working 24/7 for truth and honesty
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Here is Pazdur’s recent paper about crossover:
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(22)00006-0/fulltext
LOL LOL hysterically funny, it is NOT about crossover, in fact he doesnt mention crossovers
thanks I wasnt asking you, I was responding to another poster
who Pazdur????
so why would he not mention any FDA mandate, a very important matter to overlook
so what, did Pazdur say they demanded a crossover, no he did not, further there is a great deal of misunderstanding , the issue isnt that there was a crossover it is how that crossover what handled.as a reminder:
M
say, doesnt dr Bosch work for the company?????
hmmmmm, well first JAMA and any other journal would simply [ront what the authors said, In this case let look at what Dr Bosch said:
sure must be a BO LOL LOL
nah, I have no need to do that. But I do want to thank them for the paper that make no mention of FDA mandating the crossover, OUCH!
go right ahead lol lol
the 73 were paid, simple explanation
seems savvy investors dont believe it was a highly successful trial
I didnt said a word about jama
Yes correct this is social media and their if s lot incorrect . Such as the trial was s success
Perhaps but it appears there was no manipulation in the p2 so I think I would go with that
Guess we better sell before the 29 Th. If ll is speaking then we’ll we know how that goes lol
Probably due to investigators who are well regarded
tell us who they are so we can decide if they are experts
I have explained this previously, but it is important to know that the authors are NOT the peer reviewers
seems it may not be the cure
oh, ok who are they ?
the real doctor is a podiatrist , no thank s
Really life support ? Proof !???
well that highly successful is now seriously in doubt
not sure why the comments about a guy's waistline, hair, push up ability has any relevance to his opinions,,,,,,,,,,,,,, oh wait................never mind LOL LOL
thanks, again, we already know that but thanks anyway
useless info as no one is talking about those "stats: LOL
LOL a podiatrist, nuff said thanks
LOL wow a podiatrist complains to the SEC about an oncology treatment, I am sure the SEC will immediately jump to action LOL
hmmm that would seem to be faulty statistics (seems to be a trend with nwbo), There are about 330 million people in the US and a couple of hundred dont buy stat, LOL LOL
AF may be a gnat but he sure does get people excited LOL LOL
nope i nailed it
It is interesting how we get these reports like this " we heard this" and that but never any actual names etc LOL LOL
of course I am correct
what mistake? of course I am correct
But Merck is not a sponsor
I haven’t seen anything the sec would find remotely interesting . Lol lol
Yes that is arguable for sure lol lol
Agreed they will ignore stuff like approve this crappy drug
the company would do well to hire oncologists rather than calvary, Oncologists that would help them understand how to run clinical trials