Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SFOR is trying to reverse - charts looking a bit better on being oversold...we will see if it holds or not in the next two days.
We might see 4's again. The airing isn't until the end of January is what I heard...let me know if you heard different please. There might be a pop once the show airs, but it doesn't mean the pps will skyrocket. Hopefully, there is a meaningful announcement that SFOR has done a major deal that has actually closed and made money...we will see.
Looking for cheaper yet too!!!
FACT Dude...there it is again...your chance to be happy and get out at .0055 - you can sell over 2,000,000 shares right now. Fact! Are you or is anyone else going to? Sell to me!!!
Dude, I never said there wasn't selling - that is obvious, but if you happened to be aware, ANY naysayer or ANY long could have sold 2,000,000 shares at .0055 before the close. They had about a half hour opportunity to sell then - but nobody took advantage of it. That is all I am saying, Dude.
Revs definitely stunk...nobody can deny that! Someone said SFOR hasn't been paid by them yet...hope not because it is peanuts for the period. Anymore, it is a wild guess what kind of deals SFOR is making and who they have them with. They keep surviving year after year! Yes, we know sometimes they take it out on common shareholder's hide too.
ACTUALLY, I haven't left yet, but am soon, and I will respond this time. I am not convinced by the 8k that it was a wash, and not convinced by some that say they were at the SHM and are telling people it was a wash.
(Not my definition): If it is a "voluntary dismissal with prejudice", it is the result of an out of court agreement or settlement between parties that they agree is final. If the case is dismissed "without prejudice" the lawsuit can be filed again by the plaintiff.
1. Cases can be dismissed with prejudice that involve a settlement. 2. We know SFOR DID NOT have to spend money on Entrust. 3. However, We DO NOT know that Entrust has not accepted an agreement or agreements that SFOR has demanded.
I am not saying there is more than a wash, but I will believe the details in future financials that disclose more information (I'm not fully believing people on a board).
I am not convinced that Entrust was a wash for a couple of reasons. Sounds like SFOR did get them off their back for good, but I think litigation was advantageous to SFOR more than what most are thinking. On the other hand, I'm not thinking it put a large amount of money in SFOR's coffers either. I know there will be lots of people disagreeing, but we will see later on! Not going to respond...have to go for now.
Doesn't look like all of the "potential" SFOR has going for it is supporting the share price the last few trading days (no kidding right?)...if SFOR has so much going for it, why do so many other stinky pinkies that "have less going on" trade higher (and consistently)? I am sitting with cash for lower prices, but WOW, what a disappointment!!! If it hits .01, I WOULD NOT say a R/S is out of the question. I don't care what Kay has said before, it could happen again.
I am sorry if you already mentioned about 50 employees, but I don't think you have. If it is HUUUGE, why didn't you mention it this weekend when people already asked about the shareholder's meeting that you attended?
Hope so, but when was the patent granted to SFOR? Patent number?
There are other companies already going after very large corporations that say they own the PUSH patent. I too would like to see verification that SFOR owns the PUSH patent.
Thanks! Does that make you think SFOR’s attorneys might not be very effective with other companies they are going based on a wash with Entrust?
Did Mark Kay tell you in private or to all shareholders? Thanks!
Dr Evil... did YOU PERSONALLY hear Mark or someone from SFOr say Entrust was a wash and SFOR won’t benefit financially in any way from the lawsuit?
Mdrifter...are you saying Mark or someone at SFOR told you Entrust was a wash without any kind of financial gain for SFOR. Please...I want to hear from Mdrifter only since he was there at the shareholder meeting. Thanks!
Are you selling into the large bid and then going to repurchase at .009? HMMM!
8 million shares on the bid at .0124 a little bit ago and ate up the 1.7 million shares on the ask in a hurry.
People...look at this! Why is nobody on to the classic run up and then down 40%? Actually, now 45%. Why 45%? That was one of the last deals SFOR did for financing that would take it out of common shareholder's hides. Do the math... .02 to .011. SFOR could go lower but has stabilized above .011 for now. So, I know that people are going to say no toxic debt, but it all matches up just like it always does. There was no support as of last Thursday other than a few "retail investors." I am not going to comment any further about this, but this is what happens, and has happened many times in the past. Buy on the dips from here!
My opinion might not be popular (and I don't care who wants to disagree), but I don't think the "monetary award" is going to be as large as many expect because both SFOR and Entrust were really going after each other (I know folks...Entrust was dismissed prior), but this could be much more valuable for setting up future wins against other infringers. I look at this as a "win" by getting a much larger giant (Entrust) off SFOR's back in our legal system. Ultimately, I hope it is HUGE (monetarily), and ALSO helps SFOR to reduce the amount of time litigating against other infringers.
Speaking of buying...have orders in...anyone want to let some shares go?
MM's want panic selling...question is, who is going to give their shares up?
Why yes it is...MM's want panic selling before it goes up.
I'm READY, but adding more on dips (anyone else want to sell more to me)...let's go!
Right on 2 weeks is nothing especially for those who are going to hold a large portion of their holdings over the next year or two...SFOR WILL have a much-much higher share price then, and decent chances before. Most of us have been involved with SFOR in some capacity here for a while, and 2 weeks is a blink of the eye.
They wouldn't post ANY specific deals on twitter or other social media.
Not speculating by any means, but SFOR does not post tweets about competitors, but I see Herjavec Group was posted by Strikeforce 13 hours ago on twitter. Possible SFOR deal(s) with this company?
Welcome. VERY VALID reasons to be in this! You obviously wouldn't waste your time over the past 6 months if you didn't have some belief in SFOR (unlike some negative people that waste everyone's time and post on here everyday). Having a position in SFOR is smart!
Right on!!!
Pumped up to .03 before is exactly what happened before, NOW, there is REAL news and REAL events unfolding. There are a lot of fluff OTC companies out there, but TOP legal firms still fighting for SFOR. There has NEVER been better chances for SFOR to bring in money than NOW and in the NEAR future.
SCOOP UP THE BARGAINS!!!
SCOOP UO THE BARGAINS!!!
I'm sure he will say he has nothing to do with the share price. I know someone that has a HUGE Bid in the low 6's...he will adjust accordingly.
Exactly Baldeagle1!!! Thanks for your two posts today...yes indeed, it does look like a very important step forward for SFOR!
Your info about Kasperky was on major TV networks this morning. Kaspersky has been taken off our government antimalware vendor list, and goverment personnel is wanting the general public to stop using it as well.
Just curious...do you think the other companies that offer MFA are "better suited" because they infringed upon SFOR's patented technology or not? Why then, would R&G and BR be in such YUGE support of SFOR? Thanks!
I think there is some money on hand that is on Q3 books in addition to cash on hand from Q2 (from actual sales). Probably not a huge amount, but some to supplement the cash on hand stated in the last Q. IMO, Kay is a master of keeping this company afloat by any means necessary. History shows it. Therefore, those that think BK is going to happen...WRONG, plus the law firms wouldn't be supporting SFOR if they weren't believers in their patents. What we have here are folks on this board that have experienced SFOR's past (significant) dilution and R/S's, and those that haven't. We are closer to zero than a dollar. It was nice at .03, and hoping we will get far beyond that one day, but time will tell. If R&G and Blank weren't in the picture, I think we would be in the trips. SFOR is one of (if not the most) interesting pinkie. Good luck all!
How do you know this? Thanks!
I don't use my money for public favors unless I donate on my own terms. I hold a long position but I'm not "all in" because of the history of SFOR, and today marks some similar history...dismal revenue (AGAIN)!
Dismal revenue though...horrible! I sold that much in a month when I was a kid working in a paint store (selling to contractors and home owners). Horrible revenue!