Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Your post suggests that you're the one who's bitter. I'm just a realist. And I and others are offering you some good information. Which you choose to ignore.
Feel free.
No. He couldn't sell on the market to specific individuals.
You should know better than to listen to Jono.
If Urbie wants to sell some of his own stock, he has to register to sell it. And as an insider, he can only sell a portion of his holdings every quarter.
Even to attempt to do what you decribe would be a bad mistake.
At least it's a reporting company....
Tell me why I should do that?
Please tell me you're kidding.
Urban is on Paltalk right now!
Dilution? Wow, how unusual! Do they have anywhere near 483 billion o/s?
Didn't Sterling promise an "explanation" of this harebrained scheme? Do we have it yet?
Lol, I agree with your assessment.
Damn, your cars are getting older...
Langley Park Investment Trust Plc. They're the "London investment company" doing a stock swap with UCAD and a number of other companies.
See this excellent post by maninfla for details:
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3849942
I'm sorry...don't know. I don't get time and sales, and so I was just following what a couple of others had said.
Yes, just a share swap. But UCAD can only sell half the Langley shares it gets. And share price will be whatever Langley sells for on the London Exchange (which exchange? the regular one, or AIM?). Now....apparently Langley is cutting the same deal with 22 other little companies.
Can we assume that all of 'em will want to start selling at once? I think so.
On the other hand, Langley has a considerable quantity of the little companies' stock in the form of restricted shares. Any reason they can't short against them?
Pretty damn good. So why's it a Pinkie?
Dell's good, but thanks, I'll keep my Mac.
Heheheh.
Beats me, then. I haven't seen time and sales. But if the seller at 0.0001 feels he didn't get the deal he should have, he should contact his broker and ask for the trades to be busted.
You only say that because you don't know about the bulletproof goats, the Dominion of Melchizedek, the 547 barrels of gold dust in the L.A. warehouse, and the Indonesian bank guarantees...
Well, I gave you a cite. Argue with the author of the piece if you want. In addition, remember that Langley isn't in the States, and so might choose to short UCAD elsewhere.
We've recently seen how easy it was for a broker to list dozens of OTCBB and Nasdaq Small Cap stocks in Berlin.
LOLOL!!
"Just off Gunderson Road and SR 375, this property offers the unique opportunity to own land near what has become known as "AREA 51". All amenities are available in nearby Rachel."
Omigod, it certainly does. So now Sterling's subbing for Glenn?
BILL: contact Sterling if you can't get through to Roger Glen or Urban regarding fake PRs.
Yes, it was.
about the +0.0000155 shs. of UCAD from the otcbb.com site.
the + stands for stock distribution of another company. they use the + in front of the number to distinguish the number from a cash dividend ($0.0000155) or stock dividend (0.0000155%). this is why you do not see the + used in front of the other dividends on the site. the plus is only used to indicate that you are getting shares of another company. that's it.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3713722
lol, which cons did you have in mind?
Huh?
the people who make and run the market are the same people who have a vested interest in seeing the market go one way or the other..
MMs make just as much money when the spread is 0.0008 x 0.0009 as they do when it's 0.0003 x 0.0004. They're not a monolith: they are, in fact, competing against one another, and they're also working against market sentiment.
Unless they're working for a specific individual client, they don't care what the price of the stock is.
Depends on your broker.
The 0.0001 trades were corrected to 0.0003. Maybe you have too many people on Ignore?
An alternative way to reduce the employee’s exposure to risk is to take positions in other securities to hedge this risk. The most direct hedge is, of course, to short-sell your own stock...
http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/index.cfm?fa=viewarticle&id=421
If you want to read this, you'll have to go through the same annoying registration process I was subjected to.
I couldn't agree with you more! Just as SRCI was winding down...along came CMKX. And when this one's over, there'll be another.
So much better than the soaps.
Well, I can't figure out why anyone thinks CMKX is gonna make them a gazillionaire, so I guess we're even.
Because that was the bid. If you check the CMKX thread you'll see that the 0.0001 trades were a print error; they've been changed to 0.0003.
Yes, I know....I saw that too. But I thought the technical hopelessness of the SEC was kinda funny...
Maybe one day they'll have someone work up a search function for their site that actually works.
Why "a shame"? They wanted to sell, and did so. Who knows? Maybe they were right.
I myself find UCAD's last two PRs rather disturbing. Or I would if I owned any CMKX or UCAD.
Sure they're devious. If they weren't, they wouldn't last long. My point is that that they're not thinking about "investors". Ever. They're watching numbers, and trying to see where they can take an advantage if they move quickly.
lol, mystery solved.
Do you really believe MMs sit around thinking about whether what they do will have some effect on people who don't have Level II? At the end of the day on a Friday?
Sorry: they're thinking of starting their weekend fun.
lol, I don't own any CMKX, and so won't own any UCAD. I'm interested in UCAD's new financing, and whether Langley will be able to short against the restricted UCAD shares they'll get.
LOLOL!! Until now Edgar was only compatible with Win 95 and Win 98...
No, I meant the size of the bid...
Well, if the MMs were trading among themselves, it doesn't really matter what the price was, in a way.
I suppose it isn't possible to know what happened without knowing an MM.
Taken a good look at the UCAD financing deal yet?