Now assume none of it is true or assume we cannot prove it. That goes both ways depending how you want to paint the picture.

Why would the November 15th court date get moved if the change of venue is denied. That does not make any sense. The state case (if lost) does not award Drago the patents. CLYW is taking him to court to try and remove him from the company, he is not taking CLYW to court to claim ownership of the patents. Worst case is we have to continue to put up with him from now on and pay him money he has not earnd.

I have read most of your post and at times they are quite entertaining but in reality I have to agree with most on here that you are in too deep and are trying to get the price down to help eliminate bad judgement on your part for selling too soon. It is obvious you are interested in CLYW and think it will eventually make money or you would not waist your time keeping up with what is going on. Keep trying to get the price down and maybe more people will buy more shares who knows? Good Luck.

I know it is not much but I do like seeing the green at the top of the page.

So you are saying that if we lose against Drago we will still be able to make deals with infringers of the patent? Seriously? Wow that is the first time that someone has actually said you do not have to own the patent to make money off it. And if you are saying we can make deals now but that may change if we lose the state case with Drago then you are reassuring what I have said about Tmob not wanting to make a deal with CLYW since they do not know who controls the pantent and for how long.

Cabel: No it does not stop you from making money on the patent however I am pretty sure a multi billion dollar company is smart enough to wait it out....they are not losing any money now nor will they in the future just because CLYW is in a dispute with Drago....Try again to make it make sense but you will end up with the same answer.

Thanks for finally agreeing with me ;)

Why do you think Tmob will sign a deal with CLYW and we/they do not know who controls the patent until after the state case? Would you buy a car from someone, give them the money, and them not have the title to the car? Why would Tmob sign a deal with CLYW if there is a chance that Drago will end up with the patent?

If the state case is awarded the change of venue and the court date is delayed, then you can forget about any short term settlement with Tmob. Tmob can easily wait till the 2011 court date and then argue the fact that CLYW does not have control over the patent so why would they be forced to pay any settlement. You can analize until you are blue in the face but it will not change the facts.

Someone commented on a previous post of mine and asked what technology is out there that could replace the 923 patent??? Are you kidding me? Do you think that "WOW" we discovered a seamless switching technology and we do not have to do anything else? Things are apparently moving faster than you so please try to keep up.

And if in the end the only thing both parties have is an empty bottle while we watch the new technology make the $$, then what do we have other than someones satisfied ego? CLYW does not have the money to continue to stay in court. If they were selling tug boats on the river all ClYW could do is run up and down the shoreline saying "ain't that cheap".......We have no money. Settle, sign the deal with Tmob and let's move on.

So I am guessing they (the courts) will be moving the State case from November 15, 2010 to April 15, 2011 which will in turn extend the Tmob case. I know some of you are for taking this all the way to the end but unfortunately that may not be the best plan. With the tech industry moving forward everyday, how long before ASNAP is out dated and new technology has taken its place. CLYW patented this technology before anyone was using it....do you honestly think someone else is not already working on something that is better? When a new technology does come out and we are still in court with Daic because we wanted to flex our muscle and show him....well we really showed him huh!!!

I have been a part of this stock since 2003 and would love to see this thing go to the next level, but it may never make it as long as we continue to stay in court fighting an elusive ghost.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion....even if it is wrong. Drago will walk away with his shares and not pay CLYW a penny. The only thing that CLYW will gain is restricting him from the day to day operations of CLYW. Save this post and reply to it when the final judgement from the courts is made.............

I have been saying it all along. Daic is not going to walk away empty handed and the sooner Dave realizes that then the sooner we can settle with him and move forward with Tmob.

Excellent post Stan.

CLYW Traded 456,000 shares.

KMFA YOU SMF

I agree 100%.

If Williamson is removed as Diacs attorney then Diac will have at least 90 to 120 days to get his new attorney up to date on what is going on. CLYW does not have the money to string this out any longer. They need to settle with Drago and TMOB and the sooner the better. Dave, sign the freakin agreement and lets move on to the next infringement case. Have you heard the phrase "You can't see the forest for the trees"? You are not seeing the big picture, stop with the personal grudge you have with Drago and move this company forward. If we act quick enough we would be able to make our announcemet with TMOB around the same time Microsoft takes off with their new phone....what a perfect time to bring light to CLYW.

It is only a 90 day stay. It did not say they will have a deal completed in 90 days or less. If they cannot come to an agreement then the court day would be moved from December 09 to how ever many days are used up until the court steps back in. I would love to see Drago be strung up by his nut sack but that may not happen soon enough to save the deal with Tmob. I hope I am wrong about all of this and everything continues on the course and we get control over the patent and a deal with Tmob. This is my second post today so you will not hear from me till tomorrow.

This is not good. CLYW does not have good history with being able to keep an attorney for an extended amount of time. (NO MONEY)If this gets moved to the 151st court then it will extend the court dates past November 15th. I want Drago gone as well but with that I do not want to risk my investment in this company to do it. Dave needs to make sure he keeps his personal feelings out of this and do what is best for the shareholders. Am I missing something? We Do Not Have Any Money to pay attorney fees...how can we afford to extend this any longer. I also agree that TMob will not get in bed with us until it is resolved. Stay the course we are almost there......

Damn it!!!!!!

Ref.....I do not see you bragging about buying more shares at these prices? What happened to you and Highrider buying up the shares at such a great price?

Excellent Post. Everyone has an opinion and you should stand behind it no matter what others think. I have had CLYW since 2003 and agree with your analysis. If everyone thinks that you are wrong about it going down and are confident in it staying at the current levels but continue to say they would add more at .05 then why not add more at the current levels? Again, do not let a few (3) dictate your post.

And by the way I am not allowed to post more than two per day....the moderators have restricted my opinion.

Ok..the Admin has restricted my post at the request of the moderators....

Calypso Wireless Satellite Patent infringement:


Leslie Horn - PC Magazine Leslie Horn - Pc Magazine – Thu Sep 23, 10:30 am ET
JetBlue will bring advanced Wi-Fi to all 160 of its aircraft by late 2012, the company announced Thursday. The airline is partnering with California-based telecommunications company ViaStat to provide satellite broadband and TV service on its entire fleet.

"Rather than invest in current technology, designed to transmit broadcast video and audio, we elected to partner with ViaStat to create broadband functionality worthy of today's interactive personal technology needs," JetBlue chief executive Dave Barger said in a statement.

ViaSat will provide JetBlue with its Ka-band antenna components and SurfBeam 2 modems for use on the airline's EMBRAER E190 and Airbus A320 planes, as well as bandwidth services and satellites. Jetblue subsidiary LiveTV will handle the integration of ViaSat technology onto JetBlue planes and provide Wi-Fi service.

The Federal Aviation Association must test the service before its implementation. ViaSat and LiveTV also intend to partner and bring this technology to other airlines.

JetBlue first offered Wi-Fi service in December 2007 on its Airbus A320 with LiveTV, and Yahoo and Research in Motion as partners.

According to a July report from Computerworld, one-third of domestic planes already offer Internet access. JetBlue competitors AirTran and Virgin Atlantic have it and Delta and Southwest plan to implement the feature on all of their planes by the time JetBlue begins installation.

I agree that some will have the perception that the risk is too high at some point...but that risk will not exist when the settlement between Calypso Wireless and T-Mobile have a signed agreement, at that point we will have new level investors interested in the risk/reward with Calypso Wireless Inc.

Note: In an effort to utilize search engines, it may not be a bad idea to spell out Calypso Wireless for the next few weeks as new people try to find information about the company.

Surely .156 is not the top with this kind of news! We know that Daic has no chance in the state case and it is just a matter of time for the settlement with Tmob. It is apparent that there is not enough talk on the street at this point. Just the announcement of the "motion" shows that both Tmob and CLYW are ready to move this thing to the next level. If there was not an agreement or $$ amount discussed (that both parties agree on) then they would not stay the case for 90 days. So unless Daic has a smoking gun.....which he does not, then lets move this to the next level. If ClYW reached .50 in 2007 on a wing and a prayer then .50 on the settlement discussion news should be a drop in the bucket.

JMHO

Amen. I do not think the short sellers see the significance of the motion (if they even know about it). This admits they (TMOB)know they will not win in court and they are willing to settle once the state case is resolved.

Don't forget, this is not just a US patent agreement, this deal will cover over seas patent=$$$$$$$.

I agree, not sure why it has not shot up? We know it is an easy win over DD in the state case. If anyone is planning on getting in, you may want to do it today.

If Turini is not removed then Dave and the BOD are not doing their job.....

Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Turrini agreed “not to act in any way that would be detrimental to Calypso and constitute a conflict of interest.”


11. In addition, pursuant to the Employment Agreement, Turrini was prohibited from entering into any Stock Grants without the approval of the Board of Directors.


12. Notwithstanding the terms of his Employment Agreement, on or about May 15, 2007, without Board authorization or knowledge, Turrini , on behalf of Calypso, entered into a Patent Purchase Agreement with Voice to Phone (the “Patent Agreement”).


13. Brennan executed the Patent Agreement on behalf of Voice to Phone. Pursuant to the Patent Agreement, Voice to Phone agreed to assign to Calypso its right, title and interest in four patents specified therein (the “Patents”), and Calypso agreed to pay for the Patents by issuing to Voice to Phone 5,000,000 free trading S-8 shares of Calypso stock, 4,000,000 of which were to be delivered within fifteen days of the date of the Patent Agreement, and 1,000,000 of which were to be delivered on or before November 1, 2007.


14. Calypso’s Board never authorized Turrini to enter into the Patent Agreement, and had no knowledge that he had done so.


15. Upon information and belief, Turrini and Brennan are the controlling shareholders and alter egos of Voice to Phone. Upon information and belief, Turrini organized Voice to Phone with the intent and purpose of diverting assets and corporate opportunities of Calypso to Voice to Phone and Turrini and Brennan.


20. On August 31, 2007, in furtherance of the Patent Agreement, Turrini, without Board authorization, and without the knowledge of the Board, improperly authorized and directed Calypso’s transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company to issue 1,200,000 of the free trading shares to Baxter Technologies PTE LTD (“Baxter Technologies”), and the other 2,800,000 free trading shares to Voice to Phone. (the “Shares”).

The Team

Baxtech Inc.

John F. Baxter Jr. (Jack)
Founder
jack@baxtech.com
Cristian C. Turrini
Chief Executive Officer USA
ccturrini@baxtech.com
Kulen Suntharalingam
Chief Executive Officer Asia
k.suntharalingam@baxtech.com


Baxtech Inc.
North America Licensing
info@baxtech.com
Baxtech Ltd.
South America Licensing
info@baxtech.com
Lawrence Lee
Director of finance
lawrence@baxtech.com
Sonny de Graaff
IT Administrator
sonny@baxtech.com
Licensing and legal
IP@baxtech.com

Did you know Turrini was the Corporate attorney for Baxter...this is the company that we supposedly bought patents from but never received the patents. Thank you Turrini. How strange it is that Turrini's brother in law ended up with 2.6 million shares of CLYW without paying a penny. This transaction took place under Turrini's direction. From what I recall Turrini acted as attorney for both parties....can you say conflict of interest?

I challenge anyone on here to show proof. WHAT HAS TURRINI DONE?
How about this....do a conference call with Turrini and Pattin and let's see who is telling the truth. My prediction....Turrini declines while Pattin would be more than happy to do a conference call with Turrini.

Keep the light off Ben.....

As long as you cannot see it, then it did not happen?
Great way to manage your investment.

Turrini did not "Do" anything as far as Acacia is concerned. He was in Florida while Richard was at the office trying to raise money to keep this company going. He did not know what was going on then and he sure as heck does not know what was going on now. The only thing he has done to this point is hold a title. If anyone on here suggest that Turrini is working on deals to further CLYW in business....make sure to ask for proof. He has not brought any money or business into this company and the sooner Dave realizes that, the sooner he can get Turrini off the payroll.

Too funny.

Received several million Free shares.

Richard Pattin has one of the best understandings of what our next step with CLYW is. He is the only person that stepped up in 2008 and took the lead when no one else would. Yes he kept this company afloat without getting paid and then was ousted by people he appointed to the BOD...the main one being DAVE the GTW. Two things Turrini has...Yellow stripe down his back and no Backbone.

I have asked before with no response....What exactly has Turrini done for this company....Be specific.

So if I am John Dalton then I am guessing you are angry with me since I have several Million FREE shares and when the value of CLYW goes to $10 per share then.....well you can do the math.....don't be jealous......Chris?

I savor the day that Richard Pattin gets involved with CLYW again. He is the only one that can lead the company into the future. Hopefully the BOD will wake up and get rid of Turini and put Pattin in.

Not relevant? That why the long winded reply?

Is there any evidence that DD has purchased (invested)any shares of CLYW? Or is it that the only shares he has are the ones stolen from CLYW?

Enough.

The BOD needs to do their job and get this settled with DD. If you have not bought your shares then too bad. I read a post that someone has had their bid in for a couple of weeks and it did not hit......awww so sorry. If you are confident in CLYW then buy at .028 or .029, if not then sell and get out of the way of progress. Everyone has an opinion but that does not improve the position of the company. The BOD are the only ones that have that control.......DO YOUR JOB!!!!!!!!!

This post(from Highrider) should be placed in the top box for easy access of the progress.

Posted by: HighRider Date: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:12:10 AM
In reply to: Deer Slayer 9791 who wrote msg# 35009 Post # of 35562

For those interested here is the Fed Court Schedule for the Calypso/Tmobile case this year.

December 9, 2010 Claim construction hearing 9:00 a.m., Marshall, Texas. Markman Hearing.
November 12, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-5(c)
October 29, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-5(b)
September 23, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-5(a)
September 9, 2010 Discovery deadline-claims construction issues
September 9, 2010 Respond to Amended Pleadings
August 19, 2010 Amend Pleadings
Amend after August 19, 2010)
September 2, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-3
August 6, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-2
July 9, 2010 Comply with P.R. 4-1
June 15, 2010 Comply with P.R. 3-3, 3-4

As you can tell the case will be moving along with requirements to be met each month.

The Dec. 2010 is a Markman Hearing. A Markman hearing is a pretrial hearing in a U.S. District Court during which a judge examines evidence from all parties on the appropriate meanings of relevant key words used in a patent claim, when patent infringement is alleged by a plaintiff. It is also known as a "Claim Construction Hearing".[1]

Holding a Markman hearing in patent infringement cases has been common practice since the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., found that the language of a patent is a matter of law for a judge to decide, not a matter of fact for a jury to decide. In the United States, juries determine facts in many situations,[2] but judges determine matters of law.[3]

Markman hearings are important, since the court determines patent infringement cases by the interpretation of claims. A Markman hearing may encourage settlement, since the judge's claim construction finding can indicate a likely outcome for the patent infringement case as a whole. Markman hearings are before a judge, and generally take place before trial. A Markman hearing may occur before the close of discovery, along with a motion for preliminary injunction, or at the end of discovery, in relation to a motion for summary judgment. A Markman hearing may also be held after the trial begins, but before jury selection.

The evidence considered in a Markman hearing falls into two categories: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic evidence consists of the patent documentation and any prosecution history of the patent. Extrinsic evidence is testimony, expert opinion, or other unwritten sources; extrinsic evidence may not contradict intrinsic evidence.
When the judge sides with CLYW then the trial (by jury Dec. 2011) will pretty much just determine the amount of justification CLYW will receive from Tmob$$$. I am sure that Tmob does not want it to reach the jury. Not saying Tmob will settle right after the Markman hearing but the fat lady will be on her final note. JMHO

Chris, when you say "the thieves are whining" and "the increased volume is from the squeaky wheels" What you are really saying is the BOD bought on news not yet released to the public. Hmmm I call that "insider trading" illegal by SEC regulations. Thanks for pointing that out. This whole time I was wrong about you. You do agree that this BOD is corrupt and doing things illegally.

Any time a significant change takes place (hire new attorney) a public announcement must be made within four (4) days of the event.

It is not a waste of money and it is not because of whining shareholders. The fact is, it is required by the SEC. Now do your job as "Moderator" and stop being opinionated about concerned shareholders.

Refrmaniac....who is the state attorney? Why do we not know? Does the BOD know? Did they hire Markle? You seriously do not know what news the BOD should be announcing?