InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 398
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/2009

Re: None

Friday, 10/22/2010 2:59:09 PM

Friday, October 22, 2010 2:59:09 PM

Post# of 60938
Why do you think Tmob will sign a deal with CLYW and we/they do not know who controls the patent until after the state case? Would you buy a car from someone, give them the money, and them not have the title to the car? Why would Tmob sign a deal with CLYW if there is a chance that Drago will end up with the patent?

If the state case is awarded the change of venue and the court date is delayed, then you can forget about any short term settlement with Tmob. Tmob can easily wait till the 2011 court date and then argue the fact that CLYW does not have control over the patent so why would they be forced to pay any settlement. You can analize until you are blue in the face but it will not change the facts.

Someone commented on a previous post of mine and asked what technology is out there that could replace the 923 patent??? Are you kidding me? Do you think that "WOW" we discovered a seamless switching technology and we do not have to do anything else? Things are apparently moving faster than you so please try to keep up.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.