Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Anything's possible. However, to greatly increase the odds in our favor I suggest every long reading this write him. I also suggest you reference Lt/Gen Ben Hodges Armed Forces Network interview.
It took place in Poland during NATO's field exercise in June. In it he states "Neither (unclassified) radio communications nor email are secure" and "I assume everything I write on my BlackBerry is being monitored" then write him about the SFOR Mobile Trust solution to his troops mobile device COMSEC problem.
President-Elect Trumps Current Address is:
One Trump Tower
725 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY
10022
I don't have any connection to him. I am just a vet trying to help
his old unit, EUCOM & todays warfighters. But I believe together we can help place critically needed defensive software on the mobile devices of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines and coast guard members. Realistically, my one letter may never get to him. But yours could. Particularly if his transition team gets a lot of letters about the issue. Also, consider sending his national security advisor Lt/Gen Flynn a copy at the same address. Thanks for supporting the troops!
I believe that is a very reasonable conclusion.
It would be great for a bidding war to begin! With $92 Billion in assets Singapore Telecom would easily be able to outbid Duo or Centrify. Then they could simply reinitiate the IP infringment cases against them to help defray the SFOR purchase cost in my scenario.
Who do you think that potential partner could be? IMHO it's Trustwave 97% owned by Singapore Telecom. SingTel dominates Asia as its largest Telecom provider. They now have a U.S. subsidiary and offices giving them a platform to enter the lucrative US market. They rolled out an OOBA cyber security service for its mobile device customers in Oct. Last but not least SFOR's pending international patent would allow world market domination!
There is nothing wrong with this incremental progress quarter over quarter.
It is also "military-grade"! Just what our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines and coast guard members need IMHO.
Yeah, makes sense, it could do exactly that. Tax selling season is upon us so for the next 25 days it'll be a periodic case of "Attention shoppers, there is a blue-light special on Strike Force Technologies common shares". I know a couple people with some dry powder wanting to add to their positions on the cheap. They eagerly wait for that temporary dip down. They're still green or have free shares, know what they own and have patient capital invested here.
I agree that "the winter of 2016-2017 is SFOR's tipping point" into profitability and dramatic growth! 2017 will be our year to shine and we will get an inkling of that with the release of the year-end 10-K report IMHO.
With the watershed event of the Phone Factor $9.7 million settlement and NDA license agreement with Micosoft the tide turned for SFOR. Yeah, this sea-change has been a long time coming. In 2017 the rising tide will finally lift investors boats.
IMHO it'll be like the Bay of Fundy's high tide that year!
That may be true. Although news of a settlement could happen anytime now. I can patiently wait for that next Q, the year-end 10-K report because I think it will be a good, a very good one!
I must disagree with your last sentence "Every investor needs some SFOR in their Christmas stocking". There are some "investors" on the SFOR message board who have been naughty and not nice. IMHO they deserve lumps of coal in their stockings!
Speak about putting some skin in the game! I will never carp about the pay raises they got! It's obvious to me our Corporate Officers believe deeply in SFOR, it's IP and potential. Thank you for sharing that. It's leadership by example in my book.
That's what I thought. Thanks for the confirmation.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but DART has no intention of liquidating their holdings. I think they realize the potential here and are willing to take the risk. Remember, if you're not willing to risk it, you'll never get the biscuit. I see SFOR as a high risk/high profit investment. We'll know if I'm right or wrong with the release of the year-end 10-K and then 1st Q of 2017 reports. Until then I am SFOR Long & Strong!
Yep, and we've barely scratched the surface right now. Like the Klondike gold rush miners SFOR longs have endured harsh conditions to get to Dawson. We've staked & filed our claim. After the Phone Factor/Microsoft $9.7 million settlement & NDA license agreement the SFOR gold mine opened up for business. The quarterly reports this year have shown some color during the sluice box clean up. Now, the hard rock mining has begun with Christmas sales. There's no telling how good the ore is we have unearthed until the assay office (year-end 10-K report) is issued. Until then, the miners (longs) are existing on their grubstake (cash remaining) and what's been found & put in the poke so far (from sales, OEMs, license fees). It doesn't look like a dry hole to me on what's been found so far! We'll know better once we get that assay office (10-K) report. Until then this hard rock miner (investor) remains long & strong SFOR!
Bingo! "Expect a high growth pivotal Santa Clause Q4 that will change the whole equation." Once those sales figures hit the street with the release of the year-end 10-K there will be no holding back SFOR. It'll be off to the races then IMHO.
Long & Strong SFOR!
Would SFOR also do this in preparation for a possible buyout? That way the bidder would know exactly what they are getting into financial statement wise right?
The cliché "Liars can figure & figures can lie" may be appropriate here. We won't really have empirical evidence one way or the other until the release of the year-end 10-K in late March IMHO. Until then it's a case of," Madams and Mansours place your bets". I'm betting on SFOR!
Why did you get it is my question? You wrote you have not been on this board and out of the blue a "very good, Audio commercial for Strike Force Tech's Guarded ID" was delivered to your desktop.
To me this indicates our new marketing guy is doing his job. This is good news! Thanks for sharing it with us. I now wonder what the scale of this audio advertising campaign is?
Either could be right! If "case terminated" as reported in PACER means the judge dismissed our IP case down we go to .0035 or less. If it means settlement up we go to a penny or two or three.
What do you make of that PACER entry? Thanks for your thoughts.
O.K. phasing out the pre-existing case numbers makes sense to me.
So, my next question to you is what does "case terminated" (after a mere 3 minutes) mean then? Help me get my head around that. I'm confused! Does it mean our case is thrown, settled or is this something just administrative in nature?
Please explain this PACER entry to me. Thanks for your input!
11/29 All 3 civil cases are consolidated into 1 case # 16-cv-03571
11/30 11:53 AM case association created
11/30 11:56 AM the case was terminated (in 3 minutes!)
I'm not a lawyer or paralegal. I don't speak legalize What does this mean to you? Is the case to be dropped, settled or what?
Another board member posted yesterday or today it was 300.
That PR brings to mind a successful past and perhaps portends an even much better future near term. Thanks for finding and sharing that with us who believe SFOR will be made great again!
I don't. We saw the pps go above the three cent mark on speculation of a possible settlement or settlements alone.
Then it's a great thing SFOR's Guarded ID and Mobile Trust have been #1 & #2 on Amazon for both best sellers and most wished for in networking security!
I take a very literal reading of the phrase Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) in contracts since I used it as a contracting officer for the 1 year I was a USAF Finance Officer. Those signing one can be held pecuniary libel for its violation.
Yet is closes "every freaking day" above the support level of half a cent.
Low gear unless shopping network segment Mr. Kay mentioned happens before the close out date of the 1st Q report.
If it does the gear shifter moves to High IMHO! You agree?
Sweet!
Sorry martoni1 but I must disagree with your first sentence. I see
things in the completely opposite light!
Nope,the opposite, "Irrational Exuberance"
My bad. I apologize I seriously you meant .004
I'm comfortable with that. I have no problem waiting for the year-end 10-K and 1st Q of 2017 reports since I know what I own.
What .004? The order did not execute!
Date time groups & # may be helpful in your PACER research
The cases were consolidated into one case by my read with #16-cv-03571
Here's where it gets weird IMH (legally ignorant) opinion
11/30 at 11:53 case association created then terminated 3 minutes later. What gives? Does anybody have legal insight here? I don't!
Need Verification/Interpretation. Don't speak legalese. I don't understand this stuff. Need somebody with a PACER account to check this second hand report out
11/29 All three cases consolidated
11/30 A case # was issued 3 minutes later another entry
11/30 Terminated
What could this mean? IMHO one of two things possible dismissal or
IMHO probable settlement in the works but I am not a lawyer or a paralegal so that is a total guess on my part.
Thanks for your PACER verification/interpretation of this second-hand report that I myself doubt and frankly do not understand.
"I'm shocked, shocked that gambling (not investing) is going on here!" Captain Renault in the 1942 classic Casablanca
"They call him Flipper, Flipper faster than lightning" and they believe "No one is smarter than he". Poor Flipper will have a rude wake-up call and be chasing his tail and the price North
come the 10-K and 1st Q of 2017.
Please be advised there's a sleddog or two drooling also!