Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's fine. Can you tell us all, since you promote buying the stock, why the company issued billions and billions of shares into the float? To any buyer, i believe that is a vital and fundamental question that is being dodged.
Stop drinking the Kool-aid. The company set the building on fire (by issuing billions of shares into the float) and then they show up with a pail of water to put out the fire. Tell me why the issues billions of shares into the float? That is the key to the riddle. According to your logic, they will put 1M dollars into a BB when they can spend a few hundred for a RS. Answer my question...please
you got it now
In reality it is a absurd. You are trying to unring a bell for a problem you did not make. Once the H1N1 flu is out here it cannot be contained and neither can zillionnnnnsssss of shares. The company has to protect it's investors.
Companies do not dump, they get financed from these shares. Why would any public company create a share structure with billions of shares? It's obvious. I know the answer...
wabby-- you do not know your Ps & Qs. A RS will knock you out of your position.
So why pollute the float with billions of shares and then buy back?
People line up to drink the Kool-Aid. It's like fantasy football but with real money.
At this level buy-backs are BS 99% of the time. Brace for a R/S at some point.
As it applies to pinkies. Simply put, there is a publicly trading shell/vehicle and an operating company merged into it. That is the story/company you are buying into. The shell/vehicle just allows the company to trade and issue shares etc. What if the stock never trades/or the company goes bust/ or the story sucks/or company does a massive reverse split and shareholders would never touch it again? Well, they can merge in a new company, get a new symbol, restructure shares and start a new.
Don't confuse a reverse merger with a reverse split. And don't confuse a reverse merger with an acquisition. If the company does not want to bury it's shareholders, but want to consolidate it's float, it can do a mild reverse split like 1-20 or 1-30 and the shareholder still has value. Often, pinkies just blast away in the the triples, keep diluting, especially when there are high billions of shares and (after they dilute too much) they do a big reverse split and start over at a higher price and tighter float. Which kills all shareholders. In that case they may do a reverse merger (putting a new operating company in) because of the slaughter. A mild reverse split with great news and revenue can be good for all as is any new acquisitions.
Has anyone had a recent live conversation with anyone working for EVRM? Any IR inquiries been responded to?
The point is they get paid to pump and the featured company itself provides the profiles. Lets not beat this horse to death and move on. Maybe we should all buy some BONZ and make a few pumped up bucks. BYW, I happen to know these things as facts.
'nuff fun for one day. Think green!
Aha...now you ask a good question. And here is the answer. First off, it is highly doubtful Skymark initiated coverage or a buy recommendation. Again, they issued a marketwire PR to get folks to subscribe to their site. Fine, i can live with that. Sym did not approve or pay. Fine, i can live with that. Maybe a stock can get a bump eeven from the PR, so what's the harm. Here it is... real buyers, that retail buyers, generally head for the hills when they see pumpers promote a stock. That is a kiss of death to real investors who will assume they were paid to pump.
where is the EVRM coverage? Has anyone seen it?
Have they profiled and promoted EVRM? And at no charge...No!
You keep missing the point by a mile.
Sky Mark disclaimer found on their website:
http://www.skymarkresearch.com/privacy.php
Skymark Research is an independent electronic publication providing information on selected public companies for entertainment and/or as a public relations service. Companies profiled by Skymark Research may pay consideration in cash and/or stock or other securities to Skymark Research for the electronic dissemination of company information. In some cases Skymark Research may be retained as consultants to featured public companies for various services, including the electronic dissemination of information concerning the profiled company, and/or services pertaining to cultivating market awareness. warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of said information, although it is believed by Skymark Research to be valid.
So why did they issue a marketwire PR on EVRM without Sym's permission?
Yes it is BONZ. And this was not an alert. Already misleading. This was a full color 4-page mailer that cost many thousands of dollars to produce and mail. The fact that they issued the EVRM PR without the CEO's permission to piggyback their high visibility in ihub for their own PR purposes sure begins a bad smell. Is your nose stuffed up?
I do not subscribe. These companies often get their stinkin' paws on Nobo and shareholder lists (provided to them from other clients/companies that hire them to pump up their stocks) and they compile a mailing list of active investors. That is how they round out their mailers which need to be in the high thousands to tens of thousands to be effective.
I said, I got the mailer delivered to my home today. A 35cent stock that I won't name because why give them free plugs. They, by law, have to say how much they got paid and they do.... and it's a lot. They were paid, (in the very very fine print) to only promote the stock and they sure do. Sorry, and Santa is not real. We all have to learn the truth some time. They are pumpers, like Wall Street Grand, Red Hot Penny Stocks, Bull and Advantage and many others.
Sky Mark-- Coincidence that i got a mailer from them pushing a stock (not EVRM). There is no way they will promote a stock (EVRM) that they are not paid to do. The bogus PR mentioning EVRM was solely to promote them and their web site. These companies do it all the time. Standard crap.
I said sometimes it does happen. Whats 100% wrong with that?
Here's the reality regarding an IR person. Investors need to add up all the info available and make a decision as to their course of action. Basic factors/mechanisms; Gagged TA, status on pinksheets.com and postings (revenue etc,), IR person, PRs, and share structure. Each one, whether there or not, provides some insite. The better companies that value shareholders and have a real biz act accordingly. Not rocket science here. Regarding IR person, all public companies should, in my opinion, provide a live person, even if it is to say (not much). Having a live person to answer provides a bit more info to shareholders that they are valued. No one talks to the CEO usually (it does happen) but having a live (low level person there) is a plus.But many pinks have no cash and can't even afford a 20K per year person. Keep that in mind.
banjo-- at least yours is nicely braided!
stervc--you are way to apologetic in your tone in your explanation. Smooth-- isn't today your day to shave your back?
Here is the scoop on today's unsolicited PR. A company like Skymark, will claim to add a company like EVRM to its research list or something crap like that. Then then they post a national (PR) press release on a newswire for a basic fee. It is simply a way for them to promote their website and use a hotly talked about stock as the means to get attention for themselves. It's simply self-serving. So for a cost of a few hundred bucks they get the ihub crowd checking them out as well as whomever reads the release (via marketwire) and is interested. check out the PRs on pinksheets.com and you'll see a ton of them. most of the time they only show up there. This one got through to other outlets somehow. They must have paid for a wider release for the release.