Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I trace it back to short sellers. Stock was on a steady incline right before the squeeze and then in a rush to drive the price back down, a smear campaign. If it wasn't for you and your kind the stock would still be on a steady upward incline. This stock will continue to grow so have your fun trying to manipulate for now but you can't hold back the inevitable.
I concur. I don't believe this is the proper forum to be promoting one's own private business interests.
No issue just wanted to share. PR released on Newswire was sufficient.
I don't interpret this as your regular dillution where the shares are being dumped on the open market. These shares are held privately and not even allowed to be traded for a specific amount of time, or unless they are properlly registered according to the Secutiry Exchange Act. So basically there are 1M plus shares being held privately so alone, the transaction shouldn't negatively affect share price as would a typical dillution. Am I reading this correctly?
My email from Skymark concerning this most recent PR does not have the disclaimer stating the information cannot be redistributed without the consent of Skymark as did their last news release. Am I allowed to repost?
I wonder how this PR will be interpreted? It can be spun either way. I view it as a positive that a a pair of private purchasers were willing to pay $1.09 a share to the tune of $1.2 million. Also, PR states "none of them may be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act." meaning that they can't be dumped without due process and proper registration under the Securities Act so it's unlikely we will see them unloaded aftecting the float.
One question I have is could this affect TSHO's ability to uplist considering the transaction was not registered under the applicable Securities Act?
Whom ever the private purchaser of the mil + shares must have confidence in the $1.09 per share price they paid.
I'm okay with some slight dillution here as long as it's going to fund the expansion of commercials being aired.
Long and strong.
Even at .68 I was still over 100% gain on my initial investment. I'm sure we will be getting back to back PRs in the near term.
Bashers are back on Yahoo. I'm not even going to waste my time there anymore. I don't think the board has very many followers anyway.
Here was my response:
Hahahaa that's the biggest load of crap I think I have ever heard! You're hilarious! BTW I'm not an owner of Skymark but I wish I was. I work in Iraq on a defense contract but thanks for propping me up like that. Here's the buyins.com report on the "Short Attack":
http://www.buyins.com/reports/tsho3-1-10...
This is clearly not made up. The rest of your post is pure pish as well. I'm not even going to respond any further. Read the report.
Yeah that's my handle on the yahoo board. What a load of crap! Hilarious none the less.
Agreed. I apoligize if you took offence to my tone in the post as that was not my intention.
And keep in mind that all it's going to take is one solid PR if the test run was good to have these parasites running for the hills.
Preferably I would like to see these PRs rolled out one after the other in this order to blow them out of the water:
1 Legal team response
2 Test results and sales projections
3 Product to follow Ultimate Squeegie
Once that happens then our support level could double.
What are you talking about? The overall trend is up, with a single interuption that shot the price up due to shorts having to cover. The new support levels are higher then they were before the spike? We're all on standby awaiting the following:
-Outcome of test launch
-Financial data and projections based on test lanch
-Product to follow Ultimate Squeegie
$.80 to $1.00 is to be expected until some data is released. I would hate for the stock price to be overly optimistic and then get lack-luster test results.
Again, I'm invested long term and am looking 6 month, 1 year and beyond and am perfectly content allowing this to mature at the pace TSHO has set.
We can argue this all day long but the numbers will not lie. TSHO has one motive, to generate capital through sales. You think a company would contract through Cesari Direct, Datapak, LiveOps and Forward Information Technologies to build the facade of being a profit generating company for the sole purpose of jacking the stock price up and leaving a bunch of bag holders? Sure the stock price may become overvalued at times but the overall trend is up and in my estimation will continue to go up 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and beyond. If you wanted to play the down turns then you would be in favor of another short squeeze, no?
Also, just because James has brought sound analysis and arguments to the forum, previously, doesn't mean it is his responibility as a fellow share holder to continue to do so day in and day out, regurgitating the same information over and over, to quell investor doubt when nothing has changed with the company, fundemantally.
Sorry shouldn't have brought this clown up in conversation again. He's purely a ring leader for the shorting effort and nothing more. He got his pee pee hurt shorting TSHO and played part in the smear campaign. He's posted on this forum several times but doesn't stick around to provide sound arguments to his short postion. His investment track record was created shorting pinks purely on the basis that they were pay promoted in one way or another. Due to the fact that TSHO paid Skymark as a conduit for PR he associated it with all other paid promo hype type stocks and either lost his ass or lost his paid subscribers money and either organized or played part in organizing a smear campaign that ran TSHO's share price down after the last short squeeze.
Don't forge me! I'm associated too! Haven't paid for my subscription yet but I'm loosly affiliated! lol
A pinksheet actually executing, not diluting stock and generating revenues in the near, mid and long term is unfathomable for a short holder with a vendetta. It's hardly worth your breath trying to argue with someone so focused on the near term constraints that shorting creates because all of their gains must be made before the margin call. Investors who have a clue about TSHO and what the future holds relax, put their feet up and enjoy a JW Blue Label on the rocks while these clowns scramble to try and drive price down before the inevitable takes place. This intraday volitility means nothing to those who have reviewed the business plan, seen the potential and are willing to put up with a little volitility until TSHO releases some preliminary numbers in reference to the trial run. Everyone thinks this stock is hinging on the success of a simple squeegie with a pad. If they would have done their research they would know the squeegie is just the product used during the test run trials for the purpose of fine tuning their marketting, sales and distribution network. Good luck SHORTS! You'll need it if your blindly following Timothy Sykes and his goons.
He doesn't really actively post but more or less conducts "drive by" postings. I'm sure he is attracted to the attention created after stirring the pot. After watching those youtube clips I'm in awe that people pay the premium subscription fee for this juvenille's "Pennystocking Pro" service. As I stated on the Yahoo TSHO board, I hope that subscription comes with a free pair of clown shoes!
His handle on Myspace is 'RichAssJew' if anyone is interested in becoming pals. Maybe he could use a friend or two?
Well I do what I can. One question, if you've never traded TSHO then why are you so intent on driving the price down? Did you recomend it as part of your premium subscription service?
Notice that on the front page of Tim's website http://www.timothysykes.com/ there is a table labeled "Tim's latest Trades". I wonder why he doesn't post how much money he lost shorting TSHO there? Too funny! I hope he bet the farm on shorting TSHO and wiped out his entire account.
I'm not a basher. I'm a bag holder and forced to hold onto these shares hoping the new CEO can turn things around.
Yes this is good for everbody, including Adam. Just think, now he can persue his true calling in life, Mafia Wars, without all these nonesense distractions and angry shareholder phone calls associated with running a potential multi-million dollar "AS SEEN ON TV" publicly traded company into the dirt.
Kudos to Adam! I wish you the best in all your Mafia Wars quests. Maybe someday if you flip enough burgers you might be able to afford an XBOX.
Aim high in life Adam! Don't ever let anyone tell you that you can't achieve your dream (an XBOX)!
I just posted the following on the Yahoo TSHO message board. Be sure to rate it!
---------
Timothy Sykes and his connections at TheStreetSweeper.org could find themselves in hot water
So I was wondering why Timothy Sykes and his followers hell bent on driving TSHO's price down suddenly show up on IHUB and Yahoo boards the day TSHO makes a run to start bashing the stock and touting Syke's impecable track record of profiting from shorting penny stocks based on a method of shorting positions after a run due to a paid promotional campaign or "pump". Syke's postings seemed a bit desperate to me for someone with such a highly developed process for making money. Syke's and his TSHO bashing cronies sure weren't here to offer sound advice complete with sources and were quite condescending in their tone as well which probably did more to discredit Skykes than it did shake investor confidence. It's one thing to create panic and play the phsycological approach to shake the tree as we see it all the time but when these guys hit a brick wall and started flinging personal attacks such as "morons", "uneducated TSHO investors", etc. in frustration, it was a clear sign of desperation. My observation corroberates with Skymark's response to the StreetSweeper article that Tim, through his dedicated team of followers and contacts at TheStreetSweeper.org, is scrambling to save face and subsriber confidence in his "Pennystocking" short sale pick service through intitating a smear campagian on Skymark and TSHO in order to drive TSHO's share price down. First this and then the new SEC rules expanding restirictions on shorting stocks and soon to be a legal team on his trail, this guy is having a bad week! If I was a subscriber of Sykes's service, which can run upwards of $1,400 a month, I would be seriously considering a cancelation of service at this point. Skymark, who's subscriber base was built on a stellar track record of promoting sound small cap stocks with solid fundamentals and business plans creates a serious threat to the Sykes's questionable investment strategy.
Yeah I was wondering why Timothy Sykes just showed up on our board one day and started bashing stock and touting his impecable track record. Seemed a bit desperate to me for someone with such an highly developed process for making money. He sure wasn't here to offer advice and was quite condescending in his tone as well. It's one thing to create panick and play the phsycological approach to shake the tree as we see it all the time but when these guys hit a brick wall they started flinging personal attacks such as "morons", "uneducated TSHO investors", etc. which was also a clear sign of desperation. My observation corroberates with Skymarks original response that Tim is scrambling save face and subscriber confidence. Poor little Timmay got all jacked up by a real company with real revenues on the horizon... First this and then the new SEC rules on shorting stocks and soon to be a legal team onhis trail. This guy is having a bad week!
Yeah like you stated in your last post on BLAP as well. Are you just making the rounds and pasting pre-canned messages? At least bring something with some substance to the table and don't just copy and paste old messages over and over. You make it too easy to discredit yourself.
I'm pretty sure Sykes is confusing companies that Skymark initiated research with companies that have actually been promoted by Symark.
Anyhow, that's great that Sykes has such a wonderfull track record.
I might have signed up for his service if it wasn't for the fact that he spouts off half caulked on the forums and really missed it with his thorough and in-depth TSHO and Skymark analysis.
Daisy,
In earlier posts I had mentioned the fact that although I thought the Ulti Squeege was a good product, I didn't think that it was thier golden goose. I suspect that they rolled the Ultimate Squeegie out first to test thier call processing, shipping, marketting, warehousing,etc., elements to work out any kinks as De Beers has outsourced all of these entities. He's paid this firm good money to handle all of these calls and if they aren't delivering then he needs to take prompt action to rectify the situation. I don't think this reflects as negatively on TSHO management as it does the company paid to provide these services.
Ben
Let's send some to T Sykes!
Hahaa! I had some shirts made through CustomInk.com. They're pretty good. I Like the T-Shirt design interface offered through the site.
Just Checking in on last day of my vacation!
Still long and holding strong!
What a ride! I'm not to concerned about the current drop just wish I had some funds on hand to buy more.
Looking forward to the coming weeks and subsequent financial report.
Cheers from Portland, OR
Ben
Wouldn't that hurt Timothy Skykes's reputaion / performance record if he's telling his subscribers to short TSHO simply because it had a run after SKYMARK /ESR promotion and runs into a brick wall with the float on lockdown like so?
Just sayin...
He might want to do some futher research before tagging SKYMARK / ESR recomendations as a typical paid pump scheme.
I know there are very few panick sellers left on this board but if there are, then this video clip is for you:
Hahaa Nice one! That's what we need to do to all these panick sellers!
Well said James!
Goodnight folks! Entertaining Board today! This is better than stand up comedy!
Oh yes indeed!
Five days in Vegas was almost too much! Stayed at a penthouse at the Palms Place just off the strip. What an experience. I went to a UFC fight, hit every club and afterparty on the strip and basically made up for lost time taking my little brother along as my 'wingman'. Anyway I'm in SLC just now and driving back tomorrow to see my new contact before flying to Portland and then back to Kuwait / Baghdad later this week.
Ouch! Why would you resorting to name calling? I thought we were having a constructive debate here. I'm trying to hash this out and get to the verifyable facts like everyone else. I don't consider myself a moron but then again I could be mistaken. If you have some specific evidence of me being a moron or acting in a moronic manner then please share. If I have my facts wrong then please offer evidence that proves the contrary. Even if I have certain facts wrong I don't think that alone constitutes moronism but please enlighten me as to your thought process of how you came to the conclusion that I was a moron as I would really like to know.
To address your initial question before you pegged me as a 'Moron':
Private equity / hedge funds haven't invested in this company because it has been under the radar up until the point it decided to roll out it's business plan and simultaneously purchase coverage through SKYMARK / ESR. Only after the business plan passed SKYMARK / ESR's screening were we made aware of the business plan / model and recomnedation, before private equity / hedge funds and other institutional investors had the chance. Typically these private equity / hedge funds and other institutional investors wont even consider a stock until it's passed the $1.00 range. I believe SKYMARK / ESR began their recomendation somewhere aroung the .16 cent range (correct me if I'm wrong team).
Any other questions or personal attacks?
Actually I did write a several hundred line response and I am quite irritated that I lost it all. After spending a couple hours trying to address your concerns I gave up because I realized that I could provide all the facts necessary and you would still be doing what you are doing... Bashing.
Startup or not, the current business model is poised to launch.
Ultamate squeegie is one of many products. Do you really think they are going to use their golden goose as thier initial product? I doubt it. They are going to use a product that they know has at least some customer appeal to test their marketting and sales engine in order to work out any kinks. Once the kinks are worked out then you will see them pull out the real arsenal. Ultamate Squeegie and the exclusivity of rights of the product is a moot point considering it's purpose.
Industry leaders include Cesari Direct for one. More to follow as soon as I pull up the previuous post as their is a whole arsenal of sub contracted organizations involved, all of which are being payed high sums of money and or shares. As a matter of fact why don't you do the research? It would behoove you to do so before running a smear campaign such as the one you are running. Start from post #1 and read through the entire thread and then get back with me.
JIM01 don't let him bait you. All of these arguments are frivolous.
If we address them 1 by 1 it's actually quite commical.
I'll start with the first five as I'm short on time. Someone else pick up where I left off.
1/ Company has NO cash.
- We are investing in a startup company. The point here is that we see potential in the business plan and anticipate that when it is executed that the company will make money. Apparently, several sub-contracted firms who are industry leaders in their respective fields also agree that this business plan will succeed.
2/ Company has NO inventory.
- TSHO sub-contracts all business sub-entities including marketting, distribution, warehouseing, call-centers, etc. etc. etc. so why would he have 50,000,000 squegies in his garage?
3/ Company has practically NO revenues.
- See argument #1. Moot point.
4/ Company has no product - check out their old website, www.ontvco.com
- Company has 7 products poised for release in the near to mid term. Three of which will be released this year. Check out their new website at: http://www.tsho.com/
5/ The Company is paying for PR (through various pump & dump websites and paid spam) from common stock.
- The comapny is paying for coverage by Skymark and ESR whom both have a reputation on the line as they are not fly by night companies. SKYMARK and ESR's customer base was developed through disclosing their performace record with stock picks. Their reputation and customer base is at stake if they make a bad pick.
2009, TRADEFOREVER, JIM01, MAONE, one of you guys pick up where I left off.
I actually wrote a several hundred line response to this post but I accidentally hit a hyperlink with the mouse and when I returned to page I had lost it.