Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow this board is dead this morning...
After all the games that were played on the L2 yesterday I have to think you are correct... Something BIG is coming IMO...would love to close above .007 today....
Good Morning GEM
I'm here woody, just doing a little DD..Good Morning..
I could tell their intentions from the first reply I had received from them.... It's clear the reinforcements are on their way!
I know Doxen ;)
$10 by end of month
I didn't say there was or was not..I was simply stating that the numbers given differed greatly from one post to the next.. personally, I believe if there was dilution of shares, I do not think it is being presented correctly..IF he is correct about the addition, It is my opinion that the shares he was referring to were given out to shareholders of open sundaes when the acquisition was completed. So yes,maybe the shares he speaks of have been added, but IMO it was for the reason stated above, not for financing as suggested... Again, JMO
Some of it opinion, and some of it is indisputable fact. For example, the recent addition of 30 million shares can be seen from the most recent TA update in the sticky post. That figure is 30 million higher than the Sept 15 company update at otcx.com.
I went over the 90 million share with you a few times already. That was the year over year increase which can be found in the most recent 10Q. Those are facts that can be confirmed by anyone with an Internet connection and 2 minutes to spare.
As far as short interest is reported, it is only compiled and reported twice a month. I've posted the links from the FINRA and SEC websites. Regular sell volume is widely misinterpreted as short. If you go to ocx.com and Nasdaq.com, you will see this. You will also note there are no failures to deliver. If your theory was correct, there would be FTDs and forced covers with an open short position of 50 times the adv.
These are facts, not opinions.
Yup keeps going lower and lower.... seems to me we are way up from last week when you said the same thing!!!
The only thing I have fallen in love with is proving you and others WRONG! and that gets easier every day!!!
Both my L2 and shittrade acct. show it closed at .004
WOW, desperate pass the .0046 through on a form t how classic!!!! 13 seconds after close so it does not show on for the EOD
I am guessing that whole rant is in your opinion, correct??
Really? this coming from the same guy that was pumping this stock just 3 months ago....
I have already given you a link to your answers, you obviously do not care to figure it out for your self...
so are you implying that DUSS sold 30 million shares this month? sort of like the 90 million you stated just the other day? please, make up your mind... which is it?
Just like the short interest, are you going to tell us again how we are all misinterpreting them and that you'll interpret them for us???
EOD fury coming again???
As stated earlier, I only help those that are here for the right reasons, IMO you are not one of them!
but here, I'll help you out anyways www.nippermulberry.com, dont just skim read the whole thing... you'll find the answers to your questions there!
If your DD fails you again please let me know and maybe i'll be nice and break it down for you!!!
No problem Woody, I'm always happy to help those I know are here for the right reasons!
woody sent you a pm but just realized you might not be able to reply.... If you are willing to give an email address I will send the image to you...
They already stated they were not attending this year.... Ok now you've set me up... please tell me if they were alive and doing well they would be there....go ahead, I dare you..... Cause I'll smack it right back in your face why they are not!!!
same 500k being passed back and forth all day!!!
I kicked them hard the beginning of this week and started this climb..Ask around, I'm sure someone will back me up!
It's Someone else's turn now!
If DUSS needed consulting for a couple months, why would management bring on 2 more board members for a 3 month assignment? If the board membership was just temporary, why didn't the August PR announcement state this? Sorry but it makes zero sense. And finally, if the board members job was complete as you state, why didn't the October PR announcement state that the board members were let go. Instead it states they both resigned. It's not adding up....sorry.
MM's are desperate.. here comes the whole team!!!
Do I really need to post the link to what a board member is and their different meanings again?
You know what... I might as well just go ahead and do it again....
Directors
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_directors
The directors of an organization are the persons who are members of its board. Several specific terms categorize directors by the presence or absence of their other relationships to the organization.[8]
An inside director is a director who is also an employee, officer, major shareholder, or someone similarly connected to the organization. Inside directors represent the interests of the entity's stakeholders, and often have special knowledge of its inner workings, its financial or market position, and so on.
Typical inside directors are:
A Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who may also be Chairman of the Board
Other executives of the organization, such as its Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or Executive Vice President
Large shareholders (who may or may not also be employees or officers)
Representatives of other stakeholders such as labor unions, major lenders, or members of the community in which the organization is located
An inside director who is employed as a manager or executive of the organization is sometimes referred to as an executive director (not to be confused with the title executive director sometimes used for the CEO position). Executive directors often have a specified area of responsibility in the organization, such as finance, marketing, human resources, or production.
An outside director is a member of the board who is not otherwise employed by or engaged with the organization, and does not represent any of its stakeholders. A typical example is a director who is president of a firm in a different industry.
Outside directors bring outside experience and perspective to the board. They keep a watchful eye on the inside directors and on the way the organization is run. Outside directors are often useful in handling disputes between inside directors, or between shareholders and the board. They are thought to be advantageous because they can be objective and present little risk of conflict of interest. On the other hand, they might lack familiarity with the specific issues connected to the organization's governance.
Recapping the terminology:
director - any member of the board of directors
inside director - a director who, in addition to serving on the board, has a meaningful connection to the organization
outside director - a director who, other than serving on the board, has no meaningful connections to the organization
executive director - an inside director who is also an executive with the organization. The term is also used, in a completely different sense, to refer to a CEO
non-executive director - a director who is not an executive with the organization
Individual directors often serve on more than one board. This practice results in an interlocking directorate, where a relatively small number of individuals have significant influence over a large number of important entities. This situation can have important corporate, social, economic, and legal consequences, and has been the subject of significant research.
Though "consultants" may have been the best choice of words, as you see, there are several different meanings of a Director...
Jason Dussault, President and CEO of Dussault Apparel, commented, "I am happy to announce the appointment of Ms. Kim and Ms. Kostakou to our Board. The Company is facing significant challenges; the current year's lackluster revenue, recent changes of policy of the Pension Financial Services regarding the clearing of stocks priced below $0.10 and the new XBRL financial reporting requirement are hurdles the Company must overcome. It is the intent of the Company to form a committee to undertake a comprehensive review evaluating the current business of the Company to determine its viability and the Company's direction. This review is intended to include current operations of the Company, including a review of assets and liabilities, the business operations of the Company, and its trademarks with a view to providing the officers, directors and management of the Company with a report and recommendations. Ms. Kostakou and Ms. Kim will head the committee which will undertake this review, and will be responsible to gather all information from legal, consultants and management and prepare a report with recommendations to the Company. I believe it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders The Company may also review new financing opportunities and possible acquisitions to enhance its asset value."
IMO this clearly outlines why they were added to the board of directors... It is also my opinion that their duties are now complete and they have resigned from their positions as a result...
Please read why they were hired..... then ask your questions again... I believe you'll be able to figure it out your self though....
We have already discussed this just a few days ago.... your answers are here on the board..
He's just grasping at straws.... He know's his name has a big FAIL next to it..... He's liable to loose his job over this one... JMO
ya, and I believe that for one second.... try again!
OK all mighty one, Please explain the 3 911's then...
We already know A&E is out, Think Discovery channel!!!
DUSS #9 most active forums again!!!
makes sense! they want to keep it as low as possible.
IMO it's not going lower anytime soon... this one is about to bounce!
take the AON off... bet you'll get filled right away!
We are the "filter" friend!
right, showing 5k at .0047 but just pass through 400k...
5k at .0047 still showing
It's possible, but two days in a row and has been done 3 times now..... If you include the price for the trade that would average to about .01 per share.... I doubt someone other than the MM's are doing it...
They know their in trouble!
Has everyone signed the petition yet? If not please do so now... link to petition is in my signature below.....
desperate times call for desperate measures!! their scrambling right now!!