Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SEC will revoke Webbers scam soon
Licht set up llc to steal the assets of smev
What a hoot
Agreed Snizzle. Licht frenkel spivak are all liars who milked the company.
Thanks Meyer. Provest just doesn't want to believe the facts
licht looks like even more of a scumbag after reading it again. don't forget ella frenkel was lichts wife. illya spivak is lichts brother. alex grichiner is a convicted felon and lichts partner in crime.
details of lichts theft from smev shareholders.
34. The gravamen of the subpoena was that Licht was defrauding State
Farm and hiding his assets and income through Simulated. Licht had maintained that he was not an owner of Simulated’s common stock and was neither an officer nor director of Simulated.
35. Shortly thereafter, based on information and belief, Licht and the rest of the Counterclaim Defendants caused Simulated to borrow $200,000 to pay State Farm in full and final satisfaction of Licht’s $1,000,000 judgment against him. It is believed that this self-dealing transaction was never properly disclosed to the public marketplace.
36. In or about August 2010, the Counterclaim Defendants began their
activity of demanding money for payroll and salaries by sending emails stating that the Defendants need for money was “immediate” and needed money “today.” SEE EXHIBIT “C”
37. Over the course of the next twelve months, the Counterclaim
Defendants became even more demanding that the various defendants in the
Amended Complaint continuously fund Simulated for the purpose of continuing the Counterclaim Defendants’ self-dealing transactions.
45. On or about February 7, 2012, Licht and the Counterclaim Defendants
sent communicated that unless his demands are met, Licht will “set on an
irreversible course.” SEE EXHIBIT “G”
46. On or about February 9, 2012, Licht and the Counterclaim Defendants
demanded $20,000 today (February 9, 2012) otherwise Licht would press the “Send” button on his defamatory and tortious emails and/or communication with various third parties and the Securities and Exchange Commission. SEE EXHIBIT “H”
47. On or about February 9, 2012, Licht sent his defamatory and tortious
email to various third parties. SEE EXHIBIT “I”
48. On or about February 17, 2012, Licht sent an email concocting a plan
for Licht to be given all of the assets of Simulated (even though these assets have a UCC1 lien on them) and the investors would take the “shell” of the public vehicle leaving all investors and Simulated shareholders with nothing. SEE EXHIBIT “J”
49. In or about March 2012, Licht and the Counterclaim Defendants
effected communications, only after their extortion attempts was rebuked, with the SEC indicating to the SEC that the various defendants in Licht’s Amended Complaint were the persons responsible for the aforementioned subpoena and Licht lived up to his threat of his “irreversible course.”
Iran info
142. Simulated’s internal accounting and paperwork listed the Iranian
transactions as “Iran,” “Iran Septa Co,” or “I. Septa.”
143. Simulated’s internal records show that the Counterclaim Defendant’s
smuggled the goods through Sea Saba General Trading L.L.C, P.O. Box 16682,
Deira, Dubai, U.A.E. (“Sea Saba”) for the ultimate destination of Iran.
144. On April 12, 2010, Sea Saba effected a wire transfer of $19,975.00 to
Simulated on behalf of Iran Septa Co. See EXHIBIT “K”
145. On July 4, 2010, ironically one of the most important dates in the
United States history, Sea Saba effected a wire transfer of $99,025.00 to Simulated
on behalf of Iran Septa Co. See Exhibit “K”
146. On each of the shipments and bills of lading, the Counterclaim
Defendants falsified documents and concealed from the United States government
the true nature and destination of their shipments.
152. The ITR prohibited, among other things, the export, reexport, sale, or
supply, directly or indirectly, of any goods, technology, or services from the
United States or by a United States person, wherever located, to Iran or the
Government of Iran, without prior authorization or license from the United States
Department of the Treasury, through the Office of Foreign Assets Control, located
in the District of Columbia. These regulations further prohibited any transactions
that evaded or avoided or had the purpose of evading or avoiding any of the
prohibitions contained in the ITR, including the unauthorized exportation of goods
from the United States to a third country if the goods were intended or destined for
Iran.
153. The Executive Orders and the ITR were in effect at all times material.
G. The Iranian Overt Acts
154. The Counterclaim Defendants did knowingly and willfully conspire,
combine, confederate, and agree together and with others known and unknown, to
defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the
lawful function of the United States in administering its export laws and
regulations by exporting goods from Simulated to Iran by deceit, craft, trickery,
and dishonest means.
155. The object of the conspiracy was for the Counterclaim Defendants to
obtain money and property by exporting and causing to be exported goods in
violation of United States law.
156. The Counterclaim Defendants would and did use the following
manner and means, among others, to accomplish the object of the conspiracy.
a. It was a part of the conspiracy that Counterclaim Defendants,
structured themselves as an organized criminal group in the following ways:
i. Iran Septa Co Ltd. in Iran was the purchaser of the goods
who directed Licht to sell the goods to an entity established in Dubai.
ii. Because Iran Septa Co Ltd. was unable to purchase the
goods directly from the United States, Sea Saba purchased the goods
for Iran Septa Co Ltd. from the United States.
iii. Licht served as a buffer between Sea Saba and Iran Septa
Co Ltd.
iv. Sea Saba had responsibility for procuring the goods from
Simulated in the United States and exporting the goods to Iran.
v. The Counterclaim Defendants arranged with Sea Saba to
have the items transferred from Dubai to Iran.
vi. Because the Counterclaim Defendants exported its goods
using Federal Express, the Counterclaim Defendants obtained tracking
numbers for certain shipments of goods to Sea Saba and tracked the
shipments from the United States to Dubai.
b. It was a part of the conspiracy that the Counterclaim
Defendants obtained money and goods through false pretenses and received
money and property knowing that the property had been unlawfully obtained
through such false pretenses.
i. The Counterclaim Defendants received money for
transshipping Simulated’s goods to Iran knowing that the goods had
been unlawfully obtained by the Counterclaim Defendants without a
license from the United States government for export, direct or
indirect, to Iran.
157. It was further a part of the conspiracy that the Counterclaim
Defendants acted across international borders by conducting and causing to be
conducted international shipments of goods and services, including theinternational shipment of the goods and the international transfer of monetary
payments.
H. Failure to Obtain a License
158. At no point during any of the transactions described in the overt acts
enumerated above did any of the Counterclaim Defendants apply for or receive a
license or other authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control, United
States Department of the Treasury, located in the District of Columbia, to export
indirectly or directly U.S.-origin commodities from the United States to Iran.
in the exhibits there are financial records with evidence that licht shipped to Iran with payments though Dubai so just looking at that I think you can add money laundering to lichts criminal acts
doesn't all cut and paste dude because there are images
licht $1,000,000 judgment:
Case 1:09-cv-21583-PAS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/11/2009
Highlights:
1. Judgment is entered against Defendant, Allen Licht, and in favor of
Plaintiffs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casually Company under Counts, I, III, IV. and V of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint, which are for fraud. statutory insurance fraud, and violations of and conspiracy to violate the RICO statute §§ 1962 (c), 1964 (e), 1962 (d).
2. Judgment is entered against Defendant, Allen Licht, and in favor of
Plaintiffs, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company in the amount of $l,OOO,OOO.OO to Counts I, III, IV, and V of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint
3. Defendant, Allen Licht consents to the entry of Judgments to Counts I, III, IV, and V of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint in the amount of $1,000,000 to each individual count.
4. Plaintiffs, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State
Farm Fire and Casualty Company may recover a total of $1,OOO,OOO from Defendant, Allen Licht
theres your highlights dude
pay for the download and buy a clue while youre at it
licht shipped goods to IRAN
that's illegal
licht stole $200,000 from smev to pay his state farm $1,000,000 judgment
that is illegal
edwy turned out to be a nir toxic piece of crap. do you have a problem with that?
very poor connection dude
stupidity deserves no respect
www.pacer.gov
all links will make you login anyways. so do it and read it. then speak intelligently about it or just don't speak at all
whats telling is you don't know what you are talking about
that's dumb maybe you should read it again
Now this is interesting. Gordon shoulduv patted bud fox down before he left
Doctor sounds like you have a lot of knowledge of the inner workings of this operation
Alllllllennnn ellla illlllya update the shareholders
Let us know where you put the stolen money
They won't get a "D"
What a hoot
smev belongs to the shareholders not licht
I agree with ya snizzy
Anyone speak to licht about why he robbed smev for $200,000
Timer is ah ringing Woog
Think licht might be in some trouble
The defendants. licht accused of smuggling to iran
Reads LichtFrankel Spivak used SMEV as personal piggybank
Licht Frankel Spivak were countersued for fraud blackmail
Judge dismissed all federal claims with prejudice about a month ago
Sniz was reading judge recommended dismissal in July. Licht did not oppose
that kitchen sink lawsuit has been thrown out
check out pacer
www.pacer.gov
that kitchen sink lawsuit has been thrown out
check out pacer
www.pacer.gov
yeah uh doc. Not showing any lawsuits
what lawsuits dr?
We should all call allen to find out but we all know he wont answer the phone
Forex get a clue dude. Company had 1.8 billion authorized not 3 billion. You cant issue more than what you have authorized. Your lies are too easy point out
This is how we know you do not have a clue. Pps hasn't been going down as you state. Who cares what the mms are doing as nobody is outright selling. So you can self promote and say negative things about a company that you specifically signed up on this rag to bash.
wow that is interesting. you follow this for 15 years and yet you have only posted on this ticker and for only the past 7 months. so whats your beef with Britannia? maybe you are related to max
Who really cares they mentioned a name. What does that mean anyways? Nothing
Waaaaa waaaaa
keeeep crying about other companies waaaaa waaaaaaaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa
forex you and your buttbuddy max are still jilted over losing out on Britannia?