Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Lots of failure to delivers here...
Nope not calling the SEC, and they'll just redirect you to this site I'm sure.
https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm
Lol anyone actually download one of those files? What a joke.
We don't even have the data...
Don't think any dilution today...
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CBGL/security
Every stock I check has FTDs at some point, this is not evidence of naked shorting. But the fact that DBMM has no data is interesting...
"The website, SEC.report provides services for viewing data gathered from multiple sources including the U.S. SEC, U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, U.S. Treasury, and others."
https://sec.report/privacy_policy.php
Its interesting because this site has data on every other ticker I have check, Pink, Grey, Expert, CE etc.
https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=DBMM
There was another ticker where some posters were saying no FTDs, but that site showed there were in fact FTDs.
"Sir we have no data on the Nitrogen levels in Earth's atmosphere 500 million years ago, from this we conclude there was no Nitrogen."
You don't think its kind of disingenuous to say no FTDS when we don't even have data?
I am Canadian, but maybe someone in US can email the SEC for FTD data on DBMM.
https://www.sec.gov/oso/help/foia-contact.html
It seems to be so, sent some emails out on why that's the case but so far no response.
Where do you see no FTDs, I just see no data.
Are short positions able to be covered in grey/Expert Markets?
As you your self stated, revocation unlikely. DBMM did outstanding job staying on top of filings going threw OIP, Grey/Expert Market and a Pandemic, I'm sure you'd agree.
How long has DBMM been current with filings now? Even you yourself said revocation off table, simply dosen't make sense now. Company has done well to maintain filings with challenging circumstances including OIP, Expert Market and pandemic.
revocation probably has been taken off the table
Revoking a company that has been filing for how long now? Through challenging circumstances including a pandemic, comon man.
IF this has a MOASS, the OTC and Ihub will never be the same.
Perhaps company should do proxy vote and send proxies out to people that own stock, see how many shares out there...
I believe GTII was considering a dividend as well.
Who is the current CEO and team at Eventure now? Was there any fraud specifically do with EVTI?
What happens if you want to sell your share. The DTCC won't turn around and say, 'you can't sell that because we never got good delivery of your purchase'. The broker would have normally just sold your counterfeit shares to the next naïve investor. Have you ever heard of an investor who got a proxy solicitation statement that indicated that he or she can't vote his or her shares because they are counterfeit and there never were any voting rights attached? The DTCC has to maintain this illusion otherwise the reverse ponzi scheme will be revealed.
So what happens if a non-standard dividend is issued? The DTCC can’t ‘cook the books’ and are forced to reconcile the float back down to its’ issued amount.
Shorts HAVE to close their positions. They need everyone to sell to cancel out their ‘fake borrow’. What if no one sells? YOU GET THE MOASS.
The naked shorting scandal is much worse than you may have first believed. The 'real' shares in your account hold the exact same rights as any other, but behind the curtain, the DTCC has historically covered up the FTDs and mass naked shorting using CEBE (Counterfeit Electronic Book Entries). This is the DTCC's way of maintaining this reverse Ponzi scheme. This is why a 'non-standard' dividend would ruin them, as they can’t ‘cook the books’ for everyone to get one.
Are the FTDs from the site I posted made up? And if they are, why? I have never seen them used here to pump the stock or create some sort of narrative.
"This further suggests that a buyer may fail to receive shares at settlement even though the seller delivered the shares at settlement. Buyers that receive an FTR during settlement rather than the actual shares are unlikely to be aware of this. They have most of the rights of buyers that receive shares during settlement (e.g., entitlement to dividend payments and right to sell the stock), but not all of the rights (e.g., no voting rights and no entitlement to lend the stock). Thirdly, this overview suggests an alternative to the reason put forward by Boni (2006) to explain why buy-ins are rare. Given the way in which the settlement procedures reallocate FTRs and the finding that FTDs represent approximately 1-5% of daily traded volume, only in rare circumstances or in very infrequently traded stocks would a participant have an FTR for long enough to initiate the Buy-in process, let alone complete it. Further, if a buy-in is completed, the participant forced to purchase the stock is not necessarily the same participant with which the Buy-In Notice originator traded. Finally, the US clearing and settlement system does not provide any significant disincentives for naked short selling. The Buy-in procedure, on the rare occasions that it is used, is unlikely to force a naked short seller to close out the FTD; the Stock Borrow Program effectively facilitates a zero-fee zero-rebate loan to the naked short seller; and the fees for failing are insignificant."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228260887_Naked_Short_Sales_and_Fails_to_Deliver_An_Overview_of_Clearing_and_Settlement_Procedures_for_Stock_Trades_in_the_US
I thought SEC suspensions last 10 days than the stock is sent to GRey or Expert, is this correct?
EVTI Fails to Deliver..
https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=EVTI
"This graph contains the date and total number of fails-to-deliver (i.e., the balance level outstanding) recorded in the National Securities Clearing Corporation's ("NSCC") Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) system aggregated over all NSCC members for EVTI. Data on or after September 16, 2008 include all securities with a balance of total fails-to-deliver as of a particular settlement date.
Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling"
I asked you did SEC.report make up those FTDs that it shows?
They are trying to confuse people even though they have a disclaimer? So those FTDs they show for EVTI are just made up? They use information from reputable sources.
Isn't that obfuscating the matter? So the site I posted does show FTDs with data collected from the SEC and other reputable organizations. Nowhere did I say it was the SEC, but the point remains if they show FTDs using SEC data why isn't that data available on official SEC site?
"The website, SEC.report provides services for viewing data gathered from multiple sources including the U.S. SEC, U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, U.S. Treasury, and others."
And why exactly are they a bogus site? Where do they get their information from on FTDs? How come the site I was told to get accurate information dosen't even have information on EVTI FTDs?
Uh that's a pretty deceptive statement, we have no data on FTDs means there is none? What?
What is the issue with this site?
https://sec.report/fails.php?tc=EVTI
Where are they getting their information from? And if there is no connection with the SEC why can they use the title SEC report?
Why not bet on the existence of beautiful exotic women from Venus?
Why is it not on the list? Because it dosen't have FTD's? Why not have it on the list showing the information? Where did the site I posted get its information?
We know that the nature of naked shorting is convoluted and complex. Hard to get definitive answers from anyone.
Depends on the speculative tolerance of the individual.
Maintain a short position? How would they have got out of it? Company was sent to Grey and CE placed.