All of this can and should be audited—and if true, vigorously prosecuted.

Please contact Robyn Balliet privately on Twitter. I’m not on Twitter, otherwise I would.

As someone “directing social media and digital marketing for CELZ,” shouldn’t she be in the know about what’s being said here and elsewhere online—and be squarely in the middle of managing CELZ’ response, in terms of both image and practical countermeasures?

I requested a brief acknowledgment from the company that they received the message I sent yesterday. If they do not send one, I will be forced to draw one or more of the following conclusions:

1. They do not care about the concerns of their shareholders;
2. They do not care about the flagrant, destructive, and obvious manipulation of their stock; and/or
3. They are complicit in that activity

They need to do the right thing RIGHT NOW.

Thanks for taking time to share your insights. I’d love to learn more. My basic question remains though: how are they able to “hide” hundreds of thousands of purchased shares, “fake” this and that, etc? And if they’re conspiring, the alarm bells sound even louder! So the SEC’s rules of engagement not require more transparency, and less duplicity and coordination?

Theoretically that’s good advice—but it’s not like they tell us what they’re gonna do and when! Hindsight is 20/20...

Next thing someone will tell us is that the MMs are all working independently. DOUBTFUL. Their communications should be subpoenaed and their activities reported to the SEC. They must be smoked out into the light of day!

CorruptionFighter and Eslifesvr can tell you the specific email addresses to send to.

How is this sort of smoke-and-mirrors manipulation legal? Folks who operate like this should be known to the rest of us. You wanna play shitty games? Show your face!

Sadly, I think much of what you say is fairly accurate. Ichim is the real deal, but Warbington looks like a used car salesman.

The PR yesterday was good enough for starters—and yet this bloodbath

I’ve heard others here challenge the notion of shorting a stock like this on the grounds that it’s too hard to get a broker to do it without hefty fees. Your thoughts on this?

If CaverStem doesn’t attract the attention of an analyst, what WILL? I struggle to believe that CELZ won’t begin to get some attention from analysts (which will, I predict, be quite favorable toward this stock)—no matter what the PPS is. Conventional wisdom (such as “Analysts don’t pay attention to stocks until their PPS reaches ‘X’”) may not be very relevant here...

What two clinical stage analogues were you referring to?

I was piggybacking on swaddim’s claim that there were two such companies trading north of $5/share. Swaddim-can you elaborate?

While your math may be true, how do you justify rationally clinical stage companies with NO commercialization being valued that highly. BTW, 650M OS for a company with this kind of market cap potential doesn’t seem that high at all to me.

Please tell me that docs are loaded! We need some reinforcements from outside the current game to let their force be felt. All those people blowing up Twitter about CELZ better already be loaded and locked!

It will be important NOT to reduce dilution through reverse split. If the conservative revenue models I’ve seen are even close to being accurate, PPS of 50-75¢ should be feasible organically within 6-12 months. From there, NASDAQ is within striking distance.

AWESOME!

That price would yield about 75¢/share. I can’t see them forking over a likely multi-billion dollar windfall for that.

What’s your best and most realistic/safe guess on PPS? Ichim sold his other venture for around 1.25/share. Something tells me CELZ could be much bigger, but I’m not sure.

I have minimal experience as an investor holding shares of a purchased company. However, given the number and complexity of CELZ’ technologies I anticipate that any buyout would probably involve the sale of a branch of the company (for example, CaverStem) rather than the whole company. If the whole outfit were to be sold, it would probably not happen in the near term—why would CELZ be in a hurry to quantify (which and possibly UNDERVALUE) itself? Just some food for thought.

Shares

Do we know for certain that’s what took place?

T-trade SALE at 4:05. 900K?! WTF!

This just dawned on me: any idea whether they are testing or planning to test this sort of technology on breast cells? I’m not a cell biologist, but my rational mind tells me there could be a similarly huge and equally revolutionary market there as well...

This thing is screwier than an owl’s eyes!

I can see 10Q just fine in the news tab of my TD app

Precisely. This is being done intentionally.

Giving docs a chance to get in cheap? On the supposition that intelligent people ALWAYS have a rationale for why they do what they do, I wonder whether something along these lines could be a part of our answer?

There is ALWAYS an explanation and with each passing day (now approaching a week since AUA started—and all the time with no official updates on ANYTHING from the company) it natural to analyze what we know and ask questions.

Would it be unusual to give the signatory doctors a share in the business? Doesn’t seem too far-fetched to me. Not knowing how that works, I nonetheless wonder whether it might not be preferable to get as many docs on board the train as possible BEFORE releasing news that would likely make the PPS pop. Thoughts?

I was looking under his last name, not the name of his practice. So what exactly does this Tweet tell us that we didn’t already know regarding Gershman and CELZ?

Twitter search turns up no account for Gershman—and most recent CaverStem post on Twitter is from late January (and July before that) ??

Look at Facebook and Twitter. Imho it would be better for them to have NO presence than what they show the public.

Magnificent message!

Newsflash: until the stock rises A LOT, SMALL, private investors will be the ONLY ones who can drive the PPS up to the point where institutions can join the game—and individual investors like to have a sense of currency and frequency from the companies they sink their hard-earned money into. “Speed to lead,” promptness, and frequency mean a lot here.

The fact that (1) their social media “profiles” are so dated and stale, and (2) we went the entire AUA and now almost a full business day after it with ZERO news/updates/energy tells me that (A) they don’t know what their message coming out of AUA really is, (B) they don’t know how to package it, and/or (C) they don’t know how to interpret the meaning of that messaging (and, more importantly, how to convey that meaning effectively to others. Very frustrating.

The only way to beat the MMs is to get more people and money here! Tick-tock, Clarice...

My instinct tells me they’re waiting to “get it all in the message”: DEAD WRING APPROACH! Give information INCREMENTALLY and thereby build a FOLLOWING. Manage communications!

Feel free to send one too—and use anything I’ve written (if you find it useful).

Any effective communicator (i.e. leader) has two or three speeches/messages ready GOING INTO AUA. This allows for a QUICK PIVOT after the event.

More generally, their social media “presence” is pretty embarrassing: they’re there, but the first impression one quickly gets is of dated (and therefore stale) content. Manage your image, CELZ!

Why do they not manage communications more proactively? Crazy to let this thing be manipulated into 20-30% haircuts when all indications suggest it should be rocketing? But you have to DRIVE the outcome!

Banking on what premise?