Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I do know that the 302nd Military Intelligence Battalion is based there in the area. There are a number of NATO and German military bases in the area as well.
pg8675309
I really try not to speculate on future shareprice. It all comes down to sales and execution of the team at this point. We have one of the BOD's performance plan milestones now being met, but we still need to see revenue growth, cost containment/reduction, and progress in the other revenue producing divisions. There are pilots in-progress/nearing completion in Mexico, China, & Japan (there was an implication in the latest news release that there is something going on domestically as well, but I have no idea what that could be),and those also need to lead to some new contracts for this business to "take off". Magic Money rollout via FSS shoud be starting to generate revenues, and I would like to see StratVoIP expand its market reach beyond Brazil.
How about US military personnel?
You are correct, but I am calculating a Net Present Value based upon projected cashflows, a discount rate, and a specific fixed cost assumption of acquiring a specific percentage of the population as an initial customer base. Yes, one could add into the cashflow the marketing/sales cost projections needed for customer retention as well.
That is true, but consider the fact that those initial marketing/sales costs are "sunk costs" at the acquisition point and one needs to really look at the run rate, discounted cashflows, out to say a 3-5 year horizon....also add in other services (which the acquisition costs would be minimal at that point) which could be added on later and you would have an idea of the true Net Present Value.
Assets from an accounting perspective would be booked on the Balance Sheet as costs incurred in setup (labor etc.) plus cost of equipment.
Of course you have to make sure you add in all three cities currently being built out by Sept. and I am not considering cross selling of other services which could be offered through the network.
Add in the market potential (take 10-15% of the population to be conservative and add in US military personnel in the area as well, which would not be tallied in the population census) with a monthly charge rate of say $40/month (less than the current DSL package being offered) and then take this cashflow out to a time horizon of 5 years.
I believe you are right. Revenue generation and progress to plan in all divisions is critical.
I think we may hear some news related to the Stratelite testing next...just my humble opinion.
GLTA......Danielle
Next
- There are pilots completed (or in progress still) in China, Mexico, & Japan
- Magic Money rollout in India (and elsewhere)
- Further growth in Centerline
- Stratelite test results and progress
- Developments with growth in VoIP
......a lot to expect in the coming weeks IMHO
of course, there is the uncertianty with the AMEX listing, but that will be resolved one way or another in a week.
Schwab posted the news already
The more important question cookie01810
is from whom will the SHORTs buy to cover?
Hmmm...looks like today was indeed a good buy-in point.
Oh well....I did mention the correlation between the financing notes and potential business expansion didn't I?
Phd_B here is something for you
http://www.imanet.org/pdf/1832.pdf
Very Interesting Indeed!!!
I had a Buy Limit Order for 10,000 at .41 and it executed at 2:40 and appeared as a SELL.
Hmmmmm....
The fact that he admitted to being a paid stocktriggers subscriber should speak volumes!
)
runandadd...
1. The amount is insignificant when one considers their monthly run rate.
2. If you look historically when this was previously arranged, late last year, it was prior, at the time what was considered, to be a significant material event.
That is all I will say...for now.
Question...some time ago someone posted an interpretation of odd lot trades as representing signals between market makers etc. (such as 100, 300, 800, etc.).
Does anyone have a link to that post or could anyone explain what this would mean in a market for GTE where a majority of the shares are traded off the AMEX?
I thought you tech. analysts would know these things.
)
Thanks in advance....
i have understood this to be correct.
labrador should have his guard dogs monitor pitbull's house in Chicago.
I personally think, as I have expressed in the past, that moving back to the OTC:BB for a period of time, and then applying to another higher exchange later, after a few solid quarters of growing profits, will be better in the long term for this company.
The company fundamentals and prospects are still good...obviously the firms who syndicated that small loan think so too.
JMHO
At what level would you be a buyer?
Interesting to think...why would that behemouth Forbes, with so many thousands of other companies, would spend the newsprint and effort to bash this little company....or was it a bash at all?
I solidly believe it will be unlikely that there will be any PRs until after the AMEX hearing.
My opinion is based upon 20 years professional experience in consulting and dealing with numerous vendors and projects in the Telcom and networking space. On what credentials are you basing your opinion and speculations on?
Bottom line....my opinions are at least as valid as anyone else's here.
SAMdashada...you are full of BS
please show us the specific SEC reporting that demonstartes Huff has sold one share of stock recently?! ....and don't start making erroneuous assumptions about 3rd party holdings either...those also come under SEC rules of insider trading.
They may have been misinformed by the software vendor (who is typically reluctant...in most cases in my 20 years of I/T consulting experience it is very common to see this...to pass along "bad news" until the very last minute).
The issues surrounding the extra time needed for parallel testing of the new expanded Billing system may not have been reported at that time. Ever consider that?
A new article on futures in Wireless on Scientific American
Digital Online
http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=8E53FE91-2B35-...
is worth a read.
How many companies, with hundreds of projects and sales initiatives have missed dates or had projects delayed? How many have ever been successfully sued?
You are either very naieve (delays in projects or cancellation of business deals never happen?) or you have other motives.
We may have some news regarding the progress on Stratelite testing soon.
(maybe wishful thinking on my part)
Simply not true mide. Why was I restricted in exercise of my vested options during specific periods while I was at Gambro? I am sure you are mistaken. There are what are termed SEC regulatory based "blackout periods" where exercising, even vested options or grants, is prohibited.
There are always restrictions on insiders purchasing or disposing of securities. I was an "insider" at Gambro Healthcare, and even though the shares, options, and securities I received as incentives, were traded on the Stockholm exchange, I was similarly restricted by US securities regulations.
They need to file form 144s and are restricted from buying and selling during specific periods...I may venture to guess...especially the period leading up to significant known material events.
Interesting Forbes article
http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/13/naked-shorts-jp-morgan-chase_biz_cx_0913naked.html?partner=yahootix
Looks like the SEC's enforcement arm is starting to "wake up".
coastiretired...have you read the provisions of the note? Have you noticed that there is a provision, with regard to limits on the syndicate members of accumulating more than a specific percentage of outstanding shares?
Read the conditions of the notes. The conversion is not automatic. The company has the ability to call in the notes, prior to conversion.
http://investor.globetel.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67726&p=irol-SECText&TEXT=aHR0cDovL2NjYm4uMTBrd....
"1.8 Company's Right to Call.
(a) Subject to the provisions of clauses 1.8(b)
below, in the event that: (A) the volume weighted average price of a share of
Common Stock as traded on the Principal Market (or such other exchange or stock
market on which the Common Stock may then be listed or quoted) equals or exceeds
200% of the then applicable exercise price of this Warrant and (B) the minimum
daily trading volume of the Common Stock is not less than 1,000,000 shares, each
for a period of 20 consecutive trading days immediately prior to such notice,
then the Company, upon thirty (30) days' prior written notice (the "Notice
Period"), may call this Warrant with respect to up to 100% of the shares of
Common Stock then purchasable pursuant to this Warrant at a redemption price
equal to the Warrant Exercise Price then in effect, which right shall be
exercisable by the Company commencing on the Effective Date and continuing for a
period of two (2) years thereafter. Notwithstanding any such notice by the
Company, the Holder shall have the right to exercise this Warrant prior to the
end of the Notice Period.
(b) In connection with any transfer or exchange of
less than all of this Warrant, the transferring Holder shall deliver to the
Company an agreement or instrument executed by the transferring Holder and the
new Holder allocating between them on whatever basis they may determine in their
sole discretion any subsequent call of this Warrant by the Company, such that
after giving effect to such transfer the Company shall have the right to call
the same number of Warrants that it would have had if the transfer or exchange
had not occurred.
"
There is a hearing...a very important hearing I might add...at the end of the month. Stop and think...why something like this would not be NR-ed by GTE? Is this really "a material event"? Does it make sense to NR this, as well as other, developments now?