lmorovan:

He resigned as an employee.

He is now a consultant.

Maybe there is a tax break in being a consultant over an employee.

Come on lmorovan, just be honest for once. Dr. Wade Poteet is not leaving the Company, as diddy suggest, he is now a "FULL TIME CONSULTANT", and remains CDEX's "PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST".

I have twisted nothing, I am quoting directly from the document.

Maybe your diddy is twisting, just like you are.

lmorovan:

"full time consulting lmorovam. What exactly does full time mean?

He also "continue's as Company's Principal Scientist."

What does continue mean?

tia

lmorovan:

You are one of the extreme bashers of MP, imho, you have slandered him and committed defamation of his character.

You have said for years he needs to resign, and when he does, he continue to bash and badmouth.

Truly amazing, and well noted.

lmorovan:

Are you stating a fact or an opinion?

tia

Rottenapple:

Do you have a specific post that you want me to address, where I am saying that Dr. Poteet retired, yet when one really looks at what is written, that is not the case at all.

I think it is quite clear that diddy is not being honest.

Do you agree with diddy? Are you also saying Dr. Poteet is retiring?

rottenapple:

I thought you and others said MP needed to let someone else run the company.

According to what you and others said, this sounds like exactly what you ask for.

d4diddy:

Does this sound like and resemble the type of post that the elgindy people posted?

Crow3:

Do you think that anyone(s) on this board mat fit the example scared laid out?

You know, people who have just bashed CDEX and its Tech and its people?

d4diddy"

Would you please put you bio under this one:

"Mr. Donald W. Strickland, Director, comes to CDEX from a 30-year career in
successfully developing businesses internationally for both large public
companies and technology startups. He has held executive positions at Eastman
Kodak Company and Apple Computer, including heading product development,
manufacturing, and sales. In 1996 he became CEO of PictureWorks Technology, a
technology start up, which he sold for $200M in 2000 to IPIX Corporation, a
public company traded on the NASDAQ exchange. Thereafter, he served as President
and CEO of IPIX through 2004, during which time he led the company through a
major restructuring, focusing on the security markets and taking the company to
profitability. Mr. Strickland holds a bachelor's degree in physics from Virginia
Tech, a master's degree in physics from the University of Notre Dame, a master's
degree in optics from the University of Rochester, a master's degree in
management from the Stanford University and a law degree from George Washington
University."

thank you in advance.

d4diddy:

Are you truly being truthful when you say that Dr. Wade Poteet is retiring?

"Dr. Poteet resigned from his employment position with the company effective
January 1, 2006 and now serves on a full-time consultancy basis, continuing as
the company's Principal Scientist."

He nows serves as "full time consultant" " continuing as the company's Principal Scientist."

Does this sound like retitrement, diddy?

Are you being honest?

Hey MG:

We just thought ole abzt was dead.

Now, lets get cdex moving!

d4diddy:

Who said this:

"By: diddy
28 Dec 2003, 03:03 AM EST
Msg. 199964 of 239304
(This msg. is a reply to 199958 by gquarn.)
Jump to msg. #
GQ,

Have a great time!

I'm not supposta say that MP wants you to STFU.

Kapeesh?"

d4diddy:


"What I question is his documented involvement with a public company, Loch Harris which I was heavily invested in. I question his actions, as well as the actions of all the officers, directors and insiders of the company.

I question the numerous PR's in which his name was used to promote a stock scam.

I question why he did not take immediate action once those false PR's were disseminated.

I question why there is no record of how Poteet was paid while working for Loch Harris."


All of the above questions you ask, and probably 50 to 100 more were asked by the SEC, FBI, DOJ, and AG, imho.

Can you honestly say, you don't think the SEC asked all of your questions and more?

You have read the SEC filings against Loch, we know the FBI raided the lab in Tucson. Yet, not one charge filed against anyone.

Plus diddy, as I have pointed out many times. The SEC had "ALL" the documents, whatever they were, and after seeing those documents, and taking all the depositions, still allowed CDEX to go public.

The "ONLY" conclusion one could draw from knowing all of that, is that CDEX and its bod, and employees are clean.

If the SEC had found one shred of any misconduct from MP, Dr. Poteet, or any other CDEX person, do you honestly think that they would have allowed CDEX to go public?

I believe the correct answer would be, NO, they would not have.

d4diddy:

What do you want to risk?

LOL

Come little boy, show us you got some strong belief's in your facts!

10K minimum!

ra:

Is that what hes worth?

LOL

With the abuse that some may have felt, lets say 10k or more!

d4diddy:

What do you want to risk?

d4diddy:

Get this through your thick skull.

If you want to put something on the line to back up your belief there are no letter(s) with the SEC or AG, I will gladly believe what I feel to be a fact there are.

At some point and time we ALL will know if there was or not.

If there was not a letter(s), then you win, if there was, then I win.

If you are not willing to back up your belief, then I be through playing your silly, this and that game.

I want to see if your willing to risk something for your belief's. I AM!

So, what do you want to risk?

d4diddy:

LOL

Go ask the SEC and FBI, they have ALL the fatcs.

THINK!!!!!

d4diddy:

The funniest thing I have ever read:

"It's hard to believe that when a hospital gets a new patient in, they will have to send a sample to CDEX to get a signature. Not only will they have to pay extra for it, they have to wait at least a week to get the ValiMed updated. It makes no sense!!!"

Crow3:

The paragragh I wrote is filled in, duh, LOL

This is it, the colors are seen clearly.

You and others are not equipped to do it.

Your off the hot seat, so go soak your little burned behind.

ra:

That is about par for your IQ.

The point has been well made.

I will not continue to rub the blanks into your face.

Crow3:

Fill in the blanks, and lets see who laughs.

Crow3:

I came up with a very easy fill in the blank for you and all other bashers. Not even you rocket scientist knows what to fill in.

There is plenty of laughter on going by many.

It is you and others that cannot figure out the black and white.

Or figure out the business wire that I laid in diddy's lap for him to read.

So keep us laughing, and supplying us with your knowledge, plenty of us are taking good notes.

rottenapple:

Whatever!

I could careless what any basher has to say concerning whether you believe one thing I post.

You stand for deception and the bashing of a company and its people.

A company that I believe in, a company that I have risk investment dollars in, and a company whose people I believe to be oof strong character.

Because, unlike you, I have met all the people, even the Loch Harris people, with the exception of the Harris's. Never met any of them.

I encountered the oil package while in Austin on other business. I took that package straight to Marshal Gandy. It was then, that I realized something was not right.

It is one thing to berate someone who has it coming for failures, deception, or outright fraud. It is but a cheap, snake crawling maggot, that will talk out of his behind about people they have not met with in person, or have a clue as to whether they are honest.

"Another untrue statement! It's YOU that I doubt anyone believes!"

Over 30,000 people believed in the SA, RA. I guess you forgot.

Crow3:

Another helpful hint:

Maybe you can understand this one, LOL:

"According to the BAXA FAQ...

What does the ValiMed Technology validate?
The testing confirms a known drug sample and its concentration. The validation is a pass/fail process to confirm compounding accuracy."


You little boys just love decepetion from the truth, and yes diddy, I be talking to you too!

LOL

Crow3:

Source?


You mean we have to state our sources on this board?

LOL

lmorovan:

" Yes, deception performed by professional deceivers."

Is this a fact or just an opinion?


"Simple, expose you and your associates for what you really are. "

LOL, You expose yourself over and over, but only to yourself. Which is why you have no one, I mean no one who believes in you.

"I asked you why you didn't ask the SEC to get involved in the discovery process of the DA, and you come back with well written, prefabricated paragraphs from a deceitful document that served the purpose for which it was written, that is, deception of us, shareholders and self serving deals for all who participated in."

Is this a fact or just your opinion.?

Sooner or later lmorovan, your antics of slander are going to come home to roost, imho!

lmorovan:

What?

I believe you are the one know believes.

I have had plenty of help with every turn I have made.

There is no deception, lmorovan, except you.

What have you done for the shareholders? NADDA!

We all know that, you cannot get one person to help you go get the boys. Why, because not one person believes a word you say. Not the court in Austin, not the Judge, not the SEC, not one attorney. No one.

Why did you erase my post? Did you feel little upid because I provided you with the proof from your web site?

"10. Confirmatory Discovery. The individual defendants and Loch Harris will provide forthwith to plaintiffs' counsel, subject to an appropriate confidentiality agreement and redaction of portions that are confidential under attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine, the following documents and information: minutes of all meetings, consents in lieu of meetings, and notices of all meetings scheduled or held from January 1, 1997 through the present; articles, bylaws and all amendments thereto; and all stock ledgers. Plaintiffs' counsel will destroy or return all such material promptly after the Effective Date and, promptly thereafter, certify to all defendants' counsel that this step is done. If plaintiffs' counsel believe in good faith that such information is materially different from representations made to plaintiffs or their counsel during the course of negotiating this settlement, plaintiffs' counsel may request nonbinding mediation to recommend modifications without nullifying the settlement. Expenses of such mediation will be borne by plaintiffs' counsel."

There the proof is again.

Get someone to explain it to you.

Crow3:

Well, it is REAL obvious that your science expert, diddy, will never be able to fill in the blanks.

Maybe this will help both of you:

"System and methods for detection and identification of chemical substances


[0064] When evaluating a mixture of substances, for example, a pill cup with multiple medications, the mixture can be analyzed by deconvolving the spectra of the mixture into a variety of subsets. The subsets may include (1) component or individual drug signatures and/or (2) compounded spectra (of several drugs). Thereafter, the invention can determine whether the spectra of a component subset match the spectra of a known interacting drug combination."

Now, talk about some easy reading.

Your welcome, I did the work for you two little boys.

lmorovan:

You say that because you are clueless as to the facts that you have on your web site.

You have done not one thing to help one shareholder get one share he or she deserves.

Not one thing.

You have not even helped yourself go after the "millions" you claim the boys made.

Why?

You sold yourself out.

lmorovan:

DAH, !@#$%^&*())(*&^R@!#$%^&*())(*&^%$,

Are you saying the SEC would have handed over all of there facts? Is that what you are saying?

Go to bed, you need rest. What little sanity you might have is gone already. Your day is done, get some sleep.

Ask yourself why the SEC has not filed against Loch, Baker, or Boone.

Why do you think so?

Bye

lmorovan:

EXACTLY!!!

Now why did none of that happen? Read your web page, the answers are all there with cases identified!

Read the final documents lmorovan, the answers are there for you to read.

Now, do you have that DA where they demanded the SEC get involved?

LOL

Of course not would be the answer.


Poor poor you.

rottenapple:

Did you lie or can you please answer: "Could you please provide the post where I said the SEC would release the info.

Thank you in advance

lmorovan:

A better question is why did you not?

Can you check on the last DA filed by anyone who demanded the SEC involvement?

Thank you in advance.

Crow3:

Why do you say the SEC allowed CDEX to go public?

Why do you say that the SEC has allowed Dr. Poteet to lay claim as the Tech inventor?

lmorovan:

Absolutely not!

PLEASE go read your web page, my gosh lmorovan, there were cases sighted that explained the exact reasons why the case went as it did.

Do you remember our demands ever asking for rb baker to give up shares? No would be the correct answer. Did he, yes would be the correct answer.

d4diddy, rottenapple, crow,

Is post 7891 to tough to understand?

rottenapple:

Lets do as diddy says, lets put something up that means a great deal to us all. And quit the games, lets get down to business.

You know, kinda like when some sa in a bar pops off and says, Pittsburgh will win by 14 points, and someone says, you want to wager. Now, do you boys want to back up your beliefs the letters don't exist, or do you want to keep playing games?

And lets focus directly on two exact points.

1) Are there letters to the SEC from Dr. Poteet claiming false info from blair.

2) Is there a letter that the Sec has where Dr. Poteet tells the newspaper the article has false information in it.

Well, little boys, what say you.

d4diddy:

Fill in the blanks diddy, once you have, you have your answers.

Rottenapple:

I believe for a FACT that the letter(s) are in the SEC and Ag hands.

WHY WHY WHY WHY do I believe that!!!!!!!!!!!!


LOL

In order to be better,
There must be letter.
Cause to be trading,
Has caused much hating!