Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
YAK, the $1.78 Million FINRA AWARD has not yet
been added to the balance sheet. Don't forget,
the AWARD is growing at 6% APR since 2007!
Stock-Based Compensation
A Company may adopt a Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” ("SFAS No.123"), which establishes a fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. The provisions of SFAS No. 123 allow companies to either expense the estimated fair value of stock options or to continue to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", but to disclose the pro forma effect on net loss and net loss per share had the fair value of the stock options been exercised. The Company has elected to continue to account for stock-based compensation plans utilizing the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair market price of the Company's common stock at the date of the grant above the amount an employee must pay to acquire the common stock.
RED STOP SIGN ON OTC MARKETS IS GONE!
Notice the new alias Fatnhappy3, born today 12/11/11.
He should be tossed by tomorrow for violating
Texas Spoofing Statutes passed in Sept 1, 2011.
Ya know, from 2003 - 2011 BioTech was scrutinized
by the SEC, FINRA, FBI, DOJ, FDA, IRS and Nevada and
Texas Securities Commissions.
The Nevada DOJ-US Attorney General
in the Indictment of TEN (10) persons said it best:
Out of all the scams by those indicted, BioTech
Medics was the ONLY company with proven assets,
verifiable products and reputable officers and
directors which still operates today.
ALL THE REST ARE HISTORY AND OUT OF BUSINESS!
BIOTECH MEDICS INC CELEBRATES ITS 14TH YEAR
IN BUSINESS ON DECEMBER 27, 2011. NONE OF
EDWARDS SCAMS LASTED THAT LONG!
There are over 50,000 pages of evidence.
NONE OF THE 50,000 PAGES IMPLICATE ANY OF THE
OFFICERS AND/OR DIRECTORS OF BIOTECH MEDICS
FROM DECEMBER 7, 2004 THROUGH TODAY!
Why is Keith Houser on the SEC, FBI & DOJ-AG
"Victim - witness list"???? If Houser were
under investigation or had a questionable
history, why did the SEC and US-AG use Houser's
sworn testimony to indict 10 people and charge
another 20 persons with civil fraud????
The answer to why Keith Houser is a "victim-
witness" for the SEC & US-DOJ AG is that it
was thoroughly investigated and is recorded
as evidence that NONE of the BioTech officers
nor directors sold ONE (1) share of BioTech
stock from October 1, 2004 through June 1,
2007. This was the time period that Edwards
and his co-conspirators were raping BioTech
of equity funds. So how could BioTech be an
ATM machine for any BioTech officer or director???
Or how could Houser benefit financially if
he did not take any money out of the company
via stock sales?????
The answer is simple: NONE of the officers
or Directors of BioTech including Houser
benefited from the criminal activity of John
Edwards and his indicted and un-indicted
co-conspirators.
It is public record that "Barbara Houser" was
NOT an officer, or director or shareholder of
BioTech Medics, Inc. from December 1, 2004
through September, 2010. So how was she the
"mastermind" of anything????
The SEC in it's civil charges of John Edwards
declared Edwards the "Mastermind".
Wouldn't it make sense one of the un-indicted
co-conspirators made the posts raising this
issue?
An intelligent person might ask questions
regarding these false and disparaging posts,
especially if one un-indicted co-conspirator
is up on other criminal charges right now???
IMHO!!!!!
FULTON, KELLY JOAN VS BARNETT, ADAM
Case Number (LOCAL): 2011-033002-FC-04 Filing Date: 11/02/2011
Case Number (STATE): 132011DR033002A001CH Case Type: REPVIOL
Consolidated Case No: N/A Judicial Section: SD01
Party Code Party Name Atty Bar No Disp Date Disp Code
PE Fulton, Kelly Joan
RE Barnett, Adam Erik
FULTON, KELLY JOAN VS BARNETT, ADAM E
Case Number (LOCAL): 2011-033002-FC-04 Filing Date: 11/02/2011
Case Number (STATE): 132011DR033002A001CH Case Type: REPVIOL
Consolidated Case No: N/A Judicial Section: SD01
Party Code Party Name Atty Bar No Disp Date Disp Code
PE Fulton, Kelly Joan
RE Barnett, Adam Erik
FULTON, KELLY JOAN VS BARNETT, ADAM E
Case Number (LOCAL): 2011-033002-FC-04 Filing Date: 11/02/2011
Case Number (STATE): 132011DR033002A001CH Case Type: REPVIOL
Consolidated Case No: N/A Judicial Section: SD01
Party Code Party Name Atty Bar No Disp Date Disp Code
PE Fulton, Kelly Joan
RE Barnett, Adam Erik
BioTech took their FINRA $1.78 million plus
nearly $300,000 in interest and penalties
to the Nevada Courts to have the FINRA
Judgment confirmed. Don't take my
word for it, it is public record.
BioTech then took the Nevada Court Judgment
and has served FINRA to collect on the
$5 million insurance bond. It takes
time, but so far they are winning!
So is CarmelBeach in jail or disceased?
once again we are told by one who espouses to be a neutritionist,
in addition to being a lawyer, attorney, SEC expert,
etc.
He misquotes stuff without any sources to back
up his misinformation.
Oh the web he weaves to deceive!
Turino's video is a scam. He was in jail.
Look at the props behind him. His affidavit
was not in front of a notary so you have
been scammed again. Oh, it is soooooo
easy for you guys to be conned.
ROTFLOL, AGAIN!
Houser's depositions wer with an SEC Officer
present and a Court reporter.
SEC NAILS PETER L. JENSEN - BASIN WATER
The SEC alleges that former Basin Water chief executive officer Peter L. Jensen and former chief financial officer Thomas C. Tekulve, Jr. improperly recognized revenue to disguise the company’s true financial performance in its 2006 and 2007 quarterly and annual reports. The SEC also alleges that Jensen sold and donated his own Basin Water shares before the company’s true financial condition was revealed, reaping millions of dollars in trading profits and tax benefits. Basin Water built, sold, and leased water treatment systems that cleaned contaminated groundwater.
Carmel Beach is copying and pasting IHUB
posts on Raging Bull. A violation, but who cares!
He claims he knows the definition of "biotechnology".
Well there are numerous definitions. Here's one
that will make him squirm from WORD IQ DEFINITIONS:
One section of biotechnology is the directed use of organisms for the manufacture of organic products (examples include beer, milk-products, and skin)
Now what do you know BioTech Medics has 4 US Patents
for SHBAN which is to be put on the "skin" and its
main ingredients are made from sea weed and sea kelp!
Oooopppps, Carmel has egg on his face...AGAIN!
Hey Jarta:
There's approximately a four year old Illinois case which
involved US Bank and STAMP.
STAMP lost and had to pay. Can you find it?
You seem great to posting cases here on IHUB.
Thanks!
“When we’re talking about small, unprofitable, biotech companies,
I rarely care about quarterly or even annual earnings.
What I care about is that the R&D programs stay on track
and that the…” products ”…will make the company worth
a whole lot more in the future than it is today”.
Quote by Charly Travers, The Motley Fool
Analysis not "astute" but BOGUS!
According to the US DOJ - US Attorney General Las Vegas
John Edwards et al robbed over 10 public companies and
hundreds of thousands of investors over a 10 year period.
Nine of the ten companies are bankrupt and out of business.
Over $258 million investment money lost.
Only ONE (1) "viable" company stands, BMCS!
When the reverse/merger took place in December, 2004
Corbel had $2 million in losses, no income and no
assets. It was trading sub penny. So the
investors funds were worth ZERO.
So which one of the ten companies would you have
wished you made an investment?
That is the proper analysis of the situation.
There is no record of BioTech Medics
hiring Willie W nor Hal E.
Sorry, Panther your "guess"
as always is WRONG!
CDC reports over 22,000 calls to Poison Control Center over
alcohol related poisoning during past three years!
ZERO calls related to povidone-iodine poisoning!
Snopes confirms extreme dangers of alcohol gel ingestion.
DR. Gupta has published articles over the dangers of alcohol
gel ingestion.
Neither should be ingested...however, if you are a parent
of an infant or toddle who accidentally ingested half an
ounce of alcohol gel vs povidone-iodine and the alcohol gel
can be fatal and the povidone-iodine not (based on half an ounce)...which would you rather have accidentally
happen to your child???
I like it better that it shows
your "guesses" are far far far
from reality!
Your reference is to a "hospital grade"
Povidone-Iodine packet. Not the same
thing. Sorry, your "guess" is not
accurate. Start over...trust the
force...do not lean on your own
understanding!
Jarta now claims to be a medical expert...
Oh, the Illinois ARDC is going to love this!
And what court admissible proof do you have
that povidone-iodine cannot be ingested????
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Waiting!
Jarta, Jarta Jarta....
STAMP had failed to maintain a Registered Agent within the
State of NY in violation of NY statutes.
STAMP had failed to maintain offices within the State of
NY.
STAMP was operating out of New Jersey without having filed
as a Foreign company pursuant to NJ statutes.
STAMP was operating WAY outside of the law...illegally.
You are correct, this was not a win against Wells....
but I can assure you if STAMP had prevailed in their Motion
to Dismiss there would be about 50 posts here saying the
Wells case was lost by BioTech.
Just keeping everything in perspective!
Just want everyone to see what nice law abiding people
the STAMP group are (or aren't).
BioTech vs STAMP - Wins over Motion to Dismiss
Yessssssssssssss! Jarta said BMCS could not prevail!
Case No. A-10-608128-B
Biotech Medics Inc, Plaintiff(s) vs. Wells Fargo Bank National Assn, Defendant(s)
03/21/2011 Order Denying
Order Denying Defendant Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss and Granting Plaintiff BioTech Medics, Inc.'s Countermotion for Enlargement of Time to Serve Defendant Securities Transfer Agent Medallion Program Pursuant to NRCP 4(i)
How does one-half of one milligram
povidone-iodine topically become 2 to 3 grams
of iodine (sic) ingested and become poison?
How some lawyers twist truth and remove facts
to try to manipulate the truth
into a lie! EOM-OAO
SEC REPORT ON FAILS TO DELIVER JUST OUT:
BETWEEN FEB 7-15, 2011
55,000 shares failed to deliver
75,000 shares failed to deliver
105,000 shares failed to deliver
270,000 shares failed to deliver
WE SUSPECT THERE WILL BE MORE!
DON'T FORGET THE BIG ONES JAN 10-17, 2010 533,500 (THIS WAS 10X THE
DAILY VOLUME).
ILLEGAL MARKET MANIPULATION IS STILL HAPPENING DESPITE NEW REGS!
WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED??
IODINE is an "essential element" in our diets!
If you do no get enough you get sick and die!
So why is IODINE so important?
Japan may hand out iodine near nuclear plants
By REUTERS 03/12/2011 15:24
Japanese authorities are making preparations to distribute iodine to people living near nuclear power plants affected by Friday's earthquake. Iodine can be used to help protect the body from radioactive exposure.
Alcohol gels cannot help you in this situation!
Think about it!
People who have no interest
really do not need to know! Waste of time!
Betadine has the SAME disclaimers on their USA
web site. Little do you know about FDA
labeling requirements.
Trade secrets are just that and those do NOT
need to be released, etc.
So sorry!
SHBAN Active Ingredient FDA Approved!
Independent verifiable source: FDA
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4184B1_01_01-FDA-Executive%20Summary.pdf
Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Date: September 22, 2005
From: Topical Antiseptic Review Team
[excerpt]
2.3. What active ingredients are used in consumer antiseptics?
Antiseptics are formulated using antimicrobial chemicals known as biocides. Biocide is a general term for a chemical or physical agent that kills all living organisms, both pathogenic and non-pathogenic. Chemical biocides are incorporated into a wide variety of other products in addition to antiseptics, such as surface disinfectants, plastics, fabrics, and paint.
The TFM currently lists only two active ingredients as generally recognized as safe and effective (GRAS/E) for antiseptic and healthcare personnel handwashes: 60-95% alcohol and 5-10% povidone-iodine.
SHBAN for home use contains 5% povidone-iodine as its "active ingredient".
Hospital grade 10% povidone-iodine as its "active ingredient".
What happens when the shareholders sign
a Notarized Power of Attorney to BMCS
to collect on their behalf their losses???
Hmmmmmm????????????????????????
You did no think about those bunches of bananas, did you?????
Still want to give legal advice and not know all the facts?????
Pinksheets were current for 9 months last year
with BMCS makes no difference.
Pinksheets according to their own disclaimer
states:
"information on this company is not to be
used for investment purposes"
SO WHY USE IT??????????????????????
Please sticky where BioTech's lawyer states
there will be plenty of evidence submitted
by the DUE DATE. The DUE DATE had not
taken place as of the hearing. The DUE
DATE has now taken place and BioTech
submitted 1857 new pages of evidence.
Stop misquoting the truth (as always).
Submit where the STAMP attorney apologized
to the Judge. That makes interesting
reading. See there are two sides to
the story.
BioTech submitted 1858 if you count
the first page submitted.
Always twisting the truth.
1857 submitted with the witness list
and other documents in compliance
with the Court's Scheduling Order.
It is all there for all to see!
All public record! Try reading all
of it instead of taking quotes out
of context like always!
BioTech submitted over 1857 pages of evidence.
Some posters always fail to supply the entire
story.
Proof would be nice over hearsay.
The ARDC is the agency of the Supreme Court
of Illinois which investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.
Our principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer's fitness to practice law in Illinois.
If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, we will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges.
The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely).
I called Riskmarkets...they have a software glitch!
It does not allow for days when the stock is not
traded, so it erroneously gives a false high risk
warning. They are working on correcting it, but
don't know when. Their software is designed for
daily trading to calculate risk.
So simple a thing, calling the source and finding
out what the problem is all about.
FYI, NASDAQ is NOT the source of the chart,
Riskmarkets is and NASDAQ totally disclaims
any official labeling of a stock high risk or
low risk. It is all on Riskmarkets.
So NASDAQ is NOT rating BMCS! Ooops another
misinformation.
OTC MARKETS & PINKSHEETS NOT FINRA
MORE FALSE INFORMATION...WHAT A CROCK!
NASDAQ RISK METRICS DISCLAIMER
#
# Disclaimer. THE SERVICE AND ALL OTHER CONTENT, DATA, CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION PROCESSED BY OR TRANSMITTED BY RISK METRICS GROUP ON THE WEB SITE (COLLECTIVELY, THE "RMG CONTENT") ARE PROVIDED BY RISK METRICS GROUP "AS IS." ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO RMG CONTENT (WHETHER OR NOT ALLEGED TO ARISE BY LAW, BY REASON OF CUSTOM OR USAGE IN THE TRADE, OR BY COURSE OF DEALING) ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: (A) THE ACCURACY OF THE RESULTS FROM ANY USE OF THE RMG CONTENT OR INFORMATION DERIVED FROM THE RMG CONTENT; (B) THE MERCHANTABILITY OF THE SERVICE AND RMG CONTENT AND/OR ITS SUITABILITY FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE (INCLUDING INVESTMENT DECISIONS),
WHETHER OR NOT RISKMETRICS GROUP KNOWS OR HAS REASON TO KNOW OR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF ANY SUCH PURPOSE; AND (C) NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRD PARTY INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS IN AND TO THE SERVICE, THE RMG CONTENT AND THE TRADEMARKS CONTAINED ON THE WEB SITE.
RISKMETRICS GROUP ALSO DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES (i) THAT THE CONTENT IS ERROR-FREE AND/OR FREE FROM ANY COMPUTER BUGS, VIRUSES OR DISENABLING CODES.
RISKMETRICS GROUP DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY, INTEGRITY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE SERVICE AND RMG CONTENT,
AND INVESTORS ARE ADVISED NOT TO RELY EXCLUSIVELY UPON THE SERVICE AND RMG CONTENT IN ASSESSING THE DESIRABILITY OF INVESTING IN A PARTICULAR SECURITY.
ALL SERVICE RESULTS ARE CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF HISTORICAL OBSERVATIONS AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON TO PREDICT FUTURE MARKET MOVEMENTS.
PINKSHEETS & OTC MARKET Risk Warning
Why would anyone go to these locations for investor
information?????
Quote:
• The material in this web site is for reference purposes only and is neither an offer nor a solicitation to purchase or sell any security. None of the information provided in this website constitutes a recommendation that any investment is suitable for any person. Persons using this website should consult with their financial advisors before making any investment decision.
• THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS SITE IS ACCURATE OR ERROR FREE. ANY USER OF SUCH INFORMATION EXPRESSLY ASSUMES ALL RISKS FROM USING THE INFORMATION. In particular, Pink OTC Markets does not review, and is not responsible for confirming, the accuracy of issuer documents and information submitted to Pink OTC Markets for inclusion on this site. The issuer and its management are primarily responsible for the accuracy of any information regarding the issuer provided on this site. INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THIS SITE PRIOR TO MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. The information on this site is not intended to be used as the basis for any investment decision.
Alcohol is poisonous.
Ever hear of drunks dying of liver failure from alcoholism?
Alcohol is poisonous to children:
SNOPES.COM VERIFIES CHILD POISONING VIA ALCOHOL HAND SANITIZER!
http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/sanitizer.asp
Ever hear of college guys dying from
acute alcohol poisoning from binge drinking?
Poison Control Center Confirms alcohol gels poisonous to kids
'Ingesting as little as an ounce or two of this product (alcohol gel hand sanitizer) could be fatal to a toddler," says Heidi Kuhl, health educator Central New York Poison Control Center.