or rule out cancer
• A Doctor fails to properly address a patient's signs and symptoms including:
• unexplained extensive weight loss
• enlargement of lymph nodes
• change in bowel or bladder habits
• unusual bleeding or discharge
• thickening or lump in a body part
• Early cancer detection tests are not properly administered
• A mammogram is misinterpreted or misread by a radiologist, leading to an enlargement or spread of breast cancer.
• A biopsy is misread or does not properly sample the suspicious tissue in question
Common examples of cancer misdiagnosis and failure to diagnose cancer cases our lawyers handle include:
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Breast Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Leukemia
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Lung Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Prostate Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Cervical Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Ovarian Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Testicular Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Colon Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Skin Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose a Brain Tumor
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Cancer of the Uterus
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Pancreatic Cancer
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Hodgkin¹s disease
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Lymphoma
• Misdiagnosis or failure to diagnose Leukemia
Patients can help prevent medical misdiagnosis by seeking a second opinion, repeating lab and other medical tests, asking questions, and researching the condition and symptoms of the condition the patient has been diagnosed with.
When misdiagnosis is the result of medical malpractice, the medical professional can be held liable for any damages that a patient suffers.
>Contact our Cancer Misdiagnosis Lawyers
If you believe that you or a loved one is a victim of a cancer misdiagnosis, it is important to consult with a qualified medical malpractice attorney. Contact an attorney at Kelley Law Group, P.C. right away for a free, no obligation evaluation of your case.
We make home and hospital visits and we will come to you wherever you are in Massachusetts. Again, you pay nothing up front to have us handle your case. There is never any fee unless we win your case.
.
GOLDSEEKER, these guys will be very interested in recaf.
Goldseeker states, "I said nothing about any benefits."
My comment: Have you ever?
With all of your negativity (which is relentless) it has only strengthened my ability to see the multiple benefits of recaf. Thanks for alleviating all of the potential negatives. All the clues are right in front of you. This is going to be a blockbuster for Inverness and it will translate into many avenues of revenue for shareholders. Beep beep.....all aboard the money train!!!!
It's been evident that there is manipulation for quite some time. Kag, you don't need to point that out. Everyone is well aware of the churning.
I am under the opinion that Dr Moro has been silent because he is on the cusp of some major news and he is not ready to spill the beans yet. I am certain he is feeling the pressure from shareholders. It won't be long. If he was truly concerned about the future of Biocurex, human nature would have caused him to say things out of desperation. It is my understanding that there is big news on the horizon. I'm content to wait and be amused by this circus of a message board.