Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I keep hearing fully diluted share structure in the billions? This what I see..
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UNQL/security
He got a settlement on DBMMs terms, he did not get the company.
The original point was does Asher own DBMM? The answer is no.
Or he was not legally allowed to accept ownership...
Wasn't there some clause with Asher where they could not takeover companies? So why did a PR come out saying such?
Explain the situation at GTII...
"Generally those who provide toxic financing will also short the stock while holding the paper. If the trade goes bad, they simply turn in the paper instead of chasing the stock price. If it goes good, they lower the price and as a result, they are given more paper."
The dividend is for exposing naked shorts, not to woo investors.
Its to weed out naked shorts, not to wooh investors obviously.
The Asher group does not own DBMM.
Well if its coming out of the Expert Market is certainly isn't dead money.
Is this a naked short story?
Oh my god everybody jump ship save yourselves!!!!!! The sky is falling!!!
Well seeing as I posted an article as it relates to securities and the stock market, I would say that has more relation to DBMM then Bigfoot would seeing as DBMM is a part of the stock market.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)
"In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future.[1] Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act be undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offense). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability (unless, in some cases, it occurs before the parties have committed overt acts) but may reduce their sentence."
Millions in fines but how much did they rake in from their activities?
I agree from my limited understanding FTD's are not necessarily linked to shorting or naked shorting. I wonder why almost every ticker on SEC.report has FTD data including tickers that have no data on the official SEC site.
From SEC.report:
"This graph contains the date and total number of fails-to-deliver (i.e., the balance level outstanding) recorded in the National Securities Clearing Corporation's ("NSCC") Continuous Net Settlement (CNS) system aggregated over all NSCC members for ****. Data on or after September 16, 2008 include all securities with a balance of total fails-to-deliver as of a particular settlement date.
Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling"
SEC.report has a much nicer easier to decipher layout, have you actually downloaded one of those documents from SEC website?
This is from SEC.report site: "The website, SEC.report provides services for viewing data gathered from multiple sources including the U.S. SEC, U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, U.S. Treasury, and others."
There are tickers that aren't on the SEC site but the SEC.report has information on them.
If the pandemic did not happen would we already have OIP decision? What is the usual timeframe?
You know its interesting you guys never brought up the "Call the SEC" line until I pointed out the lack of data at SEC.report. What did the fella at the SEC tell yah word for word?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=159079392
Given DBMM's record of filing on time for the last several periods, revocation probably has been taken off the table. But SOME sort of punishment should be levied.
Mitigating circumstances sir, you want to see a company go down because their auditor had trouble with the SEC?
And what about the judges decision?
Lol are we really gonna keep splitting hairs?!
Why even have judges then? And anyway you yourself said revocation unlikely at this point.
DBMM has been filing going on three years since the judges decision, why would they overturn?
follow a scammy little company and their little legal
"Fritz refuted their corpfin claims with a detailed timeline of correspondence with corpfin.
GUESS WHAT! Enforcement had NO REPLY!"
If getting away with it means being in a state of limbo for 5 years in the Grey/Expert Market...
Well I'm sure whoever made the claim was assuming that the richest country on Earth could buy!
Well that's a little disingenuous seeing as their is still trading restriction in the richest country on Earth!
It would be very strange for a ticker to have no FTDs in its history, basically impossible.
Have you actually downloaded any of those files?
Question is why does SEC.report not have DBMM? They have literally every other stock I have checked, and guess what every stock had FTD's at some point. I would say FTD's are pretty normal and not necessarily a sign of naked shorting.
What did you here?
Every stock I check on SEC.report has FTD's, this dosen't mean naked shorting. For DBMM to have no FTD's over say a 5 year period, impossible.